Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effectiveness of genera as a higher-taxon substitute for species in ant biodiversity analyses is not affected by sampling technique

Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Survey costs and a lack of taxonomists are often the main impediments to biodiversity inventories. The use of a higher-taxon approach that is efficient in representing species patterns within a short period of time is one way to overcome these constraints, especially if these responses are consistent at various spatial scales and sampling techniques. Here, we evaluated whether the use of pitfall trapping or Winkler extraction influenced the utility of genus as a surrogate to predict patterns of species richness and composition related to environment. The study sites were spread along 10 degrees of latitude, covering phytophysiognomies with different topographic characteristics. We recorded 450 ant species/morphospecies distributed in 70 genera. Pitfall-traps captured a larger proportion of species (77–98%) and genera (71–100%) per site. Genus was efficient in predicting variations in richness, and assemblage composition detected at the species level, using pitfall-traps or Winkler extractors. The higher-taxon approach saved approximately 40% of the surveys costs. The negative effect of the species-genus ratio was detected only on species composition, but it did not affect the quality of predictions using genera. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that genus can be used as a proxy for broader sets of species independent of sampling technique or environmental heterogeneity. The use of pitfall-traps or Winkler extractors for genus-level identification proved to be cost-efficient and time-efficient and should work well in other regions requiring conservation effort and monitoring programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the anonymous reviewers who helped improve this manuscript. Juliana Araújo, Pollyana Cavalcante, Camila Gomes, Adriano Oliveira, Marcos Torres, Carlos Nogueira, Claudio Santos-Neto, and all field guides for help in sampling ants. Fernando Fernández, Jacques Delabie, John Longino, José Vilhena, Itanna Fernandes and Rodrigo Feitosa confirmed the species identifications for this study. Financial support was provided by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisas do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM) PIPT/1750/08, FIXAM/AM 062.01325/2014 and Universal Amazonas 62.00674/2015; the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) PNPD/03017/19-05; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), PRONEX 16/2006; the Programa de Pesquisa em Biodiversidade (PPBio) 558318/2009-6, 457545/2012-7; the Programa de Pesquisas Ecológicas de Longa Duração (PELD) 403764/2012-2; the Centro de Estudos Integrados da Biodiversidade Amazônica (CENBAM). PACLP was supported by a CNPq post-doctoral scholarship. FBB, EF and WEM held CNPq Productivity grants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge L. P. Souza.

Additional information

Communicated by Akihiro Nakamura.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Souza, J.L.P., Baccaro, F.B., Pequeno, P.A.C.L. et al. Effectiveness of genera as a higher-taxon substitute for species in ant biodiversity analyses is not affected by sampling technique. Biodivers Conserv 27, 3425–3445 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1607-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1607-x

Keywords

Navigation