Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 24, Issue 12, pp 2953–2965 | Cite as

Mixed sampling protocols improve the cost-effectiveness of roadkill surveys

Original Paper


Road mortality due to animal vehicle collisions has serious negative effects on population viability, demanding urgent implementation of mitigation measures where most required. Data from roadkill surveys is generally used to choose the best mitigation measures, but there is a lack of knowledge about the sampling intensity required for surveys to effectively detect roadkill patterns. Improving the cost-effectiveness of road surveys could free up limited resources that, in turn, could be used to obtain a better perception of road impacts and mitigation effectiveness elsewhere. We evaluate the possibility of improving road survey cost-effectiveness by comparing the spatial patterns obtained when using a weekly versus monthly survey and year-round versus seasonal surveys. We analyzed a roadkill dataset, previously collected over 2 years in southern Brazil, and applied two criteria for assessing the effectiveness of two alternative survey protocols: tradeoff between sampling effort and sample size; and similarity in spatial patterns. We found support favoring monthly surveys for those taxa in which roadkill was not markedly temporally clustered, as was the case for larger mammals. However, performing weekly surveys over shorter periods may significantly improve cost-effectiveness for taxa with peaks in mortality if surveys are performed during those periods when roadkill is most likely to occur. We suggest applying a mix of sampling protocols, with intensive surveys during warmer periods for reptiles and other taxa with peak roadkill at these times while, for the rest of the year, a monthly survey could be used to improve detection of rarer species.


Road ecology Road monitoring Sample size Spatial pattern Kernel density estimation Vertebrates Brazil 



We would like to thank Lucas Del Bianco Faria, Clara Grilo, Luis M. Rosalino and Luis Borda-de-Água for their suggestions on the first version of this manuscript. AS and AB were supported by the project Estrada Viva—RS and financially supported by Fundação O Boticário de Proteção à Natureza (O Boticário Nature Protection Foundation). The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Supplementary material

10531_2015_988_MOESM1_ESM.docx (89 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 89 kb)


