Integrative reflections on the new conservation science debate
- 502 Downloads
In 2012, Kareiva and Marvier published What is Conservation Science? almost 30 years after Soulé’s (1985) What is Conservation Biology? The “New Conservation Science” (NCS), as it has been called (Doak et al. 2014; Miller et al. 2014; Soulé 2013), refocuses conservation biology towards human wellbeing by placing it under the broader umbrella of conservation science. This stirred a volley of responses and debate—all of which contribute to a broader conservation dialogue (Soulé 1985, 2013; Noss 1999; Miller et al. 2011). Here, we pause to reflect on this debate, using our perspectives as members of an integrative conservation science doctoral program to emphasize the importance of divergent values in framing the NCS debate for current and future conservation scientists.
As members of the Applied Biodiversity Science (ABS) program at Texas A&M University (Fitzgerald and Stronza 2009), our academic training and development cultivates ‘agile scientists’ (Welch-Devine et al. 2014) to...
KeywordsBiodiversity Conservation Conservation Biology Integrative Conservation Participatory Dialogue Unify Conservation
- Fitzgerald LA, Stronza AL (2009) Applied biodiversity science: bridging ecology, culture, and governance for effective conservation. Interciencia 34:563–570Google Scholar
- Noss R, Nash R, Paquet P, Soulé M (2013) Humanity’s domination of nature is part of the problem: a response to Kareiva and Marvier. Bioscience 63:241–242Google Scholar