Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 28, Issue 14, pp 3695–3711 | Cite as

Impacts of bamboo spreading: a review

  • Sarah Tanganeli Buziquia
  • Paulo Victor Freitas Lopes
  • Aleska Kaufmann Almeida
  • Isabel Kaufmann de AlmeidaEmail author
Review Paper
  • 48 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Invasive species

Abstract

Bamboo has been receiving increased attention as a renewable resource owing to its fast growth, economic value, widespread availability, and physical properties. However, environmental impacts of such intensive bamboo cultivation need to be assessed in order to avoid any negative consequences that could result from this plant’s invasive potential. In this study, we sought to evaluate the possible implications of bamboo growth in diverse ecosystems, as well as its relations with riparian zones and local hydrology. We reviewed studies that have focused on cultivation of bamboo in various areas where they are not always native. Furthermore, we have provided an objective compilation of studies that report possible effects and impacts that bamboo may have in local landscapes where it has been introduced or established. We conclude that, regardless of bamboo being native or exotic in a region, it can become invasive in some ecosystems, even when a bamboo species does not show spreading characteristics. Introduction of bamboo in a new area needs preliminary studies to avoid the species that may become invasive and to minimize the risk of suppression of different stages of ecological succession in local vegetation and of the changes in the forest structure and diversity.

Keywords

Local vegetation Diversity Invasive character Native plant Exotic plant 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—CAPES, to the Programa de Apoio à Pós-graduação—PROAP and to the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul—UFMS for their support in the development of this work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

References

  1. Araujo LSD (2008) Padrões e condicionantes da dinâmica da paisagem na floresta com bambus do Parque Estadual Intervales, SP. Universidade de São Paulo, Doctoral dissertationCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlow J, Silveira JM, Mestre LA, Andrade RB, D’Andrea GC, Louzada J, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Numata I, Lacau S, Cochrane MA (2012) Wildfires in bamboo-dominated Amazonian forest: impacts on above-ground biomass and biodiversity. PLoS ONE 7(3):e33373.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033373 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Blundell AG, Scatena FN, Wentsel R, Sommers W (2003) Ecorisk assessment using indicators of sustainability: invasive species in the Caribbean National Forest of Puerto Rico. J For 101(1):14–19.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/101.1.14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brasil (2011) Lei nº 12.484 8 de setembro de 2011. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2011/lei/l12484.htm. Accessed 28 Aug 2019
  5. Bystriakova N, Kapos V, Lysenko I, Stapleton CMA (2003) Distribution and conservation status of forest bamboo biodiversity in the Asia-Pacific Region. Biodivers Conserv 12(9):1833–1841.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024139813651 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Canavan S, Richardson DM (2015) Understanding the risks of an emerging global market for cultivating bamboo: considerations for a more responsible dissemination of alien bamboosGoogle Scholar
  7. Canavan S, Richardson DM, Visser V, Le Roux JJ, Vorontsova MS, Wilson JR (2017) The global distribution of bamboos: assessing correlates of introduction and invasion. AoB Plants.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plw078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canavan S, Kumschick S, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM, Wilson JR (2019) Does origin determine environmental impacts? Not for bamboos. Plants, People, Planet 1(2):119–128.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen X, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Booth T, He X (2009) Changes of carbon stocks in bamboo stands in China during 100 years. For Ecol Manag 258(7):1489–1496.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chou CH, Yang CM (1982) Allelopathic research of subtropical vegetation in Taiwan II. Comparative exclusion of understory by Phyllostachys edulis and Cryptomeria japonica. J Chem Ecol 8(12):1489–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark LG (1990) Diversity and biogeography of Neotropical bamboos (Poaceae: Bambusoideae). Acta Botan Bras 4(1):125–132.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33061990000100009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coradin L, Tortato DT (2006) Espécies exóticas invasoras: situação brasileira. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas, Brasília, p 23Google Scholar
  13. Corenblit D, Tabacchi E, Steiger J, Gurnell AM (2007) Reciprocal interactions and adjustments between fluvial landforms and vegetation dynamics in river corridors: a review of complementary approaches. Earth Sci Rev 84(1):56–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Council GEPP (2006) List of non-native invasive plants in Georgia. http://www.gaeppc.org/list.cfm. Accessed 19 Sept 2017
  15. County MD (2016a) Weed Risk Assessment for Phyllostachys aurea Carr. ex A. & C. Rivière (Poaceae)–Golden bambooGoogle Scholar
  16. County MD (2016b) Weed Risk Assessment for Phyllostachys aureosulcata McClure (1945) (Poaceae)—Yellow groove bambooGoogle Scholar
  17. Crosti R, Cascone C, Cipollaro S (2010) Use of a weed risk assessment for the Mediterranean region of Central Italy to prevent loss of functionality and biodiversity in agro-ecosystems. Biol Invasions 12(6):1607–1616.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9573-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. da Silva IF, dos Santos Pereira D, Silva SRF (2013) Estudos Morfológicos do Bambu (Bambusa cf. vulgaris L.), uma Espécie Invasora em Área de Mata Atlântica no Parque Municipal de Maceió-Alagoas. Revista Semente 6(6)Google Scholar
  19. Daehler CC, Carino DA (2000) Predicting invasive plants: prospects for a general screening system based on current regional models. Biol Invasions 2(2):93–102.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010002005024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dattilo AJ, Rhoades CC (2005) Establishment of the woody grass Arundinaria gigantea for riparian restoration. Restor Ecol 13(4):616–622.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00079.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dawson W, Burslem DF, Hulme PE (2009) The suitability of weed risk assessment as a conservation tool to identify invasive plant threats in East African rainforests. Biol Conserv 142(5):1018–1024.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Engler B, Schoenherr S, Zhong Z, Becker G (2012) Suitability of bamboo as an energy resource: analysis of bamboo combustion values dependent on the culm’s age. Int J For Eng 23(2):114–121.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2012.10739967 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fantini AC, Guries RP (2000) Guadua tagoara (Taquaruçu): uma espécie invasiva da Mata Atlântica. Forest 136–138Google Scholar
  24. Felker RM, Rovedder APM, Longhi SJ, Araújo EF, Stefanello MDM, Peccatti A (2017) Impact of bambusa tuldoides munro (poaceae) on forest regeneration. CERNE 23(2):275–282.  https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201723022297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Filgueiras TS (2005) Asiáticas no Brasil: gramíneas (Poaceae) introduzidas da Ásia. Eugeniana 28:3–18Google Scholar
  26. Filgueiras TS, Gonçalves AS (2004) A checklist of the basal grasses and bamboos in Brazil (Poaceae). J Am Bamboo Soc 18(1):7–18Google Scholar
  27. Friberg N, Winterbourn MJ (1997) Effects of native and exotic forest on benthic stream biota in New Zealand: a colonization study. Mar Freshw Res 48(3):267–275.  https://doi.org/10.1071/MF96094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gadgil M, Prasad SN (1984) Ecological determinants of life history evolution of two Indian bamboo species. Biotropica 16(3):161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. GBIF (2017a) Global biodiversity information facility (GBIF), Online Database. https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/search?has_coordinate=true&has_geospatial_issue=false&taxon_key=2705751. Accessed 17 Sept 2017
  30. GBIF (2017b) Global biodiversity information facility (GBIF), Online Database. https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/search?taxon_key=2705758. Accessed 17 Sept 2017
  31. GBIF (2017c) Global biodiversity information facility (GBIF), Online Database. https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/search?taxon_key=2705751. Accessed 17 Sept 2017
  32. GBIF (2017d) Global biodiversity information facility (GBIF), Online Database. https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/search?taxon_key=2705762. Accessed 17 Sept 2017
  33. GBIF (2017e) Global biodiversity information facility (GBIF), Online Database. Available: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/search?taxon_key=4128264. Accessed 17 Sept 2017
  34. GBIF (2017f) Global biodiversity information facility (GBIF), Online Database. Available: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/search?taxon_key=5290167. Accessed 17 Sept 2017
  35. Gielis J (2002) Future possibilities for bamboo in European agriculture. Oprins Plant Sint-Lenaartsesteenweg 91:1–10Google Scholar
  36. Gonzalez L, Christoffersen B (2006) The quiet invasion: a guide to invasive plants of the Galveston Bay area. Texas Commun Environ. Quality, Galveston Bay Estuary Program, Houston, TXGoogle Scholar
  37. Gordon DR, Onderdonk DA, Fox AM, Stocker RK, Gantz C (2008) Predicting invasive plants in Florida using the Australian weed risk assessment. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1(2):178–195.  https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-07-037.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Greco TM, Pinto MM, Tombolato AFC, Xia N (2015) Diversity of bamboo in Brazil. J Trop Subtrop Bot 23(1):1–16.  https://doi.org/10.11926/j.issn.1005-3395.2015.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gregory SV, Swanson FJ, McKee WA, Cummins KW (1991) An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. Biosci 41(8):540–551.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1311607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Griscom BW, Ashton PMS (2003) Bamboo control of forest succession: Guadua sarcocarpa in Southeastern Peru. For Ecol Manag 175(1):445–454.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00214-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gucker CL (2009) Phyllostachys aurea. Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/graminoid/phyaur/all.html. Accessed 6 Nov 2017
  42. Hawkins CL, Bacher S, Essl F, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Kühn I, Rabitsch W (2015) Framework and guidelines for implementing the proposed IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT). Divers Distrib 21(11):1360–1363.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. He S, Yin L, Wen J, Liang Y (2018) A test of the Australian weed risk assessment system in China. Biol Invasions 20(8):2061–2076.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1680-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ide JI, Shinohara Y, Higashi N, Komatsu H, Kuramoto K, Otsuki K (2010) A preliminary investigation of surface runoff and soil properties in a moso-bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) forest in western Japan. Hydrol Res Lett 4:80–84.  https://doi.org/10.3178/hrl.4.80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Judziewicz EJ, Clark LG, Londono X, Stern MJ (1999) American bamboos. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  46. Kato H, Hata K, Yamamoto H, Yoshioka T (2006) Effectiveness of the weed risk assessment system for the Bonin Islands. Assessment and control of biological invasion risk. Shoukadoh Book Sellers, Kyoto, pp 65–72Google Scholar
  47. Kaufman W, Kaufman SR (2013) Invasive plants: guide to identification and the impacts and control of common North American species. Stackpole Books, MechanicsburgGoogle Scholar
  48. Kawakita K, Rodrigues RS, Filgueiras TS (2016) Poaceae em uma planície de inundação no Brasil: listagem florística e novas ocorrências. Hoehnea 43(02):203–216.  https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-8906-76/2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Komatsu H, Onozawa Y, Kume T, Tsuruta K, Kumagai TO, Shinohara Y, Otsuki K (2010) Stand-scale transpiration estimates in a Moso bamboo forest: II. Comparison with coniferous forests. For Ecol Manag 260(8):1295–1302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Koop AL, Fowler L, Newton LP, Caton BP (2012) Development and validation of a weed screening tool for the United States. Biol Invasions 14(2):273–294.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0061-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Křivánek M, Pyšek P (2006) Predicting invasions by woody species in a temperate zone: a test of three risk assessment schemes in the Czech Republic (Central Europe). Divers Distrib 12(3):319–327.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00249.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kull CA, Tassin J, Moreau S, Ramiarantsoa HR, Blanc-Pamard C, Carrière SM (2012) The introduced flora of Madagascar. Biol Invasions 14(4):875–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Leung B, Lodge DM, Finnoff D, Shogren JF, Lewis MA, Lamberti G (2002) An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc R Soc Lond B 269(1508):2407–2413.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lieurance D, Cooper A, Young AL, Gordon DR, Flory SL (2018) Running bamboo species pose a greater invasion risk than clumping bamboo species in the continental United States. J Nat Conserv 43:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Little EL, Skolmen RG, Francis Sinclair (2003) Common forest trees of Hawaii (native and introduced). College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, MānoaGoogle Scholar
  56. Liu Y, Ying Z, Wang S, Liao J, Lu H, Ma L, Li Z (2017) Modeling the impact of reproductive mode on masting. Ecol Evol 7(16):6284–6291.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3214 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Liu W, Hui C, Wang F, Wang M, Liu G (2018) Review of the resources and utilization of bamboo in China. Bamboo-Curr Future Prospects.  https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lobovikov M, Schoene D, Yping L (2012) Bamboo in climate change and rural livelihoods. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 17(3):261–276.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9324-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Londoño X (1998) Evaluation of bamboo resources in Latin America. A Summary of the Final Report of Project, (96-8300), 01-4Google Scholar
  60. Londoño X, Clark LG (2002) Three new taxa of guadua (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) from South America. Novon.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3393241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Londono X, Peterson PM (1991) Guadua sarcocarpa (Poaceae: Bambuseae), a new species of Amazonian bamboo with fleshy fruits. Syst Bot 16:630–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mahdavi M, Clouston PL, Arwade SR (2010) Development of laminated bamboo lumber: review of processing, performance, and economical considerations. J Mater Civ Eng 23(7):1036–1042.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Makita A (1998) The significance of the mode of clonal growth in the life history of bamboos. Plant Species Biol 13(2–3):85–92.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.1998.tb00251.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McNeely JA, Mooney HA, Neville LE, Schei P, Waage JK (eds) (2001) Global strategy on invasive alien species. IUCN on behalf of the Global Invasive Species Programme, GlandGoogle Scholar
  65. Mews HA, Silvério DV, Lenza E, Marimon BS (2013) Influência de agrupamentos de bambu na dinâmica pós-fogo da vegetação lenhosa de um cerrado típico, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Rodriguésia-Inst de Pesqui Jard Botân do Rio J 64(2):211–221Google Scholar
  66. Morais M, Marchante E, Marchante H (2017) Big troubles are already here: risk assessment protocol shows high risk of many alien plants present in Portugal. J Nat Conserv 35:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2016.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. National Invasive Species Council (2001) Meeting the invasive species challenge: national invasive species management plan. National Invasive Species Council, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  68. O’connor PJ, Covich AP, Scatena FN, Loope LL (2000) Non-indigenous bamboo along headwater streams of the Luquillo Mountains, Puerto Rico: leaf fall, aquatic leaf decay and patterns of invasion. J Trop Ecol 16(4):499–516.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400001541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ohrnberger D (1999) The bamboos of the world: annotated nomenclature and literature of the species and the higher and lower taxa. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  70. Pagad S (2016) Bamboos and invasiveness. INBAR Working Paper 77Google Scholar
  71. Perkins LB, Leger EA, Nowak RS (2011) Invasion triangle: an organizational framework for species invasion. Ecol Evol 1(4):610–625.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.47 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Pheloung PC, Williams PA, Halloy SR (1999) A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. J Environ Manag 57(4):239–251.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1999.0297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. PROTA (2017) PROTA4U web database. In: Grubben GJH, Denton OA (eds). Wageningen, Netherlands: Plant Resources of Tropical Africa. https://www.prota4u.org/database/searchresults.asp. Accessed 17 Sept 2017
  74. PySek P (1995) On the terminology used in plant invasion studies. Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  75. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmanek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6(2):93–107.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rother DC, Rodrigues RR, Pizo MA (2009) Effects of bamboo stands on seed rain and seed limitation in a rainforest. For Ecol Manag 257(3):885–892.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rother DC, Rodrigues RR, Pizo MA (2016) Bamboo thickets alter the demographic structure of Euterpe edulis population: a keystone, threatened palm species of the Atlantic forest. Acta Oecol 70:96–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2015.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shackleton RT, Shackleton CM, Kull CA (2019) The role of invasive alien species in shaping local livelihoods and human well-being: a review. J Environ Manag 229:145–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sharma ML, Nirmala C (2015) Bamboo diversity of India: an update. In: Proceedings of the 10th world bamboo congress, Damyang, Korea, 17–22 September 2015, pp 516–528Google Scholar
  80. Shen Z, Ye S, Gang L (2016) Characteristics of soil and water lossin typical bamboo forest. 2nd International Conference on Architectural, Civil and Hydraulics Engineering (ICACHE 2016)Google Scholar
  81. Silvério DV, Mews HA, Lenza E, Marimon BS (2010) Impactos do agrupamento do bambu Actinocladum verticillatum (Nees) McClure ex Soderstr.(POACEAE) sobre a vegetação lenhosa de duas fitofisionomias de Cerrado na transição Cerrado-Floresta Amazônica. Acta Amazon 40(2):347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sinha P, Bajpai R (2009) Plant it—bring good luck to people, energy, and environment. Akshay Urja (Renewable Energy) 2:18–21Google Scholar
  83. Smith M, Nelson BW (2011) Fire favours expansion of bamboo-dominated forests in the south-west Amazon. J Trop Ecol 27(1):59–64.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646741000057X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Suzuki S (2015) Chronological location analyses of giant bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) groves and their invasive expansion in a satoyama landscape area, western Japan. Plant Species Biol 30(1):63–71.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1442-1984.12067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Swearingen J, Bargeron C (2011) Invasive plant atlas of the United States, and beyond? Plant invasions 164Google Scholar
  86. Tripathi SK, Singh KP (1994) Productivity and nutrient cycling in recently harvested and mature bamboo savannas in the dry tropics. J Appl Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2404604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Umemura M, Takenaka C (2015) Changes in chemical characteristics of surface soils in hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) forests induced by the invasion of exotic Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) in central Japan. Plant Species Biol 30(1):72–79.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1442-1984.12038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. USDA - United States Department of Agriculture (2019) Guidelines for the USDA-APHIS PPQ Weed Risk Assessment Process. USDA - United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  89. Valkenburg JV, Brunel S, Brundu G, Ehret P, Follak S, Uludag A (2014) Is terrestrial plant import from East Asia into countries in the EPPO region a potential pathway for new emerging invasive alien plants? EPPO Bull 44(2):195–204.  https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Van der Lugt P, Vogtländer J, Brezet H (2008) Bamboo, a sustainable solution for Western Europe: design cases LCAs and land-use. VSSD, DelftGoogle Scholar
  91. Wang Y, Liu Y (1995) Hydrological characteristics of a moso-bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) forest in south china. Hydrol Process 9(7):797–808.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090706 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Weakley AS (2008) Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, northern Florida, and surrounding areas. University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  93. Weber E, Gut D (2004) Assessing the risk of potentially invasive plant species in central Europe. J Nat Conserv 12(3):171–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2004.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wong KM (1991) The growth architecture and ecology of some tropical bamboos. J Am Bamboo Soc 8:43–58Google Scholar
  95. Wysocki WP, Clark LG, Attigala L, Ruiz-Sanchez E, Duvall MR (2015) Evolution of the bamboos (Bambusoideae; Poaceae): a full plastome phylogenomic analysis. BMC Evol Biol 15(1):50.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0321-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. Yi X (2008) Study on the spread rules and invasive risk management of alien invasive plant. Nanjing Agricultural University, NanjingGoogle Scholar
  97. Zhou BZ, Wang XM, Cao YH, Kong WJ, Tang YL (2012) Water and soil conservation characteristics for two typical subtropical forests in Southeast China. Advanced materials research, vol 518. Trans Tech Publications, Pfaffikon, pp 4827–4831Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Tanganeli Buziquia
    • 1
  • Paulo Victor Freitas Lopes
    • 1
  • Aleska Kaufmann Almeida
    • 1
  • Isabel Kaufmann de Almeida
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Urbanism and GeographyFederal University of Mato Grosso do SulCampo GrandeBrazil

Personalised recommendations