Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 28, Issue 14, pp 3733–3747 | Cite as

Towards an understanding of the drivers of broad-scale patterns of rarity-weighted richness for vertebrates

  • Fabio AlbuquerqueEmail author
  • Yaiyr Astudillo-Scalia
  • Rafael Loyola
  • Paul Beier
Original Paper
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

To combat biodiversity loss, conservation planners prioritize sites with high complementarity (ability to represent all or most species in a few sites), but little work has been done to understand the traits that influence site complementarity. Here we focus on the drivers of rarity-weighted richness (RWR), a metric of site endemism that has previously been demonstrated to be a reliable metric of site complementarity. Our aims are to assess how environmental variables individually contribute to explaining global patterns of RWR. After quantifying RWR for 18,020 terrestrial grid cells for amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals, we used random forest models to identify associations between RWR and predictors reflecting current environment (topography, soils, climate), evolutionary history, and human footprint. Slope, long known to affect plant diversity, had strongest positive association with RWR values for amphibians, birds and mammals; human footprint was the primary driver of RWR for reptiles. RWR increased with slope, levels of human impact, diurnal temperature oscillation, land cover diversity, actual evapotranspiration, and cold season precipitation, Surprisingly, RWR increased with human footprint, perhaps because human activities cause species to have small ranges or because human activities and small-ranged species tend to occur under the same environmental conditions. Our study provides evidence that climate variables, including both temperature and precipitation—well known to drive patterns of species richness—also generate and maintain gradients of RWR at a global scale. As climate changes in the coming decades, regions of high RWR might also change, depending on the extent to which the spatial patterns of climate also change. Elucidating the patterns of RWR may improve the way in which sites are prioritized, so that all or most species can be conserved in affordable areas.

Keywords

Complementarity Biodiversity Biogeography Biological conservation Latitudinal gradients Macroecology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank B. Benito for providing the environmental variables, and S. Pimm and Miguel Araújo for comments on an earlier version of this paper. RL research is funded by CNPq (grant no 306694/2018-2). This paper is a contribution of the INCT in Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity Conservation founded by MCTIC/CNPq (grant no 465610/2014-5) and FAPEG (grant no 201810267000023).

Supplementary material

10531_2019_1847_MOESM1_ESM.docx (124 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 123 kb)
10531_2019_1847_MOESM2_ESM.csv (6.3 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (CSV 6495 kb)

References

  1. Albuquerque FS, Beier P (2015a) Global Patterns and environmental correlates of high-priority conservation areas for vertebrates. J Biogeogr 42:1397–1405Google Scholar
  2. Albuquerque FS, Beier P (2015b) Rarity weighted richness: a simple and reliable alternative to integer programming and heuristic algorithms for minimum set and maximum coverage problems in conservation planning. PLoS ONE.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119905 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Albuquerque FS, Beier P (2016) Predicted rarity-weighted richness, a new tool to prioritize sites for species representation. Ecol Evol 6:8107–8114PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Ardron J, Possingham HP, Klein C (2010) Marxan good practices handbook, version2. Pacific marine analysis and research association. Available: http://www.pacmara.org
  5. Astudillo-Scalia Y, Albuquerque FS (2019) Evaluating the performance of rarity as a surrogate in site prioritization for biodiversity conservation. Glob Ecol Conserv 18:e00639Google Scholar
  6. BirdLife International (2012). Bird species distribution maps of the world. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK and NatureServe, Arlington, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Bivand R, Krug R, Neteler M (2014) spgrass6: interface between GRASS 6 + geographical information system and R. R package version 0.8-6. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/spgrass6/
  8. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32Google Scholar
  9. Buckley LB, Jetz W (2007) Environmental and historical constraints on global patterns of amphibian richness. Proc R Soc B 274:1167–1173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ceballos G, Brown JH (1995) Global patterns of mammalian diversity, endemism and endangerment. Conserv Biol 9:559–568Google Scholar
  11. Cresswell HP, Hamilton GJ (2002) Particle size analysis. In: McKenzie NJ, Cresswell HP, Coughlan KJ (eds) Soil physical measurement and interpretation for land evaluation. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 224–239Google Scholar
  12. Crisp MD, Laffan S, Linder HP, Monro A (2001) Endemism in the Australian flora. J Biogeogr 28:183–198Google Scholar
  13. Csuti B, Polasky S, Williams PH, Pressey RL, Camm JM, Kershaw M et al (1997) A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biol Conserv 80:83–97Google Scholar
  14. Currie DJ (1991) Energy and large-scale patterns of animal- and plant-species richness. Am Nat 137:27–49Google Scholar
  15. Currie DJ, Paquin V (1987) Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees. Nature 329:326–327Google Scholar
  16. Cutler DR, Edwards TE, Beard K, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler J (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Davies RG, Orme CDL, Olson V, Thomas GH, Ross SG, Ding TS, Rasmussen PC, Stattersfield AJ, Bennett PM, Blackburn TM, Owens IPF, Gaston KJ (2006) Human impacts and the global distribution of extinction risk. Proc R Soc B 273:2127–2133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies RG, Orme CDL, Storch D, Olson VA, Thomas GH, Ross SG, Ding T-S, Rasmussen PC, Bennett PM, Owens IPF, Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ (2007) Topography, energy and the global distribution of bird species richness. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274:1189–1197Google Scholar
  19. Doran JW, Zeiss MR (2000) Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol 15:3–11Google Scholar
  20. FAO-Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015) Global map of yearly actual evapotranspiration—5 arc minutes (GeoLayer). http://data.fao.org/ref/750d56ca-f92a-405e-8bbc-302221d55917.html?version=1.0. Latest update: 04 Jun 2015. Accessed 24 Apr 2017
  21. Field R, O’Brien EM, Whittaker RJ (2005) Global models for predicting woody plant richness from climate: development and evaluation. Ecology 86:2263–2277Google Scholar
  22. Flather CH, Sieg CH (2007) Species rarity: definition, causes, and classification. In: Raphael MG, Molina R (eds) Conservation of rare or little known species: biological, social, and economic considerations. Island Press, Washington, pp 40–66Google Scholar
  23. Francis AP, Currie DJ (2003) A globally consistent richness-climate relationship for angiosperms. Am Nat 161:523–536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Friedman JH (2001) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 29:1189–1232Google Scholar
  25. Gaston KJ (2000) Global patterns of biodiversity. Nature 45:200–227Google Scholar
  26. GlobCover (2009) (Global Land Cover Map) RELEASED ON 21st December 2010. http://due.esrin.esa.int/page_globcover.php. Assessed Dec 2017
  27. GRASS Development Team (2012) Geographic resources analysis support system (GRASS 6) programmer’s manual. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. http://grass.osgeo.org/programming6/
  28. Grenyer R, Orme CDL, Jackson SF, Thomas GH, Davies RG, Davies TJ, Jones KE, Olson VA, Ridgely RS, Rasmussen PC, Ding T-Z, Bennett PM, Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Gittleman JL, Owens IPF (2006) Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates. Nature 444:93–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Guisan A, Rahbek C (2011) SESAM—a new framework integrating macroecological and species distribution models for predicting spatio-temporal patterns of species assemblages. J Biogeogr 38(8):1433–1444Google Scholar
  30. Guerin GR, Lowe AJ (2015) Sum of inverse range-sizes (SIR), a biodiversity metric with many names and interpretations. Biodivers Conserv 24:2877–2882Google Scholar
  31. Hargreaves GH (1994) Defining and using reference evapotranspiration. J Irrig Drainage Eng 120:1132–1139Google Scholar
  32. Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ, Friedman JH (2001) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer series in statistics. Springer, New York, NY, USA. Random Forests for Classification in Ecology. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5795733_Random_Forests_for_Classification_in_Ecology. Accessed 23 Apr 2017
  33. Hawkins BA, Porter EE, Diniz-Filho JAF (2003a) Productivity and history as predictors of the latitudinal diversity gradient of terrestrial birds. Ecology 84:1608–1623Google Scholar
  34. Hawkins BA, Field R, Cornell HV, Currie DJ, Guegan J-F, Kaufman DM, Kerr JT, Mittelbach GG, Oberdorff T, O’Brien EM, Porter EE, Turner JRG (2003b) Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology 84:3105–3117Google Scholar
  35. Heiberger RM, Holland B (2004) Statistical analysis and data display: an intermediate course with examples in S-Plus, R, and SAS. Springer Texts in statistics. Springer, New York. ISBN 0-387-40270-5Google Scholar
  36. Hengl T, de Jesus JM, MacMillan RA, Batjes NH, Heuvelink GBM, Ribeiro E, Samuel-Rosa A, Kempen B, Leenaars JGB, Walsh MG, Ruiperez Gonzalez M (2014) SoilGrids1km—global soil information based on automated mapping. PLoS ONE 9:e105992PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Herrick JE (2000) Soil quality: indicator of sustainable land management? Appl Soil Ecol 15:15–83Google Scholar
  38. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978Google Scholar
  39. Hortal J, Triantis KA, Meiri S, Thébault E, Sfenthourakis S (2009) Island species richness increases with habitat diversity. Am Nat 174:205–217Google Scholar
  40. Hunt N, Gilkes R (1992) Farm monitoring handbook. The University of Western Australia, NedlandsGoogle Scholar
  41. Hurlbert AH, Jetz W (2007) Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:13384–13389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Irl SDH, Harter DEV, Steinbauer MJ, Puyol DG, Fernández-Palacios JM, Jentsch A, Beierkuhnlein C (2015) Climate vs. topography—spatial patterns of plant species diversity and endemism on a high-elevation island. J Ecol 103:1621–1633Google Scholar
  43. ISRIC (2013) SoilGrids: an automated system for global soil mapping. Available at: http://www.soilgrids1km.isric.org/
  44. IUCN (2016) Red list spatial data. http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/spatial-data. Accessed Sept 2016
  45. Karlen DL, Mausbach MJ, Doran JW, Cline RG, Harris RF, Schuman GE (1997) Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:4–10Google Scholar
  46. Kerr JT, Packer L (1997) Habitat heterogeneity as determinant of mammal species richness in high-energy regions. Nature 385:252–254Google Scholar
  47. Kirkpatrick J (1983) An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biol Conserv 25:127–134Google Scholar
  48. Ladle RJ, Whittaker RJ (eds) (2011) Conservation biogeography. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Leroy B, Petillon J, Gallon R, Canard A, Ysnel F (2012) Improving occurrence-based rarity metrics in conservation studies by including multiple rarity cut-off points. Insect Conserv Divers 5:159–168Google Scholar
  50. Leroy B, Canard A, Ysnel F (2013) Integrating multiple scales in rarity assessments of invertebrate taxa. Divers Distrib 19:794–803Google Scholar
  51. Liaw A, Wiener M (2014) randomForest: Breiman and Cutler’s random forests for classifications and regression. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/randomForest
  52. Lomolino MV, Riddle BR, Whittaker RJ, Brown JH (2010) Biogeography, 4th edn. Sinauer, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  53. McKenzie N, Coughlan K, Cresswell H (2002) Soil physical measurement and interpretation for land evaluation. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  54. Meyer CK, Baer SG, Whiles MR (2008) Ecosystem recovery across a chronosequence of restored wetlands in the Platte River Valley. Ecosystems 11:193–208Google Scholar
  55. Mittelbach GG, Schemske DW, Cornell HV, Allen AP, Brown JM, Bush MB, Harrison SP, Hurlbert AH, Knowlton N, Lessios HA, McCain CM, McCune AR, McDade LA, McPeek MA, Near TJ, Price TD, Ricklefs RE, Roy K, Sax DF, Schluter D, Sobel J, Turelli M (2007) Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecol Lett 10:315–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Moilanen A, Meller L, Leppanen J, Pouzols FM, Arponen A, Kujao H (2014) Zonation spatial conservation planning framework and software, version 4. http://cbig.it.helsinki.fi/
  57. O’Brien EM (1993) Climate gradients in woody plant species richness: towards an explanation based on an analysis of southern Africa’s woody flora. J Biogeogr 20:181–198Google Scholar
  58. O’Brien EM (1998) Water-energy dynamics, climate, and prediction of woody plant species richness, an interim general model. J Biogeogr 25:379–398Google Scholar
  59. O’Brien EM, Field R, Whittaker RJ (2000) Climatic gradients in woody plant (tree and shrub) diversity: water–energy dynamics, residual variation, and topography. Oikos 89:588–600Google Scholar
  60. Ohlemuller R, Anderson BJ, Araújo MB, Butchart SHM, Kudrna O, Ridgely RS, Thomas CD (2008) The coincidence of climatic and species rarity: high risk to small-range species from climate change. Biol Let 4:568–572Google Scholar
  61. Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, D’amico JA, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ, Allnutt TF, Ricketts TH, Kura Y, Lamoreux JF, Wettengel WW, Hedao P, Kassem KR (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience 51:933–938Google Scholar
  62. Orme CDL, Davies RG, Burgess M, Eigenbrod F, Pickup N, Olson VA, Webster AJ, Ding T, Rasmussen PC, Ridgely RS, Stattersfield AJ, Bennett PM, Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Owens IPF (2005) Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436:1016–1019PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Pärtel M, Kalamees R, Reizer U, Tuvi EL, Roosaluste E, Vellak A, Zobel M (2005) Grouping and prioritization of vascular plant species for conservation: combining natural rarity and management need. Biol Conserv 123:271–278Google Scholar
  64. Pianka ER (1966) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. Am Nat 100:33–46Google Scholar
  65. Pimm SL, Raven P (2000) Biodiversity: extinction by numbers. Nature 403:843–845PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  67. Rabinowitz D, Cairns S, Dillon T (1986) Seven form of rarity and their frequency in the flora of the British Isles. In: Soule ME (ed) Conservation biology. The science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 182–204Google Scholar
  68. Rodríguez MÁ, Belmontes JA, Hawkins BA (2005) Energy, water and large-scale patterns of reptile and amphibian species richness in Europe. Acta Oecol 28:65–70Google Scholar
  69. Roll U, Feldman A, Novosolov M, Allison A, Bauer AM, Bernard R, Böhm M, Castro-Herrera F, Chirio L, Collen B, Colli GR, Dabool L, Das I, Doan TM, Grismer LL, Hoogmoed M, Itescu Y, Kraus F, LeBreton M, Lewin A, Martins M, Maza E, Meirte D, Nagy ZT, de Nogueira C, Pauwels OSG, Pincheira-Donoso D, Powney GD, Sindaco R, Tallowin OJS, Torres-Carvajal O, Trape J, Vidan E, Uetz P, Wagner P, Wang Y, Orme CDL, Grenyer R, Meiri S (2017) The global distribution of tetrapods reveals a need for targeted reptile conservation. Nat Ecol Evol 1(11):1677–1682PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Sala E, Knowlton K (2006) Global marine biodiversity trends. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:91–122Google Scholar
  71. Sandel et al (2011) Influence of climate change velocity on species endemism. Science 334:660PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. SCBD [Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity] (2010) Global biodiversity outlook 3. MontréalGoogle Scholar
  73. Soberón J, Ceballos G (2011) Species richness and range size of the terrestrial mammals of the world: biological signal within mathematical constraints. PLoS ONE 6(5):e19359.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019359 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Stein BA, Kutner LS, Adams JS (2000) Precious Heritage: the status of Biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  75. Stein A, Gerstner K, Kreft H (2014) Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecol Lett 17:866–880PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Steinbauer MJ, Otto R, Naranjo-Cigala A, Beierkuhnlein C, Fernández-Palacios JM (2012) Increase of island endemism with altitude—speciation processes on oceanic islands. Ecography 35:23–32Google Scholar
  77. Sykes L, Santini L, Newbold T (2019) Different forms of rarity interact to determine species’ responses to land use. Conserv Biol 33 (accepted)Google Scholar
  78. Trigas P, Panitsa M, Tsiftsis S (2013) Elevational gradient of vascular plant species richness and endemism in Crete—the effect of post-isolation mountain uplift on a continental island system. PLoS ONE 8:e59425PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Tucker MA et al (2018) Moving in the Anthropocene: global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements. Science 359:466–469PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. USGS [US Geological Survey]. No date. Global 30 Arc-Second Elevation (GTOPO30). https://lta.cr.usgs.gov/GTOPO30
  81. Villalobos F, Dobrovolski R, Provete DB, Gouveia SF (2013) Is rich and rare the common share? Describing biodiversity patterns to inform conservation practices for South American Anurans. PLoS ONE 8(2):e56073.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056073 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Whittaker RJ, Willis KJ, Field R (2001) Scale and species richness: towards a general hierarchical theory of species diversity. J Biogeogr 28:453–470Google Scholar
  83. Whittaker RJ, Araujo MB, Jepson P, Ladle RF, Watson JEM, Willis KJ (2005) Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Divers Distrib 11:3–23Google Scholar
  84. Wildlife Conservation Society—WCS, and Center for International Earth Science Information Network—CIESIN—Columbia University (2005) Last of the wild project, version 2, 2005 (LWP-2): global human footprint dataset (Geographic). NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Palisades. http://dx.doi.org/10.7927/H4M61H5F
  85. Williams P, Gibbons D, Margules C, Rebelo A, Humphries C, Pressey R (1996) A comparison of richness hotspots rarity hotspots and complementary areas for conserving diversity using British birds. Conserv Biol 10:155–174Google Scholar
  86. Williams KJ, Belbin L, Austin MP, Stein JL, Ferrier S (2012) Which environmental variables should I use in my biodiversity model? Int J Geogr Inf Sci 26:2009–2047Google Scholar
  87. Zellweger F, Baltensweiler A, Ginzler C, Roth T, Braunisch V, Bugmann H, Bollmann K (2016) Environmental predictors of species richness in forest landscapes: abiotic factors versus vegetation structure. J Biogeogr 43(6):1080–1090.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zomer RJ, Trabucco A, Bossio DA, Verchot LV (2008) Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 126:67–80Google Scholar
  89. Zuloaga J, Currie DJ, Kerr JT (2018) The origins and maintenance of global species endemism. Glob Ecol Biogeogr.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science and Mathematics Faculty, College of Integrative Sciences and ArtsArizona State UniversityMesaUSA
  2. 2.School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  3. 3.Conservation Biogeography Lab, Department of EcologyFederal University of GoiásGoiâniaBrazil
  4. 4.Fundação Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento SustentávelRio de JaneiroBrazil
  5. 5.School of ForestryNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA

Personalised recommendations