Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 1249–1287 | Cite as

Is there a future for the Cactaceae genera Copiapoa, Eriosyce and Eulychnia? A status report of a prickly situation

  • Isabel Larridon
  • Kirsty Shaw
  • Mauricio A. Cisternas
  • Anna Paizanni Guillén
  • Suzanne Sharrock
  • Sara Oldfield
  • Paul Goetghebeur
  • Marie-Stéphanie Samain
Original Paper

Abstract

Many of Chile’s iconic cactus species are threatened by human activities and global change. In order to safeguard them from extinction, both in situ and ex situ conservation actions are urgently needed. In this paper, an overview is given of the in situ and ex situ conservation status of the mainly Chilean cactus genera Copiapoa, Eriosyce and Eulychnia, including a worldwide survey of living ex situ collections of the species of these genera. From our results, we can conclude that although the threats to Chile’s remarkable biodiversity are now recognized as an environmental problem, and efforts are underway to protect the threatened endemic flora, many of the most threatened species are currently not protected in situ. Although a higher percentage of living accessions of Copiapoa, Eriosyce and Eulychnia in ex situ collections are of known wild origin compared to results of previous studies on other plant groups, the number of available accessions is insufficient to adequately preserve the genetic diversity of the threatened species. Prospects to upscale both in situ and ex situ conservation of the studied genera are discussed.

Keywords

Argentina Botanic gardens Chile Cactaceae Copiapoa Eriosyce Eulychnia Ex situ conservation In situ conservation Peru Threatened plant species 

