Soluble Reactive Phosphorus Transport and Retention in Tropical, Rainforest Streams Draining a Volcanic and Geothermally Active Landscape in Costa Rica. : Long-Term Concentration Patterns, Pore Water Environment and Response to ENSO Events
- 114 Downloads
Soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) transport/retention was determined at four sites in three rainforest streams draining La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. La Selva is located at the base of the last remaining intact rainforest transect from 30 m above sea level to 3000 m along the entire Caribbean slope of Central America. Steam SRP levels can be naturally high there due to regional, geothermal groundwater discharged at ambient temperature. Monitoring since 1988 has revealed distinctive long-term differences in background SRP and total P (TP) for three streams in close proximity, and identified the impact of ENSO (El Nino Southern Oscillation) events on SRP-enriched reaches. Mean interannual SRP concentrations (± standard deviation) were 89 ± 53µg/l in the Salto (1988–1996), 21 ± 39µg/l in the Pantano (1988–1998), and 26 ± 35µg/l in the Sabalo (1988–1996). After January, 1997 the separate upland-lowland contributions to discharge and SRP load were determined monthly in the Salto. SRP in Upper Salto was low (19 ± 8µg/l, 1997–2002) until enriched at␣the upland-lowland transition by regional groundwater. Mean SRP concentration in Lower␣Salto (108 ± 104µg/l) was typically highest February–April, the driest months, and lowest July–September, the wettest. SRP concentration was positively correlated to the inverse of discharge in Lower Salto when ENSO data were omitted (1992 and 1998–1999), but not in the Upper Salto, Pantano, or Sabalo. TP was positively correlated to the inverse of discharge in all three streams when ENSO data were omitted. High SRP springs and seeps along the Lower Salto contributed 36% of discharge but 85% of SRP export 1997–2001. Annual SRP flux from the total Salto watershed (1997–2001) averaged 2.9 kg/ha year, but only 0.6 kg/ha year from the Upper Salto. A dye tracer injection showed that pore water environments were distinctly different between Upper and Lower Salto. Upper Salto had high surface water–pore water exchange, high dissolved oxygen, low SRP, and low conductivity similar to surface water, and Lower Salto had low surface water–pore water exchange, low dissolved oxygen, high SRP, and high conductivity reflecting geothermal groundwater influence. SRP export from the Salto was controlled by regional groundwater transfer, which in similar volcanic settings could be a significant P source. However, ENSO events modified the SRP concentration in the Salto suggesting that long-term monitoring is required to understand underlying SRP dynamics and P flux to downstream communities.
Key wordsPhosphorus Retention Sorption SRP Streams Tropical TP Transport Volcanic ENSO
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from National Science Foundation grants DEB 95-28434 and DEB 00-75349, and from the National Research Program, Water Resources, U.S. Geological Survey. We also acknowledge the field assistance of Minor Hildago, La Selva Biological Station.
- Bourgeois WW, Cole DW, Riekerk H, Gessel SP (1972) Geology and soils of comparative ecosystem study areas, Costa Rica. Contribution No. 11, Institute of Forestry Production, University of Washington, 112 ppGoogle Scholar
- Enell M, Lofgren S (1988) Phosphorus in interstitial water: methods and dynamics. Hydrobiologia 170:103–132Google Scholar
- Golterman HL (1975) Chapter 2: Chemistry. In: Whitton BA (eds) River ecology. University of California Press, Berkeley CA, pp 39–80Google Scholar
- Gonsiorczyk T, Koschel R (1997) Variations of phosphorus release from sediments in stratified lakes. Water Air Soil Pollut 99:427–434Google Scholar
- Hendricks SP, White DS (2001) Stream and groundwater influences on phosphorus biogeochemistry. In: Jones JB, Mulholland PJ (eds) Streams and groundwaters. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 221–236Google Scholar
- Holtan H Kamp-Nielsen L, Stuanes AO (1988) Phosphorus in soil, water and sediment: an overview. Hydrobiologia 170:19–34Google Scholar
- Likens GE, Bormann H, Pierce RS, Eaton JS, Johnson NM (1977) Biogeochemistry of forested ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- McClain ME, Bilby RE, Triska FJ (1998) Nutrient cycles and responses to disturbance. In: Naiman RJ and Bilby RE (eds) River management and ecology: lessons from the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Mulholland PJ, Marzolf ER, Webster JR, Hart DR, Hendricks SP (1997) Evidence that hyporheic zones increase heterotrophic metabolism and phosphorus uptake in forest streams. Limnol Oceanogr 42:443–451Google Scholar
- Newbold JD, Elwood JW, Oȁ9Neill RV, Van Winkle W (1981) Measuring nutrient spiraling in streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:860–863Google Scholar
- Webster JR, Dȁ9Angelo DJ, Peters GT (1991) Nitrate and␣phosphate uptake in streams at Coweta Hydrologic Laboratory. Verh Internat Verein Limnol 24:1681–1686Google Scholar
- Zellweger GW, Kennedy VC, Bencala KE, Avanzino RJ, Jackman AP, Triska FJ (1986) Data on the solute concentration within the subsurface flows of Little Lost Man Creek in response to a transport experiment, Redwood National Park, northwest California. U.S. Geological Survey, Open File Report OFR 86–403WI 28 pGoogle Scholar