Abstract
Survey costs and a lack of taxonomists are often the main impediments to biodiversity inventories. The use of a higher-taxon approach that is efficient in representing species patterns within a short period of time is one way to overcome these constraints, especially if these responses are consistent at various spatial scales and sampling techniques. Here, we evaluated whether the use of pitfall trapping or Winkler extraction influenced the utility of genus as a surrogate to predict patterns of species richness and composition related to environment. The study sites were spread along 10 degrees of latitude, covering phytophysiognomies with different topographic characteristics. We recorded 450 ant species/morphospecies distributed in 70 genera. Pitfall-traps captured a larger proportion of species (77–98%) and genera (71–100%) per site. Genus was efficient in predicting variations in richness, and assemblage composition detected at the species level, using pitfall-traps or Winkler extractors. The higher-taxon approach saved approximately 40% of the surveys costs. The negative effect of the species-genus ratio was detected only on species composition, but it did not affect the quality of predictions using genera. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that genus can be used as a proxy for broader sets of species independent of sampling technique or environmental heterogeneity. The use of pitfall-traps or Winkler extractors for genus-level identification proved to be cost-efficient and time-efficient and should work well in other regions requiring conservation effort and monitoring programs.
References
Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso L, Schultz TR (2000a) Ants standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC
Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (2000b) Sampling ground dwelling ants: case studies from the World’s rain forests. Australia
Alves C, Vieira C, Almeida R, Hespanhol H (2016) Genera as surrogates of bryophyte species richness and composition. Ecol Indic 63:82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.053
Andersen AN (1995) Measuring more of biodiversity: genus richness as a surrogate for species in Australian ant faunas. Biol Conserv 73:39–43
Andersen AN (1997) Using ants as bioindicators: multiscale issues in ant community ecology. Ecol Soc 1:1–8
Andersen AN (1999) My bioindicator or yours? Making the selection. J Insect Conserv 3:61–64
Andersen AN, Hoffmann BD, Müller WJ, Griffiths AD (2002) Using ants as bioindicators in land management: simplifying assessment of ant community responses. J Appl Ecol 39:8–17
Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46
Angelo C (2016) Brazil’s scientists fight funding freeze. Nature 539:480. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.21014
Angelo C (2017) Brazilian scientists reeling as federal funds slashed by nearly half. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2017.21766
Baccaro FB, Feitosa RM, Fernandez F, et al (2015) Guia para os gêneros de formigas do Brasil, 1st edn. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.32912
Balmford A, Green MJB, Murray MG (1996) Using higher-taxon richness as a surrogate for species richness: I. Regional tests. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 263:1267–1274
Bestelmeyer BT, Agosti D, Alonso LE et al (2000) Field techniques for the study of ground-dwelling ants: an overview, description, and evaluation. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) Ants standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 122–145
Bevilacqua S, Terlizzi A, Claudet J et al (2012) Taxonomic relatedness does not matter for species surrogacy in the assessment of community responses to environmental drivers. J Appl Ecol 49:357–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02096.x
Bhusal DR, Kallimanis AS, Tsiafouli MA, Sgardelis SP (2014) Higher taxa vs. functional guilds versus trophic groups as indicators of soil nematode diversity and community structure. Ecol Indic 41:25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.01.019
Bilton DT, Mcabendroth L, Bedford A, Ramsay PM (2006) How wide to cast the net? Cross-taxon congruence of species richness, community similarity and indicator taxa in ponds. Freshw Biol 51:578–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01505.x
Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P et al (2011) Numerical ecology with R, 1st edn. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7976-6
Cardoso P, Silva I, de Oliveira NG, Serrano ARM (2004a) Indicator taxa of spider (Araneae) diversity and their efficiency in conservation. Biol Conserv 120:517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.024
Cardoso P, Silva I, Oliveira NG, Serrano ARM (2004b) Higher taxa surrogates of spider (Araneae) diversity and their efficiency in conservation. Biol Conserv 117:453–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.08.013
Carneiro FM, Bini LM, Rodrigues LC (2010) Influence of taxonomic and numerical resolution on the analysis of temporal changes in phytoplankton communities. Ecol Indic 10:249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.05.004
Caruso T, Migliorini M (2006) Micro-arthropod communities under human disturbance: is taxonomic aggregation a valuable tool for detecting multivariate change? Evidence from Mediterranean soil oribatid coenoses. Acta Oecologica 30:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2006.01.003
Costa FRC, Magnusson WE (2010) The Need for large-scale, integrated studies of Biodiversity—the experience of the program for biodiversity research in Brazilian Amazonia. Nat Conserv 8:3–12. https://doi.org/10.4322/natcon.00801001
De Marques-Filho AO, de Ribeiro MNG, Santos HM, Santos JM (1981) Estudos climatologicos da reserva florestal Ducke-Manaus AM. IV. Precipitação. Acta Amaz 11:759–768
de Souza JLP, Baccaro FB, Landeiro VL et al (2012) Trade-offs between complementarity and redundancy in the use of different sampling techniques for ground-dwelling ant assemblages. Appl Soil Ecol 56:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.01.004
dos Ribas LGS, Padial AA (2015) The use of coarser data is an effective strategy for biological assessments. Hydrobiologia 747:83–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2128-6
dos Santos JG, Malhado ACM, Ladle RJ et al (2015) Geographic trends and information deficits in Amazonian conservation research. Biodivers Conserv 24:2853–2863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0981-x
Driessen MM, Kirkpatrick JB (2017) Higher taxa can be effective surrogates for species-level data in detecting changes in invertebrate assemblage structure due to disturbance: a case study using a broad range of orders. Austral Entomol. https://doi.org/10.1111/aen.12315
Ellis D (1985) Taxonomic sufficiency in pollution assessment. Mar Pollut Bull 16:459
Escobar H (2015) Fiscal crisis has Brazilian scientists scrambling. Science 349:909–910. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.349.6251.909
Fisher BL (1999) Improving inventory efficiency: a case study of leaf-litter ant diversity in Madagascar. Ecol Appl 9:714–731
Folgarait PJ (1998) Ant biodiversity and its relationship to ecosystem functioning: a review. Biodivers Conserv 7:1221–1244
Franklin E, de Moraes J, Landeiro VL et al (2013) Geographic position of sample grid and removal of uncommon species affect multivariate analyses of diverse assemblages: the case of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida). Ecol Indic 34:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.04.024
French DD, Picozzi N (2002) Functional groups of bird species, biodiversity and landscapes in Scotland. J Biogeogr. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00664.x
Gallego I, Davidson TA, Jeppesen E et al (2012) Taxonomic or ecological approaches? Searching for phytoplankton surrogates in the determination of richness and assemblage composition in ponds. Ecol Indic 18:575–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.002
Gardner TA, Barlow J, Araujo IS et al (2008) The cost-effectiveness of biodiversity surveys in tropical forests. Ecol Lett 11:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01133.x
Gaspar C, Gaston KJ, Borges PAV (2010) Arthropods as surrogates of diversity at different spatial scales. Biol Conserv 143:1287–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.007
Gaston KJ (2000) Biodiversity: higher taxon richness. Prog Phys Geogr 24:117–127
Gaston KJ, Williams PH (1993) Mapping the world’s species-The higher taxon approach. Biodivers Lett 1:2–8
Gomes CB, Souza JLP, Franklin E (2018) A comparison between time of exposure, number of pitfall traps and the sampling cost to capture ground-dwelling poneromorph ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 65:138–148. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i2.1207
Gotelli NJ (2004) A taxonomic wish-list for community ecology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359:585–597. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1443
Gotelli NJG, Ellison AM, Dunn RR, Sanders N (2011) Counting ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): biodiversity sampling and statistical analysis for myrmecologists. Myrmecological News 15:13–19
Graça MB, Morais JW, Franklin E et al (2016) Combining taxonomic and functional approaches to unravel the spatial distribution of an Amazonian butterfly community. Environ Entomol 45:301–309. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvv183
Graça MB, Souza JLP, Franklin E et al (2017) Sampling effort and common species: optimizing surveys of understorey fruit-feeding butterflies in the Central Amazon. Ecol Indic 73:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.040
Heino J (2014) Taxonomic surrogacy, numerical resolution and responses of stream macroinvertebrate communities to ecological gradients: are the inferences transferable among regions? Ecol Indic 36:186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.022
Heino J, Soininen J (2007) Are higher taxa adequate surrogates for species-level assemblage patterns and species richness in stream organisms? Biol Conserv 137:78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.017
Hodkinson ID, Jackson JK (2005) Terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates as bioindicators for environmental monitoring, with particular reference to mountain ecosystems. Environ Manage 35:649–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0211-x
Jones FC (2008) Taxonomic sufficiency: the influence of taxonomic resolution on freshwater bioassessments using benthic macroinvertebrates. Environ Rev 16:45–69. https://doi.org/10.1139/A07-010
Kaspari M, Weiser MD (2000) Ant activity along moisture gradients in a neotropical forest. Biotropica 32:703–711
Kessler M, Abrahamczyk S, Bos M et al (2011) Cost-effectiveness of plant and animal biodiversity indicators in tropical forest and agroforest habitats. J Appl Ecol 48:330–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01932.x
Laird NM, Ware JH (1982) Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38:963–974
Lawler JJ, White D (2008) Assessing the mechanisms behind successful surrogates for biodiversity in conservation planning. Anim Conserv 11:270–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00176.x
Leal IR, Bieber AGD, Tabarelli M, Andersen AN (2010) Biodiversity surrogacy: indicator taxa as predictors of total species richness in Brazilian Atlantic forest and Caatinga. Biodivers Conserv 19:3347–3360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9896-8
Legendre P, Legendre L (2003) Numerical ecology, 3rd edn. Angew Chemie Int Ed. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20010316)40:6%3c9823::aid-anie9823%3e3.3.co;2-c
Longino JT, Colwell RK (1997) Biodiversity assessment using structured inventory: capturing the ant fauna of a tropical rain forest. Ecol Appl 7:1263–1277
Lopes CT, Vasconcelos HL (2008) Evaluation of three methods for sampling ground-dwelling ants in the Brazilian Cerrado. Neotrop Entomol 37:399–405
Lovell S, Hamer M, Slotow R, Herbert D (2007) Assessment of congruency across invertebrate taxa and taxonomic levels to identify potential surrogates. Biol Conserv 139:113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.008
Magnusson WE, Lima AP, Luizão R et al (2005) Rapeld: a modification of the gentry method for biodiversity surveys in long-term ecological research sites. Biota Neotrop 5:1–6
Magnusson WE, Braga-neto R, Pezzini F et al (2013) Biodiversidade e monitoramento ambiental integrado biodiversity and integrated environmental monitoring, Primeira. Áttema Editorial, Manaus
Mandelik Y, Roll U, Fleischer A (2010) Cost-efficiency of biodiversity indicators for Mediterranean ecosystems and the effects of socio-economic factors. J Appl Ecol 47:1179–1188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01864.x
Margules CR, Pressey RL, Williams PH (2002) Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation. J Biosci 27:309–326
Mazaris AD, Kallimanis AS, Tzanopoulos J et al (2010) Can we predict the number of plant species from the richness of a few common genera, families or orders? J Appl Ecol 47:662–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01814.x
McGeoch MA (1998) The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biol Rev 73:181–201
Mezger D, Pfeiffer M (2011) Partitioning the impact of abiotic factors and spatial patterns on species richness and community structure of ground ant assemblages in four Bornean rainforests. Ecography 34:39–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06538.x
Minchin PR (1987) An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetation 69:89–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038690
Nakamura A, Catterall CP, House APN et al (2007) The use of ants and other soil and litter arthropods as bio-indicators of the impacts of rainforest clearing and subsequent land use. J Insect Conserv 11:177–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9034-9
Neeson TM, Van Rijn I, Mandelik Y (2013) How taxonomic diversity, community structure, and sample size determine the reliability of higher taxon surrogates. Ecol Appl 23:1216–1225
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, et al (2018). vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
Oliveira PY, Souza JLP, Baccaro FB, Franklin E (2009) Ant species distribution along a topographic gradient in a “terrafirme” forest reserve in Central Amazonia. Pesqui Agropecuária Bras 44:852–860
Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1993) A possible method for the rapid assessment of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 7:562–568
Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1996) Invertebrate morphospecies as surrogates for species: a case study. Conserv Biol 10:99–109
Olson DM (1991) A comparison of the efficacy of litter and pitfall traps for sampling leaf litter ants (hymenoptera, Formicidae) in a tropical wet forests, Costa Rica. Biotropica 23:166–172
Parr CL, Chown SL (2001) Inventory and bioindicator sampling: testing pitfall and Winkler methods with ants in a South African savanna. J Insect Conserv 5:27–36
Peres-Neto P, Jackson D (2001) How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia 129:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100720
Pik AJ, Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1999) Taxonomic sufficiency in ecological studies of terrestrial invertebrates. Aust J Ecol 24:555–562
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, et al (2017). nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-131. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
Porto W, Pequeno PAL, Tourinho AL (2016) When less means more: reduction of both effort and survey methods boosts efficiency and diversity of harvestmen in a tropical forest. Ecol Indic 69:771–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.014
Prance GT (1994) A comparison of the efficacy of higher taxa and species numbers in the assessment of biodiversity in the neotropics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 345:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1994.0090
R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org
Reyers B, Van Jaarsveld AS, Krüger M (2000) Complementarity as a biodiversity indicator strategy. Proc R Soc London 267:505–513
Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (2002) Does butterfly diversity predict moth diversity? Testing a popular indicator taxon at local scales. Biol Conserv 103:361–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00147-1
Rosser N (2017) Shortcuts in biodiversity research: what determines the performance of higher taxa as surrogates for species? Ecol Evol 7:2595–2603. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2736
Rosser N, Eggleton P (2012) Can higher taxa be used as a surrogate for species-level data in biodiversity surveys of litter/soil insects? J Insect Conserv 16:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-011-9395-6
Sætersdal M, Gjerde I, Blom HH (2005) Indicator species and the problem of spatial inconsistency in nestedness patterns. Biol Conserv 122:305–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.020
Santos EM, Franklin E, Magnusson WE (2008) Cost-efficiency of subsampling protocols to evaluate oribatid-mite communities in an Amazonian savanna. Biotropica 40:728–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00425.x
Souza JLP, Moura CAR, Harada AY, Franklin E (2007) Diversidade de espécies dos gêneros de Crematogaster, Gnamptogenys e Pachycondyla (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) e complementaridade dos métodos de coleta durante a estação seca numa estação ecológica no estado do Pará, Brasil. Acta Amaz 37:649–656. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0044-59672007000400022
Souza JLP, Moura CAR, Franklin E (2009) Efficiency in inventories of ants in a forest reserve in Central Amazonia. Rev Agropecuária Bras 44:940–948
Souza JLP, Baccaro FB, Landeiro VL et al (2016) Taxonomic sufficiency and indicator taxa reduce sampling costs and increase monitoring effectiveness for ants. Divers Distrib 22:111–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12371
Su JC, Debinski DM, Jakubauskas ME, Kindscher K (2004) Beyond species richness: community similarity as a measure of cross-taxon congruence for coarse-filter conservation. Conserv Biol 18:167–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00337.x
Tulloch A, Possingham HP, Wilson K (2011) Wise selection of an indicator for monitoring the success of management actions. Biol Conserv 144:141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.009
Ugland KI, Bjørgesæter A, Bakke T et al (2008) Assessment of environmental stress with a biological index based on opportunistic species. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 366:169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2008.07.021
Underwood EC, Fisher BL (2006) The role of ants in conservation monitoring: if, when, and how. Biol Conserv 132:166–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.03.022
Van Rijn I, Neeson TM, Mandelik Y (2015) Reliability and refinement of the higher taxa approach for bee richness and composition assessments. Ecol Appl 25:88–98. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-2380.1
Vasconcelos HL, Macedo ACC, Vilhena JMS (2003) Influence of topography on the distribution of ground-dwelling ants in an Amazonian forest. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 38:115–124
Vasconcelos HL, Frizzo TLM, Pacheco R et al (2014) Evaluating sampling sufficiency and the use of surrogates for assessing ant diversity in a neotropical biodiversity hotspot. Ecol Indic 46:286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.036
Whittaker RJ, Araujo MB, Paul J et al (2005) Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Divers Distrib 11:3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00143.x
Williams PH, Gaston KHJ (1994) Measuring more of diversity: can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? Biol Conserv 67:211–217
Acknowledgements
We thank all the anonymous reviewers who helped improve this manuscript. Juliana Araújo, Pollyana Cavalcante, Camila Gomes, Adriano Oliveira, Marcos Torres, Carlos Nogueira, Claudio Santos-Neto, and all field guides for help in sampling ants. Fernando Fernández, Jacques Delabie, John Longino, José Vilhena, Itanna Fernandes and Rodrigo Feitosa confirmed the species identifications for this study. Financial support was provided by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisas do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM) PIPT/1750/08, FIXAM/AM 062.01325/2014 and Universal Amazonas 62.00674/2015; the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) PNPD/03017/19-05; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), PRONEX 16/2006; the Programa de Pesquisa em Biodiversidade (PPBio) 558318/2009-6, 457545/2012-7; the Programa de Pesquisas Ecológicas de Longa Duração (PELD) 403764/2012-2; the Centro de Estudos Integrados da Biodiversidade Amazônica (CENBAM). PACLP was supported by a CNPq post-doctoral scholarship. FBB, EF and WEM held CNPq Productivity grants.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Akihiro Nakamura.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Souza, J.L.P., Baccaro, F.B., Pequeno, P.A.C.L. et al. Effectiveness of genera as a higher-taxon substitute for species in ant biodiversity analyses is not affected by sampling technique. Biodivers Conserv 27, 3425–3445 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1607-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1607-x