Biogeochemistry

, Volume 71, Issue 3, pp 317–337

Restoring natural seepage conditions on former agricultural grasslands does not lead to reduction of organic matter decomposition and soil nutrient dynamics

  • J. van. Dijk
  • M. Stroetenga
  • L. Bos
  • P.M. van. Bodegom
  • H.A. Verhoef
  • R. Aerts
Article

Abstract

In the central part of the Netherlands, wetland restoration projects involve the rewetting of former agricultural land, where low water levels were artificially maintained (polders). Many of these projects do not result in the expected reduction of nitrogen and phosphorus availability and subsequent re-establishment of a diverse wetland vegetation. The aim of the present study was to investigate which mechanisms are responsible for this lack of success. Thereto, we studied the effect of rewetting of former agricultural grasslands on acidified peat soil (pH = 3.5) on organic matter decomposition, nitrogen cycling and phosphorus availability in the soil for three seasons. To provide an explanation for the observed effects, we simultaneously studied a set of potentially controlling abiotic soil conditions that were expected to change after rewetting. It was found that rewetting of these grasslands with natural, unpolluted seepage water did not affect nitrogen cycling, but raised decomposition rates and almost doubled phosphorus availability. The main cause of these effects is a raise of soil pH to about 7 due to the hydrochemical composition of the soil pore water after rewetting, which reflects groundwater with high amounts of buffering ions. This effect overruled any reduction in process rates by the lowered soil redox potential. The counterintuitive finding of eutrophication after rewetting with natural and unpolluted water is considered to represent a new form of internal eutrophication, triggered by the restoration of natural site conditions of former agricultural land on acid peat soil.

Groundwater Internal eutrophication Nitrogen mineralisation Peatland Phosphorus Wetland restoration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aerts R. and de Caluwe H. 1999. Nitrogen deposition effects on carbon dioxide and methane emissions from temperate peatland soils. Oikos 84: 44–54.Google Scholar
  2. Aerts R. and Chapin F. S. 2000. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv. Ecol. Res. 30: 1–67.Google Scholar
  3. Aerts R., Verhoeven J. T. A. and Whigham D. F. 1999. Plant-mediated controls on nutrient cycling in temperate fens and bogs. Ecology 80: 2170–2181.Google Scholar
  4. Bakker J. P. and Ol. H. 1995. Nutrient dynamics during restoration of fen meadows by haymaking without fertiliser application. In: Wheeler B. D., Shaw S. C., Fojt W. J. and Robertson R. A. (eds) Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, pp. 143–166.Google Scholar
  5. Beltman B., den Broek T. and Bloemen S. 1995. Restoration of acidi ed rich-fen ecosystems in the Vechtplassen area: successes and failures. In: Wheeler B. D., Shaw S. C., Fojt W. J. and Robertson R. A. (eds), Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, pp. 273–286.Google Scholar
  6. Beltman B., Vandenbroek T., Bloemen S. and Witsel C. 1996. Effects of restoration measures on nutrient availability in a formerly nutrient-poor floating fen after acidification and eutrophication. Biol. Conserv. 78: 271–277.Google Scholar
  7. Berendse F., Oomes M. J. M., Altena H. J. and Devisser W. 1994. A comparative study of nitrogen. ows in 2 similar meadows affected by different groundwater levels. J. Appl. Ecol. 31: 40–48.Google Scholar
  8. Box J. D. 1983. Investigation of the Folin-Ciocalteau phenol reagent for the determination of polyphenolic substances in natural waters. Water Res. 17: 511–525.Google Scholar
  9. Brown A., Birks H. J. B. and Thompson D. B. A. 1993. A new biogeographical classification of the Scottish uplands. 2. Vegetation environment relationships. J. Ecol. 81: 231–251.Google Scholar
  10. den Held J. J. and den Held A. J. 1976. Beknopte handleiding voor vegetatiekundig onderzoek, 2nd edn. K. N. N. V, Hoogwoud, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  11. Grime J. P. 2001. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester.Google Scholar
  12. Harrison A. F., Latter P. M. and Walton D. W. H. 1988. Cotton strip assay: an index of decomposition in soils. In: Harrison A. F., Latter P. M. and Walton D. W. H. (eds) ITE Symposium no. 24. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology/Natural Environment Research Council.Google Scholar
  13. Houba V. J. G., van der Lee J. J. and Novozamsky I. 1995. Soil Analysis Procedures: Other Procedures, 6th edn. Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  14. Howard-Williams C. 1985. Cycling and retention of nitrogen and phosphorus in wetlands: a theoretical and applied perspective. Freshwater Biol. 15: 391–431.Google Scholar
  15. Jongman R. H. G., Ter Braak C. J. F. and Van Tongeren O. F. R. 1995. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Koerselman W., Vankerkhoven M. B. and Verhoeven J. T. A. 1993. Release of inorganic N, P and K in peat soils-effect of temperature, water chemistry and water level. Biogeochemistry 20: 63–81.Google Scholar
  17. Kok C. J., Meesters H. W. G. and Kempers A. J. 1990. Decomposition rate, chemical composition and nutrient recycling of Nymphaea-Alba L floating leaf blade Detritus as influenced by pH, alkalinity and aluminum in laboratory experiments. Aquat. Bot. 37: 215–227.Google Scholar
  18. Lamers L. P. M., Smolders A. J. P. and Roelofs J. G. M. 2002. The restoration of fens in the Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 478: 107–130.Google Scholar
  19. Lamers L. P. M., Tomassen H. B. M. and Roelofs J. G. M. 1998. Sulfate-induced eutrophication and phytotoxicity in freshwater wetlands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32: 199–205.Google Scholar
  20. McLatchey G. P. and Reddy K. R. 1998. Regulation of organic matter decomposition and nutrient release in a wetland soil. J. Environ. Qual. 27: 1268–1274.Google Scholar
  21. Olde Venterink H., Pieterse N. M., Belgers J. D. M., Wassen M. J. and de Ruiter O. D. 2002. N, P and K budgets along nutrient availability and productivity gradients in wetlands. Ecol. Appl. 12: 1010–1026.Google Scholar
  22. Oomes M. J. M. 1992. Yield and species density of grasslands during restoration management. J. Veg. Sci. 3: 271–274.Google Scholar
  23. Oomes M. J. M., Kuikman P. J. and Jacobs F. H. H. 1997. Nitrogen availability and uptake by grassland in mesocosms at two water levels and two water qualities. Plant Soil. 192: 249–259.Google Scholar
  24. Oomes M. J. M., Ol. H. and Altena H. J. 1996. Effects of vegetation management and raising the water table on nutrient dynamics and vegetation change in a wet grassland. J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 576–588.Google Scholar
  25. Ponnamperuma F. N. 1972. The chemistry of submerged soils. Adv. Agron. 24: 29–96.Google Scholar
  26. Raison R. J., Connell M. J. and Khanna P. K. 1987. Methodology for studying. uxes of soil mineral-N in situ. Soil Biol. Biochem. 19: 521–530.Google Scholar
  27. Roelofs J. G. M. 1991. Inlet of alkaline river water into peaty lowlands-effects on water-quality and Stratiotes-Aloides L stands. Aquat. Bot. 39: 267–293.Google Scholar
  28. Schlesinger W. H. 1997. Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  29. Stumm W. and Morgan J. J. 1970. Aquat. Chem. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Ter Braak C. J. F. and Smilauer P. 2002. CANOCO Reference manual and CanoDraw or Windows User 's guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4. 5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Verhoeven J. T. A. 1992. Fens and Bogs in the Netherlands: Vegetation, History, Nutrient Dynamics and Conservation. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  32. Verhoeven J. T. A., Keuter A., Logtestijn R. v., Kerkhoven M. B. v. and Wassen M. 1996. Control of local nutrient dynamics in Mires by regional and climatic factors-a comparison of Dutch and Polish sites. J. Ecol. 84: 647–656.Google Scholar
  33. Verhoeven J. T. A., Koerselman W. and Beltman B. 1988. The vegetation of fens in relation to their hydrology and nutrient dynamics: a case study. In: Symoens J. J. (ed. ), Vegetation of Inland Waters. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 647–656.Google Scholar
  34. vanWirdum G. 1991. Vegetation and Hydrology of Floating Rich-fens. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. van. Dijk
    • 1
  • M. Stroetenga
    • 1
  • L. Bos
    • 2
  • P.M. van. Bodegom
    • 1
  • H.A. Verhoef
    • 3
  • R. Aerts
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Systems Ecology, Institute of Ecological ScienceVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Centre for Agriculture and EnvironmentUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Institute of Ecological Science, Department of Animal EcologyVrije UniversiteitAmsterdam

Personalised recommendations