Biogeochemistry

, Volume 107, Issue 1–3, pp 319–338 | Cite as

Three-dimensional spatial patterns of trace gas concentrations in baseflow-dominated agricultural streams: implications for surface–ground water interactions and biogeochemistry

  • Samuel F. Werner
  • Bryant A. Browne
  • Charles T. Driscoll
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Small streams that drain agricultural landscapes have come under close scrutiny as potentially significant indirect sources of greenhouse gases (GHGs) to the atmosphere. By exploring the stream-ground water connection in three dimensional space (horizontally and vertically beneath the stream channel, and longitudinally along the stream corridor) our results show (1) ground water can be a significant source of greenhouse gases to streams draining agricultural watersheds with concentrations in excess of atmospheric equilibrium by 221 μmol C L−1 carbon dioxide, 0.64 μmol C L−1 methane, and 0.65 μmol N L−1 nitrous oxide (N2O); (2) changes in the stream-ground water connection can create seemingly erratic patterns in GHG concentrations over short longitudinal distances (order of meters); (3) soil-stream interfaces are hotspots for denitrification and methanogenesis; however, no significant N2O production was observed at such an interface under a riparian forest; and (4) nitrate (NO3 −) and N2O can be preserved as electron acceptors in oxic ground waters draining agriculture landscapes; hence, soil nitrification was the major source of N2O to stream water, with a legacy in ground water dating back to the 1960s; N2O tracked the seepage of NO3 − into surface waters. In this study, we demonstrate the utility of detailed measurements of multiple trace gases towards revealing spatial and temporal patterns of surface–ground water interactions and biogeochemistry across several small baseflow-dominated stream ecosystems in central Wisconsin, USA.

Keywords

Greenhouse gases Trace gases Major ions Surface–ground water interactions Agriculture Nitrogen acidification 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the spring 2006 University of Wisconsin Stevens Point Water 480 class, Juliane Bowling, Cory Wallschlaeger, and Jeremy Wyss for their help with this study. This work is dedicated to Bryant A. Browne, a great friend and mentor, who oversaw this work and passed away during the writing of this manuscript.

References

  1. Abril G, Frankignoulle M (2001) Nitrogen-alkalinity interactions in the highly polluted Scheldt basin (Belgium). Water Res 35:844–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA (1995) Methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaulieu JJ, Arango CP, Hamilton SK, Tank JL (2008) The production and emission of nitrous oxide from headwater streams in the Midwestern United States. Glob Chang Biol 14:878–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Böhlke JK (2002) Groundwater recharge and agricultural contamination. Hydrogeol J 10:438–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Böhlke JK, Denver JM (1995) Combined use of groundwater dating, chemical, and isotopic analyses to resolve the history and fate of nitrate contamination in two agricultural watersheds, Atlantic Coastal Plain, Maryland. Water Resour Res 31:2319–2339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowden WB, Bormann FH (1986) Transport and loss of nitrous oxide in soil water after forest clear-cutting. Science 233:867–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Browne BA (2004) Pumping-induced ebullition: a unified and simplified method for measuring multiple dissolved gases. Environ Sci Technol 38:5729–5736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Browne BA, Guldan NM (2005) Understanding long-term baseflow water quality trends using a synoptic survey of the ground water-surface water interface, Central Wisconsin. J Environ Qual 34:825–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browne BA, Kraft GJ, Bowling JM, DeVita WM, Mechenich DJ (2008) Collateral geochemical impacts of agricultural nitrogen enrichment from 1963 to 1985: a Southern Wisconsin ground water depth profile. J Environ Qual 37:1456–1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bu X, Warner MJ (1995) Solubility of chlorofluorocarbon 113 in water and seawater. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap 42:1151–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bullister J, Weiss R (1988) Determination of CCl3F and CCl2F2 in seawater and air. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap 35:839–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clough TJ, Bertram JE, Sherlock RR, Leonard RL, Nowicki BL (2006) Comparison of measured and EF5-r-derived N2O fluxes from a spring-fed river. Glob Chang Biol 12:352–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cole JJ, Prairie YT, Caraco NF, McDowell WH, Tranvik LJ, Striegl RG, Duarte CM, Kortelainen P, Downing JA, Middelburg JJ, Melack J (2007) Plumbing the global carbon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget. Ecosystems 10:171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook P, Favreau G, Dighton J, Tickell S (2003) Determining natural groundwater influx to a tropical river using radon, chlorofluorocarbons and ionic environmental tracers. J Hydrol 277:74–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawson JJC, Smith P (2007) Carbon losses from soil and its consequences for land-use management. Sci Total Environ 382:165–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dawson JJC, Hope D, Cresser MS, Billett MF (1995) Downstream changes in free carbon-dioxide in an upland catchment from Northeastern Scotland. J Environ Qual 24:699–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Denver JM, Tesoriero AJ, Barbaro JR (2010) Trends and transformation of nutrients and pesticides in a coastal plain aquifer system, United States. J Environ Qual 39:154–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duval TP, Hill AR (2007) Influence of base flow stream bank seepage on riparian zone nitrogen biogeochemistry. Biogeochemistry 85:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Firestone MK, Davidson EA (1989) Microbiological basis of NO and N2O production and consumption in soil. In: Andreae MO, Schimel DS (eds) Exchange of trace gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere (Dahlem workshop reports). John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, pp 7–21Google Scholar
  20. Fisher SG, Sponseller RA, Heffernan JB (2004) Horizons in stream biogeochemistry: flowpaths to progress. Ecology 85:2369–2379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gleason RA, Tangen BA, Browne BA, Euliss NH (2009) Greenhouse gas flux from cropland and restored wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region. Soil Biol Biochem 41:2501–2507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guldan NM (2004) Relationships between groundwater recharge dates, nitrate levels, and denitrification in a central Wisconsin watershed. Masters Thesis. University of Wisconsin Stevens Point, Stevens Point, WIGoogle Scholar
  23. Harrison J (2003) Patterns and controls of nitrous oxide emissions from waters draining a subtropical agricultural valley. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17. doi: 10.1029/2002GB001991
  24. Harrison JA, Matson PA, Fendorf SE (2005) Effects of a diel oxygen cycle on nitrogen transformations and greenhouse gas emissions in a eutrophied subtropical stream. Aquatic Sci 67(3):308–315Google Scholar
  25. Heaton T, Vogel JC (1981) “Excess air” in groundwater. J Hydrol 50:201–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hedin LO, von Fischer JC, Ostrom NE, Kennedy BP, Brown MG, Robertson GP (1998) Thermodynamic constraints on nitrogen transformations and other biogeochemical processes at soil-stream interfaces. Ecology 79:684–703Google Scholar
  27. Hlaváčová E, Rulík M, Čáp L, Mach V (2006) Greenhouse gas (CO2, CH4, N2O) emissions to the atmosphere from a small lowland stream in Czech Republic. Arch Hydrobiol 165:339–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holocher J, Peeters F, Aeschbach-Hertig W, Kinzelbach W, Kipfer R (2003) Kinetic model of gas bubble dissolution in groundwater and its implications for the dissolved gas composition. Environ Sci Technol 37:1337–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jarvie H, Withers P, Hodgkinson R, Bates A, Neal M, Wickham H, Harman S, Armstrong L (2008) Influence of rural land use on streamwater nutrients and their ecological significance. J Hydrol 350:166–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kemp MJ, Dodds WK (2001) Spatial and temporal patterns of nitrogen concentrations in pristine and agriculturally-influenced prairie streams. Biogeochemistry 53:125–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kling GW, Kipphut GW, Miller MC (1991) Arctic lakes and streams as gas conduits to the atmosphere—implications for tundra carbon budgets. Science 251:298–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lohse KA, Brooks PD, McIntosh JC, Meixner T, Huxman TE (2009) Interactions between biogeochemistry and hydrologic systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34:65–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin GE, Snow DD, Kim E, Spalding RF (1995) Simultaneous determination of argon and nitrogen. Ground Water 33:781–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McClain ME, Boyer EW, Dent CL, Gergel SE, Grimm NB, Groffman PM, Hart SC, Harvey JW, Johnston CA, Mayorga E, McDowell WH, Pinay G (2003) Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Ecosystems 6:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Modica E, Reilly TE (1997) Patterns and age distribution of ground-water flow to streams. Ground Water 35:523–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Neill C, Deegan LA, Thomas SM, Haupert CL, Krusche AV, Ballester VM, Victoria RL (2006) Deforestation alters the hydraulic and biogeochemical characteristics of small lowland Amazonian streams. Hydrol Process 20(12):2563–2580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nevison C (2000) Review of the IPCC methodology for estimating nitrous oxide emissions associated with agricultural leaching and runoff. Chemosphere Glob Change Sci 2:493–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Plummer LN, Busenberg E (2000) Chloroflurocarbons. In: Cook PG, Herczeg AL (eds) Environmental tracers in subsurface hydrology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, pp 441–478Google Scholar
  39. Reay DS, Smith KA, Edwards AC (2003) Nitrous oxide emission from agricultural drainage waters. Glob Change Biol 9:195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. River Alliance of Wisconsin (2009) Lateral move: the Isherwood’s ditch. [Online] Available at http://www.wisconsinrivers.org/documents/newsletter/RA_News_Spring09_Final.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2010. River Alliance of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
  41. Robertson GP, Paul EA, Harwood RR (2000) Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: Contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 289:1922–1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanders IA, Heppell CM, Cotton JA, Wharton G, Hildrew AG, Flowers EJ, Trimmer M (2007) Emission of methane from chalk streams has potential implications for agricultural practices. Freshw Biol 52:1176–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schlesinger WH, Reckhow KH, Bernhardt ES (2006) Global change: the nitrogen cycle and rivers. Water Resour Res 42. doi: 10.1029/2005WR004300
  44. Tiedje JM (1988) Ecology of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia. In: Zehnder AJB (ed) Wiley, Chichester, NY, USA, pp 179–244Google Scholar
  45. Vogel J, Talma AS, Heaton T (1981) Gaseous nitrogen as evidence for denitrification in groundwater. J Hydrol 50:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Warner M, Weiss R (1985) Solubilities of chlorofluorocarbons 11 and 12 in water and seawater. Deep Sea Res A 32:1485–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. WDNR (1996) Groundwater sampling field manual. PUBL-DG-038 96. [Online] Available at http://dnr.wi.gov/org/water/dwg/gw/pubs/GW-SFM.PDF. Accessed 30 April 2010. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI
  48. Weeks EP, Ericson DW, Holt LR (1965) Hydrology of the Little Plover River basin, Portage County, Wisconsin, and the effects of water resources development. Water Supply Paper 1811. USGS, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilcock RJ, Sorrell BK (2007) Emissions of greenhouse gases CH4 and N2O from low-gradient streams in agriculturally developed catchments. Water Air Soil Pollut 188:155–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilhelm E, Battino R, Wilcock RJ (1977) Low-pressure solubility of gases in liquid water. Chem Rev 77:219–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Winter TC, Harvey JW, Franke OL, Alley WM (1998) Ground water and surface water—a single resource. Circular 1139 [Online] Available at http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/circ/circ1139. Accessed 30 April 2010. USGS, Reston, VA
  52. Woessner WW (2000) Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: rescaling hydrogeologic thought. Ground Water 38:423–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel F. Werner
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bryant A. Browne
    • 1
  • Charles T. Driscoll
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Natural ResourcesUniversity of Wisconsin Stevens PointStevens PointUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations