C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass?
- 7.3k Downloads
Well-constrained carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus (C:N:P) ratios in planktonic biomass, and their importance in advancing our understanding of biological processes and nutrient cycling in marine ecosystems, has motivated ecologists to search for similar patterns in terrestrial ecosystems. Recent analyses indicate the existence of “Redfield-like” ratios in plants, and such data may provide insight into the nature of nutrient limitation in terrestrial ecosystems. We searched for analogous patterns in the soil and the soil microbial biomass by conducting a review of the literature. Although soil is characterized by high biological diversity, structural complexity and spatial heterogeneity, we found remarkably consistent C:N:P ratios in both total soil pools and the soil microbial biomass. Our analysis indicates that, similar to marine phytoplankton, element concentrations of individual phylogenetic groups within the soil microbial community may vary, but on average, atomic C:N:P ratios in both the soil (186:13:1) and the soil microbial biomass (60:7:1) are well-constrained at the global scale. We did see significant variation in soil and microbial element ratios between vegetation types (i.e., forest versus grassland), but in most cases, the similarities in soil and microbial element ratios among sites and across large scales were more apparent than the differences. Consistent microbial biomass element ratios, combined with data linking specific patterns of microbial element stoichiometry with direct evidence of microbial nutrient limitation, suggest that measuring the proportions of C, N and P in the microbial biomass may represent another useful tool for assessing nutrient limitation of ecosystem processes in terrestrial ecosystems.
KeywordsCarbon Microbial biomass Nitrogen Phosphorus Soil Stoichiometry
We thank Loren Sackett and Christine Fairbanks for assistance with the literature search, and Noah Fierer, Alan Townsend, Josh Schimel and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on the manuscript. C. C. was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (DEB-0515744). D.L. was supported by grants from the NSF Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) program (DEB-9810128).
- Aerts R, Chapin FS III (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 10:402–407Google Scholar
- Cleveland CC, Townsend AR, Schmidt SK (2002) Phosphorus limitation of microbial processes in moist tropical forests: evidence from short-term laboratory incubations and field experiments. Ecosystems 5:680–691Google Scholar
- Cleveland CC, Townsend AR, Constance BC, Ley RE, Schmidt SK (2004) Soil microbial dynamics in Costa Rica: seasonal and biogeochemical constraints. Biotropica 36:184–195Google Scholar
- Falster DS, Warton DI, Wright IJ (2006) SMATR: standardised major axis tests and routines, ver2.0. http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/ecology/SMATR/Google Scholar
- Hecky RE, Kilham P (1988) Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in freshwater and marine environments: a review of recent evidence on the effects of enrichment. Limnol Oceanogr 33:796–822Google Scholar
- Holland KJ (2006) Fate of nitrogen in alpine tundra. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
- Jenny H (1941) Factors of soil formation. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Johnson AH, Frizano J, Vann DR (2003) Biogeochemical implications of labile phosphorus in forest soils determined by the Hedley fractionation procedure. Oecologia 135:487–499Google Scholar
- Okin GS, Mahowald N, Chadwick OA, Artaxo P (2004) Impact of desert dust on the biogeochemistry of phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems. Global Biogeochem Cycles 18, GB2005Google Scholar
- Paul EA, Clark FE (1996) Soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Redfield A (1958) The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. Am Sci 46:205–221Google Scholar
- Reed SC, Cleveland CC, Townsend AR (2007) Controls over free-living nitrogen fixation in a lowland tropical rain forest. Biotropica (in press)Google Scholar
- Reiss MJ (1989) The allometry of growth and reproduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- Ross DJ, Speir TW, Tate KR, Feltham CW (1997) Burning in a New Zealand snow-tussock grassland: effects on soil microbial biomass and nitrogen and phosphorus availability. N Z J Ecol 21:63–71Google Scholar
- Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: The biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Waksman S, Starkey R (1931) The soil and the microbe. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Wardle DA (1992) A comparative assessment of factors which influence microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels in soil. Biol Rev 67:321–358Google Scholar
- Yeates GW, Saggar S (1998) Comparison of soil microbial properties and fauna under tussock-grassland and pine plantation. J Roy Soc New Zeal 28:523–535Google Scholar