Effects of temperature and initial pH on biohydrogen production from food-processing wastewater using anaerobic mixed cultures
- 329 Downloads
This study attempted to determine the optimal temperature and initial cultivation pH by conducting a series of batch tests in stirred-tank bioreactor using fructose-producing wastewater as an organic substrate. The bioreactor temperature was controlled at 35–55°C with an initial pH of 4–8. Hydrogen production efficiency was assessed using specific hydrogen production potential (SHPP) and the maximum specific hydrogen production rate (SHPRm). Experimental results indicated that temperature and initial pH markedly affected SHPP and SHPRm, volatile fatty acids distribution as well as the ratio of butyrate/acetate (BHu/HAc). Two-fold higher SHPP and SHPRm were obtained at thermophilic condition (55°C) than those at mesophilic condition (35°C). The optimal initial pH was 6 for hydrogen production with peak values of SHPP of 166.8 ml-H2/g-COD and SHPRm of 26.7 ml-H2/g-VSS-h for fructose-processing wastewater. Molasses-processing wastewater had a higher SHPP (187.0 ml-H2/g-COD) and SHPRm (42.7 ml-H2/gVSS-h) than fructose-processing wastewater at pH 6. The DGGE profiles indicated that molasses-processing wastewater is a better substrate than fructose-processing wastewater for growth of hydrogen-producing bacteria due to the high staining intensity of bands.
KeywordsTemperature Initial pH Biohydrogen Food-processing wastewater Butyrate/acetate ratio
The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan for financially supporting this research. Ted Knoy is appreciated for his editorial assistance.
- American Public Health Association (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. APHA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Chao YC (2004) Performance evaluation of hydrogen fermentation process utilizing starch and peptone as multiple substrates. M.S. Thesis, National Cheng-Kung University, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
- Khanal SK, Chen WH, Li L, Sung S (2004) Biological hydrogen production: effects of pH and intermediate products. Int J. Hydrogen Energy 29:1123–1131Google Scholar
- Monteoliva-Sanches M, Incerti C, Ramos-Cormenzana A, Paredes C, Roig A, Cegarra J (1996) The study of the aerobic bacterial microbiota and biotoxicity in various samples of olive mill wastewaters (Alpechin) during their composting process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38:211–214Google Scholar
- Sasikala K, Ramana CHV, Subrahmanyam M (1991) Photoproduction of hydrogen from wastewater of a lactic acid fermentation plant by a purple non-sulfur photosynthetic bacterium, Rhodobacter sphaeroides O.U. 001. Indian J Exp Biol 129:74–75Google Scholar
- Speece RE (1996) Anaerobic biotechnology for industrial wastewaters. Archae Press, Nashville, TNGoogle Scholar
- Thauer RK, Jungermann K, Decker K (1977) Energy conversation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. Bacterial Rev 1:100–180Google Scholar