Thermophilic, anaerobic co-digestion of microalgal biomass and cellulose for H2 production
- 650 Downloads
Microalgal biomass has been a focus in the sustainable energy field, especially biodiesel production. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of treating microalgal biomass and cellulose by anaerobic digestion for H2 production. A microbial consortium, TC60, known to degrade cellulose and other plant polymers, was enriched on a mixture of cellulose and green microalgal biomass of Dunaliella tertiolecta, a marine species, or Chlorella vulgaris, a freshwater species. After five enrichment steps at 60°C, hydrogen yields increased at least 10% under all conditions. Anaerobic digestion of D. tertiolecta and cellulose by TC60 produced 7.7 mmol H2/g volatile solids (VS) which were higher than the levels (2.9–4.2 mmol/g VS) obtained with cellulose and C. vulgaris biomass. Both microalgal slurries contained satellite prokaryotes. The C. vulgaris slurry, without TC60 inoculation, generated H2 levels on par with that of TC60 on cellulose alone. The biomass-fed anaerobic digestion resulted in large shifts in short chain fatty acid concentrations and increased ammonium levels. Growth and H2 production increased when TC60 was grown on a combination of D. tertiolecta and cellulose due to nutrients released from algal cells via lysis. The results indicated that satellite heterotrophs from C. vulgaris produced H2 but the Chlorella biomass was not substantially degraded by TC60. To date, this is the first study to examine H2 production by anaerobic digestion of microalgal biomass. The results indicate that H2 production is feasible but higher yields could be achieved by optimization of the bioprocess conditions including biomass pretreatment.
KeywordsDunaliella tertiolecta Chlorella vulgaris Cellulose degradation Anaerobic digestion Hydrogen production
Partial funding for this study was received from the Finland Distinguished Professorship Program (402/2006) of the Finnish Agency for Technology and Innovation (S.M. Carver and O.H. Tuovinen), USDA National Needs Graduate Fellowship Program (S.M. Carter), Academy of Finland (D.N. Thomas), and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Studentship in conjunction with RWE Power (U.K.) and Varicon Aqua Ltd. (C.J. Hulatt and D.N. Thomas).
- Ben-Amotz A, Polle JEW, Rao DVS (2010) The alga Dunaliella: biodiversity, physiology, genomics and biotechnology. Science, EnfieldGoogle Scholar
- Cordóba LT, Bocanegra ARD, Llorente BR, Hernández ES, Echegoyen FB, Borja R, Bejines FR, Morcillo MFC (2008) Batch culture growth of Chlorella zofingiensis on effluent derived from two-stage anaerobic digestion of two-phase olive mill solid waste. Electron J Biotechnol. doi: 10.2225/vol11-issue2-fulltext-1 11(2):1–8
- Department of Energy (2007) Roadmap for bioenergy and biobased products in the U.S. Biomass Research and Development, Technical Advisory Committee, Washington DC ADA494661Google Scholar
- Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Rice EW, Greenberg AE, Franson MAH (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Holmes RM, Aminot A, Kérouel R, Hooker BA, Peterson BJ (1999) A simple and precise method for measuring ammonium in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:1801–1808Google Scholar
- Ike A, Saimura C, Hirata K, Miyamoto K (1996) Environmentally friendly production of H2 incorporating microalgal CO2 fixation. J Mar Biotechnol 4:47–51Google Scholar
- Kojima H, Lee YK (2001) Photosynthetic microorganisms in environmental biotechnology. Springer, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
- Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stokes BJ, Erbach DC (2005) Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. U.S. Department of Energy DOE/GO-102005-2135Google Scholar