Advertisement

Biogeochemistry

, Volume 111, Issue 1–3, pp 97–103 | Cite as

Changes in water colour between 1986 and 2006 in the headwaters of the River Nidd, Yorkshire, UK: a critique of methodological approaches and measurement of burning management

  • A. R. YallopEmail author
  • B. Clutterbuck
  • J. I. Thacker
Article

Abstract

The effect of moorland management on the release of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from blanket peat is currently a topic of great interest in the UK. A recent paper by Chapman et al. (Biogeochemistry, doi: 10.1007/s10533-010-9474-x, 2010) reports on changes in humic colour/DOC concentrations in surface waters draining 15 upland peat catchments in the North Pennines (UK) over two decades, and examines the possible underlying drivers of those changes. Chapman et al. identify significant variation in water colour between adjacent catchments and over time. One potential driver of changes in DOC is managed moorland burning, and Chapman et al. state that their study provides evidence that burning has no effect on colour in upland catchment drainage waters. This observation counters a recent series of papers showing strong links between new moorland burn management on blanket peat soils and colour/DOC in catchment drainage waters. We have reviewed the methodological approach and results presented by Chapman et al. that relate to the assessment of managed burning, and show significant errors in the data used in their analysis. This has resulted in conclusions being drawn about the role of managed burning in DOC release that are not supported by evidence.

Keywords

Water colour Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) Peat Heather burning Land management 

References

  1. Chapman PJ, McDonald AT, Tyson R, Palmer SM, Mitchell G, Irvine B (2010) Changes in water colour between 1986 and 2006 in the headwaters of the River Nidd, Yorkshire, UK. Biogeochemistry. doi: 10.1007/s10533-010-9474-x
  2. Charman DJ (1992) Blanket mire formation at the Cross Lochs, Sutherland, northern Scotland. Boreas 21:53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clay GD, Worrall F, Fraser EDG (2009) Effects of managed burning upon dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil water and runoff water following a managed burn of a UK blanket bog. J Hydrol 367:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clutterbuck B, Yallop A (2010) Land management as a factor controlling dissolved organic carbon release from upland peat soils 2: changes in DOC productivity over four decades. Sci Total Environ 408(24):6179–6191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans CD, Monteith DT, Cooper DM (2005) Long-term increases in surface water dissolved organic carbon: observations, possible causes and environmental impacts. Environ Pollut 137:55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Freeman C, Fenner N, Ostle NJ, Kang H, Dowrick DJ, Reynolds B, Lock MA, Sleep D, Hughes S, Hudson J (2004) Export of dissolved organic carbon from peatlands under elevated carbon dioxide levels. Nature 430:195–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lindsay RA (1995) Bogs: the ecology, classification and conservation of ombrotrophic mires. Scottish Natural Heritage, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  8. Mitchell G, McDonald AT (1995) Catchment characterisation as a tool for upland water quality management. J Environ Manag 44:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Monteith DT, Stoddard JL, Evans CD, de Wit HA, Forsius M, Høgåsen T, Wilander A, Skjelkvåle BL, Jeffries DS, Vuorenmaa J, Keller B, Kopácek J, Vesely J (2007) Dissolved organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmospheric deposition chemistry. Nature 450:537–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Moore PD (1993) The origin of blanket mire, revisited. In: Chambers FM (ed) Climate change and human impact on landscape. Chapman & Hall, Boston, pp 217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shaw SC, Wheeler BD, Kirby P, Phillipson P, Edmunds R (1996) Literature review of the historical effects of burning and grazing of blanket bog and upland wet heath. English Nature Research Report, No. 172, English Nature, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  12. Simmons IG (2003) The moorlands of England and Wales: an environmental history 8000 BC–AD 2000. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  13. Stewart GB, Coles CF, Pullin AS (2004) Does burning degrade blanket bog? Systematic Review No. 1, Centre for Evidence-Based ConservationGoogle Scholar
  14. Tallis JH (1991) Forest and moorland in the South Pennine uplands in the mid-Flandrian period. III. The spread of moorland—local, regional and national. J Ecol 79:401–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tucker G (2003) Review of the impacts of heather and grassland burning in the uplands on soils, hydrology and biodiversity. English Nature Research Report No. 550, English Nature, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  16. Ward SE, Bardgett RD, McNamara NP, Adamson JK, Ostle NJ (2007) Long-term consequences of grazing and burning on northern peatland carbon dynamics. Ecosystems 10:1069–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Worrall F, Burt TP (2004) Time series analysis of long term river DOC records. Hydrol Process 18:893–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Worrall F, Armstrong A, Adamson JK (2007) The effects of burning and sheep-grazing on water table depth and soil water quality in a upland peat. J Hydrol 339:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yallop AR, Clutterbuck B (2009) Land management as a factor controlling dissolved organic carbon release from upland peat soils 1: spatial variation in DOC productivity. Sci Total Environ 407(12):3803–3813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yallop AR, Thacker J, Thomas G, Stephens M, Clutterbuck B, Sannier C (2006) The extent and intensity of management burning in the English uplands. J Appl Ecol 43(6):1138–2664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yallop AR, Clutterbuck B, White S (2008) Evidence for a mechanism driving recent observed trends in dissolved organic carbon release from upland peat soils. Asp Appl Biol 85:127–132. In: Shaping a vision for the uplandsGoogle Scholar
  22. Yallop AR, Clutterbuck B, Thacker J (2010) Increases in humic dissolved organic carbon (hDOC) export from upland peat catchments: the role of temperature, declining sulphur deposition and changes in land management. Clim Res 22. doi: 10.3354/cr00884

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Applied ScienceCranfield UniversityCranfieldUK

Personalised recommendations