Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 24, Issue 13, pp 3217–3251 | Cite as

Long-term bio-cultural heritage: exploring the intermediate disturbance hypothesis in agro-ecological landscapes (Mallorca, c. 1850–2012)

  • Joan MarullEmail author
  • Enric Tello
  • Nofre Fullana
  • Ivan Murray
  • Gabriel Jover
  • Carme Font
  • Francesc Coll
  • Elena Domene
  • Veronica Leoni
  • Trejsi Decolli
Original Paper

Abstract

We applied an intermediate disturbance-complexity approach to the land-use change of cultural landscapes in the island of Mallorca from c. 1850 to the present, which accounts for the joint behaviour of human appropriation of photosynthetic capacity used as a measure of disturbance, and a selection of land metrics at different spatial scales that account for ecological functionality as a proxy of biodiversity. We also delved deeper into local land-use changes in order to identify the main socioeconomic drivers and ruling agencies at stake. A second degree polynomial regression was obtained linking socio-metabolic disturbance and landscape ecological functioning (jointly assessing landscape patterns and processes). The results confirm our intermediate disturbance-complexity hypothesis by showing a hump-shaped relationship where the highest level of landscape complexity (heterogeneity connectivity) is attained when disturbance peaks at 50–60 %. The study proves the usefulness of transferring the concept of intermediate disturbance to Mediterranean cultural landscapes, and suggests that the conservation of heterogeneous and well connected land-use mosaics with a positive interplay between intermediate level of farming disturbances and land-cover complexity endowed with a rich bio-cultural heritage will preserve a wildlife-friendly agro-ecological matrix that is likely to house high biodiversity.

Keywords

Cultural landscape Bio-cultural heritage Disturbance ecology Human appropriation of net primary production Socio-ecological transition Biodiversity conservation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the research project HAR2012-38920-C02-02 funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, and the international Partnership Grant SSHRC-895-2011-1020 ‘Sustainable farm systems: long-term socio-ecological metabolism in western agriculture’ funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. We also thank the comments received in the oral presentation made in the European Conference on ‘Linking Biological and Cultural Diversity in Europe’ held in Florence (08-11/04/2014) for the Implementation of the UNESCO-SCBD Joint Programme on Biological and Cultural Diversity.

References

  1. Agnoletti M (2014) Rural landscape, nature conservation and culture: some notes on research trends and management approaches from a (southern) European perspective. Landsc Urban Plan 126:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcover JM, Pons GX, Palmer M (2003) Biodiversitat i Societat. In: Duarte C, Grasses F (eds) El papel social de la ciencia en Baleares: un homenaje a Javier Benedí. Llibre homenatge a Javier Benedí, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Balears, pp 111–130Google Scholar
  3. Altieri M (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landsc Urban Plan 70:21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antrop M (2006) Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia? Landsc Urban Plan 75:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arts B, van Bommer S, Ros-Tonen M, Verschoor G (2012) Forest-people interfaces: understanding community forestry and biocultural diversity. Wageningen Academic Publishers, WageningenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He J-S, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B (2006) Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett 9:1146–1156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnes B, Sidhu HS, Roxburgh SH (2006) A model integrating patch dynamics, competing species and the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Ecol Model 194:414–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bender DJ, Contreras TA, Fahrig L (1998) Habitat loss and population decline: a meta-analysis of the patch size effect. Ecology 79:517–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bengtsson J, Angelstam P, Elmqvist T, Emanuelsson U, Folke C, Ihse M, Moberg F, Nyström M (2003) Reserves resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32(6):389–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Binimelis J, Ordines A (2008) La pagesia illenca als albirs del segle XXI. Agricultura i postproductivisme a les Illes Balears, El GallGoogle Scholar
  13. Bisson J (1977) L’homme et la terre aux îles Baléares. Edisud, Aix -en-ProvenceGoogle Scholar
  14. Blondel J (2006) The ‘Design’ of mediterranean landscapes: a millennial story of humans and ecological systems during the historic period. Hum Ecol 34(5):713–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Braat L, ten Brink P (2008) The cost of policy inaction. The case of not Meeting the 2010 biodiversity target. Study/Report for the European Commission, DG EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
  16. Buckling A, Kassen R, Bell G, Rainey PB (2000) Disturbance and diversity in experimental microcosms. Nature 408:961–964PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Calow P (1987) Evolutionary physiological ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cela Conde CJ (1979) Capitalismo y campesinado en la isla de Mallorca. Siglo XXI, MadridGoogle Scholar
  20. Chesson P, Huntly N (1997) The roles of disturbance, mortality, and stress in the dynamics of ecological communities. Am Nat 150:519–553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cocks ML, Wiersum F (2014) Reappraising the concept of biocultural diversity: a perspective from South Africa. Hum Ecol 42(5):727–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Collins SL, Glenn SM (1997) Intermediate disturbance and its relationship to within- and between-patch dynamics. N Z J Ecol 21:103–110Google Scholar
  23. Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Groot R (2006) Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dial R, Roughgarden J (1998) Theory of marine communities: the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Ecology 79:1412–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Estrany J, Garcia C, Batalla RJ (2010) Hydrological response of a small mediterranean agricultural catchment. J Hydrol 380(1–2):180–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fahrig L, Jonsen I (1998) Effect of habitat patch characteristics on abundance and diversity of insects in an agricultural landscape. Ecosystems 1(2):197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Farina A (2000) The cultural landscape as a model for the integration of ecology and economics. Bioscience 50:313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Firbank LG, Petit S, Smart S, Blain A, Fuller RJ (2008) Assessing the impacts of agricultural intensification on biodiversity: a British perspective. Philos Trans R Soc B 363:777–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 216:265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fischer J, Brosi B, Daily GC et al (2008) Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Front Ecol Environ 6(7):380–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fischer-Kowalski M, Haberl H (eds) (2007) Socioecological transitions and global change. Trajectories of social metabolism and land use. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  33. Forman RTT (1995) Land Mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Fox JW (2013) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned. Trends Ecol Evol 28(2):86–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gabriel D, Sait SM, Kunin WE, Benton TM (2013) Food production vs. biodiversity: comparing organic and conventional agriculture. J Appl Ecol 50:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Giampietro M, Mayumi K, Sorman AH (2011) The metabolic pattern of societies: where economists fall short. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  38. Gilbert-Norton L, Wilson R, Stevens JR, Beard KH (2010) A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness. Conserv Biol 24:660–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gil-Sánchez L, Valdés CM, Díaz-Fernández P (2002) La transformación histórica del paisaje forestal en las islas Baleares. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, MadridGoogle Scholar
  40. GIST (2009) Mapes de cobertes del sòl de les Illes Balears (1:25.000): 1956(1973), 1995, 2000. Universitat de les Illes Balears, Departament de Ciències de la Terra, Grup d’Investigació de Sostenibilitat i Territori, Palma de MallorcaGoogle Scholar
  41. Gliessman SR (ed) (1990) Agroecology: researching the ecological basis for sustainable agriculture. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. González de Molina M, Toledo V (2014) The social metabolism. A socio-ecological theory of historical change. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Green RE, Cornell SJ, Scharlemann JPW, Balmford A (2005) Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307:550–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Grove AT, Rackham O (2003) The nature of Mediterranean Europe: an ecological history. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  45. Haberl H (2001) The energetic metabolism of societies. part I: accounting concepts. J Ind Ecol 5:107–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Haberl H, Plutzar C, Erb KH, Gaube V, Pollheimer M, Niels B, Schulz NB (2005) Human appropriation of net primary production as determinant of avifauna diversity in Austria. Agric Ecosyst Environ 110:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Haberl H, Erb KH, Krausmann F, Gaube V, Bondeau A, Plutzar C, Gingrich S, Lucht W, Fischer-Kowalski M (2007) Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth’s terrestrial ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(34):12942–12947PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Haines-Young R (2009) Land use and biodiversity relationships. Land Use Policy 26:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harper KA, MacDonald SE, Burton PhJ, Chen J, Brosofsfe KD, Saunders SC, Euskirchen ES, Robert D, Jaiteh MS, Esseen PA (2005) Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol 19:768–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hawkins BA, Field R, Cornell HV, Currie DJ, Guegan JF, Kaufman DM, Kerr JT, Mittelbach GG, Oberdorff T, O’Brien EM, Porter EE, Turner JRG (2003) Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology 84(12):3105–3117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Helming K, Perez-Soba M, Tabbush P (eds) (2007) Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Ho MW, Ulanowicz R (2005) Sustainable systems as organisms? BioSystems 82(1):39–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hong SK, Bogaert J, Min Q (2014) Biocultural landscapes. Diversity, functions and values. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Hooper DU, Chapin FS III, Ewel JJ et al (2005) Effects of biodiversity of ecosystem function: a consensus of current knowledge. ESA report. Ecol Monogr 75(1):3–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Horn HS (1975) Markovian properties of forest succession. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Huston M (2014) Disturbance, productivity, and species diversity: empiricism versus logic in ecological theory. Ecology 95:2382–2396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hutchinson GE (1951) Copepodology for the ornithologist. Ecology 32:571–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jaeger J (2000) Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landsc Ecol 15(2):115–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Johst K, Gutt J, Wissel C, Grimm V (2006) Diversity and disturbances in the antarctic megabenthos: feasible versus theoretical disturbance ranges. Ecosystems 9:1145–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jover G, Manera C (2009) Producción y productividad agrícola en la isla de Mallorca, 1590-1860. Revista de Historia Económica—Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History XXVII(3):463-498Google Scholar
  61. Jover G, Soto R (2002) Colonización feudal y organización del territorio, Mallorca, 1230-1350. Revista de Historia Económica—Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History XX(3):437-475Google Scholar
  62. Krausmann F, Erb KH, Gingrich S, Haberl H, Bondeau A, Gaube V, Lauk C, Plutzar C, Searchinger T (2013) Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:10324–10329PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kumaraswamy S, Kunte K (2013) Integrating biodiversity and conservation with modern agricultural landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 22(12):2735–2750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Li BL (2000) Why is the holistic approach becoming so important in landscape ecology? Landsc Urban Plan 50:27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Liu L, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Pell AN, Deadman P, Kratz T, Lubchenco J, Ostrom E, Ouyang Z, Provencher W, Redman CL, Schneider SH, Taylor WW (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317(5844):1513–1516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Loreau M (2000) Are communities saturated? On the relationship between α, β and γ diversity. Ecol Lett 3:73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Manera C (2001) Història del creixement econòmic a Mallorca (1700–2000). Lleonard Muntaner Editor, Palma de MallorcaGoogle Scholar
  68. Margalef R (2006) Ecological theory and prediction in the study of the interaction between man and the rest of biosphere. In: Siolo H (ed) Ökologie und Lebensschutz in Intrenationaler Sicht, Rombach Freiburg, 1973; reprinted in Catalan, Spanish and English in Medi Ambient. Tecnologia i Cultura 38:114–125Google Scholar
  69. Marull J, Mallarach JM (2005) A GIS methodology for assessing ecological connectivity: application to the Barcelona Metropolitan area. Landsc Urban Plan 71:243–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Marull J, Pino J, Mallarach JM, Cordobilla MJ (2007) A land suitability index for strategic environmental assessment in metropolitan areas. Lands Urban Plan 81:200–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Marull J, Pino J, Tello E, Cordobilla MJ (2010) Social metabolism, landscape change and land-use planning in the Barcelona Metropolitan region. Land Use Policy 27:497–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Marull J, Tello E, Wilcox PT, Coll F, Pons M, Warde P, Valldeperas N, Ollés A (2014) Recovering the land-use history behind a Mediterranean edge environment: the importance of cultural landscapes in biological conservation. Appl Geogr 54:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Marull J, Otero I, Stefanescu C, Tello E, Coll F (2015a) Exploring the links between forest transition and landscape changes in the Mediterranean. Can forest recovery lead to lower landscape quality? Agroforest Syst 20:1–15 (in press) Google Scholar
  74. Marull J, Font C, Tello E, Fullana N, Domene E (2015b) Towards an Energy-Landscape Integrated Analysis? Exploring the links between socio-metabolic disturbance and landscape ecology performance (Mallorca, Spain, 1956–2011). Landsc Ecol (accepted)Google Scholar
  75. Marull J, Font C, Padró R, Tello E, Panazzolo A (2015c) Energy–Landscape Integrated Analysis of agro-ecosystems: how the complexity of energy flows shapes landscape patterns (Barcelona province, 1860–2000). Ecol Indic (submitted)Google Scholar
  76. Matson PA, Vitousek PM (2006) Agricultural intensification: will land spared from farming be land spred for nature? Conserv Biol 20(3):709–710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Matthews R, Selman P (2006) Landscape as a focus for integrating human and environmental processes. J Agric Econ 57:199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. McGarigal K, Marks B (1994) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  79. Miller A, Reilly D, Bauman S, Shea K (2012) Interactions between frequency and size of disturbance affect competitive outcomes. Ecol Res 27:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Molino JF, Sabatier D (2001) Tree diversity in tropical rain forests: a validation of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Science 294:1702–1704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Morowitz HJ (2002) The Emergence of Everything: how the world became complex. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  82. Murray I (2012) Geografies del capitalisme balear. Poder, metabolisme socio-econòmic i petjada ecològica d’una superpotència turística. Dissertation, University of the Balearic IslandsGoogle Scholar
  83. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GA, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Naredo JM (2004) La evolución de la agricultura en España (1940–2000). Universidad de Granada, GranadaGoogle Scholar
  85. O’Neill RV, Krummel JR, Gardner RH, Sugihara G, Jackson B, DeAngelis DL, Milne BT, Turner MG, Zygmunt B, Christensen SW, Dale VH, Graham RL (1988) Indices of landscape pattern. Landsc Ecol 1(3):153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Odum HT (1984) Energy analysis of the environmental role in agriculture. In: Stanhill E (ed) Energy and agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 24–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Odum HT (2007) Environment, power, and society for the twenty-first century. The hierarchy of energy. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  88. Opdam P, Steingrover E, van Rooij S (2006) Ecological networks: a spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75:322–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Padisak J (1993) The influence of different disturbance frequencies on the species richness, diversity and equitability of phytoplankton in shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia 249:135–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Parrotta JA, Trosper RL (2012) Traditional forest-related knowledge: sustaining communities, ecosystems and biocultural diversity. World Forests 12:1–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pelletier N, Audsley E, Brodt S, Garnett T, Henriksson P, Kendall A, Kramer K, Murphy D, Nemecek T, Troell M (2011) Energy intensity of agriculture and food systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36:223–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2010) The agroecological matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(13):5786–5791PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Peterseil J, Wrbka T, Pultzar C, Schmitzberger I, Kiss A, Szerencsits E, Reiter K, Schneider W, Suppan F, Beissmann H (2004) Evaluating the ecological sustainability of Austrian agricultural landscapes—the SINUS approach. Land Use Policy 21:307–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Petraitis PS, Latham RE, Niesenbaum RA (1989) The maintenance of species diversity by disturbance. Q Rev Biol 64:393–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Phalan B, Onial M, Balmford A, Green RE (2011) Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333:1289–1291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Pierce S (2014) Implications for biodiversity conservation of the lack of consensus regarding the humped-back model of species richness and biomass production. Funct Ecol 28:253–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Pino J, Marull J (2012) Ecological networks: are they enough for connectivity conservation? A case study in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region (NE Spain). Land Use Policy 29:684–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Plieninger T, Hui C, Gaertner M, Huntsinger L (2014) The impact of land abandonment on species richness and abundance in the Mediterranean basin: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 9(5):e98355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098355 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Pons A, Rullan O, Murray I (2014) Tourism capitalism and island urbanization: tourist accommodation diffusion in the Balearics, 1936–2010. Isl Stud J 9(2):239–258Google Scholar
  100. Rayó M (2004) L’ecologisme a les Balears. Edicions Documenta Balear, Palma de MallorcaGoogle Scholar
  101. Reed RA, Johnson J, Baker WL (1996) Fragmentation of a forested rocky mountain landscape 1950–1993. Biol Conserv 75:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Rindfuss RR, Walsh SJ, Turner BL, Fox J, Mishra V (2008) Developing a science of land change: challenges and methodological issues. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101(39):13976–13981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Robson JP, Berkes F (2011) Exploring some of the myths of land use change: can rural to urban migration drive declines in biodiversity? Global Environ Chang 21(3):844–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Roca J (1992) Modernització agrícola i desenvolupament industrial. El cas de Mallorca (1850–1950). Estudis Baleàrics 43:109–118Google Scholar
  105. Rosselló-Verger VM (1982) Canvis de propietat i parcel.lacions al camp mallorquí entre els segles XIX i XX. Randa. Història i Cultura de Mallorca 12:19–60Google Scholar
  106. Roxburgh SH, Shea K, Wilson JB (2004) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis, patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. Ecology 85:359–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Rullan O (2002) La construcció territorial de Mallorca. Editorial Moll, Palma de MallorcaGoogle Scholar
  108. Rullan O (2010) Las políticas territoriales en las Islas Baleares. Cuadernos geográficos de la Universidad de Granada 47:403–428Google Scholar
  109. Sasaki T, Okubo S, Okayasu T, Jamsram U, Ohkuro T, Takeuchi K (2009) Management applicability of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis across Mongolian rangeland ecosystems. Ecol Appl 19(2):423–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Schroter D, Cramer W, Leemans R, Prentice IC, Araújo MB, Arnell NW, Bondeau A, Bugmann H, Carter TR, Gracia CA, de la Vega-Leinert AC, Erhard M, Ewert F, Glendining M, House JI, Kankaanpää S, Klein RJT, Lavorel S, Lindner M, Metzger MJ, Meyer J, Mitchell TD, Reginster I, Rounsevell M, Sabaté S, Sitch S, Smith B, Smith J, Smith P, Sykes MT, Thonicke K, Thuiller W, Tuck G, Zaehle S, Zier B (2005) Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 310:1333–1337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Schwartz MW, Bringham CA, Hoeksema JD, Lyons KG, Mills MH, van Mantgem PJ (2000) Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia 122:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Schwarzlmüller E (2009) Human appropriation of aboveground net primary production in Spain, 1955–2003: an empirical analysis of the industrialization of land use. Ecol Econ 69(2):282–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27(379–423):623–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Shea K, Roxburgh SH, Rauschert ESJ (2004) Moving from pattern to process: coexistence mechanisms under intermediate disturbance regimes. Ecol Lett 7:491–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Sheil D, Burslem D (2003) Disturbing hypotheses in tropical forests. Trends Ecol Evol 18:18–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Sheil D, Burslem D (2013) Defining and defending Connell’s intermediate disturbance hypothesis: a response to Fox. Trends Ecol Evol 28:571–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Shreeve TG, Dennis RLH, Van Dick H (2004) Resources, habitats and metapopulations—whither reality? Oikos 106:404–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Socies A (2013) Varietats locals de les Illes Balears. Documenta Balear, Palma de MallorcaGoogle Scholar
  120. Soto R (2015) Feudal colonization and socio-ecological transition in the island of Mallorca in the thirteenth century. Continuity and Change (in print)Google Scholar
  121. Suau J (1991) El món rural mallorquí, segles XVIII-XIX. Curial, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  122. Svensson JR, Lindegarth M, Jonsson PR, Pavia H (2012) Disturbance-diversity models: what do they really predict and how are they tested? Proc R Soc Lond B 279:2163–2170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Swift MJ, Izac AMN, van Noordwijk M (2004) Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes—are we asking the right questions? Agric Ecosyst Environ 104(1):113–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Tischendorf L (2001) Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently? Landsc Ecol 16:235–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Tress B, Tress G, Décamps H, d’Hauteserre AM (2001) Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research. Landsc Urban Plan 57:137–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger TC, Jackson L, Motzke I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Whitbread A (2012) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv 151:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Turner MG, Ruscher CL (1988) Changes in landscape pattern in Georgia, USA. Landsc Ecol 1:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Turner BL, Lambin EF, Reenberg A (2007) The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(52):20666–20671PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Ulanowicz RE (1997) Ecology, the ascendent perspective. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  130. Urech y Cifre C (1869) Estudios sobre la riqueza territorial de las Islas Baleares. Felipe Guasp, Palma de MallocaGoogle Scholar
  131. Vackar D, Chobot K, Orlitova E (2012) Spatial relationship between human population density, land use intensity and biodiversity in the Czech Republic. Landsc Ecol 27(9):1279–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Van der Maarel E (1993) Some remarks on disturbance and its relations to diversity and stability. J Veg Sci 4:733–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Verburg PH, van de Steeg J, Veldkamp A, Willemen L (2009) From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization. J Environ Manag 90:1327–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Verdasca MJ, Leitao AS, Santana J, Porto M, Dias S, Beja P (2012) Forest fuel management as a conservation tool for early successional species under agricultural abandonment: the case of Mediterranean butterflies. Biol Conserv 146:14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Vitousek PM, Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH, Matson PA (1986) Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. Bioscience 36:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Wilkinson DM (1999) The disturbing history of intermediate disturbance. Oikos 84(1):145–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Wilson JB (1990) Mechanisms of species coexistence: twelve explanations for Hutchinson’s ‘paradox of the plankton’: evidence from New Zealand plant communities. N Z J Ecol 13:17–42Google Scholar
  138. Wilson JB (1994) The ‘intermediate disturbance hypothesis’ of species coexistence is based in on patch dynamics. N Z J Ecol 18:176–181Google Scholar
  139. Wrbka T, Erb K-H, Schulz NB, Peterseil J, Hahn C, Haberl H (2004) Linking pattern and process in cultural landscapes. An empirical study based on spatially explicit indicators. Land Use Policy 21:289–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Young JC, Waylen KA, Sarkki S, Albon S, Bainbridge I, Balian E, Davidson D, Edwards D, Fairley R, Margerison C, McCracken D, Owen R, Quine CP, Stewart-Roper C, Thompson D, Tinch R, Van den Hove S, Watt A (2014) Improving the science-policy dialogue to meet the challenges of biodiversity conservation: having conversations rather than talking at one-another. Biodivers Conserv 23:387–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Barcelona Institute of Regional and Metropolitan StudiesAutonomous University of BarcelonaBellaterraSpain
  2. 2.Department of Economic History and InstitutionsUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of GeographyUniversity of the Balearic IslandsPalmaSpain
  4. 4.Research History InstituteUniversity of GironaGironaSpain
  5. 5.Department of MathematicsAutonomous University of BarcelonaBellaterraSpain
  6. 6.Department of Urban PlanningUniversity IUAV of VeniceVeniceItaly

Personalised recommendations