Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 1339–1346 | Cite as

Spatial structure of the soil seed bank of Poa annua L.—alien species in the Antarctica

  • Maciej Wódkiewicz
  • Maciej Ziemiański
  • Kamil Kwiecień
  • Katarzyna J. Chwedorzewska
  • Halina Galera
Open Access
Original Paper

Abstract

Poa annua L. (annual bluegrass) is the only non–native flowering plant species that has successfully established a breeding population in the maritime Antarctic and has been shown to maintain a soil seed bank. The characteristic of the spatial structure of the Antarctic population of this species is the formation of distinct dense clumps—tussocks. In the temperate zone the species is only loosely tufted. We focused on the characteristics of seed deposition associated with the tussocks and some aspects of the spatial heterogeneity of the soil seed bank of P. annua in the Antarctic. We wanted to assess the microspatial structure of the soil seed bank of annual bluegrass at Arctowski Station. Therefore we compared the number of seeds deposited underneath and in the vicinity of P. annua clumps. Our results indicate that P. annua in the Antarctic maintains a soil seed bank comparable to species typical for the polar tundra. The microspatial structure of P. annua soil seed bank in the Antarctic is highly associated with the presence of tussocks. Seeds are deposited underneath the tussock rather than in the vicinity of the clump. Our results also indicate that seeds are able to survive the Antarctic winter and readily germinate under optimal conditions.

Keywords

Antarctica Invasive species Poa annua Soil seed bank Dispersal 

Introduction

In polar conditions, where temperature stress, water availability and snow cover are unpredictable, the strategy of soil seed bank formation may be of an adaptative value. Due to prolonged viability of seeds stored in the soil and their ability to germinate over time, the risk associated with their germination under unfavorable conditions may be reduced (Venable and Brown 1988). At least some seeds, instead of germinating while environmental conditions remain unfavorable, are able to stay dormant until conditions improve. Therefore many Arctic tundra species have developed different degree of seed dormancy, enabling them to postpone seed germination to optimal conditions (Baskin and Baskin 2001).

The Antarctic tundra consists mostly of cryptogams and has two native flowering plant species Colobanthus quitensis (Kunth) Bartl. and Deschampsia antarctica Desv. (Komárkowá et al.1985). Only one alien angiosperm, Poa annua L. has survived, bred and dispersed in the maritime Antarctic. While at Cierva Point (Antarctic Peninsula) a small patch of Poa pratensis has been noted (Pertierra et al. 2013), this species does not produce seeds, and therefore does not form a soil seed bank. P. annua was introduced accidentally to the vicinity of Polish Antarctic Station Arctowski over 28 years ago (Olech and Chwedorzewska 2011; Chwedorzewska and Bednarek 2012). The local Antarctic population of this species forms tussocks (Wódkiewicz et al. 2013), while in the temperate zone the species is only loosely tufted (Grime et al. 1986). P. annua forms a soil seed bank in temperate regions (Lush 1988), as well as in the Antarctic (Wódkiewicz et al. 2013).

We focused our research on the characteristics of seed deposition and some aspects of the spatial heterogeneity of the soil seed bank of P. annua in the Antarctic. Our objective was to investigate if P. annua caryopses are deposited mainly in the soil under or outside the tussocks. This is connected with safe sites for seed persistence, seed dispersal, the expansion mechanism and the possible further spread of the species. Our question was whether tussock enlargement may be mediated through seed deposition and new individual recruitment in the immediate vicinity of mother plants enabling the tussocks to expand by the means of seed dispersal. We were also interested in the deposition of seeds influenced by strong local winds and a preliminary assessment of seed dispersal outside the tussock.

Materials and methods

Soil samples were collected from the vicinity of Arctowski Station (62°10′S, 58°28′W) occupied by a population of P. annua during the austral summer season 2011/2012. Twenty randomly selected tussocks with a diameter of 5–40 cm were investigated. We noted the diameter and height of each tussock and designated four sampling points for the soil seed bank assessment: one was situated directly underneath the tussock and the other 10 cm from the tussock edge (Fig. 1). We chose this spatial scale because we wanted to assess if seeds are deposited within the mother clump or if they are displaced away from their source. Furthermore, we assumed that the selected clump is the major source of seeds in the surrounding soil. In the area occupied by the studied population the distance between clumps is rather short (around 30–40 cm, see Fig. 2). Therefore, if we had extended the spatial scale of our sampling, other P. annua clumps might have interfered with the assumed seed rain and our interpretation of results might have been biased. The selected scheme potentially allowed to minimize the interference of seed rain of plants growing in the vicinity. At each sampling point we collected 100 cm3 of soil from the 0–5 cm layer. We collected 80 soil samples amounting to 8 liters and 0.157 m2 soil surface area. The collected samples were air dried at room temperature at the Station and transported to our laboratory in Poland at 4 °C.
Fig. 1

Sampling scheme. C, N, WSW, ESE—soil sample location in relation to tussock position

Fig. 2

Poa annua in the vicinity of Arctowski Station

We sieved the samples through 0.5 and 1.5 mm sieves and extracted caryopses from the 0.5–1.5 mm soil fraction under a stereoscopic microscope. Extracted caryopses and the remaining soil were placed in a germination chamber for 3 months under 12 h photoperiod, 10/23 °C. These optimal germination conditions were used to promote germination in all seeds with potential germination capability and therefore to assess the size of the soil seed bank of living diaspores. Under Antarctic conditions these seeds would have remained a part of a living soil seed bank with the potential ability to germinate when conditions become adequate. Thus we assessed the size of the soil seed bank with the extraction method and the germination method. At the same time we estimated the germination capacity of seeds by germination tests of seeds extracted from soil samples. We assumed that seeds which failed to germinate were not viable.

To calculate seed densities per square meter we divided the seed count in a sample by the area of the sample (Baskin and Baskin 2001). We used nonparametric statistics, as the distribution of seeds in samples was not normal. We used the sign test to compare the seed bank size assessed with the extraction and germination methods for samples from the center point. With Spearman correlation we checked the relation between the tussock diameter and height and the size of the seed bank, as well as the relation between the size of the seed bank estimated with the extraction and germination methods. We performed Friedman’s ANOVA to check for differences between sampling points around the clump. The analysis was performed with SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc. 2007) and Statistica 9.0 (StatSoft and 2009).

Results

Altogether we extracted 520 P. annua caryopses. This corresponds to 3,312 seeds m−2. Out of all extracted seeds, 426 germinated, which is nearly 82 %. Additionally, 43 seeds germinated from samples left after the propagule extraction, therefore altogether 469 seeds germinated from the collected soil samples. Thus, the size of P. annua seed bank surrounding the tussocks assessed with the germination method corresponded to 2,986 seeds m−2. For the analysis of differences in the seed bank size assessment between the extraction and germination methods we used only the central sampling points and excluded sampling points surrounding the tussock from the analysis, as in most of them we detected single seeds (Table 1). We found a difference in the seed bank size assessment with the extraction and germination methods for sampling points situated underneath the tussocks (sign test M = 6.5, p = 0.0002, N = 20). The median difference in the seed bank size assessed with both methods was 2 seeds. Therefore this difference in the assessment corresponds to around 10 % of the mean seed bank size assessed with either the germination or the extraction method (Table 1). Further analysis was restricted to the germination data, as it summarizes information about living diaspores.
Table 1

Mean and standard deviation of number of Poa annua seeds in samples located underneath (C), and around (N, WSW, ESE) the tussocks in the vicinity of Arctowski Polar Station

Soil sample location

Extraction method

Germination method

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

C

24.85

21.68

21.10

19.09

N

0.40

0.80

0.20

0.40

WSW

0.35

0.79

1.05

3.47

ESE

0.40

0.74

1.10

2.86

All samples

26.00

21.69

23.45

20.04

We found significant differences in the seed bank size from different sampling points (Friedman’s ANOVA Q = 35.7162, p < 0.0001). A comparison of mean ranks for all sampling points indicated that the majority of seeds were deposited underneath the tussocks (Fig. 3). The seed bank under the tussocks was relatively rich (10466 ± 9636 (mean ± SD) seeds m−2, median 6,621 seeds m−2). The sizes of the soil seed bank did not differ between sampling points surrounding the tussocks (399 ± 1345 (mean ± SD) seeds m−2, median 0 seeds m−2).
Fig. 3

Differences in the size of P. annua soil seed bank between different sampling points relative to tussock position. C, N, WSW, ESE—soil sample location in relation to tussock position, square box - median, box: 25–75 %, whiskers: min–max

We did not find any significant correlation between the seed bank size and P. annua clump size (diameter, height). There was, however, a negative correlation between clump size and percent of seeds germinating from soil samples (R = −0.72165, p = 0.0007, n = 18 for clump diameter and R = −0.63247, p = 0.0049, n = 18 for clump height).

Discussion

Soil seed bank size in Antarctic conditions

The average size of P. annua soil seed bank reported in our study was around 3,000 seeds m−2. The discrepancies between the seed bank size of P. annua evaluated with two methods were relatively small, only 10 %. Our estimation of P. annua seed bank size, especially in the soil underneath the tussocks (over 10,000 seeds m−2) may be associated with the sampling strategy targeted on functional plant units in the population. Significant differences in the size of the soil seed bank underneath the clump and in the area outside the clump, even 10 cm from the edge of the clump, indicate a high spatial variability of the soil seed bank, which was associated with the presence of the clump. Soil between tussocks, even only 10 cm away, may completely lack deposited seeds (median = 0; Table 1).

The size of the soil seed bank of P. annua is within the limits reported for the Arctic (3,400 seeds m−2 in undisturbed sites; McGraw and Vavrek 1989) and alpine (6,000 seeds m−2 in a disturbed site; Chambers 1993) tundra. The seed bank of sub-Antarctic regions has received less attention and seems to be smaller—about 1,000 seeds m−2 (Arroyo et al.1999). Both C. quitensis and D. antarctica form in Antarctica a persistent soil seed bank of around 1,650 and 5,645 seeds m−2 respectively (McGraw and Day 1997, Ruhland and Day 2001). The abundance of P. annua soil seed bank is intermediate in relation to both native vascular plant species. Poa annua soil seed bank size underneath the tussocks, however large in comparison with other tundra plants, is just a fraction of the species’ seed bank as reported from temperate regions (30,000–210,000 seeds m−2; Lush 1988).

In our preliminary research we found that around 45 % of seeds from the previous year’s infructescences are capable of germination (Wódkiewicz et al. 2013). This time we found that over 80 % of seeds extracted from the soil were viable, as revealed by germination experiments. Lower germination capacity of freshly collected seeds than of seeds recovered from soil samples may also indicate that part of seeds are dormant upon collection and over time this dormancy is broken, thus enabling the seeds to form a soil seed bank instead of germinating under sub-optimal conditions. This difference may also be associated with a seasonal variation in germination ability of P. annua in the Antarctic caused by huge differences between years in meteorological conditions (temperature, liquid water aviability, snow cover etc.) during the vegetation season (Kejna et al. 2013).

Spatial structure of P. annua seed bank in the Antarctic population

Our sampling allowed the comparison of P. annua soil seed bank characteristics at Arctowski Station between points situated underneath the tussock and in the vicinity of the clump. Soil around clumps in either direction showed a minimal seed bank size in comparison with the center of the clump. The distance of 10 cm from the edge of a clump represented the space between clumps, as the clumps are spaced approximately at 30–40 cm distance (Fig. 2). The increased number of seeds in the soil beneath the clump might suggest that seeds are deposited mainly within the mother clump, and only a small fraction may be transported at a larger distance.

The tussock may be an efficient seed trap in contrast with bare soil and act for seed accumulation similarly to larger shrubs (Bullock and Moy 2004). Artificial turf, similar to grass, has been shown to efficiently trap seeds blown by the wind in the Arctic tundra (e.g. Molau and Larsson 2000). Beside seed production, P. annua clumps may present safe sites for seed persistence (Jumpponen et al. 1999). Therefore we might speculate that the local spread of P. annua in the future might largely depend on clump expansion rather than on the formation of new distinct clumps. The formation of new clumps is probably a stochastic phenomenon dependent on long distance seed dispersal, topography and surface soil characteristics favorable for seed entrapment and subsequent germination (Chambers et al. 1991). Also human dependent seed transport may play a role in the species spread, similarly to the way in which seeds get transported to Antarctic research stations (see e.g. Lee and Chown 2009; Lityńska-Zając et al. 2012).

Similar aggregated spatial characteristics of the soil seed bank was observed in arid regions (Wang et al. 2005). This similarity may depend on strong winds, specific plant architecture and environmental factors. However, factors driving spatial distribution of the soil seed bank in arid environments differ from the Antarctic tundra in the presence of animal activity reshaping the spatial distribution of seeds (Hulme 1998), and in the existence of more species with different growth habit, which might interact with the distribution of the shed seeds.

Seed deposition underneath the mother plant is not an unusual means of seed dispersal (Wang et al. 2005), especially in the case of seeds without any specific adaptations aiding their dispersal. The following seedling development is usually limited by intraspecific competition. In the case of the Antarctic population of P. annua high concentration of plants within the tussock may confirm this rule—at least some of the tussocks consist of many individuals (unpublished data). Moreover, high density of plants within the tussock may be of an adaptative value for the persistence of plants in extreme polar conditions.

Our earlier observations suggest that the tussocks are rather stable in time (unpubl. data). Poa annua is capable of forming perrenial ecotypes (Gibeault 1971). Therefore at least some of the clumps may be capable of surviving over several vegetation periods. Diaspores deposited in the soil can accumulate underneath the tussocks for an extended period of time. An interesting finding of our study was that the percent of germinating seeds of P. annua in Antarctica was negatively correlated with the clump size. A possible explanation might be that larger clumps may be older and have accumulated seeds through a longer period of time. With time some of the seeds deposited in the soil may lose their viability and yet be distinguishable due to slow decomposition rates in cold climates. Therefore in larger clumps the germinability of seeds may be lower than in small, young clumps, where all seeds are relatively young and have not lost their viability yet.

The tussock may not only be the source of diaspores in the underlying soil, but also present safe sites for the accumulation of soil seed bank. The clumps might function as seed traps for propagules transported by wind. Mechanisms associated with clump formation will be the focus of our further research.

Conclusions

Poa annua maintains in the Antarctic a soil seed bank comparable to plants typical for the polar tundra. The species’ seed bank in the vicinity of Arctowski is linked spatially with the extant population, as in other environments (Wódkiewicz and Kwiatkowska-Falińska 2010). The microspatial structure of the soil seed bank in the Antarctic is highly associated with the presence of tussocks. Over 80 % of seeds extracted from soil were viable and readily germinated under optimal conditions. A large number of seedlings germinating from soil samples indicates that they are able to survive the Antarctic winter. A still open question remains if the tussocks present a safe site for the accumulation of seeds transported by wind.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Ministry of Scientific Research and Higher Education grant 2013/09/B/NZ8/03293. The authors would like to thank Ms Anna Gasek for providing assistance with the field work.

References

  1. Arroyo MTK, Cavieres LA, Castor C, Humaña AM (1999) Persistent soil seed bank and standing vegetation at a high alpine site in the central Chilean Andes. Oecol 119:126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baskin CC, Baskin JM (2001) Seeds ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  3. Bullock JM, Moy IL (2004) Plants as seed traps: inter-specific interference with dispersal. Acta Oecol 25:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chambers JC (1993) Seed and vegetation dynamics in an alpine herb field: effects of disturbance type. Can J Bot 71:471–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chambers JC, MacMahon JA, Haefner JH (1991) Seed entrapment in alpine ecosystems: effects of soil particle size and diaspore morphology. Ecol 72:1668–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chwedorzewska KJ, Bednarek PT (2012) Genetic and epigenetic variation in a cosmopolitan grass (Poa annua L.) from Antarctic and Polish populations. Pol Polar Res 33:63–80Google Scholar
  7. Gibeault VA (1971) Perenniality of Poa annua L. Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, ORGoogle Scholar
  8. Grime JP, Hodgson JG, Hunt R (1986) Comparative plant ecology: a functional approach to common British species. Unwin Hyman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Hulme PE (1998) Post-dispersal seed predation and seed bank persistence. Seed Sci Res 8:513–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jumpponen A, Vare H, Mattson KG, Ohtonen R, Trappe JM (1999) Characterization of ‘safe sites’ for pioneers in primary succession on recently deglaciated terrain. J Ecol 87:98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kejna M, Araźny A, Sobota I (2013) Climatic change on King George Island in the years 1948–2011. Pol Polar Res 34:213–235Google Scholar
  12. Komárkowá V, Poncet S, Poncet J (1985) Two native Antarctic vascular plants, Deschampsia antarctica and Colobanthus quitensis: a new southernmost locality and other localities in the Antarctic Peninsula area. Arct Alp Res 17:401–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee JE, Chown SL (2009) Quantifying the propagule load associated with the construction of an Antarctic research station. Antarct Sci 21:471–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lityńska-Zając M, Chwedorzewska KJ, Olech M, Korczak-Abshire M, Augustyniuk-Kram A (2012) Diaspores and phyto-remains accidentally transported to the Antarctic Station during three expeditions. Biodivers Conserv 21:3411–3421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lush WM (1988) Biology of Poa annua in a temperate zone golf putting green (Agrostis stolonifera/Poa annua). II The seed bank. J Appl Ecol 25:989–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McGraw JB, Day TA (1997) Size and Characteristics of a Natural Seed Bank in Antarctica. Arct Alp Res 29:213–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McGraw JB, Vavrek MC (1989) The role of buried viable seeds in arctic and alpine plant communities. In: Leck MA, Parker VT, Simpson RL (eds) Ecology of soil seed banks. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Molau U, Larsson EL (2000) Seed rain and seed bank along an alpine altitudinal gradient in Swedish Lapland. Can J Bot 78:728–747Google Scholar
  19. Olech M, Chwedorzewska KJ (2011) The first appearance and establishment of alien vascular plant in natural habitats on the forefield of retreating glacier in Antarctica. Antarct Sci 23:153–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pertierra LR, Lara F, Benayas J, Hughes KA (2013) Poa pratensis L., current status of the longest-established non-native vascular plant in the Antarctic. Polar Biol 36:1473–1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ruhland CT, Day TA (2001) Size and longevity of seed banks in Antarctica and the influence of ultraviolet-B radiation on survivorship, growth and pigment concentrations of Colobanthus quitensis seedlings. Environ Exp Bot 45:143–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. SAS Institute Inc. (2007) SAS OnlineDoc® 9.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute IncGoogle Scholar
  23. StatSoft, Inc. (2009) STATISTICA data analysis software system, version 9.0. www.statsoft.com
  24. Venable DL, Brown JS (1988) The selective interactions of dispersal, dormancy, and seed size as adaptations for reducing risk in variable environments. Am Nat 131:360–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang SM, Zhang X, Lia Y, Zhang L, Xiong YC, Wang G (2005) Spatial distribution patterns of the soil seed bank of Stipagrostis pennata (Trin.) de Winter in the Gurbantonggut desert of north-west China. J Arid Environ 63:203–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wódkiewicz M, Kwiatkowska-Falińska A (2010) Small scale spatial pattern of a soil seed bank in an old-growth deciduous forest. Polish J Ecol 58:487–500Google Scholar
  27. Wódkiewicz M, Galera H, Chwedorzewska KJ, Giełwanowska I, Olech M (2013) Diaspores of the Introduced Species Poa annua L. in soil samples from King George Island (South Shetlands, Antarctica). Antarct Arct Alp Res 45:415–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maciej Wódkiewicz
    • 1
  • Maciej Ziemiański
    • 2
  • Kamil Kwiecień
    • 3
  • Katarzyna J. Chwedorzewska
    • 4
  • Halina Galera
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Ecology and Environmental Conservation, Faculty of BiologyUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Botanic Garden, Faculty of BiologyUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Białowieża Geobotanical Station, Faculty of BiologyUniversity of WarsawBiałowieżaPoland
  4. 4.Department of Antarctic BiologyInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics PASWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations