Advertisement

Pathways between contrasting ecotourism experiences and conservation engagement

  • Emily Massingham
  • Richard A. Fuller
  • Angela J. DeanEmail author
Original Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Biodiversity appreciation and engagement
  2. Biodiversity appreciation and engagement

Abstract

It is commonly believed that nature experiences lead to increased concern for nature, and ultimately, the expression of conservation behaviours. Captive and non-captive ecotourism experiences with charismatic megafauna have been associated with conservation support. However, there is little research examining experiences with non-mammalian wildlife, or familiar species in domestic settings. We conducted interviews (N = 427) at two ecotourism destinations in Australia (a conservation-focused zoological park and a rainforest national park), to determine whether these experiences are associated with conservation engagement and if so, the pathways through which these might operate. Interviews identified the elements of experience (site, duration, animal encounter, educational shows, and interpretive signs), the subjective aspects of their experience (positive and negative emotions, learning, connection, reflection), and engagement in conservation (environmental intentions, policy support and signing a conservation-focused pledge). Regression analyses examined the relationship between elements of experience and conservation engagement, while controlling for demographics and nature-relatedness. Participating in non-captive bird feeding at the rainforest site was associated with greater support for conservation policies, whereas visiting the zoological park was associated with greater intention to seek and share conservation information. Mediation analysis demonstrated that both of these relationships were mediated by feeling upset about environmental problems, indicating a role for negative emotions alongside ecotourism experiences in prompting conservation engagement. No element of the experience was associated with signing the pledge, highlighting the challenges of eliciting behaviour change. Overall, these findings suggest that different types of ecotourism experiences may generate different types of conservation engagement, and that that associated negative emotions about the plight of species can foster stronger engagement in conservation issues.

Keywords

Animal encounters Behaviour change Bird feeding Ecotourism Education Negative emotions Policy support Psychology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Lone Pine Koala Sanctuary and O’Reilly’s Rainforest Retreat for their participation in the research and their interest in evaluating and improving conservation education at their sites. Also special thanks to T. Kinrade and D. Moffitt for their assistance with data collection.

Funding

This study did not receive any external funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10531_2018_1694_MOESM1_ESM.docx (39 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 39 kb)

References

  1. Acevedo-Gutiérrez A, Acevedo L, Boren L (2011) Effects of the presence of official-looking volunteers on harassment of New Zealand fur seals. Conserv Biol 25:623–627.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01611.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken LS, West SG, Reno RR (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Amel E, Manning C, Scott B, Koger S (2017) Beyond the roots of human inaction: fostering collective effort toward ecosystem conservation. Science 356:275–278.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal1931 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ardoin NM, Wheaton M, Bowers AW, Hunt CA, Durham WH (2015) Nature-based tourism’s impact on environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: a review and analysis of the literature and potential future research. J Sustain Tour 23:838–858.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1024258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballantyne R, Packer J, Hughes K, Dierking L (2007) Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environ Educ Res 13:367–383.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701430604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballantyne R, Packer J, Falk J (2011a) Visitors’ learning for environmental sustainability: testing short- and long-term impacts of wildlife tourism experiences using structural equation modelling. Tour Manag 32:1243–1252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ballantyne R, Packer J, Sutherland LA (2011b) Visitors’ memories of wildlife tourism: implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences. Tour Manag 32:770–779.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron R, Logan H, Lilly J, Inman M, Brennan M (1994) Negative emotion and message processing. J Exp Soc Psychol 30:181–201.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chawla L (1999) Life paths into effective environmental action. J Environ Educ 31:15–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909598628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chawla L (2006) Research methods to investigate significant life experiences: review and recommendations. Environ Educ Res 12:359–374.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620600942840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clapp JD, Beck JG, Palyo SA, Grant DM (2008) An examination of the synergy of pain and PTSD on quality of life: additive or multiplicative effects? Pain 138:301–309.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2008.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clayton S, Fraser J, Saunders CD (2009) Zoo experiences: conversations, connections, and concern for animals. Zoo Biol 28:377–397.  https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clayton S, Fraser J, Burgess C (2011) The role of zoos in fostering environmental identity. Ecopsychology 3:87–96.  https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2010.0079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clayton S et al (2017) Transformation of experience: toward a new relationship with nature. Conserv Lett 10:645–651.  https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen J (1978) Partialed products are interactions—partialed powers are curve components. Psychol Bull 85:858–866.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.85.4.858 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Colléony A, Clayton S, Couvet D, Saint Jalme M, Prévot A-C (2017a) Human preferences for species conservation: animal charisma trumps endangered status. Biol Conserv 206:263–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Colléony A, Martin L, Misdariis N, Clayton S, Saint Jalme M, Prévot A-C (2017b) Exoticism as a mediator of everyday experiences of nature: an anthropological exploration of soundscape in zoos. Interdiscip J 45:673–682.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-017-9937-y Google Scholar
  18. D’Amato LG, Krasny ME (2011) Outdoor adventure education: applying transformative learning theory to understanding instrumental learning and personal growth in environmental education. J Environ Educ 42:237–254.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2011.581313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dean AJ, Lindsay J, Fielding K, Smith L (2016) Fostering water sensitive citizenship—community profiles of engagement in water-related issues. Environ Sci Policy Part 1 55:238–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dean AJ, Church EK, Loder J, Fielding KS, Wilson KA (2018) How do marine and coastal citizen science experiences foster environmental engagement? J Environ Manag 213:409–416.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DeMares R (2000) Human peak experience triggered by encounters with cetaceans. Anthrozoos 13:89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diduck A, Sinclair AJ, Hostetler G, Fitzpatrick P (2012) Transformative learning theory, public involvement, and natural resource and environmental management. J Environ Plann Man 55:1311–1330.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.645718 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dierking L, Adelman L, Ogden J, Lehnhardt K, Miller L, Mellen J (2004) Using a behavior change model to document the impact of visits to Disney’s animal kingdom: a study investigating intended conservation action. Curator 47:322–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duerden MD, Witt PA (2010) The impact of direct and indirect experiences on the development of environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. J Environ Psychol 30:379–392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Esson M, Moss A (2013) The risk of delivering disturbing messages to zoo family audiences. J Environ Educ 44:79–96.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2012.695408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fritsche I, Jonas E, Kayser DN, Koranyi N (2010) Existential threat and compliance with pro-environmental norms. J Environ Psychol 30:67–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2013) Why garden for wildlife? Social and ecological drivers, motivations and barriers for biodiversity management in residential landscapes. Ecol Econ 86:258–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grajal A et al (2017) The complex relationship between personal sense of connection to animals and self-reported proenvironmental behaviors by zoo visitors. Conserv Biol 31:322–330.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12780 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grandcolas PP, Roseli (2016) Biodiversity conservation and phylogenetic systematics: preserving our evolutionary heritage in an extinction crisis. Topics in biodiversity and conservation, 1st edn. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  30. Hausmann A, Toivonen T, Slotow R, Tenkanen H, Moilanen A, Heikinheimo V, Minin ED (2018) Social media data can be used to understand tourists’ preferences for nature-based experiences in protected areas. Conserv Lett 11:e12343.  https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Haywood BK (2016) Beyond data points and research contributions: the personal meaning and value associated with public participation in scientific research. Int J Sci Educ Part B 6:239–262.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1043659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hooke RL, Martín-Duque JF (2012) Land transormation by humans. GSA Today 12:4–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hughes K (2013) Measuring the impact of viewing wildlife: do positive intentions equate to long-term changes in conservation behaviour? J Sustain Tour 21:42–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hughes K, Packer J, Ballantyne R (2011) Using post-visit action resources to support family conservation learning following a wildlife tourism experience. Environ Educ Res 17:307–328.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.540644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones D (2011) An appetite for connection: why we need to understand the effect and value of feeding wild birds. Emu Austral Ornithol 111:i–vii.  https://doi.org/10.1071/MUv111n2_ED CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klein ML, Humphrey SR, Percival HF (1995) Effects of ecotourism on distribution of waterbirds in a wildlife refuge. Conserv Biol 9:1454–1465.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09061454.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kolb AY, Kolb DA (2009) The learning way: meta-cognitive aspects of experiential learning. Simul Gaming 40:297–327.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878108325713 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to proenvironmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8:239–260.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Change 77:45–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lokhorst AM, Werner C, Staats H, van Dijk E, Gale JL (2013) Commitment and behavior change: a meta-analysis and critical review of commitment-making strategies in environmental research. Environ Behav 45:3–34.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511411477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McKenzie-Mohr D, Schultz PW (2014) Choosing effective behavior change tools. Soc Market Q 20:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Evol 20:430–434.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moscardo G, Saltzer R (2004) Understanding wildlife tourism markets. Wildlife tourism: impacts, management and planning. Common Ground Publishing Pty Ltd and Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  45. Moss A, Jensen E, Gusset M (2015) Evaluating the contribution of zoos and aquariums to Aichi Biodiversity Target 1. Conserv Biol 29:537–544.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Muloin S (1998) Wildlife tourism: the psychological benefits of whale watching Pacific. Tour Rev 2:199–213Google Scholar
  47. Myers OE, Saunders CD, Birjulin AA (2004) Emotional dimensions of watching zoo animals: an experience sampling study building on insights from psychology. Curator 47:299–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM (2013) The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness. Front Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813 Google Scholar
  49. Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Murphy SA (2008) The nature relatedness scale: linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environ Behav 41:715–740.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Neill F, Barnard S, Lee D (2004) Best practice and interpretation in tourist/wildlife encounters: a wild dolphin swim tour example. J Sustain Tour 21:7–25Google Scholar
  51. Osbaldiston R, Schott JP (2012) Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environ Behav 44:257–299.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511402673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Prévot A-C, Cheval H, Raymond R, Cosquer A (2018a) Routine experiences of nature in cities can increase personal commitment toward biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 226:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Prévot A-C, Clayton S, Mathevet R (2018b) The relationship of childhood upbringing and university degree program to environmental identity: experience in nature matters. Environ Educ Res 24:263–279.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1249456 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pyle R (1978) The extinction of experience. Horticulture 56:64–67Google Scholar
  55. Reddy SMW et al (2017) Advancing conservation by understanding and influencing human behavior. Conserv Lett 10:248–256.  https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rowe S, Kisiel J (2012) Family engagement at aquarium touch tanks—exploring interactions and the potential for learning. In: Davidsson E, Jakobsson A (eds) Understanding interactions at science centers and museums: approaching sociocultural perspectives. SensePublishers, Rotterdam, pp 63–77.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-725-7_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schmitt MT, Aknin LB, Axsen J, Shwom RL (2018) Unpacking the relationships between pro-environmental behavior, life satisfaction, and perceived ecological threat. Ecol Econ 143:130–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schrieber LA (2010) Why we feed wild birds: a case study of BTO members motivations for feeding birds in their gardens. University College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Schultz PW (2014) Strategies for promoting proenvironmental behavior. Eur Psychol 19:107–117.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Skibins JC, Powell RB (2013) Conservation caring: measuring the influence of zoo visitors’ connection to wildlife on pro-conservation behaviors. Zoo Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21086 Google Scholar
  61. Skibins J, Powell R, Hallo J (2013a) Charisma and conservation: charismatic megafauna’s influence on safari and zoo tourists’ pro-conservation behaviors. Biodivers Conserv 22:959–982.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0462-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Skibins JC, Dunstan E, Pahlow K (2013b) Exploring the influence of charismatic characteristics on flagship outcomes in zoo visitors. Human Dimens Wildl 22:157–171.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2016.1276233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smith L, Weiler B, Smith A, van Dijk P (2012) Applying visitor preference criteria to choose pro-wildlife behaviors to ask of zoo visitors. Curator 55:453–466.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2012.00168.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Steg L, Vlek C (2009) Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J Environ Psychol 29:309–317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stern PC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56:407–424.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Steven R, Morrison C, Castley JG (2016) Exploring attitudes and understanding of global conservation practice among birders and avitourists for enhanced conservation of birds. Bird Conserv Int 27:224–236.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270916000174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stevenson KT, Peterson MN, Carrier SJ, Strnad RL, Bondell HD, Kirby-Hathaway T, Moore SE (2014) Role of significant life experiences in building environmental knowledge and behavior among middle school students. J Environ Educ 45:163–177.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2014.901935 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Swanagan JS (2000) Factors influencing zoo visitors’ conservation attitudes and behavior. J Environ Educ 31:26–31.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960009598648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2013) Using multivariate statistics, 6th edn. Pearson Education, BostonGoogle Scholar
  70. Tennant R et al (2007) The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:63.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thomas EF, McGarty C, Mavor KI (2009) Transforming “apathy into movement”: the role of prosocial emotions in motivating action for social change. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 13:310–333.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309343290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Veríssimo D, Fraser I, Groombridge J, Bristol R, MacMillan DC (2009) Birds as tourism flagship species: a case study of tropical islands. Anim Conserv 12:549–558.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00282.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wilson E (2016) Half-earth: our planet’s fight for life, 1st edn. Liveright Publishing Corporation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. Zeppel HM, Muloin S (2007) Marine wildlife tours: benefits for participants. Marine wildlife and tourism management: insights from the natural and social sciences. CABI International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED)The University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia
  3. 3.School of Communication & ArtsThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations