Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 467–484 | Cite as

Deciding when to lend a helping hand: a decision-making framework for seabird island restoration

  • Rachel T. Buxton
  • Christopher J. Jones
  • Philip O’Brien Lyver
  • David R. Towns
  • Stephanie B. Borrelle
Review Paper

Abstract

Following the removal of an introduced species, island restoration can follow two general approaches: passive, where no further intervention occurs and the island is assumed to recover naturally, and; active, where recovery of key taxa (e.g. seabirds) is enhanced by manipulating movement and demography. Steps for deciding between these techniques are: (1) outlining an explicit restoration goal; (2) building a conceptual model of the system; (3) identifying the most effective management approach; and (4) implementing and monitoring outcomes. After decades of island restoration initiatives, retrospective analysis of species’ responses to active and passive management approaches is now feasible. We summarize the advantages of incorporating these analyses of past restoration results as an initial step in the decision-making process. We illustrate this process using lessons learned from the restoration of seabird-driven island ecosystems after introduced vertebrate eradication in New Zealand. Throughout seven decades of successful vertebrate eradication projects, the goals of island restoration have shifted from passive to active enhancement of island communities, which are heavily dependent on burrow-nesting petrel population recovery. Using a comparative analysis of petrel response to past predator eradications we built a conceptual model of petrel recovery dynamics and defined key site and species characteristics for use in a stepwise decision tree to select between active or passive seabird population management. Active restoration techniques should be implemented when seabird populations are absent or declining; and on islands with no nearby source colony, small remnant colonies, highly altered habitat with shallow soil and slopes, and with competitive species pairs. As we continue to restore complex island communities, decision-making tools using a logical, step-wise framework informed by previous restoration successes and failures can aid in increasing understanding of ecosystem response.

Keywords

Adaptive management Decision tree Burrowing seabirds Eradication New Zealand Prioritization Recovery 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank C. Stone, D. Hamon, and H. Moller for helpful discussions and editing. P. Gaze, J. Greenman, E. Dunning for contributing restoration goals and unpublished data. This project was funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Te Hiringa Tangata Ki Te Tai Timu Ki Te Tai Pari—facilitating bicultural restoration of coastal forests using seabirds as ecosystem engineers contract C09X0908) and the University of Otago.

Supplementary material

10531_2016_1079_MOESM1_ESM.docx (125 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 125 kb)

References

  1. Armstrong DP, Castro I, Griffiths R (2007) Using adaptive management to determine requirements of re-introduced populations: the case of the New Zealand hihi. J Appl Ecol 44:953–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson IAE, Towns DR (1990). Ecological restoration on islands: prerequisites for success. In Ecological restoration of New Zealand islands. Conservation Sciences Publication No. 2. (Towns, D. R., C. H. Daugherty, and I. A. E. Atkinson). Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand 73–90Google Scholar
  3. Bellingham P, Towns DR, Cameron EK, Davis JJ, Wardle DA, Wilmshurst JM, Mulder C (2010) New Zealand island restoration: seabirds, predators, and the importance of history. New Zealand J Ecol 34:115–136Google Scholar
  4. Borker AL, McKown MW, Ackerman JT, Eagles-Smith CA, Tershy BR, Croll DA (2014) Vocal activity as a low cost and scalable index of seabird colony size. Conserv Biol 28:1100–1108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Broome K (2009) Beyond Kapiti—a decade of invasive rodent eradications from New Zealand islands. Biodiversity 10:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bushnell P, Pratt M (2014). Performance review framework: review of the department of conservation (DOC). State Services Commission, the Treasury, and the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  7. Buxton RT (2014). Ecological drivers of seabird recovery after the eradication of introduced predators, PhD Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  8. Buxton RT, Jones IL (2012) Measuring nocturnal seabird activity and status using acoustic recording devices: applications for island restoration. J Field Ornithol 83:47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buxton RT, Jones CJ, Moller H, Towns DR (2014) Drivers of seabird population recovery on New Zealand islands after predator eradication. Conserv Biol 28:333–344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Buxton RT, Anderson D, Moller H, Jones CJ, Lyver POB (2015a) Release of constraints on nest-site selection in burrow-nesting petrels following invasive rat eradication. Biol Invasions 17:1453–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buxton RT, Jones CJ, Moller H, Lyver POB (2015b) One method does not suit all: variable settlement responses of three procellariid species to vocalisation playbacks. Emu 115:126–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buxton RT, Gormley AM, Jones CJ, Lyver PO (2016a) Monitoring burrowing petrel populations: a sampling scheme for the management of an island keystone species. J Wildlife Manag 80:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buxton RT, Taylor GA, Jones CJ, Lyver PO, Moller H, Cree A, Towns D (2016b) Spatio-temporal changes in density and distribution of burrow-nesting seabird colonies after rat eradication. New Zealand J Ecol 40:88–99Google Scholar
  14. Chanwai, K, Richardson B (1998) Reworking indigenous customary rights? The case of introduced species. New Zealand J Environ Law 2:157–185Google Scholar
  15. Circumpolar Seabird Working Group (2001) Seabird harvest regimes in the circumpolar nations. CAFF Technical, Report No 9 Google Scholar
  16. Clout M, Russell JC (2006). The eradication of introduced mammals from New Zealand islands. In Assessment and Control of Biological Invasion Risks (Koike, F., M. Clout, M. Kawamichi, M. De Poorter, and K. Iwatsuki). IUCN and Shoukadoh Book Sellers, Gland, Switzerland and Kyoto, Japan 127–141Google Scholar
  17. Courchamp F, Chapuis JL, Pascal M (2003) Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact. Biol Rev 78:347–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Craig J, Anderson S, Clout M, Creese B, Mitchell N, Ogden J, Roberts M, Ussher G (2000) Conservation issues in New Zealand. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:61–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Croll DA, Maron JL, Estes JA, Danner EM, Byrd GV (2005) Introduced predators transform subarctic islands from grassland to tundra. Science 307:1959–1961CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Croxall JP, Rothery P (1991). Population regulation of seabirds: implications of their demography for conservation. In Bird population studies: relevance to conservation management (Perrins, C. M., J. D. Lebreton, and G. J. M. Hirons). Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Csada RD, James PC, Espie RHM (1996) The “file drawer problem” of non-significant results: does it apply to biological research. Oikos 76:591–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cubaynes S, Doherty JPF, Schreiber EA, Gimenez O (2011) To breed or not to breed: a seabird’s response to extreme climatic events. Biol Lett 7:303–306CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Daugherty CH, Towns D, Atkinson IAE, Gibbs GW (1990). The significance of the biological resources of New Zealand islands for ecological restoration. In Ecological restoration of New Zealand islands (Towns, D., C. H. Daugherty, and I. A. E. Atkinson). Department of conservation, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. Department of Conservation (2010) The island strategy: guidelines for managing islands administered by the Department of Conservation (unpublished). Department of Conservation, Ecosystem Management GroupGoogle Scholar
  25. DIISE (2015). The Database of Island Invasive Species Eradications. developed by Island Conservation, Coastal Conservation Action Laboratory UCSC, IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group, University of Auckland and Landcare Research New Zealand. http://diise.islandconservation.org
  26. Donlan CJ (2007) The complexities of costing eradications. Anim Conserv 10:156–158Google Scholar
  27. Duffy DC (1994). The guano islands of Peru: the once and future management of a renewable resource In Seabirds on Islands, Threats, Case Studies and Action Plans, vol. Birdlife Conservation Series 1 (Nettleship, D. N., J. Burger, and M. Gochfield). Birdlife International and Smithsonian Institute Press, Cambridge, UK Birdlife Conservation Series 168-76Google Scholar
  28. Forbes AR, Craig JL (2013) Assessing the role of revegetation in achieving restoration goals on Tiritiri Matangi Island. New Zealand J Ecol 37:343–352Google Scholar
  29. Forgie VP, Horsley, Johnston J (2001). Facilitating community based conservation initiatives. Sci Conserv 169Google Scholar
  30. Fukami T, Wardle DA, Bellingham PJ, Mulder CPH, Towns DR, Yeates GW, Bonner KI, Durrett MS, Grant-Hoffman MN, Williamson WM (2006) Above- and below-ground impacts of introduced predators in seabird-dominated island ecosystems. Ecol Lett 9:1299–1307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gauthreaux SA, Belser CG (2003) Radar ornithology and biological conservation. Auk 120:266–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gummer H, Taylor G, Wilson K-J, Rayner MJ (2015) Recovery of the endangered Chatham petrel (Pterodroma axillaris): A review of conservation management techniques from 1990 to 2010. Global Ecol Conserv 3:310–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haami B (1993). Cultural knowledge and traditions relating to the kiore rat in Aotearoa. Part 1: a Maori perspective. Science and Mathematics Education Papers. Hamilton: University of WaikatoGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamer KC, Schreiber EA, Burger J (2002). Breeding biology, life histories, and life history-environment interactions in seabirds. In Biology of Marine Birds (Schreiber, E. A., and J. Burger). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  35. Hamilton S (2000) How precise and accurate are data obtained using an infra-red scope on burrow-nesting sooty shearwaters Puffinus griseus. Mar Ornithol 28:1–6Google Scholar
  36. Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hardie-Boys N (2010). Valuing community group contributions to conservation. Sci Conserv 299Google Scholar
  38. Heemskerk MK, Wilson M, Pavao-Zuckerman (2003). Conceptual models as tools for communication across disciplines. Ecol Soc 7Google Scholar
  39. Helmstedt KJ, Shaw JD, Bode M, Terauds A, Springer K, Robinson SA, Possingham HP (2016). Prioritizing eradication actions on islands: it’s not all or nothing. Journal of Applied Ecology:n/a-n/aGoogle Scholar
  40. Hobbs RJ, Hallett LM, Ehrlich PR, Mooney HA (2011) Intervention ecology: applying ecological science in the twenty-first century. Bioscience 61:442–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holdaway R, Worthy T (1994) A new fossil species of shearwater Puffinus from the late quaternary of the South Island, New Zealand, and notes on the biogeography and evolution of the Puffinus gavia superspecies. Emu 94:201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Holl KD, Aide TM (2011) When and where to actively restore ecosystems. For Ecol Manage 261:1558–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Imber M, West JA, Cooper WJ (2003) Cook’s petrel (Pterodroma cookii): historic distribution, breeding biology and effects of predators. Notornis 50:221–230Google Scholar
  44. IUCN (2012)Google Scholar
  45. Johnson EA, Miyanishi K (2008) Testing the assumptions of chronosequences in succession. Ecol Lett 11:419–431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Jones HP (2010a) Prognosis for ecosystem recovery following rodent eradication and seabird restoration in an island archipelago. Ecol Appl 20:1204–1216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Jones HP (2010b) Seabird islands take mere decades to recover following rat eradication. Ecol Appl 20:2075–2080CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Jones HP, Kress SW (2012) A review of the world’s active seabird restoration projects. J Wildlife Manag 76:2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jones C, McNamara L (2014) Usefulness of two bioeconomic frameworks for evaluation of community-initiated species conservation projects. Wildlife Res 41:106–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jones HP, Schmitz OJ (2009) Rapid recovery of damaged ecosystems. PLoS ONE 4:e5653CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Jones HP, Towns DR, Bodey T, Miskelly CM, Ellis JC, Rauzon MJ, Kress SW, McKown MW (2011). Recovery and restoration on seabird islands. In Seabird Islands: Ecology, Invasion and Restoration (Mulder, C., W. Anderson, D. R. Towns, and P. Bellingham). Oxford University Press, New York, NY 317–357Google Scholar
  52. Joseph LN, Maloney RF, Possingham HP (2009) Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol. Conserv Biol 23:328–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Kappes P, Jones H (2014) Integrating seabird restoration and mammal eradication programs on islands to maximize conservation gains. Biodivers Conserv 23:503–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Keitt BS, Campbell A, Saunders A, Clout M, Wang YW, Tershy B (2011). The global islands invasive vertebrate eradication database: a tool to improve and facilitate restoration of island ecosystems. In Island invasives: Eradication and Management (Veitch, C. R., M. Clout, and D. R. Towns). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland 74–77Google Scholar
  55. Kettenring KM, Adams CR (2011) Lessons learned from invasive plant control experiments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 48:970–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kier G, Kreft H, Lee TM, Jetz W, Ibisch PL, Nowicki C, Mutke J, Barthlott W (2009) A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:9322–9327CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Kildaw SD, Irons DB, Nysewander DR, Buck CL (2005) Formation and growth of new seabird colonies: the significance of habitat quality. Marine Ornithology 33:49–58Google Scholar
  58. King WB (1985). Island birds: will the future repeat the past? In Conservation of Island Birds, vol. 3 (Moors, P. J.). International Council for Bird Preservation Technical Publication 33–15Google Scholar
  59. Kitson JC (2004) Harvest rate of sooty shearwaters (Puffinus griseus) by Rakiura Maori: a potential tool to monitor population trends. Wildlife Res 31:319–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kitson JC, Moller H (2008) Looking after your ground: resource management practice by Rakiura Maori Titi harvesters. Papers Proc Royal Soc Tasmania 142:161–167Google Scholar
  61. Kress SW (1998). Applying research for effective management: case studies in seabird restoration. In Avian Conservation (Marzluff, J. M., and R. Salabanks). Island Press, Washington, DC 141–154Google Scholar
  62. Lawrence HA, Lyver POB, Gleeson DM (2014) Genetic panmixia in New Zealand’s grey-faced petrel: implications for conservation and restoration. Emu 114:249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lee WM, McGlone, Wright E (2005) Biodiversity inventory and monitoring: a review of national and international systems and a proposed framework for future biodiversity monitoring by the Department of Conservation. Landcare Res Contract Report: LC0405/122Google Scholar
  64. Lewis RR III (2000) Ecologically based goal setting in mangrove forest and tidal marsh restoration. Ecol Eng 15:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE, Haywood A, Miezis L (2011) Adaptive monitoring in the real world: proof of concept. Trends Ecol Evol 26:641–646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Lyver POB, Jones CJ, Doherty J (2009). Flavor or forethought: Tuhoe traditional management strategies for the conservation of kereru (Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae novaeseelandiae) in New Zealand. Ecol Soc14Google Scholar
  67. Lyver POB, Ngamane L, Anderson A, Clarkin P (2008) Hauraki Māori mātauranga for the conservation and harvest of tītī, Pterodroma macroptera gouldi. Pap Proc R Soc Tas 142:149–160Google Scholar
  68. Lyver PO, Jones CJ, Belshaw N, Anderson A, Thompson R, Davis J (2015a) Insights to the functional relationships of Māori harvest practices: customary use of a burrowing seabird. J Wildlife Manag 79:969–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lyver POB, Wilmshurst JM, Wood JR, Jones CJ, Fromont M, Bellingham PJ, Towns DR, Stone C, Sheehan M, Moller H (2015b) Looking back for the future: local knowledge and paleoecology inform biocultural restoration of New Zealand coastal ecosystems. Human Ecol 43:691–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Margoluis R, Stem C, Salafsky N, Brown M (2009) Using conceptual models as a planning and evaluation tool in conservation. Eval Program Plan 32:138–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Matthiopoulos J, Harwood J, Thomas L (2005) Metapopulation consequences of site fidelity for colonially breeding mammals and birds. J Anim Ecol 74:716–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. McCullough DR (1996) Metapopulations and wildlife conservation. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  73. Milberg P, Tyrberg T (1993) Naive birds and noble savages—a review of man-caused prehistoric extinctions of island birds. Ecography 16:229–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Miskelly CM (2013). Southern black-backed gull. In New Zealand Birds Online (Miskelly, C. M.). www.nzbirdsonline.org.nz
  75. Miskelly CM, Powlesland R (2013) Conservation translocations of New Zealand birds, 1863-2012. Notornis 60:3–28Google Scholar
  76. Miskelly CM, Taylor GA, Gummer H, Williams R (2009) Translocations of eight species of burrow-nesting seabirds (genera Pterodroma, Pelecanoides, Pachyptila and Puffinus: Family Procellariidae). Biol Conserv 142:1965–1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mittermeier RA, Myers N, Thomsen JB, Da Fonseca GAB, Olivieri S (1998) Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv Biol 12:516–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Moller H (2006) Are current harvests of seabirds sustainable. Acta Zoologica Sinica 52:649–652Google Scholar
  79. Moller H (2009) Matauranga Maori, science and seabirds in New Zealand. New Zealand J Zool 36:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Moller H (2010). Cross-cultural partnership for seabird conservation and restoration. Talk at Island Invasives: Eradication and Management Conference. Center for Biodiversity and BiosecurityGoogle Scholar
  81. Moller H, Frampton C, Hocken AG, McLean IG, Saffer V, Sheridan L (2000) The importance of seabird research for New Zealand. New Zealand J Zool 27:255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Moller H, Berkes F, Lyver PO, Kislalioglu M (2004) Combining science and traditional ecological knowledge: monitoring populations for co-management. Ecol Soc 9:2Google Scholar
  83. Mulder C, Grant-Hoffman M, Towns D, Bellingham P, Wardle D, Durrett M, Fukami T, Bonner K (2009) Direct and indirect effects of rats: does rat eradication restore ecosystem functioning of New Zealand seabird islands. Biol Invasions 11:1671–1688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Mulder CW, Anderson DR, Towns, Bellingham P (2011a). Seabird Islands: Ecol Invasion RestorGoogle Scholar
  85. Mulder CPH, Jones HP, Kameda K, Palmborg C, Schmidt S, Ellis JC, Orrock JL, Wait DA, Wardle DA, Yang L, Young H, et al (2011b). Impact of seabirds on plant and soil properties. In Seabird Islands: Ecology, Invasion and Restoration (Mulder, C. P. H., W. Anderson, D. R. Towns, and P. Bellingham). Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  86. Newman J, Moller H (2005) Use of matauranga (Maori traditional knowledge) and science to guide a seabird harvest: getting the best of both worlds. Senri Ethnol Studies 67:303–321Google Scholar
  87. Newman J, Fletcher D, Moller H, Bragg C, Scott D, McKechnie S (2009) Estimates of productivity and detection probabilities of breeding attempts in the sooty shearwater (Puffinus griseus), a burrow-nesting petrel. Wildlife Res 36:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Noss RS, Nielsen, Vance-Boland K (2009). Chapter 12—prioritizing ecosystems, species, and sites for restoration. In Spatial Conservation Prioritisation: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools (Moilanen, A., K. A. Wilson, and H. P. Possingham). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK 158–170Google Scholar
  89. Oro D (2003) Managing seabird metapopulations in the Mediterranean: constraints and challenges. Scientia Marina 67:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Oro D, Pradel R (1999) Recruitment of Audouin’s gull to the Ebro Delta colony at metapopulation level in the western Mediterranean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 180:267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Oro D, Pérez-Rodrígueza A, Martínez-Vilaltab A, Bertolero A, Vidal F, Genovart M (2009) Interference competition in a threatened seabird community: a paradox for a successful conservation. Biol Conserv 142:1830–1835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Orwin KH, Wardle DA, Towns DR, St MG, John PJ, Bellingham C, Jones BM, Fitzgerald RG, Parrish, Lyver POB (2015) Burrowing seabird effects on invertebrate communities in soil and litter are dominated by ecosystem engineering rather than nutrient addition. Oecologia 180:217–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Palmer MA, Ambrose RF, Poff NL (1997) Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 5:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Parejo D, Danchin E, Avilés JM (2005) The heterospecific habitat copying hypothesis: can competitors indicate habitat quality. Behav Ecol 16:96–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Parkes J, Murphy E (2003) Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand. New Zealand J Zool 30:335–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Parkes JP, Panetta D (2009). Eradication of invasive species: progress and emerging issues in the 21st century. In Invasive Species Management (Clout, M. N., and P. A. Williams). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK 47–62Google Scholar
  97. Peters MA, Hamilton D, Eames C (2015) Action on the ground: a review of community environmental groups’ restoration objectives, activities and partnerships in New Zealand. New Zealand J Ecol 39:179–189Google Scholar
  98. Pierce RJ (2002). Kiore (Rattus exulans) impact on breeding success of Pycroft’s petrels and little shearwatersGoogle Scholar
  99. Possingham HP, Andelman SJ, Noon BR, Tromblak S, Pulliam HR (2001). Making smart conservation decisions. In Conservation Biology: Research Priorities for the Next Decade (Soule, M. E., and G. H. Orians). Island Press, Washington, DC 225–244Google Scholar
  100. Richardson DM, Hellmann JJ, McLachlan JS, Sax DF, Schwartz MW, Gonzalez P, Brennan EJ, Camacho A, Root TL, Sala OE, Schneider SH et al (2009) Multidimensional evaluation of managed relocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:9721–9724CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  101. Sandvik H, Erikstad KE, Sæther BE (2012) Climate affects seabird population dynamics both via reproduction and adult survival. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 454:273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sawyer SL, Fogle SR (2010) Acoustic attraction of Grey-faced Petrels (Pterodroma macroptera gouldi) and Fluttering Shearwaters (Puffinus gavia) to Young Nick’s Head, New Zealand. Notornis 57:166–168Google Scholar
  103. Scott TA, Wehtje W, Wehtje MA (2001) The need for strategic planning in passive restoration of wildlife populations. Restor Ecol 9:262–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Seabrook-Davidson MNH, Brunton DH (2014) Public attitude towards conservation in New Zealand and awareness of threatened species. Pac Cons Biol 20:286–295Google Scholar
  105. Smith JL, Mulder CPH, Ellis JC (2011). Seabirds as ecosystem engineers: nutrient inputs and physical disturbance. In Seabird Islands: Ecol Invasion Restor (C. P. H. Mulder, W. A., D. R. Towns, and P. Bellingham). Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  106. Taiepa T, Lyver P, Horsley P, Davis J, Brag M, Moller H (1997) Co-management of New Zealand’s conservation estate by Maori and Pakeha: a review. Environ Conserv 24:236–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Taylor GA (2000). Action plan for seabird conservation in New Zealand, part A. in Threatened Species Occasional Publication. Department of Conservation, Wellington, NZGoogle Scholar
  108. Towns DR (2002) Korapuki Island as a case study for restoration of insular ecosystems in New Zealand. J Biogeogr 29:593–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Towns DR (2009) Eradications as reverse invasions: lessons from Pacific rat (Rattus exulans) removals on New Zealand islands. Biol Invasions 11:1719–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Towns DR (2011). Eradication of vertebrate pests from islands around New Zealand: what have we delivered and what have we learned? In Island Invasives: Eradication and Management (Veitch, C. R., M. Clout, and D. R. Towns). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland 364–371Google Scholar
  111. Towns DR, Broome KG (2003) From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. New Zealand J Zool 30:377–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Towns D, Atkinson IAE, Daugherty CH (1990a). The potential for ecological restoration in the mercury islands. In Ecological restoration of New Zealand islands. Conservation Sciences Publication No. 2 (Towns, D., C. H. Daugherty, and I. A. E. Atkinson). Department of Conservation, Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  113. Towns D, Daugherty CH, Atkinson IAE (1990b). Ecological Restoration of New Zealand Islands. Department of Conservation, Conservation Sciences Publication No. 2, Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  114. Towns D, Simberloff D, Atkinson IAE (1997) Restoration of New Zealand islands: redressing the effects of introduced species. Pac Conserv Biol 3:99–124Google Scholar
  115. Towns DR, Byrd GV, Jones HP, Rauzon MJ, Russell JC, Wilcox C (2011). Impacts of introduced predators on seabirds. In Seabird Islands: Ecology, Invasion and Restoration (Mulder, C., W. Anderson, D. R. Towns, and P. Bellingham). Oxford University Press, New York, NY 56–90Google Scholar
  116. Towns DR, Bellingham PJ, Mulder CPH, Lyver POB (2012) A research strategy for biodiversity conservation on New Zealand’s offshore islands. New Zealand J Ecol 36:1–20Google Scholar
  117. Towns DR, West CJ, Broome KG (2013) Purposes, outcomes and challenges of eradicating invasive mammals from New Zealand islands: an historical perspective. Wildlife Res 40:94–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Tunstall SM, Tapsell SM, Eden S (1999) How stable are public responses to changing local environments? A ‘before’ and ‘after’ case study of river restoration. J Environ Plan Manage 42:527–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Veitch CR, Miskelly CM, Harper GA, Taylor GA, Tennyson AJD (2004) Birds of the Kermadec Islands, south-west Pacific. Notornis 51:61–90Google Scholar
  120. Wagner RH, Danchin E, Boulinier T, Helfenstein F (2000) Colonies as byproducts of commodity selection. Behav Ecol 11:572–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Warham J (1990) The petrels: their ecology and breeding systems. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  122. Was NW, Sullivan WJ, Wilson KJ (2000). Burrow competition between broad-billed prions (Pachyptila vittata) and the endangered Chatham petrel (Pterodroma axillaris)Google Scholar
  123. Westgate MJ, Likens GE, Lindenmayer DB (2013) Adaptive management of biological systems: a review. Biol Conserv 158:128–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Whitehead A, Lyver POB, Jones CJ, Macleod C, Bellingham PJ, Coleman M, Karl BJ, Drew K, Pairman D, Gormley AM, Duncan RP (2014) Establishing accurate baseline estimates of breeding populations of a burrowing seabird, the Grey-faced Petrel (Pterodroma macroptera gouldi) in New Zealand. Biol Conserv 169:106–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Williams BK (2011) Adaptive management of natural resources—framework and issues. J Environ Manage 92:1346–1353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Wilmshurst JM, Anderson AJ, Higham TFG, Worthy TH (2008) Dating the late prehistoric dispersal of Polynesians to New Zealand using the commensal Pacific rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:7676–7680CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  127. Wilmshurst JM, Moar NT, Wood JR, Bellingham PJ, Findlater AM, Robinson JJ, Stone C (2014) Use of pollen and ancient DNA as conservation baselines for offshore islands in New Zealand. Conserv Biol 28:202–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Wilson RS, Bruskotter JT (2009) Assessing the impact of decision frame and existing attitudes on support for wolf restoration in the United States. Human Dimens Wildlife 14:353–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Wyant J, Meganck R, Ham S (1995) A planning and decision-making framework for ecological restoration. Environ Manage 19:789–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Young RC (2014). Behavior, physiology, biological age, and cultural role of long-lived Bering Sea seabirds. PhD, PhD thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel T. Buxton
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christopher J. Jones
    • 3
  • Philip O’Brien Lyver
    • 3
  • David R. Towns
    • 4
    • 5
  • Stephanie B. Borrelle
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Zoology and Centre for Sustainability: Agriculture, Food, Energy, and EnvironmentUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation BiologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  3. 3.Landcare ResearchLincolnNew Zealand
  4. 4.School of Applied Sciences, Institute for Applied EcologyAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand
  5. 5.Department of ConservationAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations