Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 28, Issue 14, pp 3951–3969 | Cite as

Plant populations of three threatened species experience rapid evolution under ex situ cultivation

  • R. RauschkolbEmail author
  • L. Szczeparska
  • A. Kehl
  • O. Bossdorf
  • J. F. Scheepens
Original Paper

Abstract

Many botanic gardens keep ex situ collections of rare species to prevent their extinction and to enable their reintroduction into the wild. A potential problem with ex situ collections is that relaxed selection, genetic drift, novel selection and inbreeding may cause rapid loss of adaptation to natural conditions and therefore may hamper success of reintroductions. Here, we investigated whether cultivation in ex situ collections of three threatened species—Trifolium spadiceum, Sisymbrium austriacum and Bromus grossus—influenced trait differentiation. Using plant material from the original source populations and from the ex situ collections, we compared germination characteristics, growth and phenology under different environmental treatments. Trifolium spadiceum showed reduced seed dormancy in the ex situ collection compared to the wild population, whereas germination temperature requirements changed for S. austriacum. Trifolium spadiceum also showed reduced seed viability in the ex situ collection compared to the wild population. All species showed differences in plant growth between the plants from nature and from the botanic garden. Additionally, B. grossus showed advanced flowering time in plants from the botanic garden. These differences may reflect reduced performance or changes in life-history strategies. We conclude that all three species have rapidly differentiated between wild and ex situ origins and that effects of relaxed selection, genetic drift, inbreeding depression and adaptation to cultivation conditions in the botanic garden may have played a role in population differentiation, which may be unfavourable for reintroduction into nature. To explore this further we suggest broader studies across more species, populations and gardens, involving common garden, reciprocal transplant and molecular studies.

Keywords

Botanic gardens Common garden experiment Ex situ cultivation Rapid evolution Threatened plant species 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Regierungspräsidium Tübingen for issuing the permits for seed sampling of the threatened species, Martin Engelhardt (Tübingen) and Bernd Junginger (Botanic Garden of the University of Tübingen) for locating the original natural populations, Simon Bauer (Botanic Garden of the University of Tübingen) and Michael Koltzenburg (University of Tübingen) for sharing knowledge on the species and cultivation techniques, and Andreas Ensslin (University of Bern) for his critical review of a previous version of our manuscript. This study benefited from a mobility fund from the European Union programme Knowledge Education Development to L.S.

References

  1. Adams WM (2004) Against extinction. The story of conservation. Earthsca, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Aichele D, Schwegler HW (2000) Die Blütenpflanzen Mitteleuropas. 2. Auflage. Band 2: Eibengewächse bis Schmetterlingsblütengewächse. Franckh-Kosmos, Stuttgart 2000, ISBN 3-440-08048-XGoogle Scholar
  3. Armbruster P, Reed DH (2005) Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95:235–242.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800721 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Balmford A, Bond W (2005) Trends in the state of nature and their implications for human well-being. Ecol Lett 8:1218–1234.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00814.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baskin CC, Baskin JM (2014) Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Elsevier Science, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed- effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanquart F, Kaltz O, Nuismer SL, Gandon S (2013) A practical guide to measuring local adaptation. Ecol Lett 16:1195–1205.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12150 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonser SP, Aarssen LW (2001) Allometry and plasticity of meristem allocation throughout development in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Ecol 89:72–79.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00516.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonser SP, Aarssen LW (2003) Allometry and development in herbaceous plants: functional responses of meristem allocation to light and nutrient availability. Am J Bot 90:404–412.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.3.404 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Borza JK, Westerman PR, Liebman M (2007) Comparing estimates of seed viability in three foxtail (Setaria) species using the imbibed seed crush test with and without additional tetrazolium testing. Weed Technol 21:518–522.  https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brandes D (2012) Balmenvegetation. (Vortrag 19.6.2012). Braunschweig: Institut für Pflanzenbiologie der Technischen Universität Braunschweig, Arbeitsgruppe für VegetationsökologieGoogle Scholar
  12. Breunig T, Demuth S (1999) Rote Liste der Farn—und Samenpflanzen Baden—Württembergs. Landesanstalt für Umwelt, Messungen und Naturschutz Baden-Würtemberg; 3. Auflage, Stuttgart 1999, ISBN: 3882512717Google Scholar
  13. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Rylands AB, Konstant WR et al (2002) Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 16:909–923.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00530.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (2010) Global strategy for plant conservation. Secretariat of the convention on biological diversity. Hg. v. Secretariat of the convention on biological diversity, Montreal, KanadaGoogle Scholar
  15. Daws MI, Garwood NC, Pritchard HW (2005) Traits of recalcitrant seeds in a semi-deciduous tropical forest in Panama. Some ecological implications. Funct Ecol 19:874–885.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.01034.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dirzo R, Raven PH (2003) Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28:137–167.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105532 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ensslin A, Godefroid S (2018) How the cultivation of wild plants in botanic gardens can change their genetic and phenotypic status and what this means for their conservation value. Sibbaldia 17:51–69Google Scholar
  18. Ensslin A, Sandner TM, Matthies D (2011) Consequences of ex situ cultivation of plants. Genetic diversity, fitness and adaptation of the monocarpic Cynoglossum officinale L. in botanic gardens. Biol Conserv 144:272–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ensslin A, Tschöpe O, Burkart M, Joshi J (2015) Fitness decline and adaptation to novel environments in ex situ plant collections. Current knowledge and future perspectives. Biol Conserv 192:394–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ensslin A, van de Vyver A, Vanderborght T, Godefroid S, James J (2017) Ex situ cultivation entails high risk of seed dormancy loss on short-lived wild plant species. J Appl Ecol 55:1145–1154.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans M, Dennehy J (2005) Germ banking: bet-hedging and variable release from egg and seed dormancy. Q Rev Biol 80:431–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Franks S, Sheina S, Weis A (2007) Rapid evolution of flowering time by an annualplant in response to a climate fluctuation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:1278–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gallagher MK, Wagenius S, Wilsey B (2016) Seed source impacts germination and early establishment of dominant grasses in prairie restorations. J Appl Ecol 53:251–263.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Groot MP, Kubisch A, Ouborg NJ, Pagel J, Schmid KJ, Vergeer P, Lampei C (2017) Transgenerational effects of mild heat in Arabidopsis thaliana show strong genotype specificity that is explained by climate at origin. New Phytol 215:1221–1234.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14642 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Guerrant EO, Havens K, Maunder M (2010) Ex situ plant conservation. Supporting species survival in the wild. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  26. Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD et al (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:e1500052.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Havens K (2004) Guidelines for ex situ conservation collection management: minimizing risks: supporting species survival in the wild. In: Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Island Press, pp 454–473Google Scholar
  28. Hawkins B, Sharrock S, Havens K (2008) Plants and climate change: which future?. Botanic Gardens Conservation International, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  29. Helm A, Hanski I, Pärtel M (2006) Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecol Lett 9:72–77.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00841.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Herget ME, Hufford KM, Mummey DL, Shreading LN (2015) Consequences of seed origin and biological invasion for early establishment in restoration of a North American grass species. PLoS ONE 10:e0119889.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119889 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Heschel MS, Paige KN (1995) Inbreeding depression, environmental stress, and population size variation in Scarlet Gilia (Ipomopsis aggregata). Conserv Biol 9:126–133.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09010126.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoban S, Schlarbaum S (2014) Optimal sampling of seeds from plant populations for ex situ conservation of genetic biodiversity, considering realistic population structure. Biol Conserv 177:90–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huang Z, Zhang X, Zheng G, Gutterman Y (2003) Influence of light, temperature, salinity and storage on seed germination of Haloxylon ammodendron. J Arid Environ 55:453–464.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(02)00294-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Humphrey LD, Schupp EW (2002) Seedling survival from locally and commercially obtained seeds on two semiarid sites. Restor Ecol 10:88–95.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.10109.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jacquemyn H, Meester L, Jongejans E, Honnay O (2012) Evolutionary changes in plant reproductive traits following habitat fragmentation and their consequences for population fitness. J Ecol 100:76–87.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01919.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Käsermann C, Moser D (1999) Merkblätter Artenschutz: Blütenpflanzen und Farne. BUWAL, BernGoogle Scholar
  37. Kawecki TJ, Ebert D (2004) Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Lett 7:1225–1241.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00684.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kiaer LP, Weisbach AN, Weiner J, Gibson D (2013) Root and shoot competition. A meta-analysis. J Ecol 101:1298–1312.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuznetsova A (2016) lmerTest: tests in linear mixed effects models 2.0-33. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html
  40. Lahti DC, Johnson NA, Ajie BC, Ott SP, Hendry AP, Blumstein DT, Coss RG, Donohue K, Foster SA (2009) Relaxed selection in the wild. Trends Ecol Evol 24:487–496.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lauterbach D, Burkart M, Gemeinholzer B (2012) Rapid genetic differentiation between ex situ and theirin situ source populations: an example of theendangered Silene otites (Caryophyllaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 168:64–75.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01185.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leimu R, Mutikainen PIA, Koricheva J, Fischer M (2006) How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? J Ecol 94:942–952.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01150.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leinonen T, O’Hara RB, Cano JM, Merila J (2008) Comparative studies of quantitative trait and neutral marker divergence: a meta-analysis. J Evol Biol 21:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01445.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Luoto M, Toivonen T, Heikkinen RK (2002) Prediction of total and rare plant species richness in agricultural landscapes from satellite images and topographic data. Landsc Ecol 17:195–217.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020288509837 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maass BL (2006) Changes in seed morphology, dormancy and germination from wild to cultivated hyacinth bean germplasm (Lablab purpureus. Papilionoideae). Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:1127–1135.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-005-2782-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maunder M (1992) Plant reintroduction: an overview. Biodivers Conserv 1:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maunder M, Higgens S, Culham A (2001) The effectiveness of botanic garden collections insupporting plant conservation: a European case study. Biodivers Conserv 10:383–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Menges ES (1991) Seed germination percentage increases with population size in a fragmented prairie species. Conserv Biol 5:158–164.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00120.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Metz J, Freundt H, Jeltsch F (2018) Stable germination behavior but partly changing seed–seed interactions along a steep rainfall gradient. Basic Appl Ecol 28:5–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2018.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ, Gorham J, Williams K (1986) Biomass accumulation and resource utilization in co-occurring grassland annuals. Oecologia 70:555–558.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00379903 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Nagel R, Durka W, Bossdorf O, Bucharova A (2019) Rapid evolution in native plants cultivated for ecological restoration: not a general pattern. Plant Biol 21:551–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Neergaard P (1977) Seed pathology. Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Okagami N (1986) Dormancy in Dioscorea. Different temperature adaptation of seeds, bulbils and subterranean organs in relation to north-south distribution. Bot Mag Tokyo 99:15–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Plitmann U, Kislev ME (1989) Reproductive changes induced by domestication. Adv Legume Biol 29:487–503Google Scholar
  55. Pluess AR, Stöcklin J (2004) Population genetic diversity of the clonal plant Geum reptans (Rosaceae) in the Swiss Alps. Am J Bot 91:2013–2021.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.12.2013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  57. Rucińska A, Puchalski J (2011) Comparative molecular studies on the genetic diversity of an ex situ garden collection and its source population of the critically endangered polish endemic plant Cochlearia polonica. Biodivers Conserv 20:401–413.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9965-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Satterthwaite WH (2010) Competition for space can drive the evolution of dormancy in a temporally invariant environment. Plant Ecol 208:167–185.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9696-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schröder R, Prasse R (2013) Cultivation and hybridization alter the germination behavior of native plants used in revegetation and restoration. Restor Ecol 21:793–800.  https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sharrock S (2012) GSPC: global strategy for plan conversation: a guide to the GSPC: all the targets, objectives and facts. Botanic Gardens Conservation International, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  61. Shi L, Zhang ZJ, Zhang CY, Zhang JZ (2004) Effects of sand burial on survival, growth, gas exchange and biomass allocation of Ulmus pumila seedlings in the Hunshandak Sandland, China. Ann Bot 94:553–560.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mch174 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Simons AM (2011) Modes of response to environmental change and the elusive empirical evidence for bet hedging. Proc R Soc B 278:1601–1609.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.0176 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Sun S, Frelich LE (2011) Flowering phenology and height growth pattern are associated with maximum plant height, relative growth rate and stem tissue mass density in herbaceous grassland species. J Ecol 99:991–1000.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01830.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Therneau T (2015) Mixed effects cox models. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/coxme/coxme.pdf
  65. Therneau T (2017) Package ‘survival’. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/survival.pdf
  66. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo MB, Sykes MT, Prentice IC (2005) Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:8245–8250.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409902102 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Till-Bottraud I, Wu L, Harding J (1990) Rapid evolution of life history traits in populations of Poa annua L. J Evol Biol 3(3–4):205–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Urban MC (2015) Climate change. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348:571–573.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa4984 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. van Kleunen M, Fischer M (2005) Constraints on the evolution of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in plants. New Phytol 166:49–60.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01296.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Vile D, Shipley B, Garnier E (2006) A structural equation model to integrate changes in functional strategies during old-field succession. Ecol 87:504–517.  https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0822 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vitt P, Havens K (2004) Integrating quantitative genetics into ex situ conservation and restoration practices. In: Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild, pp 286–304Google Scholar
  72. Wang P, Weiner J, Cahill JF, Zhou DW, Bian HF, Song YT et al (2014) Shoot competition, root competition and reproductive allocation in Chenopodium acuminatum. J Ecol 102:1688–1696.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang J, Maun MA (1992) Effects of burial in sand on the growth and reproduction of Cakile edentula. Ecography 15:296–302.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1992.tb00038.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plant Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Evolution and EcologyUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Plant Ecology and Environmental Conservation, Faculty of Biology, Biological and Chemical Research CentreUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Botanic Garden of the University of TübingenUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations