Small-scale hydrological variation determines landscape CO2 fluxes in the high Arctic
- 213 Downloads
We explored the influence of small-scale spatial variation in soil moisture on CO2 fluxes in the high Arctic. Of five sites forming a hydrological gradient, CO2 was emitted from the three driest sites and only the wettest site was a net sink of CO2. Soil moisture was a good predictor of net ecosystem exchange (NEE). Higher gross ecosystem photosynthesis (GEP) was linked to higher bryophyte biomass and activity in response to the moisture conditions. Ecosystem respiration (R e) rates increased with soil moisture until the soil became anaerobic and then R e decreased. At well-drained sites R e was driven by GEP, suggesting substrate and moisture limitation of soil respiration. We propose that spatial variability in soil moisture is a primary driver of NEE.
KeywordsHigh Arctic Carbon dioxide fluxes Spatial variability Soil moisture Vegetation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This research was funded by the European Commission Framework 5 grant no: EVK2-CT-2002–00145 (FRAGILE). We are grateful to the University Centre on Svalbard (UNIS) for logistical support. We also thank Jani Mannikko, Katrin Sjögersten and Richard Ubels for fieldwork assistance, Ad Huiskes for chemical analysis of soil C and N, and Steve Palmer for providing critical statistical support.
- Bliss LC, Matveyeva NV (1992) Circumpolar arctic vegetation. In: Chapin FS, III, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J (eds) Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate: an ecophysiological perspective. Academic Press, New York, USA, pp 59–89Google Scholar
- Christensen TR, Jonasson S, Callaghan TV, Havstrom M, Livens FR (1999) Carbon cycling and methane exchange in Eurasian tundra ecosystems. Ambio 28:239–244Google Scholar
- Fan SM, Wofsy SC, Bakwin PS, Jacob DJ (1992) Micrometerological measurements of CH4 and CO2 exchange between the atmosphere and subarctic tundra. J Geophys Res 97:D15, 16.627–16.643Google Scholar
- Jones C, McConnell C, Coleman K, Cox P, Falloon P, Jenkinson D, Powlson D (2005) Global climate change and soil carbon stocks; predictions from two contrasting models for the turnover of organic carbon in soil. Global Change Biol 11: 154–166, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00885Google Scholar
- Kirschbaum MUF (1995) The temperature-Dependence of soil organic-matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic-C storage. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 27: 753–760Google Scholar
- Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS® system for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
- Longton RE (1997) The role of bryophytes and lichens in polar ecosystems. In: Woodin SJ, Marquiss M (eds) Ecology of Arctic environments. British Ecological Society nr 13, pp 69–96Google Scholar
- McFadden JP, Eugster W, Chapin FS, III, (2003) A regional study on water vapor and CO2 exchange in arctic tundra. Ecology 84:2762–2776Google Scholar
- Muc M, Freedman B, Svoboda J (1989) Vascular plant-communities of a polar oasis at Alexandra fiord (79-degrees-n), Ellesmere Island, Canada. Can J Bot 67:1126–1136Google Scholar
- Oechel WC, Billings WD (1992) Effects of global change on the carbon balance of arctic plants and ecosystems. In: Chapin FS, III, Jefferies RL, Reynolds JF, Shaver GR, Svoboda J (eds), Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate: an ecophysiological perspective. Academic Press, New York, USA, pp 139–167Google Scholar
- Oechel WC, Cook AC, Hastings SJ, Vourlitis GL (1997) Effects of CO2 and climate change on arctic ecosystems. In: Woodin SJ, Maquiss M (eds) Ecology of Arctic environments. The British Ecological Society nr 13, pp␣255–274Google Scholar
- Prentice IC, Farquhar GD, Fasham MJR, Goulden ML, Heimann M, Jaramillo VJ, Kheshgi HS, Le Quéré C, Scholes RJ, Wallace DWR (2001) The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds) Climate change 2001. The scientific basis. The intergovernmental panel on climate changeGoogle Scholar
- Rosswall T, Veum AK, Kärenlampi L (1975) Plant litter decomposition at Fennoscandian tundra sites. In: Wielgolaski FE (ed) Fennoscandian Tundra ecosystems, Part 1, plants and microorganisms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 268–278Google Scholar
- Rustad LE, Cambell JL, Marion GM, Norby RJ, Mitchell MJ, Hartley AE, Cornelissen JHC, Gurevitch GCTE-NEWS (2001) A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 126:543–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sjögersten S, Wookey PA (2004) Decomposition of mountain birch leaf litter at the forest-tundra ecotone in the Fennoscandian mountains in relation to climate and soil conditions. Plant and Soil 262:215–227Google Scholar