Advertisement

The geographic and climatic distribution of plant height diversity for 19,000 angiosperms in China

  • Lingfeng MaoEmail author
  • Nathan G. Swenson
  • Xinghua Sui
  • Jinlong Zhang
  • Shengbin Chen
  • Jingji Li
  • Peihao Peng
  • Guangsheng Zhou
  • Xinshi Zhang
Original Paper
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

The geographic distribution of plant form and function has been studied for over a century for purposes ranging from vegetation classification to global vegetation modeling. Despite this attention we have surprisingly few studies that have actually mapped the distribution and diversity of quantitative plant traits on continental scales and quantified the drivers of these spatial patterns. This limitation has been largely due to the inherent patchiness in trait and spatial databases. Here we analyze the distribution and diversity of plant maximum height in relation to climatic gradients for ~ 19,000 Angiosperm species across China. First, we quantify the relationship between the mean maximum height with climatic variables to test the prediction that precipitation and temperature both should restrict the maximum heights possible in a region. Second, we used null model analysis to address the fundamental question of whether gradients in plant species richness coincide with an increased trait range as expected under limiting similarity theory or whether more species are simply packed into the same range of trait values. The results show that the mean maximum height in a plant assemblage is highest in regions with higher temperatures and annual precipitation indicating that increases in precipitation are enough to offset the concomitant increase in temperature, which was expected to limit plant height. The range and packing of height space were found to increase with species richness and in less climatically variable environments. Null modeling results also show that the deviation of the observed results from expected has a distinct spatial signature for herbaceous and woody plants. Our results highlight plant height diversity, including the range and packing of plant height space, are sensitive to environment, and the mechanisms driving the range and packing of height space in the two growth forms may be different.

Keywords

Functional traits Macroecology Biogeography Herbs Woody plants Functional diversity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the contributors for the Chinese Vascular Plant Distribution Database. This work was financially supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB31000000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870506) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20181398) and the financial support of the US National Science Foundation to Swenson (DBI 1262475). We would thank the two anonymouos reviewers and Dr. Zhiwei Ge at Nanjing Forestry University for their constructive comments.

Supplementary material

10531_2019_1895_MOESM1_ESM.docx (153 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 152 kb)

References

  1. Bolmgren K, Cowan PD (2008) Time-size tradeoffs: a phylogenetic comparative study of flowering time, plant height and seed mass in a north-temperate flora. Oikos 117(3):424–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown JH (1995) Macroecology. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S, Lewis SL, Swenson NG, Zanne AE (2009) Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol Lett 12(4):351–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Diaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, ter Steege H, Morgan HD, van der Heijden MGA, Pausas JG, Poorter H (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 51(4):335–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Du GZ, Qi W (2010) Trade-offs between flowering time, plant height, and seed size within and across 11 communities of a QingHai-Tibetan flora. Plant Ecol 209(2):321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elser JJ, Fagan WF, Kerkhoff AJ, Swenson NG, Enquist BJ (2010) Biological stoichiometry of plant production: metabolism, scaling and ecological response to global change. New Phytol 186(3):593–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Falster DS, Westoby M (2003) Plant height and evolutionary games. Trends Ecol Evol 18(7):337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernandez-Calvo IC, Obeso JR (2004) Growth, nutrient content, fruit production and herbivory in bilberry Vaccinium myrtillus L. along an altitudinal gradient. Forestry 77(3):213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fierer N, McCain CM, Meir P, Zimmermann M, Rapp JM, Silman MR, Knight R (2011) Microbes do not follow the elevational diversity patterns of plants and animals. Ecology 92(4):797–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hawkins BA (2014) Community phylogenetics at the biogeographical scale: cold tolerance, niche conservatism and the structure of North American forests. J Biogeogr 41(1):23–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25(15):1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hutchinson GE (1957) Concluding remarks. Population studies: Animal ecology and demography. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22(1507):415–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kattge J et al (2011) TRY—a global database on plant traits. Glob Change Biol 17(9):2905–2935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kempes CP, West GB, Crowell K, Girvan M (2011) Predicting maximum tree heights and other traits from allometric scaling and resource limitations. PLoS ONE 6(6):e20551PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koch GW, Sillett SC, Jennings GM, Davis SD (2004) The limits to tree height. Nature 428(6985):851–854PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Korner C (2007) The use of ‘altitude’ in ecological research. Trends Ecol Evol 22(11):569–574PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Kraft NJB, Ackerly DD (2010) Functional trait and phylogenetic tests of community assembly across spatial scales in an Amazonian forest. Ecol Monogr 80(3):401–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kraft NJB, Valencia R, Ackerly DD (2008) Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest. Science 322(5901):580–582PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Lamanna C, Blonder B, Violle C, Kraft NJ, Sandel B, Šímová I, Donoghue JC, Svenning JC, McGill BJ, Boyle B, Buzzard V (2014) Functional trait space and the latitudinal diversity gradient. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(38):13745–13750PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lebrija-Trejos E, Pérez-García EA, Meave JA, Bongers F, Poorter L (2010) Functional traits and environmental filtering drive community assembly in a species-rich tropical system. Ecology 91(2):386–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lessaard J, Belmaker J, Myers JA, Chase JM, Rahbek C (2012) Inferring local ecological processes amid species pool influences. Trends Ecol Evol 27(11):600–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacArthur R, Levins R (1967) Limiting similarity convergence and divergence of coexisting species. Am Nat 101(921):377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Macek P, Leps J (2008) Environmental correlates of growth traits of the stoloniferous plant Potentilla palustris. Evol Ecol 22(3):419–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moles AT, Leishman MR (2008) The seedling as part of a plant’s life history strategy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moles AT, Ackerly DD, Webb CO, Tweddle JC, Dickie JB, Westoby M (2005) A brief history of seed size. Science 307(5709):576–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moles AT, Warton DI, Warman L, Swenson NG, Laffan SW, Zanne AE, Pitman A, Hemmings FA, Leishman MR (2009) Global patterns in plant height. J Ecol 97(5):923–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mouchet MA, Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2010) Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Funct Ecol 24(4):867–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Niklas KJ (1994) Plant allometry: the scaling of form and process. The Univserity of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  29. Poorter L, Hawthorne W, Bongers F, Sheil D (2008) Maximum size distributions in tropical forest communities: relationships with rainfall and disturbance. J Ecol 96(3):495–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rangel TFLVB, Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM (2006) Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15(4):321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raunkiaer C (1934) The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Ricklefs RE (2009) Aspect diversity in moths revisited. Am Nat 173(3):411–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schimper AFW (1889) Pflanzengeographie auf physiologischer Grundlage [Plant geography upon a physiological basis]. G. Fischer Jena 8:876Google Scholar
  34. Šímová I, Violle C, Kraft NJ, Storch D, Svenning JC, Boyle B, Donoghue JC, Jørgensen P, McGill BJ, Morueta-Holme N, Piel WH (2014) Shifts in trait means and variances in North American tree assemblages: species richness patterns are loosely related to the functional space. Ecography 38(7):649–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith AP (1980) The paradox of plant height in an Andean giant rosette species. J Ecol 68(1):63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith SA, Donoghue MJ (2008) Rates of molecular evolution are linked to life history in flowering plants. Science 322(5898):86–89PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Stegen JC, Swenson NG (2009) Functional trait assembly through ecological and evolutionary time. Theor Ecol 2(4):239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stegen JC, Swenson NG, Enquist BJ, White EP, Phillips OL, Jorgensen PM, Weiser MD, Mendoza AM, Vargas PN (2011) Variation in above-ground forest biomass across broad climatic gradients. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20(5):744–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stephenson NL, Das AJ (2011) Comment on “Changes in climatic water balance drive downhill shifts in plant species’ optimum elevations”. Science 334(6053):177PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Sun SC, Frelich LE (2011) Flowering phenology and height growth pattern are associated with maximum plant height, relative growth rate and stem tissue mass density in herbaceous grassland species. J Ecol 99(4):991–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Swenson NG, Enquist BJ (2007) Ecological and evolutionary determinants of a key plant functional trait: wood density and its community-wide variation across latitude and elevation. Am J Bot 94(3):451–459PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Swenson NG, Weiser MD (2010) Plant geography upon the basis of functional traits: an example from eastern North American trees. Ecology 91(8):2234–2241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Swenson NG et al (2012) The biogeography and filtering of woody plant functional diversity in North and South America. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21(8):798–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thomson FJ, Moles AT, Auld TD, Kingsford RT (2011) Seed dispersal distance is more strongly correlated with plant height than with seed mass. J Ecol 99(6):1299–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Bodegom PM, Douma JC, Witte JPM, Ordonez JC, Bartholomeus RP, Aerts R (2012) Going beyond limitations of plant functional types when predicting global ecosystem-atmosphere fluxes: exploring the merits of traits-based approaches. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21(6):625–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1999) A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature 400(6745):664–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Westoby M (1998) A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil 199(2):213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Westoby M, Wright IJ (2006) Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. Trends Ecol Evol 21(5):261–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wright IJ et al (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428(6985):821–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yu R et al (2018) Patterns of maximum height of endemic woody seed plants in relation to environmental factors in China. Ecosphere 9:e02319CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lingfeng Mao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nathan G. Swenson
    • 2
  • Xinghua Sui
    • 3
  • Jinlong Zhang
    • 4
  • Shengbin Chen
    • 5
  • Jingji Li
    • 5
  • Peihao Peng
    • 6
  • Guangsheng Zhou
    • 7
  • Xinshi Zhang
    • 8
  1. 1.Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  3. 3.SYSU-Alberta Joint Lab for Biodiversity Conservation, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and School of Life ScienceSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  4. 4.Conservation DepartmentKadoorie Farm and Botanic GardenHong Kong SARChina
  5. 5.College of Environment and Civil EngineeringChengdu University of TechnologyChengduChina
  6. 6.College of Tourism and Urban–Rural PlaningChengdu University of TechnologyChengduChina
  7. 7.Chinese Academy of Meteorological SciencesBeijingChina
  8. 8.State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental ChangeInstitute of Botany, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations