, Volume 104, Issue 1–3, pp 227–236 | Cite as

Mean residence time of O horizon carbon along a climatic gradient in Scandinavia estimated by 14C measurements of archived soils

  • Mats FröbergEmail author
  • Edward Tipping
  • Johan Stendahl
  • Nicholas Clarke
  • Charlotte Bryant


We used two datasets of 14C analyses of archived soil samples to study carbon turnover in O horizons from spruce dominated old-growth stands on well-drained podzols in Scandinavia. The main data set was obtained from archived samples from the National Forest Soil Inventory in Sweden and represents a climatic gradient in temperature. Composite samples from 1966, 1972, 1983 and 2000 from four different regions in a latitude gradient ranging from 57 to 67°N were analysed for 14C content. Along this gradient the C stock in the O horizon ranges from 2.1 kg m−2 in the north to 3.7 kg m−2 in the southwest. The other data set contains 14C analyses from 1986, 1987, 1991, 1996 and 2004 from the O horizons in Birkenes, Norway. Mean residence times (MRT) were calculated using a two compartment model, with a litter decomposition compartment using mass loss data from the literature for the three-first years of decomposition and a humus decomposition compartment with a fitted constant turnover rate. We hypothesized that the climatic gradient would result in different C turnover in different parts of the country between northern and southern Sweden. The use of archived soil samples was very valuable for constraining the MRT calculations, which showed that there were differences between the regions. Longest MRT was found in the northernmost region (41 years), with decreasing residence times through the middle (36 years) and central Sweden (28 years), then again increasing in the southwestern region (40 years). The size of the soil organic carbon (SOC) pool in the O horizon was mainly related to differences in litter input and to a lesser degree to MRT. Because N deposition leads both to larger litter input and to longer MRT, we suggest that N deposition contributes significantly to the latitudinal SOC gradient in Scandinavia, with approximately twice as much SOC in the O horizon in the south compared to the north. The data from Birkenes was in good agreement with the Swedish dataset with MRT estimated to 34 years.


Forest soils Mean residence time Radiocarbon Soil organic carbon 



The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency is the main sponsor of the Swedish Forest Soil Inventory, which is administered by the Department of Soil and Environment, SLU. We also thank Wenche Aas (Norwegian Institute for Air Research) for providing temperature data for Birkenes, and the Nordic Forest Research Coordination Committee for funding of Birkenes data through the project ‘Climatic effects on pools of organic carbon and nitrogen and fluxes of dissolved carbon and nitrogen in forest soils’. Isotope measurements for Birkenes were made through NERC Radiocarbon Laboratory allocation 1063.0304 to ET.


  1. Ågren GI, Bosatta E (1987) Theoretical analysis of the long-term dynamics of carbon and nitrogen in soils. Ecology 68:1181–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ågren GI, Hyvönen R, Nilsson T (2007) Are Swedish forest soils sinks or sources for CO2—model analyses based on forest inventory data. Biogeochemistry 82:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg B (2000) Litter decomposition and organic matter turnover in northern forest soils. For Ecol Manage 133:13–22Google Scholar
  4. Berg B, Matzner E (1997) Effect of N deposition on decomposition of plant litter and soil organic matter in forest systems. Environ Res 5:1–25Google Scholar
  5. Berg B, Johansson M-B, Ekbohm G, McClaugherty C, Rutigliano F, De Santo AM (1996) Maximum decomposition limits of forest litter types: a synthesis. Can J Bot 74:659–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg B, Johansson M-B, Tjarve I, Gaitniks T, Rokjanis B, Beier C, Rothe A, Bolger T, Göttlein A, Gertsberger P (1999) Needle litterfall in a north European spruce forest transect. Reports in forest ecology and forest soils, report no. 80. Department of Forest Soils, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg B, Johansson M-B, Meentemeyer V (2000) Litter decomposition in a transect of Norway spruce forests: substrate quality and climate control. Can J For Res 30:1136–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berg B, Johansson M-B, Nilsson Å, Gundersen P, Norell P (2009) Sequestration of carbon in the humus layer of Swedish forests—direct measurements. Can J For Res 39:962–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Callesen I, Liski J, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Olsson MT, Tau-Strand L, Vesterdal L, Westman CJ (2003) Soil carbon stores in Nordic well-drained forest soils—relationships with climate and texture class. Glob Chang Biol 9:358–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freeman SPHT, Dougans A, McHargue L, Wilcken KM, Xu S (2008) Performance of the new single stage accelerator mass spectrometer at the SUERC. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 266:2225–2228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hägglund B (1981) Evaluation of forest site productivity. For Abstr 42:515–527Google Scholar
  12. Harkness DD, Wilson HW (1972) Some applications in radiocarbon measurement at the SURRC. In: Proceedings of eighth international conference on radiocarbon dating, vol 1B. Royal Society of New Zealand, p 102Google Scholar
  13. Harkness DD, Harrison AF, Bacon PJ (1986) The temporal distribution of “bomb” 14C in a forest soil. Radiocarbon 28:328–337Google Scholar
  14. Hua Q, Barbetti M (2004) Review of tropospheric bomb 14C data for carbon cycle modelling and age calibration purposes. Radiocarbon 46:1273–1298Google Scholar
  15. Hyvönen R, Ågren GI, Linder S, Persson T, Cotrufo MF, Ekblad A, Freeman M, Grelle A, Janssens IA, Jarvis PG, Kellomaki S, Lindroth A, Loustau D, Lundmark T, Norby RJ, Oren R, Pilegaard K, Ryan MG, Sigurdsson BD, Strömgren M, van Oijen M, Wallin G (2007) The likely impact of elevated [CO2], nitrogen deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems: a literature review. New Phytol 173:463–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jarvis P, Linder S (2000) Botany—constraints to growth of boreal forests. Nature 405(6789):904–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jenkinson DS (1990) The turnover of organic-carbon and nitrogen in soil. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 329:361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johansson MB (1986) Chemical composition and decomposition pattern of leaf litters from forest trees in Sweden with special reference to methodological aspects and site properties. Reports in forest ecology and forest soils, report no. 56. Department of Forest Soils, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  19. Kleja DB, Svensson M, Majdi H, Jansson PE, Langvall O, Bergkvist B, Johansson MB, Weslien P, Truusb L, Lindroth A, Ågren GI (2008) Pools and fluxes of carbon in three Norway spruce ecosystems along a climatic gradient in Sweden. Biogeochemistry 89:7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levin I, Kromer B (2004) The tropospheric 14CO2 level in mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere (1959–2003). Radiocarbon 46:1261–1272Google Scholar
  21. Liski J, Westman CJ (1997) Carbon storage in forest soil of Finland. 1. Effect of thermoclimate. Biogeochemistry 36:239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Michalzik B, Tipping E, Mulder J, Lancho JFG, Matzner E, Bryant CL, Clarke N, Lofts S, Esteban MAV (2003) Modelling the production and transport of dissolved organic carbon in forest soils. Biogeochemistry 66:241–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olsson MT, Erlandsson M, Lundin L, Nilsson T, Nilsson Å, Stendahl J (2009) Organic carbon stocks in Swedish podzol soils in relation to soil hydrology and other site characteristics. Silva Fennica 43:209–222Google Scholar
  24. Parton WJ, Stewart JWB, Cole CV (1988) Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model. Biogeochemistry 5:109–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reimer PJ, Baillie MGL, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, Bertrand CJH, Blackwell PG, Buck CE, Burr GS, Cutler KB, Damon PE, Edwards RL, Fairbanks RG, Friedrich M, Guilderson TP, Hogg AG, Hughen KA, Kromer B, McCormac G, Manning S, Ramsey CB, Reimer RW, Remmele S, Southon JR, Stuiver M, Talamo S, Taylor FW, van der Plicht J, Weyhenmeyer CE (2004) INTCAL04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 CAL kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46:1029–1058Google Scholar
  26. Saarsalmi A, Starr M, Hokkanen T, Ukonmaanaho L, Kukkola M, Nöjd P, Sievänen R (2007) Predicting annual canopy litterfall production for Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stands. For Ecol Manage 242:578–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Slota PJ, Jull AJT, Linick TW, Toolin LJ (1987) Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29:303–306Google Scholar
  28. Stendahl J, Johansson M-B, Eriksson E, Nilsson Å, Langvall O (2010) Soil organic carbon in Swedish spruce and pine forests—differences in stock levels and regional patterns. Silva Fennica 44:5–21Google Scholar
  29. Trumbore S (2000) Age of soil organic matter and soil respiration: radiocarbon constraints on belowground C dynamics. Ecol Appl 10:399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Trumbore SE, Chadwick OA, Amundson R (1996) Rapid exchange between soil carbon and atmospheric carbon dioxide driven by temperature change. Science 272(5260):393–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wu Y, Clarke N, Mulder J (2010) Dissolved organic nitrogen concentrations and ratios of dissolved organic carbon to dissolved organic nitrogen in throughfall and soil waters in Norway spruce and Scots pine forest stands throughout Norway. Water Air Soil Pollut 210:171–186Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mats Fröberg
    • 1
    Email author
  • Edward Tipping
    • 2
  • Johan Stendahl
    • 1
  • Nicholas Clarke
    • 3
  • Charlotte Bryant
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Soil and EnvironmentSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Centre for Ecology and HydrologyLancaster Environmental CentreLancasterUK
  3. 3.Norwegian Forest and Landscape InstituteÅsNorway
  4. 4.NERC Radiocarbon Facility (Environment)GlasgowScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations