Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 25, Issue 7, pp 1269–1284

Biodiversity knowledge synthesis at the European scale: actors and steps

  • Barbara Livoreil
  • Ilse Geijzendorffer
  • Andrew S. Pullin
  • Stefan Schindler
  • Marie Vandewalle
  • Carsten Nesshöver
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s10531-016-1143-5

Cite this article as:
Livoreil, B., Geijzendorffer, I., Pullin, A.S. et al. Biodivers Conserv (2016) 25: 1269. doi:10.1007/s10531-016-1143-5

Abstract

To respond to the need for a strengthened biodiversity science-policy-society interface at the European level, this paper presents the relevant actors and steps of a knowledge synthesis process relying on a Network of Knowledge. This process aims to maximize active involvement and contribution (including holders of traditional and local knowledge), transparency, credibility, relevance and legitimacy (among other values defined during several workshops held). The presented process allows for the implementation of several synthesis methodologies, depending on the availability of resources, quantity and quality of knowledge and decided according to the expectations of the requesters and users. We put this approach in parallel with other knowledge-based recommendations and negotiation processes such as CBD and IPBES and highlight the need to encompass the diversity of approaches, values, and challenges at the European scale, while the process simultaneously has to be highly flexible, yet simple and robust. Although the presented process still holds several challenges, it offers a step forward in the development and reflections on science-policy–society interfaces, based on consultations with a significant number of the actors from the European policy–science community.

Keywords

Science policy interface Knowledge synthesis Decision making Evidence Stakeholder involvement 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Livoreil
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ilse Geijzendorffer
    • 3
  • Andrew S. Pullin
    • 2
  • Stefan Schindler
    • 4
    • 5
  • Marie Vandewalle
    • 6
  • Carsten Nesshöver
    • 6
  1. 1.Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversité (FRB)ParisFrance
  2. 2.Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation (CEBC)Bangor UniversityBangorUK
  3. 3.Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d’Ecologie marine et continentale (IMBE)Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, Avignon Université, Technopôle Arbois-MéditerranéeAix-en-Provence cedex 04France
  4. 4.Department of Biodiversity and Nature ConservationEnvironment Agency AustriaViennaAustria
  5. 5.Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation and Landscape EcologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  6. 6.Department of Conservation BiologyUFZ –Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations