Biogeochemistry

, Volume 93, Issue 3, pp 219–233 | Cite as

Watershed nitrogen input and riverine export on the west coast of the US

  • Sylvia C. Schaefer
  • James T. Hollibaugh
  • Merryl Alber
Article

Abstract

This study evaluated the sources, sinks, and factors controlling net export of nitrogen (N) from watersheds on the west coast of the US. We calculated input of new N to 22 watersheds for 1992 and 2002. 1992 inputs ranged from 541 to 11,644 kg N km−2 year−1, with an overall area-weighted average of 1,870 kg N km−2 year−1. In 2002, the range of inputs was 490–10,875 kg N km−2 year−1, averaging 2,158 kg N km−2 year−1. Fertilizer was the most important source of new N, averaging 956 (1992) and 1,073 kg N km−2 year−1 (2002). Atmospheric deposition was the next most important input, averaging 833 (1992) and 717 kg N km−2 year−1 (2002), followed by biological N fixation in agricultural lands. Riverine N export, calculated based on measurements taken at the furthest downstream USGS water quality monitoring station, averaged 165 (1992) and 196 kg N km−2 year−1 (2002), although data were available for only 7 watersheds at the latter time point. Downstream riverine N export was correlated with variations in streamflow (export = 0.94 × streamflow − 5.65, R2 = 0.66), with N inputs explaining an additional 16% of the variance (export = 1.06 × streamflow + 0.06 × input − 227.78, R2 = 0.82). The percentage of N input that is exported averaged 12%. Percent export was also related to streamflow (%export = 0.05 × streamflow − 2.61, R2 = 0.60). The correlations with streamflow are likely a result of its large dynamic range in these systems. However, the processes that control watershed N export are not yet completely understood.

Keywords

Nitrogen budgets Nutrient inputs Riverine export Watersheds West coast 

References

  1. Battaglin WA, Goolsby DA (1994) Spatial data in geographic information system format on agricultural chemical use, land use, and cropping practices in the United States. USGS water resources investigations report 94-4176, US Geologic Survey, Reston, VA. http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/wri/wri944176/
  2. Battye R, Battye W, Overcash C, Fudge S (1994) Development and selection of ammonia emission factors. Final report, EC/R incorporated for EPA atmospheric research assessment lab, EPA contract number 68-D3-0034Google Scholar
  3. Bigler BS, Welch DW, Helle JH (1996) A review of size trends among North Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:455–465. doi:10.1139/cjfas-53-2-455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Binkley D, Sollins P, Bell R, Sachs D, Myrold D (1992) Biogeochemistry of adjacent conifer and alder-conifer stands. Ecology 73(6):2022–2033. doi:10.2307/1941452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Booth G, Raymond P, Oh N-H (2007) LoadRunner. Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Available online at http://environment.yale.edu/raymond/loadrunner/
  6. Boyer EW, Goodale CL, Jaworski NA, Howarth RW (2002) Anthropogenic nitrogen sources and relationships to riverine nitrogen export in the northeastern USA. Biogeochemistry 57:137–169. doi:10.1023/A:1015709302073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyer EW, Howarth RW, Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Green PA, Vörösmarty CJ (2006) Riverine nitrogen export from the continents to the coasts. Global Biogeochem Cy 20:Art. No. GB1S91Google Scholar
  8. Bricker S, Longstaff B, Dennison W, Jones A, Boicourt K, Wicks C, Woerner J (2007) Effects of nutrient enrichment in the nation’s estuaries: a decade of change, NOAA Coastal ocean program decision analysis series no. 26. National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Silver Spring, p 328Google Scholar
  9. Cairns MA, Lajtha K (2005) Effects of succession on nitrogen export in the west-central Cascades, Oregon. Ecosystems (NY, Print) 8:583–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CARB California Air Resources Board (2008) California’s air quality history key events, www.arb.ca.gov/html/brochure/history.htm. Cited 14 May 2008
  11. CDFA California Department of Food and Agriculture (2002) California agricultural resource directory. California Department of Agriculture, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Compton JE, Church MR, Larned ST, Hogsett WE (2003) Nitrogen export from forested watersheds in the Oregon coast range: the role of N2-fixing red alder. Ecosystems (NY, Print) 6(8):773–785. doi:10.1007/s10021-002-0207-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drake DC, Naiman RJ, Bechtold JS (2006) Fate of nitrogen in riparian forest soils and trees: an 15N tracer study simulating salmon decay. Ecology 87(5):1256–1266. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1256:FONIRF]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dumont E, Harrison JA, Kroeze C, Bakker EJ, Seitzinger SP (2005) Global distribution and sources of dissolved inorganic nitrogen export to the coastal zone: Results from a spatially explicit, global model. Global Biogeochem Cycles 19. Art S02(No. GB4)Google Scholar
  15. Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Capone DG, Boyer EW, Howarth RW, Seitzinger SP, Asner GP, Cleveland CC, Green PA, Holland EA, Karl DM, Michaels AF, Porter JH, Townsend AR, Vörösmarty CJ (2004) Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry 70(2):153–226. doi:10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garrow JS, James WPT, Ralph A (eds) (2000) Human nutrition and dietetics. Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  17. Gende SM, Edwards RT, Willson MF, Wipfli MS (2002) Pacific salmon in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Bioscience 52(10):917–928. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0917:PSIAAT]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gresh T, Lichatowich J, Schoonmaker P (2000) An estimation of historic and current levels of salmon production in the northeast Pacific ecosystem: evidence of a nutrient deficit in the freshwater systems of the Pacific northwest. Fisheries 25(1):15–21. doi:10.1577/1548-8446(2000)025<0015:AEOHAC>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howarth RW, Billen G, Swaney D, Townsend A, Jaworski N, Lajtha K, Downing JA, Elmgren R, Caraco N, Jordan T, Berendse F, Freney J, Kudeyarov V, Murdoch P, Zhao-Liang Z (1996) Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N and P fluxed for the drainages to the North Atlantic ocean: natural and human influences. Biogeochemistry 35:75–139. doi:10.1007/BF02179825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howarth RW, Swaney DP, Boyer EW, Marino R, Jaworski N, Goodale C (2006) The influence of climate on average nitrogen export from large watersheds in the northeastern United States. Biogeochemistry 79:163–186. doi:10.1007/s10533-006-9010-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones JA, Grant GE (1996) Peak flow responses to clear-cutting and roads in small and large basins, western Cascades, Oregon. Water Resour Res 32(4):959–974. doi:10.1029/95WR03493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lander CH, Moffitt D (1996) Nutrient use in cropland agriculture (commercial fertilizers and manure): nitrogen and phosphorus. Working paper 14, RCAIII. NRCS, United States Department of Agriculture, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Lewis WM Jr (2002) Yield of nitrogen from minimally disturbed watersheds of the United States. Biogeochemistry 57/58:275–385Google Scholar
  24. Lewis WM Jr, Melack JM, McDowell WH, McClain M, Richey JE (1999) Nitrogen yields from undisturbed watersheds in the Americas. Biogeochemistry 46:149–162. doi:10.1007/BF01007577 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu C, Wang QX, Watanabe M (2006) Nitrogen transported to three Gorges dam from agro-ecosystems during 1980–2000. Biogeochemistry 81:291–312. doi:10.1007/s10533-006-9042-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McIsaac GF, David MB, Gertner GZ, Goolsby DA (2002) Relating net nitrogen input in the Mississippi river basin to nitrate flux in the Lower Mississippi river: a comparison of approaches. J Environ Qual 31(5):1610–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Naiman RJ, Bilby RE, Schindler DE, Helfield JM (2002) Pacific salmon, nutrients, and the dynamics of freshwater and riparian ecosystems. Ecosystems (NY, Print) 5:399–417. doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0083-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. NADP National Atmospheric Deposition Program/National Trends Network (NRSP-3) (2006) NADP Program Office, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Dr., Champaign, IL. Available online at http://nadp.isws.illinois.edu/
  29. Neff JC, Holland EA, Dentener FJ, McDowell WH, Russell KM (2002) The origin, composition and rates of organic nitrogen deposition: a missing piece of the nitrogen cycle? Biogeochemistry 57:99–136. doi:10.1023/A:1015791622742 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parfitt RL, Schipper LA, Baisden WT, Elliott AH (2006) Nitrogen inputs and outputs for New Zealand in 2001 at national and regional scales. Biogeochemistry 80:71–88. doi:10.1007/s10533-006-0002-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. PRISM Group (2008) Oregon State University. http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu/Cited 5 Feb 2008
  32. Ripple WJ, Hershey KT, Anthony RG (2000) Historical forest patters of Oregon’s central coast range. Biol Conserv 93:127–133. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00034-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ruddy BC, Lorenz DL, Mueller DK (2006) County-level estimates of nutrient inputs to the land surface of the conterminous United States, 1982–2001. USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5012. US Geological Survey, RestonGoogle Scholar
  34. Runkel RL, Crawford CG, Cohn TA (2004) Load estimator (LOADEST): A FORTRAN program for estimating constituent loads in streams and rivers. US geological survey techniques and methods book 4, Chap. A5, 69 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Schaefer SC, Alber M (2007) Temperature controls a latitudinal gradient in the proportion of watershed nitrogen exported to coastal ecosystems. Biogeochemistry 85(3):333–346. doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9144-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Siuslaw Basin Council (2002) A watershed assessment for the Siuslaw basin. Available online at http://www.inforain.org/siuslaw/
  37. Smith SV, Swaney DP, Buddemeier RW, Scarsbrook MR, Weatherhead MA, Humborg C, Eriksson H, Hannerz F (2005) River nutrient loads and catchment size. Biogeochemistry 75:83–107. doi:10.1007/s10533-004-6320-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thornton PE, Running SW, White MA (1997) Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain. J Hydrol (Amst) 190:214–225. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03128-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Torrey JG (1978) Nitrogen fixation by actinomycete-nodulated angiosperms. Bioscience 28(9):586–592. doi:10.2307/1307515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Uliassi DD, Ruess RW (2002) Limitations to symbiotic nitrogen fixation in primary succession on the Tanana river floodplain. Ecology 83(1):88–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [USBoC] United States Bureau of the Census (1990) 1990 census of population: general population characteristics, United States. Washington, DC. http://factfinder.census.gov
  42. [USBoC] United States Bureau of the Census (2000) 2000 census of population: general population characteristics, United States. Washington, DC. http://factfinder.census.gov
  43. [USDA–NASS] United States Department of Agriculture—National Agricultural Statistics Service (1992) 1992 census of agriculture, Vol. 1, geographic area series. National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, DC. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Census_of_Agriculture/1992/index.asp
  44. [USDA–NASS] United States Department of Agriculture—National Agricultural Statistics Service (2002) 2002 census of agriculture. Washington, DC. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/
  45. [USDA-NRCS] United States Department of Agriculture—Natural Resources Conservation Service (2005) PLANTS database crop nutrient tool. Washington, DC. http://npk.nrcs.usda.gov/
  46. [USDA–FS] United States Department of Agriculture–Forest Service (2006) Forest inventory and analysis national program. Arlington, VA, 2006. http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/tools-data/data/
  47. [USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency (1995) Clean air status and trends network. Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/castnet/
  48. [USGS] United States Geological Survey (2006) National water information system. Reston, VA. http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/
  49. [USGS] USGS United States Geological Survey (1999a) Idaho land cover data set. US Geological Survey, Sioux FallsGoogle Scholar
  50. [USGS] USGS United States Geological Survey (1999b) Oregon land cover data set. US Geological Survey, Sioux FallsGoogle Scholar
  51. [USGS] USGS United States Geological Survey (1999c) Washington land cover data set. US Geological Survey, Sioux FallsGoogle Scholar
  52. [USGS] United States Geological Survey (1999d) National elevation dataset. USGS EROS Data Center, Sioux Falls, SD. http://gisdata.usgs.net/ned/
  53. [USGS] USGS United States Geological Survey (2000a) Montana land cover data set. US Geological Survey, Sioux FallsGoogle Scholar
  54. [USGS] USGS United States Geological Survey (2000b) Nevada land cover data set. US Geological Survey, Sioux FallsGoogle Scholar
  55. [USGS] USGS United States Geological Survey (2000c) California-north land cover data set. US Geological Survey, Sioux FallsGoogle Scholar
  56. [USGS] USGS United States Geological Survey (2000d) California-south land cover data set. US Geological Survey, Sioux FallsGoogle Scholar
  57. [USGS] USGS United States Geological Survey (2000e) Utah land cover data set. US Geological Survey, Sioux FallsGoogle Scholar
  58. [USGS] USGS United States Geological Survey (2000f) Wyoming land cover data set. US Geological Survey, Sioux FallsGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Horn HH (1998) Factors affecting manure quantity, quality, and use. In: Proceedings of the Mid-South ruminant nutrition conference, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Texas Animal Nutrition Council, 7–8 May 1998, pp 9–20Google Scholar
  60. Vogelmann JE, Howard SM, Yang L, Larson CR, Wylie BK, Van Driel N (2001) National land cover database 2001 (NLCD 2001). US geological survey, EROS data center, MRLC project, Sioux Falls, SD, http://seamless.usgs.gov/

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvia C. Schaefer
    • 1
  • James T. Hollibaugh
    • 1
  • Merryl Alber
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Marine SciencesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations