, Volume 82, Issue 2, pp 201–216 | Cite as

Fire impact on C and N losses and charcoal production in a scrub oak ecosystem

  • M. A. AlexisEmail author
  • D. P. Rasse
  • C. Rumpel
  • G. Bardoux
  • N. Péchot
  • P. Schmalzer
  • B. Drake
  • A. Mariotti
Original paper


Fire profoundly modifies the terrestrial C cycle of about 40% of the Earth’s land surface. The immediate effect of fire is that of a net loss of C as CO2 gas and soot particles to the atmosphere. Nevertheless, a proportion of the ecosystem biomass is converted into charcoal, which contains highly recalcitrant molecular structures that contribute to long-term C storage. The present study aimed to assess simultaneously losses to the atmosphere and charcoal production rates of C and N compounds as a result of prescription fire in a Florida scrub-oak ecosystem. Pre-fire and post-fire charred and unburned organic matter stocks were determined for vegetation leaves and stems, litter and soil in 20 sub-plots installed in a 30-ha area that was subjected to prescribed fire. Concentrations of C and N were determined, and fluxes among pools and to the atmosphere were derived from these measurements. Soil C and N stocks were unchanged by the fire. Post-fire standing dead biomass contained 30% and 12% of pre-fire vegetation C and N stocks, respectively. In litter, post-fire stocks contained 64% and 83% of pre-fire C and N stocks, respectively. Most of the difference in relative losses between vegetation and litter could be attributed to substantial litter fall of charred and unburned leaves during the fire event. Indeed, an estimated 21% of pre-fire vegetation leaf C was found in the post-fire litter, while the remaining 79% was lost to the atmosphere. About 3/4 of the fire-induced leaf litter fall was in the form of unburned tissue and the remainder was charcoal, which amounted to 5% of pre-fire leaf C stocks. Charcoal production ranged between 4% and 6% of the fire-affected biomass, i.e. the sum of charcoal production and atmospheric losses. This value is below the range of literature values for the transformation of plant tissue into stable soil organic matter through humification processes, which suggests that fire generates a smaller quantity of stable organic C than humification processes over decades and potentially centuries.


Carbon cycle Charcoal Fire CO2 flux Scrub oak 



This work was supported by a grant from the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center. The Institut National des Sciences de l’Univers department of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique is acknowledged for financial support under the framework of the program ‘Dynamique et stabilisation des matières organiques dans les sols tropicaux: influence des brûlis, de l’érosion et de la mise en culture’. We would like to thank the teams of Florida CO 2 site and Dynamac Corporation for fieldwork, and Naoise Nunan, Tammy Foster and John Erickson for reviews. Three anonymous reviewers also helped to improve this manuscript.


  1. Almendros G, Knicker H, Gonzalez-Vila FJ (2003) Rearrangement of carbon and nitrogen forms in peat after progressive thermal oxidation as determined by solid-state 13C-and 15N-NMR spectroscopy. Org Geochem 34:1559–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldock JA, Smernik RJ (2002) Chemical composition and bioavailability of thermally altered Pinus resinosa (Red pine) wood. Org Geochem 33:1093–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balesdent J (1996) The significance of organic separates to carbon dynamics and its modelling in some cultivated soils. Eur J Soil Sci 47:485–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balesdent J, Recous S (1997) Les temps de résidence du carbone et le potentiel de stockage de carbone dans quelques sols cultivés français. Can J Soil Sci 77(2):187–193Google Scholar
  5. Barbosa RI, Fearnside PM (2005) Above-ground biomass and the fate of carbon after burning in the savannas of Roraima, Brazilian Amazonia. For Ecol Manage 216:295–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bird MI, Moyo C, Veenendaal EM, Lloyd J, Frost P (1999) Stability of elemental carbon in savanna soil. Global Biogeochem Cycles 13(4):923–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolinder MA, Angers DA, Giroux M, Laverdière MR (1999) Estimating C inputs retained as soil organic matter from corn (Zea mays L.). Plant Soil 215:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caldwell TG, Johnson DW, Miller WW, Qualls RG (2002) Forest floor carbon and nitrogen losses due to prescription fire. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:262–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell GS, Jungbauer JD, Bildlake WR, Hungerford RD (1994) Predicting the effect of temperature on soil thermal conductivity. Soil Sci 159(5):307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Certini G (2005) Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review. Oecologia 143:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapin FS, Matson PA, Mooney HA (2002) Principle of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. Springer, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. Czimczik CI, Preston CM, Schmidt MWI, Schulze ED (2003) How surface fire in Siberian Scots pine forests affects soil organic carbon in the forest floor: stocks, molecular structure, and conversion to black carbon (charcoal). Global Biogeochem Cycles 17(1):1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dai X, Boutton TW, Glaser B, Ansley RJ, Zech W (2005) Black carbon in a temperate mixed-grass savanna. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1879–1881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Day FP, Weber EP, Hinkle CR, Drake BG (1996) Effects of elevated CO2 on fine roots length and distribution in an oak-palmetto scrub ecosystem in central Florida. Global Change Biol 2:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeBano LF (2000) The role of fire and soil heating on water repellency in wildland environments: a review. J Hydrol 231–232:195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Derenne S, Largeau C (2002) A review of some important families of refractory macromolecules: composition, origin, and fate in soils and sediments. Soil Sci 166(11):833–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dijkstra P, Hymus GJ, Colavito D, Vieglais D, Cundari C, Johnson DP, Hungate BA, Hinkle CR, Drake BG (2002) Elevated atmospheric CO2 stimulates aboveground biomass in a fire-regenerated scrub-oak ecosystem. Global Change Biol 8:90–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fearnside PM, Graça PMLA, Filho NL, Rodrigues FJA, Robinson JM (1999) Tropical forest burning in Brazilian Amazonia; measurement of biomass loading, burning efficiency and charcoal formation at Altamira, Parà. For Ecol Manage 123:65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fearnside PM, Graça PMLA, Rodrigues FJA (2001) Burning of Amazonian rainforests: burning efficiency and charcoal formation in forest cleared for cattle pasture near Manaus Brazil. For Ecol Manage 146:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernandez I, Cabaneiro A, Carballas T (1997) Organic matter changes immediately after a wildfire in an Atlantic forest soil and comparison with laboratory soil heating. Soil Biol Biochem 9(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gholz HL, Guerin DN, Cropper WP (1999) Phenology and productivity of saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) in a north Florida slash pine plantation. Can J For Res 29:1248–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gimeno-Garcia E, Andreu V, Rubio JL (2004) Spatial pattern of soil temperatures during experimental fires. Geoderma 118:17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glaser B, Balashov E, Haumaier L, Guggenberger G, Zech W (2000) Black carbon in density fractions of anthropogenic soils of the Brazilian Amazon region. Org Geochem 31:669–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glaser B, Amelung W (2003) Pyrogenic carbon in native grassland soils along a climosequence in North America. Global Biogeochem Cycles 17(2):1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graça PMLA, Fearnside PM, Cerri CC (1999) Burning of Amazonian forest in Ariquemes, Rondônia, Brazil: biomass, charcoal formation and burning efficiency. For Ecol Manage 120:179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamer U, Marschner B, Brodowski S, Amelung W (2004) Interactive priming of black carbon and glucose mineralization. Org Geochem 35:823–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ito A (2005) Modelling of carbon cycle and fire regime in an east Siberian larch forest. Ecol Model 187:121–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kauffman JB, Cummings DL, Ward DE (1994) Relationships of fire, biomass and nutrients dynamics along a vegetation gradient in the Brazilian cerrado. J Ecol 82:519–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kauffman JB, Steele MD, Cummings DL, Jaramillo VJ (2003) Biomass dynamics associated with deforestation, fire, and conversion to cattle pasture in a Mexican tropical dry forest. For Ecol Manage 176:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knicker H, Almendros G, Gonzalez-Vila FJ, Martin F, Lüdemann HD (1996) 13C- and 15N-NMR spectroscopic examination of organic nitrogen in plant biomass during thermal treatment. Soil Biol Biochem 28(8):1053–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kong AYY, Six J, Bryant DC, Denison RF, van Kessel C (2005) The relationship between carbon input, aggregation, and soil organic carbon stabilization in sustainable cropping systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1078–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuhlbusch TAJ, Crutzen PJ (1995) Toward a global estimate of black carbon in residues of vegetation fires representing a sink of atmospheric CO2 and a source of O2. Global Biogeochem Cycles 9(4):491–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuhlbusch TAJ, Andreae MO, Cachier H, Goldammer JG, Lacaux JP, Shea R, Crutzen PJ (1996) Black carbon formation by savanna fires: measurements and implications for the global carbon cycle. J Geophys Res 101(D19):23651–23665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lynch JA, Clark JS, Stocks BJ (2004) Charcoal production, dispersal, and deposition from the Fort Providence experimental fire: interpreting fire regimes from charcoal records in boreal forests. Can J For Res 34(8):1642–1656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Masiello CA (2004) New direction in black carbon organic geochemistry. Mar Chem 92:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Myers RL, Ewel JJ (1990) Ecosystems of Florida. University of Central Florida Press, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  37. Nguyen TH, Brown RA, Ball WP (2004) An evaluation of thermal resistance as a measure of black carbon content in diesel soot, wood char, and sediments. Org Geochem 35:217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pérez B, Moreno J (1998) Methods for quantifying fire severity in shrubland-fires. Plant Ecol 139:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Poirier N, Derenne S, Balesdent J, Rouzaud J-N, Mariotti A, Largeau C (2002) Abundance and composition of the refractory organic fraction of an ancient, tropical soil (Pointe Noire, Congo). Org Geochem 33:383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rasse DP, François L, Aubinet M, Kowalski AS, Vande Walle I I, Laitat E, Gérard JC (2001) Modelling short-term CO2 fluxes and long-term tree growth in temperate forests with ASPECTS. Ecol Model 14:35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rasse DP, Rumpel C, Dignac M-F (2005) Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation. Plant Soil 269:341–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roscoe R, Buurman P, Velthorst EJ, Pereira JAA (2000) Effects of fire on soils organic matter in a “cerrado sensu-stricto” from Southeast Brazil as revealed by changes in δ13C. Geoderma 95:141–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rumpel C, Kogel-Knabner I, Bruhn F (2002) Vertical distribution, age, and chemical composition of organic carbon in two forest soils of different pedogenesis. Org Geochem 33:1131–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salgado J, Gonzales MI, Armada J, Paz-Andrade MI, Carballas M, Carballas T (1995) Loss of organic matter in Atlantic forest soils due to wildfires. Calculation of the ignition temperature. Thermochim Acta 259:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmalzer PA, Hinkle CR (1996) Biomass and nutrients in above-ground vegetation and soils of Florida oak-saw palmetto scrub. Castanea 61:168–193Google Scholar
  46. Schmalzer PA, Hensley MA, Dunlevy CA (2001) Background characteristics of soils of Kennedy Space Center, Merritt Island, Florida: selected elements and physical properties. Florida Sci 64(3):161–190Google Scholar
  47. Schmidt MWI , Noak AG (2000) Black carbon in soils and sediments: analysis, distribution, implication, and current challenges. Global Biogeochem Cycles 14(3):777–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmidt MI, Skjemstad JO, Czimczik CI, Glaser B, Prentice KM, Gelinas Y, Kuhlbush TAJ (2001) Comparative analysis of black carbon in soils. Global Biogeochem Cycles 15(1):163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shindo H (1991) Elementary composition, humus composition, and decomposition in soil of charred grassland plants. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 37(4):651–657Google Scholar
  50. Simpson MJ, Hatcher PG (2004) Determination of black carbon in natural organic matter by chemical oxidation and solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Org Geochem 35:923–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Skjemstad JO, Reicosky DC, Wilts AR, McGowan JA (2002) Charcoal carbon in U.S. agricultural soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1249–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van der Werf GR, Randerson JT, Collatz J, Giglio L (2003) Carbon emission from fires in tropical and subtropical ecosystems. Global Change Biol 9:547–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wirth C, Schulze E-D, Lühker B, Grigoriev S, Siry M, Hardes G, Ziegler W, Backor M, Bauer G, Vygodskaya N (2002a) Fire and site effects on the long-term carbon and nitrogen balance in pristine Siberian Scots pine forests. Plant Soil 242:41–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wirth C, Czimzcik CI, Shulze ED (2002b) Beyond annual budgets: carbon flux at different temporal scales in fire-prone Siberian Scots pine forests. Tellus Ser B-Chem Phys Meteorol 54(5):611–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Alexis
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. P. Rasse
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. Rumpel
    • 1
  • G. Bardoux
    • 1
  • N. Péchot
    • 1
  • P. Schmalzer
    • 3
  • B. Drake
    • 4
  • A. Mariotti
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Biogéochimie et Ecologie des Milieux ContinentauxCentre INRA Versailles-GrignonThiverval-GrignonFrance
  2. 2.BioforskNorwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental ResearchAasNorway
  3. 3.Dynamac Corporation, Mail Code DYN-2NASAKennedy Space CenterUSA
  4. 4.Smithsonian Environmental Research CenterEdgewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations