Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

What can conservation strategies learn from the ecosystem services approach? Insights from ecosystem assessments in two Spanish protected areas

Abstract

Biodiversity conservation strategies that overlook the interests of local people are prone to create conflicts. The ecosystem service approach holds potential for more comprehensively integrating the social dimension into decision-making in protected areas, but its implementation in conservation policies is still in its infancy. This research assesses the extent to which ecosystem services have been implemented in conservation strategies in protected areas. The study was conducted in two outstanding Spanish protected areas, covering a wetland (Doñana Natural and National Parks) and a Mediterranean mountain system (Sierra Nevada Natural and National Parks). Data were collected from deliberative workshops with managers and researchers, face-to-face surveys with users and a review of management plans. We found that, beyond intrinsic values of ecosystems and biodiversity, these areas provide multiple ecosystem services that deserve further attention to ensure their sustained delivery. Our research shows that environmental managers and researchers have different perceptions and priorities regarding ecosystem services management compared with ecosystem service users. Environmental managers and researchers in both protected areas perceived that human-nature relationships and ecosystem services are already widely included in management plans, if often not explicitly. We found that different ecosystem service categories receive uneven attention in management plans. These contained measures to manage provisioning and cultural services whereas measures for managing regulating services were perceived to be largely absent. We conclude by summarizing insights on how the ecosystem service approach may enhance the consideration of social interests in the management of management protected areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Aspizua R, Bonet FJ, Zamora R, Sánchez FJ, Cano-Manuel FJ, Henares I (2010) El Observatorio de Cambio Global de Sierra Nevada: hacia la gestión adaptativa de los espacios naturales. Ecosistemas 19:56–68

  2. Aznar-Sánchez JA, Galdeano-Gómez E, Pérez-Mesa JC (2011) Intensive horticulture in Almeria: a counterpoint to current European rural policy strategies. J Agrar Change 11:241–261

  3. Ban NC, Mills M, Tam J, Hicks CC, Klain S, Stoeckl N, Bottrill MC, Levine J, Pressey RL, Satterfield T, Chan KM (2013) A social–ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations. Front Ecol Environ 11:194–202

  4. Bertzky B, Corrigan C, Kemsey J, Kenney S, Ravilious C, Besançon C, Burgess N (2012) Protected Planet Report 2012: Tracking progress towards global targets for protected areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK  

  5. Bonet-García FJ, Pérez-Luque AJ, Moreno-Llorca RA, Pérez-Pérez R, Puerta-Piñeiro C, Zamora R (2015) Protected areas as elicitors of human well-being in a developed region: A new synthetic (socioeconomic) approach. Biol Conserv 187:221–229

  6. Bonet-García FJ, Pérez-Luque AJ, Moreno-Llorca RA, Zamora R (2010) Observatorio de Cambio Global en Sierra Nevada. Estructura y Contenidos Básicos. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía-Universidad de Granada, Granada, p 48

  7. Caudron A, Vigier L, Champigneulle A (2012) Developing collaborative research to improve effectiveness in biodiversity conservation practice. J Appl Ecol 49:753–757

  8. Commission European (2011) The EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

  9. Consejería de Medio Ambiente (2004) Plan de Desarrollo Sostenible (PDS) del Parque Natural de Sierra Nevada. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Spain

  10. Consejería de Medio Ambiente (2010) Plan de Desarrollo Sostenible II (PDS) de Doñana. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Spain

  11. Cook CN, Carter RB, Fuller RA, Hockings M (2012) Managers consider multiple lines of evidence important for biodiversity management decisions. J Environ Manage 113:341–346

  12. Cowling RM, Egoh B, Knight AT, O’Farrel PJ, Reyers B, Rouget M, Roux RJ, Welz A, Wilhelm-Rechman A (2008) An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. PNAS 105:9483–9488

  13. Cumming GS (2016) The relevance and resilience of protected areas in the Anthropocene. Anthropocene. doi:10.1016/j.ancene.2016.03.003

  14. Cumming GS, Allen CR, Ban NC, Biggs D, Biggs HC et al (2015) Understanding protected area resilience: a multi-scale, social-ecological approach. Ecol Appl 25:299–319

  15. Custodio E, Manzano M, Montes C (2009) Las aguas subterráneas en Doñana. Implicaciones ecológicas y sociales. Agencia Andaluza del Agua, Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla

  16. Decreto 48/2004 (2004) de 10 de febrero, por el que se aprueba el Plan Rector de Uso y Gestión del Parque Nacional de Doñana. BOJA 44:5517–5580

  17. Decreto 97/2005 (2005) de 11 de abril, por el que se establece la ordenación del Parque Nacional y Parque Natural de Doñana. BOJA 105:98–105

  18. Decreto 238/2011 (2011) de 12 de julio, por el que se establece la ordenación y gestión de Sierra Nevada. BOJA 155:114–314

  19. DeFries R, Hansen A, Turner BL, Reid R, Liu J (2007) Land use change around protected areas: management to balance human needs and ecological function. Ecol Appl 17:1031–1038

  20. Dudley N (ed) (2008) Guidelines for applying protected areas management categories. IUCN, Gland

  21. Dudley N, Higgins-Zogib L, Hockings M, MacKinnon K, Sandwith T, Stoltonet S (2011) National parks with benefits: how protecting the planet’s biodiversity also provides ecosystem services. Solut Sustain Desirable Future 2:87–95

  22. Espacio Natural de Doñana (2011) Memoria de actividades y resultados 2010. Junta de Andalucía, Andalusian

  23. Espacio Natural de Doñana (2012) Memoria de actividades y resultados 2011. Junta de Andalucía, Andalusian

  24. Espacio Natural de Doñana (2013) Memoria de actividades y resultados 2012. Junta de Andalucía, Andalusian

  25. Espacio Natural de Doñana (2014) Memoria de actividades y resultados 2013. Junta de Andalucía, Andalusian

  26. Espacio Natural Sierra Nevada (2012) Memoria de actividades y resultados 2011. Sierra Nevada: Parque Nacional, Parque Natural y Reserva de la Biosfera, Junta de Andalucía

  27. Espacio Natural Sierra Nevada (2015) Memoria de actividades y resultados 2014. Junta de Andalucía

  28. Flint CG, Kunze I, Muhar A, Yoshida Y, Penker M (2013) Exploring empirical typologies of human-nature relationships and linkages to the ecosystem services concept. Landsc Urban Plan 120:208–217

  29. García-Llorente M, Iniesta-Arandia I, Willaarts B, Harrison PA, Berry P, Bayo MM, Castro AJ, Aguilera PA, Montes C, Martín-López B (2015) Biophysical and socio-cultural factors underlying spatial tradeoffs of ecosystem services in semiarid watersheds. Ecol Soc 20(3):39. doi:10.5751/ES-07785-200339

  30. García-Nieto AP, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Quintas-Soriano C, Montes C, Martín-López B (2015) Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: the role of stakeholders’ profiles. Ecosyst Serv 13:141–152

  31. Gómez-Baggethun E, Alcorlo P, Montes C (2011a) Ecosystem services associated with a mosaic of alternative states in a Mediterranean wetland: case study of the Doñana Marsh (southwest Spain). Hydrolog Sci J 56:1374–1387

  32. Gómez-Baggethun E, Kelemen E, Martín-López B, Palomo I, Montes C (2013) Scale misfit in ecosystem service governance as a source of environmental conflict. Soc Natur Resour 26:1202–1216

  33. Gómez-Baggethun E, Martín-López B, Lomas P, Zorrilla P, Montes C (2011b) Evolution of ecosystem services in a Mediterranean cultural landscape: Doñana case study, Spain (1956–2006). In: Sofo A (ed) Biodiversity. InTech, Rijeka, pp 27–46

  34. Gómez-Baggethun E, Mingorría S, Reyes-García V, Calvet L, Montes C (2010) Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: empirical study in Doñana natural areas. Conserv Biol 24:721–729

  35. Gómez-Ortiz A, Oliva M, Salvà-Catarineu M, Salvador-Franch F (2013) The environmental protection of landscapes in the high semiarid Mediterranean mountain of Sierra Nevada National Park (Spain): historical evolution and future perspectives. Appl Geogr 42:227–239

  36. Harrison PA, Berry PM, Simpson G, Haslett JR, Blicharska M, Bucur M, Dunford R, Egoh B, García-Llorente M, Geamana N et al (2014) Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: a systematic review. Ecosyst Serv 9:191–203

  37. Hauck J, Potschin M, Saarela SR (2015) Ecosystem services and transdisciplinarity (draft). In: Potschin, M, Jax K (eds) OpenNESS Ecosystem Service Reference Book. EC FP7 Grant Agreement no. 308428. http://www.openness-project.eu/library/reference-book

  38. Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Aguilera PA, Montes C, Martín-López B (2014) Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change and human well-being. Ecol Econ 108:36–48

  39. Joppa LN, Loarie SR, Pimm SL (2008) On the protection of “protected areas”. PNAS 105:6673–6678

  40. Juffe-Bignoli D, Burgess ND, Bingham H, Belle EMS, de Lima MG, Deguignet M, Bertzky B, Milam AN, Martinez-Lopez J et al (2014) Protected planet report 2014. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge

  41. Kovács E, Kelemen E, Kalóczkai Á, Margóczi K, Pataki G, Gébert J, Málovics G, Balázs B et al (2015) Understanding the links between ecosystem service trade-offs and conflicts in protected areas. Ecosyst Serv 12:117–127

  42. Ley 42/2007 (2007) de 13 de Diciembre, del Patrimonio Natural y de la Biodiversidad. BOE 299:51275–51327

  43. Ley 45/2007 (2007) de 13 de Diciembre, del Patrimonio Natural y de la Biodiversidad. BOE 299:51339–51349

  44. Lobo JM, Castro I, Moreno JC (2001) Spatial and environmental determinants of vascular plant species richness distribution in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. Biol J Linn Soc 73:233–253

  45. López-Hoffman L, Varady RG, Flessa KW, Balvanera P (2010) Ecosystem services across borders: a framework for transboundary conservation policy. Front Ecol Environ 8:84–91

  46. Mace GM (2014) Whose conservation? Science 345:1558–1560

  47. Martín-López B, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Montes C (2011) The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas: valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social-ecological system (southwestern Spain). Ecol Econ 70:1481–1491

  48. Martín-López B, Montes C, Ramírez L, Benayas J (2009) What drives policy decision-making related to species conservation? Biol Conserv 142:1370–1380

  49. Moreno J, Palomo I, Escalera J, Martín-López B, Montes C (2014) Incorporating ecosystem services into ecosystem-based management to deal with complexity: a participative mental model approach. Landsc Ecol 29:1407–1421

  50. Múgica M, De Lucio JV (1996) The role of on-site experience on landscape preferences. A case study at Doñana National Park (Spain). J Environ Manage 47:229–239

  51. Olías M, González F, Cerón J, Bolívar J, González-Labajo J, García-López S (2008) Water quality and distribution of trace elements in the Doñana aquifer (SW Spain). Environ Geol 55:1555–1568

  52. Oteros-Rozas E, Martín-López B, González JA, Plieninger T, López CA, Montes C (2014) Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services in a transhumance social-ecological network. Reg Environ Change 14:1269–1289

  53. Palomo I, Martín-López B, Alcorlo P, Montes C (2014a) Limitations of protected areas zoning in Mediterranean cultural landscapes under the ecosystem services approach. Ecosystems 17:1202–1215

  54. Palomo I, Martín-López B, Potschin M, Haines-Young R, Montes C (2013) National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding landscape: mapping ecosystem services flows. Ecosyst Serv 4:104–116

  55. Palomo I, Martín-López B, Zorrilla-Miras P, García Del Amo D, Montes C (2014b) Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. Reg Environ Change 14:237–251

  56. Palomo I, Montes C, Martín-López B, González JA, García-Llorente M, Alcorlo P, García C (2014c) Incorporating the social-ecological approach in protected areas in the Anthropocene. Bioscience 64:181–191

  57. Quintas-Soriano C, Castro AJ, García-Llorente M, Cabello J, Castro H (2014) From supply to social demand: a landscape-scale analysis of the water regulation service. Lands Ecol 132:102–110

  58. Quintas-Soriano C, Castro AJ, Castro H, García-Llorente M (2016) Impacts of land use change on ecosystem services and implications for human well-being in Spanish drylands. Land Use Policy 54:534–548

  59. Radeloff VC, Stewart SI, Hawbaker TJ, Gimmi U, Pidgeon AM, Flather CH, Hammer RB, Helmers DP (2010) Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value. PNAS 107:940–945

  60. Rands MRW, Adams WM, Bennun L, Butchart SHM, Clemnts A (2010) Biodiversity conservation: challenges beyond 2010. Science 329(5997):1298–1303

  61. Red de Parques Nacionales (2008) Primer informe de situación de la Red de Parques Nacionales a 1 de Enero de 2007. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, España

  62. Red de Parques Nacionales (2012) Segundo informe de situación de la Red de Parques Nacionales (2007–2010). Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, España

  63. Rey Benayas JM, de la Montaña M (2003) Identifying areas of high-value vertebrate diversity for strengthening conservation. Biol Conserv 114:357–370

  64. Van Riper CJ, Kyle GT (2014) Capturing multiple values of ecosystem services shaped by environmental worldviews: a spatial analysis. J Environ Manag 145:374–384

  65. Serrano L, Reina M, Martín G, Reyes I, Arechederra A, León D, Toja J (2006) The aquatic systems of Doñana (SW Spain): watersheds and frontiers. Limnetica 25:11–32

  66. Stolton S, Dudley N (2010) The contribution of protected areas to human health. WWF and Equilibrium Research

  67. Thompson ID, Okabe K, Tylianakis JM, Kumar P, Brockerhoff EG, Schellhorn NA, Parrotta JA, Nasi R (2011) Forest biodiversity and the delivery of ecosystem goods and services: translating science into policy. Bioscience 61:972–981

  68. Tortosa G, Correa D, Sánchez-Raya AJ, Delgado A, Sánchez-Monedero MA, Bedmar EJ (2011) Effects of nitrate contamination and seasonal variation on the denitrication and greenhouse gas production in La Rocina stream (Doñana National Park, SW Spain). Ecol Eng 37:539–548

  69. Velasco D, García-Llorente M, Alonso B, Dolera A, Palomo I, Iniesta-Arandia I, Martín-López B (2015) Biodiversity conservation research challenges in the 21st century: a review of publishing trends in 2000 and 2011. Environ Sci Policy 54:90–96

  70. Venter O, Fuller RA, Segan DB, Carwardine J, Brooks T, Butchart SHM, Di Marco M, Iwamura T et al (2014) Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity. PLoS Biol 12:e1001891

  71. Voth A (2007) National parks and rural development in Spain. In: Mose I (ed) Protected areas and regional development in Europe-Towards a new model for the 21st century. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 141–160

  72. Watson JEM, Dudley N, Segan DB, Hockings M (2014) The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515:67–73

  73. Wilkinson C, Saarne T, Peterson GD, Colding J (2013) Strategic spatial planning and the ecosystem services concept—an historical exploration. Ecol Soc 18:37. doi:10.5751/ES-05368-180137

  74. Young JC, Jordan A, Searle KR, Butler A, Chapman DS, Simmons P, Watt AD (2013) Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation? Biol Conserv 158:359–370

  75. Zamora R (2010) Las Áreas protegidas como Observatorios del Cambio Global. Ecosistemas 19:1–4

  76. Zamora R, Pérez-Luque AJ, Bonet FJ, Barea-Azcón JM, Aspizua R (eds) (2015) La huella del cambio global en Sierra Nevada: Retos para la conservación. Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación del Territorio, Junta de Andalucía, p 208

  77. Zorrilla-Miras P, Palomo I, Gómez-Baggethun E, Martín-López B, Lomas PL, Montes C (2014) Effects of land-use change on wetland ecosystem services: a case study in the Doñana marshes (SW Spain). Landsc Urban Plan 122:160–174

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Sierra Nevada National and Natural Park staff and the Department of Environment of the Andalusian Government staff and researchers for attending the workshops conducted, we also thank respondents who kindly answered the survey. Funding for the development of this research was provided by a postdoctoral grant from the Spanish National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (INIA) which is co-funded by the European Social Fund, a Juan de la Cierva Grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Project 018/2009), the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (project CGL2011-30266), the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Commission (FP7, 2007–2013) under the BESAFE project (Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Arguments for our Future Environment; http://www.besafe-project.net; Contract No. 282743) and the OpenNESS Project (Operationalisation of Natural capital and Ecosystem Services: From concepts to real-world applications; Contract No. 308428).

Author information

Correspondence to Marina García-Llorente.

Additional information

This is part of the special issue on ‘BESAFE’.

Communicated by Rob Bugter, Paula Harrison, John Haslett and Rob Tinch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García-Llorente, M., Harrison, P.A., Berry, P. et al. What can conservation strategies learn from the ecosystem services approach? Insights from ecosystem assessments in two Spanish protected areas. Biodivers Conserv 27, 1575–1597 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1152-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Deliberative workshop
  • Document analysis
  • Management plan
  • National Park
  • Natural Park
  • Perception