  1. Ascensão F, Grilo C, LaPoint S, Tracey J, Clevenger AP, Santos-Reis M (2014) Inter-individual variability of Stone Marten behavioral responses to a highway. PLoS ONE 9:e103544PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bager A, da Rosa C (2010) Priority ranking of road sites for mitigating wildlife roadkill. Biota Neotrop 10:2–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bager A, da Rosa C (2011) Influence of sampling effort on the estimated richness of roadkilled vertebrate wildlife. Environ Manag 47:851–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balkenhol N, Waits LP (2009) Molecular road ecology: exploring the potential of genetics for investigating transportation impacts on wildlife. Mol Ecol 18:4151–4164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Beaudry F, DeMaynadier PG, Hunter ML Jr (2010) Identifying hot moments in road-mortality risk for freshwater turtles. J Wildl Manag 74:152–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beebee TJC (2013) Effects of road mortality and mitigation measures on amphibian populations. Conserv Biol 27:657–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Blazek R (2005) Introducing the linear reference system in GRASS. Int J Geoinf 1:95–100Google Scholar
  8. Borda-de-Água L, Navarro L, Gavinhos C, Pereira HM (2011) Spatio-temporal impacts of roads on the persistence of populations: analytic and numerical approaches. Landsc Ecol 26:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borda-de-Água L, Grilo C, Pereira HM (2014) Modeling the impact of road mortality on barn owl (Tyto alba) populations using age-structured models. Ecol Model 276:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowman AW, Azzalini A (1997) Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowman AW, Azzalini A (2014) R package “sm”: nonparametric smoothing methods (version 2.2-5.4). URL:, Accessed April 30 2014
  12. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL (2006) Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313:58–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Clevenger AP, Chruszcz B, Gunson KE (2001) Highway mitigation fencing reduces wildlife-vehicle collisions. Wildl Soc Bull 29(2):646–653Google Scholar
  14. Coelho IP, Teixeira FZ, Colombo P et al (2012) Anuran road-kills neighboring a peri-urban reserve in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. J Environ Manag 112:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colino-Rabanal VJ, Lizana M, Peris SJ (2010) Factors influencing wolf Canis lupus roadkills in Northwest Spain. Eur J Wildl Res 57:399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crawford BA, Maerz JC, Nibbelink NP et al (2014) Hot spots and hot moments of diamondback terrapin road-crossing activity. J Appl Ecol 51:367–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cureton JCJ, Deaton R (2012) Hot moments and hot spots: identifying factors explaining temporal and spatial variation in turtle road mortality. J Wildl Manag 76:1047–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eberhardt E, Mitchell S, Fahrig L (2013) Road kill hotspots do not effectively indicate mitigation locations when past road kill has depressed populations. J Wildl Manag 77:1353–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ford AT, Clevenger AP, Huijser MP, Dibb A (2011) Planning and prioritization strategies for phased highway mitigation using wildlife-vehicle collision data. Wildl Biol 17:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forman RTT, Sperling D, Bissonette J et al (2003) Road ecology: science and solutions. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Glista DJ, DeVault TL, DeWoody JA (2009) A review of mitigation measures for reducing wildlife mortality on roadways. Landsc Urban Plan 91:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grilo C, Bissonette JA, Santos-Reis M (2009) Spatial–temporal patterns in Mediterranean carnivore road casualties: consequences for mitigation. Biol Conserv 142:301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grilo C, Sousa J, Ascensão F et al (2012) Individual spatial responses towards roads: implications for mortality risk. PLoS ONE 7:e43811PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gunson KE, Mountrakis G, Quackenbush LJ (2011) Spatial wildlife-vehicle collision models: a review of current work and its application to transportation mitigation projects. J Environ Manag 92:1074–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hobday AJ, Minstrell ML (2008) Distribution and abundance of roadkill on Tasmanian highways: human management options. Wildl Res 35:712–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holderegger R, Di Giulio M (2010) The genetic effects of roads: a review of empirical evidence. Basic Appl Ecol 11:522–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huijser MP, Duffield JW, Clevenger AP et al (2009) Cost–benefit analyses of mitigation measures aimed at reducing collisions with large ungulates in the United States and Canada; a decision support tool. Ecol Soc 14:15Google Scholar
  28. Jaarsma CF, van Langevelde F, Botma H (2006) Flattened fauna and mitigation: traffic victims related to road, traffic, vehicle, and species characteristics. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 11:264–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson ND, Fahrig L (2011) Relative effects of road mortality and decreased connectivity on population genetic diversity. Biol Conserv 144:3143–3148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jaeger JAG, Bowman J, Brennan J et al (2005) Predicting when animal populations are at risk from roads: an interactive model of road avoidance behavior. Ecol Model 185:329–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Langlois TJ, Fitzpatrick BR, Fairclough DV et al (2012) Similarities between line fishing and baited stereo-video estimations of length-frequency: novel application of Kernel density estimates. PLoS ONE 7:e45973PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Laurance WF, Croes BM, Guissouegou N, Buij R, Dethier M, Alonso A (2008) Impacts of roads, hunting, and habitat alteration on nocturnal mammals in African rainforests. Conserv Biol 22:721–732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Laurance WF, Goosem M, Laurance S (2009) Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests. Trends Ecol Evol 24:659–669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Laurance WF, Clements GR, Sloan S et al (2014) A global strategy for road building. Nature 513:229–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lesbarreres D, Fahrig L (2012) Measures to reduce population fragmentation by roads: what has worked and how do we know? Trends Ecol Evol 27:374–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Malo JE, Suarez F, Diez A (2004) Can we mitigate animal-vehicle accidents using predictive models? J Appl Ecol 41:701–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maltchik L, Rolon AS, Guadagnin DL, Stenert C (2004) Wetlands of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: a classification with emphasis on plant communities. Acta Limnol Brasiliensia 16:137–151Google Scholar
  38. McKellar AE, Marra PP, Hannon SJ et al (2013) Winter rainfall predicts phenology in widely separated populations of a migrant songbird. Oecologia 172:595–605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Neumann W, Ericsson G, Dettki H, Bunnefeld N, Keuler NS, Helmers DP, Radeloff VC (2012) Difference in spatiotemporal patterns of wildlife road-crossings and wildlife-vehicle collisions. Biol Conserv 145:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Orłowski G (2005) Factors affecting road mortality of the Barn Swallows Hirundo rustica in farmland. Acta Ornithol 40:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Poessel SA, Burdett CL, Boydston EE, Lyren LM, Alonso RS, Fisher RN, Crooks KR (2014) Roads influence movement and home ranges of a fragmentation-sensitive carnivore, the bobcat, in an urban landscape. Biol Conserv 180:224–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Polak T, Rhodes JR, Jones D, Possingham HP (2014) Optimal planning for mitigating the impacts of roads on wildlife. J Appl Ecol 51:726–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. QGIS Development Team (2014) Quantum GIS Geographic Information System. Open source geospatial foundation. URL:
  44. Ramp D, Caldwell J, Edwards KA, Warton D, Croft DB (2005) Modelling of wildlife fatality hotspots along the Snowy Mountain Highway in New South Wales, Australia. Biol Conserv 126:474–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. URL:
  46. Reading CJ (1998) The effect of winter temperatures on the timing of breeding activity in the common toad Bufo bufo. Oecologia 117:469–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rhodes JR, Lunney D, Callaghan J, McAlpine CA (2014) A few large roads or many small ones? How to accommodate growth in vehicle numbers to minimise impacts on wildlife. PLoS ONE 9(3):e91093PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Roedenbeck IA, Fahrig L, Findlay CS, Houlahan JE, Jaeger JAG, Klar N, Kramer-Schadt S, van der Grift EA (2007) The Rauischholzhausen agenda for road ecology. Ecol Soc 12:11Google Scholar
  49. Rosa C, Bager A (2012) Seasonality and habitat types affect roadkill of neotropical birds. J Environ Manag 97:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saino N, Szep T, Romano M et al (2004) Ecological conditions during winter predict arrival date at the breeding quarters in a trans-Saharan migratory bird. Ecol Lett 7:21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Santos SM, Carvalho F, Mira A (2011) How long do the dead survive on the road? Carcass persistence probability and implications for roadkill monitoring surveys. PLoS ONE 6:e25383PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Selva N, Kreft S, Kati V, Schluck M, Jonsson BG, Mihok B, Okarma H, Ibisch PL (2011) Roadless and low-traffic areas as conservation targets in Europe. Environ Manag 48:865–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sheather SJ, Jones MC (1991) A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation. J Roy Stat Soc Series B (Methodological) 53:683–690Google Scholar
  54. Van der Grift EA, Van der Ree R, Fahrig L et al (2012) Evaluating the effectiveness of road mitigation measures. Biodivers Conserv 22:425–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Visconti P, Pressey RL, Giorgini D et al (2011) Future hotspots of terrestrial mammal loss. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 366:2693–2702CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brazilian Center for Road Ecology (CBEE), Ecology Sector, Department of BiologyFederal University of LavrasLavrasBrazil
  2. 2.Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C), Faculdade de CiênciasUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations