, Volume 88, Issue 3, pp 257–270

Changes in the character of DOC in streams during storms in two Midwestern watersheds with contrasting land uses

  • Philippe Vidon
  • Laura E. Wagner
  • Emmanuel Soyeux
Original Paper


Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) dynamics in streams is important, yet few studies focus on DOC dynamics in Midwestern streams during storms. In this study, stream DOC dynamics during storms in two Midwestern watersheds with contrasting land uses, the change in character of stream DOC during storms, and the usability of DOC as a hydrologic tracer in artificially drained landscapes of the Midwest are investigated. Major cation/DOC concentrations, and DOC specific UV absorbance (SUVA) and fluorescence index (FI) were monitored at 2–4 h intervals during three spring storms. Although DOC is less aromatic in the mixed land use watershed than in the agricultural watershed, land use has little impact on stream DOC concentration during storms. For both watersheds, DOC concentration follows discharge, and SUVA and FI values indicate an increase in stream DOC aromaticity and lignin content during storms. The comparison of DOC/major cation flushing dynamics indicates that DOC is mainly exported via overland flow/macropore flow. In both watersheds, the increase in DOC concentration in the streams during storms corresponds to a shift in the source of DOC from DOC originating from mineral soil layers of the soil profile at baseflow, to DOC originating from surficial soil layers richer in aromatic substances and lignin during storms. Results also suggest that DOC, SUVA and FI could be used as hydrologic tracers in artificially drained landscapes of the Midwest. These results underscore the importance of sampling streams for DOC during high flow periods in order to understand the fate of DOC in streams.


Dissolved organic carbon character Midwest Storm Stream Watershed 


  1. Boyer EW, Hornberger GM, Bencala KE, McKnight DM (1997) Response characteristics of DOC flushing in an alpine catchment. Hydrol Process 11:1635–1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark GD (1980) The Indiana water resource—availability, uses, and needs. Governor’s Water Resource Study Commission, State of Indiana, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, 508 pGoogle Scholar
  3. Dalzell BJ, Filley TR, Harbor JM (2005) Flood pulse influences on terrestrial organic matter export from an agricultural watershed. J Geophys Res 110:G02011. doi:10.1029/2005JG000043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dalzell BJ, Filley TR, Harbor JM (2007) The role of hydrology in annual organic carbon loads and terrestrial organic matter export from a midwestern agricultural watershed. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71(6):1448–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elwood JW, Turner RR (1989) Streams: water chemistry and ecology. In: Johnson DW, Van Hook RI (eds) Analysis of biogeochemical cycling processes in Walker branch watershed. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 301–350Google Scholar
  6. Goolsby D, Battaglin WA, Aulenbach BT, Hooper RP (2000) Nitrogen input to the Gulf of Mexico. J Environ Qual 30:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hill AR (1993) Base cation chemistry of storm runoff in a forested headwater wetland. Water Resour Res 29(8):2663–2673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hill AR, Waddington JM (1993) Analysis of storm run-off sources using oxygen-18 in a headwater swamp. Hydrol Process 7:305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hornberger GM, Bencala KE, McKnight DM (1994) Hydrological controls on dissolved organic carbon during snowmelt in the Snake River near Montezuma, Colorado. Biogeochem 25:147–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hood E, Gooseff MN, Johnson SS (2006) Changes in the character of stream water dissolved organic carbon during flushing in three small watersheds, Oregon. J Geophys Res 111:G01007. doi:10.1029/2005JG000082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hyer KE, Hornberger GM, Herman JS (2001) Processes controlling the episodic streamwater transport of atrazine and other agrichemicals in an agricultural watershed. J Hydrol 254(1–4):47–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Inamdar SP, Christopher SF, Mitchell MJ (2004) Export mechanisms for dissolved organic carbon and nitrate during summer storm events in a glaciated forested catchment in New York, USA. Hydrol Process 18:2651–2661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson MS, Lehmann J, Couto EG, Novaes JP, Riha SJ (2006) DOC and DIC in flowpaths of Amazonian headwater catchments with hydrologically contrasting soils. Biogeochem 81(1):45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kahl JS, Norton SA, Haines TA, Rochette EA, Heath RH, Nodvin SC (1992) Mechanisms of episodic acidification in low-order streams in Maine, USA. Environ Pollut 78:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Katsuyama M, Ohte N (2002) Determining the sources of stormflow from the fluorescence properties of dissolved organic carbon in a forested headwater catchment. J Hydrol 268:192–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kladivko EJ, Van Scoyoc GE, Monke EJ, Oates KM, Pask W (1991) Pesticide and nutrient movement into subsurface tile drains on a silt loam soil in Indiana. J Environ Qual 20:264–270Google Scholar
  17. Kung KJS, Steenhuis TS, Kladivko EJ, Gish TJ, Bubenzer G, Helling CS (2000a) Impact of preferential flow on the transport of adsorbing and non-adsorbing tracers. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1290–1296Google Scholar
  18. Kung KJS, Kaldivko EJ, Gish TJ, Steenhuis TS, Bubenzer G, Helling CS (2000b) Quantifying preferential flow by breakthrough of sequentially applied tracers: silt loam soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1296–1304Google Scholar
  19. McGlynn BL, McDonnell JJ (2003) Role of discrete landscape units in controlling catchment dissolved organic carbon dynamics. Water Resour Res 39(4):1090. doi:10.1029/2002WR001525 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McKnight DM, Boyer EW, Westerhoff PK, Doran PT, Kulbe T, Andersen DT (2001) Spectrofluorometric characterization of dissolved organic matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity. Limnol Oceanogr 46(1):38–48Google Scholar
  21. Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63(3):621–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mladenov N, McKnight DM, Wolski P, Ramberg L (2005) Effect of annual flooding on dissolved organic carbon dynamics within a pristine wetland, the Okavango Delta, Bostwana. Wetlands 23(3):622–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. NOAA (2005) Climatological data, Indianapolis. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center: Date accessed: Jan 16, 2005
  24. Reid JM, MacLeord DA, Cresser MS (1981) Factors affecting the chemistry of precipitation and river water in an upland catchment. J Hydrol 50:129–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Royer TV, David MB, Gentry LE (2006) Timing of riverine export of nitrate and phosphorus from agricultural watersheds in Illinois: Implications for reducing nutrient loading to the Mississippi River. Environ Sci Technol 40:4126–4131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sklash MG (1990) Environmental isotope studies of storm and snowmelt runoff generation. In: Anderson MG, Burt TP (eds) Process studies in hillslope hydrology. Wiley, pp 410–435Google Scholar
  27. Stevens DP, Cox JW, Chittleborough DJ (1999) Pathways of phosphorus, nitrogen, and carbon movement through texturally differentiated soils, South Australia. Aust J Soil Res 37(4):679–693Google Scholar
  28. Stone WW, Wilson JT (2006) Preferential flow estimates to an agricultural tile drain with implications for Glyphosate Transport. J Environ Qual 35:1825–1835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stottlemyer R, Toczydlowski D (1991) Stream chemistry and hydrologic pathways during snowmelt in a small watershed adjacent Lake-Superior. Biogeochem 13(3):177–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. USDA (1974) Soil Survey of Hendricks County, IndianaGoogle Scholar
  31. Wagner LE, Vidon P, Tedesco LE, Gray M (2008) Stream nitrate and DOC dynamics during three spring storms across land uses in glaciated landscapes of the Midwest. J Hydrol (in press)Google Scholar
  32. Waldrip DB, Roberts MC (1972) The distribution of slopes in Indiana. Proc Indiana Acad Sci 81:251–257Google Scholar
  33. Weishaar JL, Aiken GR, Depaz E, Bergamaschi B, Fram M, Fujii R (2003) Evaluation of specific ultra-violet absorbance as an indicator of the chemical composition and reactivity of dissolved organic carbon. Environ Sci Technol 37:4702–4708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wigington PJ, Baker JP, DeWalle DR, Krester WA, Murdoch PS, Simonin HA, Van Sickle J, McDowell MK, Peck DV, Barchet WR (1996) Episodic acidification of small streams in the northeastern United States: ionic control of episodes. Ecol Appl 6:389–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Vidon
    • 1
  • Laura E. Wagner
    • 1
    • 2
  • Emmanuel Soyeux
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Earth Sciences and Center for Earth and Environmental Science, SL118Indiana University-Purdue University, IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyIowa CityUSA
  3. 3.Veolia EauParisFrance

Personalised recommendations