Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 24, Issue 10, pp 2521–2534 | Cite as

Biodiversity attracts visitors to national parks

  • Pirkko Siikamäki
  • Katja Kangas
  • Antti Paasivaara
  • Susanna Schroderus
Original Paper

Abstract

To cope with the funding constraints of biodiversity protection, nature-based tourism, which is regarded as an important ecosystem service, is considered as an option for creating revenues for biodiversity conservation. Here we show that Finnish national parks (NPs) with high biodiversity values are more attractive for visitors than parks with lower biodiversity values, providing evidence on the direct linkage between biodiversity protection and the provisioning of ecosystem services in protected areas. We found that the number of visits NPs received annually, i.e., their attractiveness, was positively associated with the number of Natura2000 habitat types and occurrences of species considered threatened in Finland according to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) Red List Categories and Criteria. Interestingly, recreational use also overlapped spatially with areas containing high biodiversity values: the number of occurrences of threatened species and Natura2000 habitat types were on average higher close to recreational routes than among randomly picked control areas within NPs. Our results emphasise the need for careful planning and park management in protecting biodiversity in NPs. However, these connections between biodiversity and recreational use of NPs are striking examples of “biophilia”, the human need for and love for nature, and can be used to engage the public more strongly with biodiversity issues.

Keywords

Biophilia Biodiversity Ecosystem services Habitat richness Nature-based tourism National parks Species richness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank A. Eskelinen, A. Hekkala, M. Hovi, E. Hurme and two anonymous referees for their comments on the previous draft of this manuscript. Data on Finnish national parks were kindly supplied by Natural Heritage Services of Metsähallitus. We acknowledge funding from the Finnish Academy (114490) and technical assistance from the staff of Oulanka Research Station and H. Antikainen.

References

  1. Airaksinen O, Karttunen K (2001) Natura 2000 habitats manual. Environmental guide 46, 2nd edn. Finnish Environmental Institute, Helsinki (in Finnish with English summary) Google Scholar
  2. Angulo E, Courchamp F (2009) Rare species are valued big time. PLoS ONE 4:e5215. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005215 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Araújo MB (2003) The coincidence of people and biodiversity in Europe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balmford A, Moore JL, Brooks T, Burgess N, Hansen LA, Williams P, Rahbeck C (2001) Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science 291:2616–2619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Balmford A, Beresford J, Green J, Naidoo R, Walpole M, Manica A (2009) A global perspective on trends in nature-based tourism. PLoS Biol 7(6):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balmford A, Green JMH, Anderson M, Beresford J, Huang C, Naidoo R, Walpole M, Manica A (2015) Walk on the wild side: estimating the global magnitude of visits to protected areas. PLoS Biol 13(2):e1002074. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002074 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Booth JE, Gaston KJ, Evans KL, Armsworth PR (2011) The value of species rarity in biodiversity recreation: a birdwatching example. Biol Conserv 144:2728–2732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buckley R (2004) Impacts positive and negative: links between ecotourism and environment. In: Buckley R (ed) Environmental impacts of ecotourism. CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire, pp 5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Burnham KB, Anderson DR, Huyvaert KP (2011) AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter KE, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson NC, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque J-F, Leverington F, Loh J, McGeoch MA, McRae L, Minasyan A, Hernández Morcillo M, Oldfield TEE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart SN, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vié J-C, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:1164–1168. doi:10.1126/science.1187512 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter SR, DeFries R (2006) Millennium ecosystem assessment: research needs. Science 314:257–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. CBD Secretariat (2002) VI conference of the parties of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Decision VI/26. http://www.biodiv.org. Accessed 25 May 2015
  14. CBD Secretariat (2010) http://www.cbd.int/2010/biodiversity/. Accessed 25 May 2015
  15. Cincotta RP, Wisnewski J, Engelman R (2000) Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404:990–992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cole DN, Landres PB (1996) Threats to wilderness ecosystems: impacts and research needs. Ecol Appl 6:168–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crawley MJ (2006) The R book. Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  18. Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. Bioscience 50:593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dallimer M, Irvine KN, Skinner AMJ, Davies ZG, Rouquette JR, Maltby LL, Warren PH, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ (2012) Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience 62:47–55. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dudley N, Stolton S (eds) (2008) Defining protected areas: an international conference in Almeria, Spain. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  21. Eagles PFJ, McCool SF, Haynes CD (2002) Sustainable tourism in protected areas: guidelines for planning and management. The World Conservation Union (IUCN), GlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eldredge N (1998) Life in the balance. Humanity and the biodiversity crisis. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  23. Erkkonen J, Sievänen T (2001) Kävijätutkimusopas. Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja. B 62 (in Finnish with English summary)Google Scholar
  24. Fennell D (1999) Ecotourism: an introduction. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Garamszegi LZ (2011) Information-theoretic approach to statistical analysis in behavioural ecology: an introduction. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gaston KJ, Evans KL (2004) Birds and people in Europe. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1649–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaston KJ, Spicer JI (1998) Biodiversity: an introduction. Blackwell Science, London 113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gössling S (1999) Ecotourism: a means to safeguard biodiversity and ecosystem functions? Ecol Econ 29:303–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grueber CE, Nakagawa S, Laws RI, Jamieson IG (2011) Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions. J Evol Biol 24:699–711CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hammitt WE, Cole DN (1998) Wildland recreation: ecology and management, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Huhtala M (2007) Assessment of the local economic impacts of national park tourism: the case of Pallas-Ounastunturi National Park. For Snow Landsc Res 81(1/2):223–238Google Scholar
  32. Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. TREE 19:101–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kajala L (2006) Monitoring outdoor recreation in the Nordic and Baltic Countries. TeMaNord 2006:530Google Scholar
  34. Kajala L (2012) TEEB Nordic case: estimating local economic benefits of visitors’ spending in protected areas. In: Kettunen M, Vihervaara P, Kinnunen S, D’Amato D, Badura T, Argimon M, Ten Brink P (eds) Socio-economic importance of ecosystem services in the Nordic Countries—scoping assessment in the context of The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB). Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen. http://www.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/TEEB-Nordic-Synthesis-Report.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2015
  35. Kangas K, Luoto M, Ihantola A, Tomppo E, Siikamäki P (2010) Recreation induced changes in boreal bird populations in protected areas. Ecol Appl 20:1775–1786CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Konu H, Kajala L (2012) Segmenting protected area visitors based on their motivations. Nature Protection Publications of Metsähallitus, Series A 194Google Scholar
  37. Liddle M (1997) Recreation ecology: the ecological impact of outdoor recreation and ecotourism. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Liu J, Ouyang Z, Pimm SL, Raven PH, Wang X, Miao H, Han N (2003) Protecting China’s biodiversity. Science 300:1240–1241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Luck GW (2007a) The relationships between net primary productivity, human population density and species conservation. J Biogeogr 34:201–212. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01575.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Luck GW (2007b) A review of the relationships between human population density and biodiversity. Biol Rev 82:607–645. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00028.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lyon K, Cottrell SP, Siikamäki P, Van Marwijk R (2012) Biodiversity hotspots and visitor flows in Oulanka National Park. Scand J Hosp Tour 11(sup1):100–111. doi:10.1080/15022250.2011.629909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  43. Mace GM, Possingham HP, Leader-Williams N (2006) Prioritizing choices in conservation. In: Macdonald D, Service K (eds) Key topics in conservation biology. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 17–34Google Scholar
  44. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Metsähallitus Natural Heritage Services (2013) Protecting Finland’s natural treasures. Annual report 2012Google Scholar
  46. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  47. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Naidoo R, Adamowicz WL (2005) Biodiversity and nature-based tourism at forest reserves in Uganda. Environ Dev Econ 10:159–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Naidoo R, Weaver LC, Stuart-Hill G, Tagg J (2011) Effect of biodiversity on economic benefits from communal lands in Namibia. J Appl Ecol 48:310–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Neuvonen M, Pouta E, Puustinen J, Sievänen T (2010) Visits to national parks: effects of park characteristics and spatial demand. J Nat Conserv 18:224–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Puhakka R (2008) Increasing role of tourism in Finnish national parks. Fennia 1:47–58Google Scholar
  52. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  53. Rassi P, Alanen A, Kanerva T, Mannerkoski I (eds) (2001) The red data book of Finland. Third revision. Ministry of Environment, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  54. Schielzeth H (2010) Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol Evol 1:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Symonds MRE, Moussalli A (2011) A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Törn A, Siikamäki P, Tolvanen A, Kauppila P, Rämet J (2007) Local people, nature conservation, and tourism in northeastern Finland. Ecol Soc 13(1):8Google Scholar
  57. UK National Ecosystem Assessment (2011) The UK national ecosystem assessment technical report. UNEP-WCMC, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperilled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilson EO (1984) Biophilia. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  60. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pirkko Siikamäki
    • 1
    • 2
  • Katja Kangas
    • 3
  • Antti Paasivaara
    • 3
  • Susanna Schroderus
    • 4
  1. 1.Oulanka Research Station, Thule InstituteUniversity of OuluKuusamoFinland
  2. 2.MetsähallitusNatural Heritage ServicesKuusamoFinland
  3. 3.Natural Resources Institute FinlandUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  4. 4.Department of GeographyUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations