Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 24, Issue 13, pp 3269–3283 | Cite as

Mountain landscape archetypes of the Western Carpathians (Slovakia)

Original paper

Abstract

The concept of landscape archetypes arises from the idea of complex spatial structures allocation in the hierarchical and logical sequence, from the higher level to the lowest one (Hreško et al. Ekológia (Bratislava) 29:158–173, 2010). The landscape units being allocated on the basis of horizontal references of the secondary landscape structure are considered to be the output of landscape archetypes regionalization. The Western Carpathians represent the highest part of the Carpathian arc with highland and alpine type of landscape, which is characterized by scenically arranged mountain ridges separated by the intermountain basins and fluvial-modeled valleys. Formation of mountain areas archetypes was primarily determined by properties of relief and geological structure. Landscape archetype reflects the country way of adaptation to the impacts and changes caused by human activity, in our conditions from the Upper Palaeolithic to the present. Gradual settlement of the mountain arc of the Carpathians in the area of Slovakia was significantly influenced by the German and the Wallachian colonization. During the research of the development of the secondary landscape structure of mountain areas of Slovakia, we identified specific textures with various patterns of landscape mosaic with a certain degree of orderliness or regularity of landscape elements at different hierarchical levels. We consider such physiognomically distinguishable parts of the landscape to be “landscape archetypes”. In this paper we want to clarify and interpret the development of some representative archetypes of the mountain area of the Western Carpathians via selected examples, and to point out one of the new ways of the landscape research.

Keywords

Landscape archetype Landscape diversity Historical landscape structure Mountain regions 

References

  1. Agnoletti M (2008) European agriculture policies and landscape: effects strategies and perspectives. In: Proceedings of the 7th meeting of the council of the Europe of the workshop for the implementation of the European landscape convention, Piešťany, pp 11–22Google Scholar
  2. Agnoletti M (2013) Italian historical rural landscapes: dynamics, data analysis and research findings. In: Agnoletti M (ed) Italian historical rural landscapes. cultural values for the environment and rural development. Springer, New York, pp 3–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agnoletti M (2014) Rural landscape, nature conservation and culture: some notes on research trends and management approaches from a (southern) European perspective. Landsc Urban Plan 126:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Druga M, Falťan V (2014) Influences of environmental drivers on land cover structure and its long-term changes: a case study of the villages of Malachov and Podkonice in Slovakia. Morav Geogr Rep 22(3):29–41Google Scholar
  5. Farina A (2007) Principles and methods in landscape ecology towards a science of the landscape. Springer, New York, p 412Google Scholar
  6. Havlíček M, Krejčíková B, Chrudina Z, Svoboda J (2012) Long-term land use development and changes in streams of the Kyjovka, Svratka and Velička river basins (Czech Republic. Morav Geogr Rep 20(1):25–42Google Scholar
  7. Hong SK, Nakagoshi N, Bojie F, Morimoto Y (eds) (2007) Landscape ecological applications in man-influenced areas. Springer, Dordrecht, p 535Google Scholar
  8. Hreško J, Mederly P (1999) Reliéf a súčasná krajinná štruktúra krasového územia (Relief and the Current Landscape Structure of the Karst Area) (in Slovak). In: Izakovičová Z (ed) Zmeny krajinnej štruktúry v kontexte trvalo udržateľného rozvoja (Changes of Landscape Structure in the Context of Sustainable Development). pp 14–24Google Scholar
  9. Hreško J, Kanásová D, Petrovič F (2010) Landscape archetypes as the elements of Slovak historical landscape structure. Ekológia (Bratislava) 29(2):158–173 ISSN 1335-342 Google Scholar
  10. Jakál J (1986) Krasová krajina ako špecifický prírodný geosystém (Karst Area as a Specific Natural Geosystem) (in Slovak). Slovenský kras, vol XXIV, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  11. Jusková K, Muchová Z (2014) Options and trends of land consolidation in the Czech and Slovak Republics, with regard to common historical development of ownership and usage rights. In SGEM 2014. 1st ed.. SGEM. Sofia: STEP92 Technology, pp 471–478Google Scholar
  12. Mojses M, Petrovič F (2013) Land use changes of historical structures in the agricultural landscape at the local level—Hriňová case study. Ekologia Bratislava 32(1):1–12 ISSN 1335-342X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mojses M et al (2011) Stratégia manažmentu tradičnej poľnohospodárskej krajiny mesta Hriňová (Strategy of Management of the Traditional Agricultural Landscape of the Hriňová Town) (in Slovak). ILE SAS, Bratislava, p 158Google Scholar
  14. Munteanu C et al (2014) Forest and agricultural land change in the Carpathian region—a meta-analysis of long-term patterns and drivers of change. Land Use Policy 38:685–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oťaheľ J, Hrnčiarová T, Kozová M (2008) Landscape typology of Slovakia: regionalization of its natural-cultural character. Environment 42(2):70–76 (In Slovak) Google Scholar
  16. Pauditšová E, Slabeciusová B (2014) Modelling as a platform for landscape planning. In: Proceedings of 14th international multidisciplinary scientific geoconferences, Albena, Bulgaria, vol III, pp 753–760Google Scholar
  17. Rozložník M, Karasová M (eds) (1994) Chránená krajinná oblasť – Biosférická rezervácia Slovenský Kras (Protected Landscape Area – Biosphere Reserve Slovak Karst) (in Slovak). Osveta, Martin, p 477Google Scholar
  18. Skokanová H et al (2012) Development of land use and main land use change processes in the period 1836–2006: case study in the Czech Republic. J Maps 8(1):88–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Slamová M, Jančura P, Daniš D (2003) Methods of historical landscape structures identification and implementation into landscape studies. Ekológia 32(3):267–276Google Scholar
  20. Špulerová J, Dobrovodská M, Izakovičová Z, Kenderessy P, Petrovič F, Štefunková D (2013) Developing a strategy for the protection of traditional agricultural landscapes based on a complex landscape-ecological evaluation (the case of a mountain landscape in Slovakia). Morav Geogr Rep 21(4):15–26 ISSN 1210-8812 Google Scholar
  21. Tarasovičová Z, Saksa M, Blažík T, Falťan V (2013) Changes in agricultural land use in the context of ongoing transformational processes in Slovakia. Agriculture 59(2):49–64Google Scholar
  22. Tasser E, Sternbach E, Tappeiner U (2008) Biodiversity indicators for sustainability monitoring at municipality level: an example of implementation in an alpine region. Ecol Ind 8(3):204–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Turner MG (1989) Landscape Ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2003) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process, vol 2. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Natural ScienceConstantine the Philosopher University in NitraNitraSlovakia

Personalised recommendations