Bacterial removal of chromium (VI) and (III) in a continuous system
- 243 Downloads
The capacity of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans to reduce different concentrations of hexavalent chromium in shake flask cultures has been investigated. A. ferrooxidans reduces 100% of chromium (VI) at concentrations of 1, 2.5 and 5 ppm, but in the presence of 10 ppm only 42.9% of chromium (VI) was reduced after 11 days of incubation. A. thiooxidans showed a lower capacity to reduce this ion and total reduction of chromium (VI) was only obtained for concentrations of 1 and 2.5 ppm, whereas 64.7% and 30.5% was reached for 5 and 10 ppm, respectively, after 11 days. A continuous flow mode system was subsequently investigated, in which A. thiooxidans was immobilized on elemental sulphur and the acidic medium obtained was employed to solubilize chromium (III) and to reduce chromium (VI) present in a real electroplating waste [30% of chromium (III) and 0.1% of chromium (VI)]. The system enabled the reduction of 92.7% of hexavalent chromium and represents a promising way to treat this type of waste in the industry.
KeywordsA. ferrooxidans A. thiooxidans Chromium (VI) Chromium (III) Reduction Solubilization
The authors from University of Cádiz wish to express their sincere gratitude to Dr. Donati from Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Fermentaciones Industriales (CINDEFI-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina, where part of this research was carried out. This research was supported by Regional Goberment of Andalusia.
- CEC (Council of the European Communities). Council Directive of 12 June 1986 on limit values and quality objectives for discharges of certain dangerous substances (86/280/EEC). Off J Eur Commum L181:16–27Google Scholar
- Chang AC, Warneke JW, Page AL, Lund LJ (1984) Accumulation of heavy metals in sewage sludge treated soils. J Environ Qual 13:87–91Google Scholar
- Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AE (1998) Plasma emission spectroscopy. standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. APHA, AWWA, WEF, 20th edn. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Davis RD (1987) Use of sewage sludge on land in the United Kingdom. Wat Sci Techn 19:1–8Google Scholar
- Ebner HG (1978) Metal recovery and environmental protection by bacterial leaching of inorganic waste materials. In: Murr LE, Torma AE, Brierley JA, (eds) Metallurgical applications of bacterial leaching and related microbiological phenomena. Academic Press. pp 195–206Google Scholar
- Rulkens WH, Grotenhuis JTC, Tichy R (1995) Methods of cleaning contaminated soils and sediments. In: Salomons W, Förstner U, Mader P (eds) Heavy Metals, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 151–191Google Scholar
- Scheltinga HMJ (1987) Sludge in agriculture: the European approach. Wat Sci Techn 19:9–18Google Scholar
- Sisti F, Allegretti P, Donati E (1998) Bacterial reduction of hexavalent chromium by species of thiobacilli grown on sulphur. Appl Biol Sci 4:47–58Google Scholar
- Tuovinen O (1990) Biological fundaments of mineral leaching processes, microbial mineral recovery. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 55–57Google Scholar