References

  1. Acosta O (2005) Intensive use of aquifers by mining activity in Northern Chile. In: Sahuquillo A, Capilla J, Martinez-Cortina L, Sanchez-Vila X (eds) Groundwater intensive use, vol 7. International Association of Hydrogeologists, Leiden, pp 177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali NS, Trivedi C (2011) Botanic gardens and climate change: a review of scientific activities at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Biodivers Conserv 20:295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson EF (2001) The cactus family. Timber Press, Portland, pp 1–776Google Scholar
  4. Anderson EF, Bonilla FM, Hoffmann JAE, Taylor NP (1990) Succulent plant conservation studies and training in Chile. World Wildlife Fund-U.S., Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Armesto JJ, Rozzi R, Smith-Ramírez C, Arroyo MTK (1998) Conservation targets in South American temperate forests. Science 282:1271–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arroyo MTK, Riveros M, Peñaloza A, Cavieres LA, Faggi A (1996) Phytogeographic relationships and regional richness patterns of the cool temperate rainforest flora of southern South America. In: Lawford RG, Alaback PB, Fuentes E (eds) High-latitude rainforests and associated ecosystems of the west coasts of the Americas. Climate, hydrology, ecology and conservation. Springer, New York, pp 134–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arroyo MTK, Marquet PA, Marticorena C, Simonetti JA, Cavieres LA, Squeo FA, Rozzi R (2004) Chilean winter rainfall–Valdivian forests. In: Mittermeier RA, Gil PR, Hoffmann M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, Lamoreux J, da Fonseca GAB (eds) Hotspots revisited: earth’s biologically wealthiest and most threatened ecosystems. CEMEX, Mexico, pp 99–103Google Scholar
  8. Arroyo MTK, Armesto JJ, Squeo FA (2008) Libro Rojo de la Flora Nativa y de los Sitios Prioritarios para su Conservación: Región de Atacama. Capítulo 1. In: Squeo FA, Arancio G, Gutiérrez JR (eds) Conservación de Especies Amenazadas a Nivel Global y Regional. Ediciones Universidad de La Serena, La Serena, pp 3–12Google Scholar
  9. BGCI (2008) Global survey of ex situ Magnoliaceae collections. Botanic Gardens Conservation International, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  10. BGCI, PlantSearch database (2013) www.bgci.org/plant_search.php Accessed 1 March 2013
  11. Brown AHD, Marshall DR (1995) A basic sampling strategy: theory and practice. In: Gaurino L, Ramanatha Rao V, Reid R (eds) Collecting plant genetic diversity: technical guidelines. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 75–91Google Scholar
  12. Brütting C, Hensen I, Wesche K (2013) Ex situ cultivation affects genetic structure and diversity in arable plants. Plant Biol 15:505–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cáceres F, Pinto R, Ostalaza C, Roque J (2013a) Eriosyce islayensis. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 2 July 2013
  14. Cáceres F, Saldivia P, Guerrero P, Walter HE, Faundez L (2013b) Eulychnia iquiquensis. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 2 July 2013
  15. Campos-Ortega CH, Jorquera-Jaramillo C (2008) Libro Rojo de la Flora Nativa y de los Sitios Prioritarios para su Conservación: Región de Atacama. Capítulo 18. In: Squeo FA, Arancio G, Gutiérrez JR (eds) Minería y Conservación en Atacama. Ediciones Universidad de La Serena, La Serena, pp 323–338Google Scholar
  16. Catálogo de las Plantas Vasculares del Conosor (Argentina, Sur de Brazil, Chile, Paraguay y Uruguay) (1997–2013). Instituto de Botánica Darwinion. http://www2.darwin.edu.ar/Proyectos/FloraArgentina/FA.asp. Accessed 12 June 2013
  17. Charles G, Hoxey P, Hunt D, Taylor N (2013) NCL updates etc: Eulychnia. Cact Syst Initiat 29:6–11Google Scholar
  18. Christie MR, Marine ML, French RA, Blouin MS (2012) Genetic adaptation to captivity can occur in a single generation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:238–242PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cires E, De Smet Y, Cuesta C, Goetghebeur P, Sharrock S, Gibbs D, Oldfield S, Kramer A, Samain MS (2013) Gap analyses to support ex situ conservation of genetic diversity in Magnolia, a flagship plant group. Biodivers Conserv 22:567–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cochrane A (2004) Western Australia’s ex situ program for threatened species: a model integrated strategy for conservation. In: Guerrant EO Jr, Havens K, Maunder M (eds) Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 40–66Google Scholar
  21. CONAMA (2005) Levantamiento de información, estudio de línea de base e instrumento legal para la conservación de la biodiversidad en los sitios priorizados en la ERB: Aguas Calientes IV y Sector Costero de Paposo, II Región de Antofagasta, desarrollado por la unidad UNARTE de la Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Desarrollo de la Universidad de ChileGoogle Scholar
  22. CONAMA (2006) Plan de Manejo Sector Costero de Paposo. Desarrollado por la Facultad de Ciencias de la Universidad de ChileGoogle Scholar
  23. Dixon RE (2013) Northern Chile and Peru: a hotspot for desalination. Desalin Water Treat 51:5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Faundez L, Guerrero P, Saldivia P, Walter HE (2013) Eriosyce calderana, Eriosyce chilensis, Eriosyce occulta, Eriosyce simulans, Eriosyce sociabilis. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 2 July 2013
  25. Frankham R (2008) Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs. Mol Ecol 17:325–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. García-Rubio O, Malda-Barrera G (2010) Micropropagation and reintroduction of the endemic Mammillaria mathildae (Cactaceae) to its natural habitat. HortScience 45:934–938Google Scholar
  27. Glowka L, Burhenne-Guilman F, Synge H, McNeely JA, Gündling L (1994) A guide to the convention on biological diversity. Environment policy and law paper no. 30. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  28. GSPC (2012) Global strategy for plant conservation. A guide to the GSPC, all targets, objectives and facts. Botanic Gardens Conservation International, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  29. Guerrant EO Jr, Havens K, Maunder M (eds) (2004a) Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Island Press, Washington, DC, p 504Google Scholar
  30. Guerrant EO Jr, Fiedler PL, Havens K, Maunder M (2004) Revised genetic sampling guidelines for conservation of rare and endangered plants. In: Guerrant EO Jr, Havens K, Maunder M (eds) Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 419–438Google Scholar
  31. Guerrero PC, León-Lobos P (2010) Ficha de antecedentes de espécie: Eriosyce aspillagae. http://www.mma.gob.cl/clasificacionespecies/fichas6proceso/fichas2010/Eriosyceaspillagae_P06R3_RCE.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2013
  32. Guerrero PC, León-Lobos P, Squeo F (2010) Ficha de antecedentes de especie: Copiapoa krainziana. http://www.mma.gob.cl/clasificacionespecies/fichas6proceso/fichas2010/Copiapoakrainziana_P06R2_RCE.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2013
  33. Guerrero PC, Arroyo MTK, Bustamante RO, Duarte M, Hagemann TK, Walter HE (2011) Phylogenetics and predictive distribution modelling provide insights into the geographic divergence of Eriosyce subgenus Neoporteria (Cactaceae). Plant Syst Evol 297:113–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Guerrero P, Saldivia P, Faundez L, Walter HE (2013a) Eriosyce recondita. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 2 July 2013
  35. Guerrero P, Faundez L, Saldivia P, Walter HE (2013b) Eriosyce taltalensis. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 2 July 2013
  36. Guerrero P, Walter HE, Faundez L, Saldivia P (2013c) Copiapoa humilis. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed on 02 July 2013
  37. Hoffmann JAE, Walter MHE (2004) Cactáceas en la flora silvestre de Chile, 2nd edn. Fundación Claudio Gay, Santiago de ChileGoogle Scholar
  38. Hou B, Tian M, Luo J, Ji Y, Xue Q, Ding X (2012) Genetic diversity assessment and ex situ conservation strategy of the endangered Dendrobium officinale (Orchidaceae) using new trinucleotide microsatellite markers. Plant Syst Evol 298:1483–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoxey P, Klaassen P (2011) Two new combinations in the genus Eulychnia (Cactaceae). Cact Succul J 83:169–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hunt D, Taylor N, Charles G (eds) (2006) The new cactus lexicon: descriptions and illustrations of the cactus family compiled and edited by members of the International Cactaceae Systematics Group, vol. 1, 2. DH Books, Acworth, pp 900Google Scholar
  41. IUCN (2012) IUCN red list categories and criteria: version 3.1, vol iv, 2nd edn. IUCN, Gland, p 32Google Scholar
  42. IUCN (2013) IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2013.1. www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 02 July 2013
  43. Kattermann F (1994) Eriosyce (Cactaceae). The genus revised and amplified. Succ Pl Res 1:1–176Google Scholar
  44. Knops F, Kahne E, de la Mata MG, Fajardo CM (2013) Seawater desalination off the Chilean coast for water supply to the mining industry. Desalin Water Treat 51:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kozlowski G, Gibbs D, Huan F, Frey D, Gratzfeld J (2012) Conservation of threatened relict trees through living ex situ collections: lessons from the global survey of the genus Zelkova (Ulmaceae). Biodivers Conserv 21:671–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. León-Lobos P, Rosas M, Guerrero PC, Sandoval A, Way M (2008) Libro Rojo de la Flora Nativa y de los Sitios Prioritarios para su Conservación: Región de Atacama. Capítulo 20. In: Squeo FA, Arancio G, Gutiérrez JR (eds) Conservación Ex Situ de la Flora de la Región de Atacama: Métodos, Experiencias y Desafíos Futuros. Ediciones Universidad de La Serena, La Serena, pp 347–356Google Scholar
  47. Li D-Z, Pritchard HW (2009) The science and economics of ex situ plant conservation. Trends Plant Sci 14:614–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Maunder M, Culham A (1997) Practical aspects of threatened species management in botanic garden collections. In: Tew TE, Crawford TJ, Spencer JW, Stevens DP, Usher MB, Warren J (eds) The role of genetics in conserving small populations. Joint Nature Conservation Committee and British Ecological Society, Petersborough, pp 122–130Google Scholar
  49. Maunder M, Higgins S, Culham A (2001) The effectiveness of botanic garden collections in supporting plant conservation: a European case study. Biodivers Conserv 10:383–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maunder M, Havens K, Guerrant EO Jr, Falk DA (2004) Ex situ methods: a vital but underused set of conservation resources. In: Guerrant EO Jr, Havens K, Maunder M (eds) Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 3–20Google Scholar
  51. McNaughton SJ (1989) Ecosystems and conservation in the twenty-first century. In: Western D, Pearl M (eds) Conservation for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 109–120Google Scholar
  52. Muñoz M, Serra MT (2006) Ficha de antecedentes de especie: Copiapoa solaris. http://www.mma.gob.cl/clasificacionespecies. Accessed 2 July 2013
  53. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Namoff S, Husby CE, Francisco-Ortega J, Noblick LR, Lewis CE, Griffith MP (2010) How well does a botanic garden collection of a rare palm capture the genetic variation in a wild population? Biol Conserv 143:1110–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oldfield S (1997) Cactus and succulent plants—status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC cactus and succulent specialist group. IUCN, Gland, pp 10–212Google Scholar
  56. Oldfield S (2010) Plant conservation: facing tough choices. Bioscience 30:778–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Oyarzun J, Oyarzun R (2011) Sustainable development threats, inter-sector conflicts and environmental policy Requirements in the Arid, Mining Rich, Northern Chile Territory. Sustain Dev 19:263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Peters EM, Martorell C, Ezcurra E (2008) Nurse rocks are more important than nurse plants in determining the distribution and establishment of globose cacti (Mammillaria) in the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. J Arid Environ 72:593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pinto R (2007) Estado de conservación de Eulychnia iquiquensis (Schumann) Britton et Rose (Cactaceae) en el extremo norte de Chile. Gayana Botánica 64:98–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. QGIS Development Team (2010) QGIS 1.7.0 Wroclaw. Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org. Accessed 2 July 2013
  61. Rae D (2011) Fit for purpose: the importance of quality standards in the cultivation and use of live plant collections for conservation. Biodivers Conserv 20:241–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rucínska A, Puchalski J (2011) Comparative molecular studies on the genetic diversity of an ex situ garden collection and its source population of the critically endangered Polish endemic plant Cochlearia polonica E. Fröhlich. Biodivers Conserv 20:401–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. SAG (2007) Informe final “Situación actual de la flora nativa de la localidad de Paposo, Comuna de TalTal—II Región, y su relación con el aumento de la presencia de ganado caprino”. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, SantiagoGoogle Scholar
  64. Saldivia P, Guerrero P, Faundez L, Walter HE (2013) Copiapoa krainziana. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 2 July 2013
  65. Samain MS, Cires E (2012) Plants for the future—A future for our planet. Towards a protocol for genetic management of ex situ living plant collections. BG J 9:3–6Google Scholar
  66. Seaton PT, Hu H, Perner H, Pritchard HW (2010) Ex situ conservation of orchids in a warming world. Bot Rev 76:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sharrock S, Jones M (2011) Saving Europe’s threatened flora: progress towards GSPC Target 8 in Europe. Biodivers Conserv 20:325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. SONAMI—Sociedad Nacional de Minería (2012). Memoria Anual 2011–2012. Published on the Internet (http://www.sonami.cl/digital/memoria/memoria20112012/files/memoria20112012.pdf)
  69. Squeo FA, Cavieres LA, Arancio G, Novoa JE, Matthei O, Marticorena C, Rodriguez R, Arroyo MTK, Muñoz M (1998) Biodiversidad de la flora vascular en la Région de Antofagasta, Chile. Revista Chilena Hist Nat 71:571–591Google Scholar
  70. Squeo FA, Arancio G, Gutiérrez JR (eds) (2008a) Libro Rojo de la Flora Nativa y de los Sitios Prioritarios para su Conservación: Región de Atacama. Ediciones Universidad de La Serena, La Serena, xvi, pp 456Google Scholar
  71. Squeo FA, Letelier L, Estevez RA, Cavieres LA, Mihoc M, López D, Arancio G (2008b) Libro Rojo de la Flora Nativa y de los Sitios Prioritarios para su Conservación: Región de Atacama. Capítulo 8. In: Squeo FA, Arancio G, Gutiérrez JR (eds) Definición de los Sitios Prioritarios para la Conservación de la Flora Nativa de la Región de Atacama. Ediciones Universidad de La Serena, La Serena, pp 137–163Google Scholar
  72. Swarts ND, Dixon KW (2009) Perspectives on orchid conservation in botanic gardens. Trends Plant Sci 14:590–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. UNEP-WCMC (Comps.) (2011) Checklist of CITES species. CITES Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland, and UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  74. Villagrán C, Hinojosa LF (1997) Historia de los bosques del sur de Sudamérica, II: Análisis fitogeográfico. Revista Chilena Hist. Nat. 70:241–267Google Scholar
  75. Volis S, Blecher M (2010) Quasi in situ: a bridge between ex situ and in situ conservation of plants. Biodivers Conserv 19:2441–2454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Walter HE (2011) Protecting cacti: a pending and urgent task in Chile’s biodiversity conservation. In: Figueroa E (ed) Biodiversity conservation in the Americas: lessons and policy recommendations. Ocho Libros Editores Ltda, SantiagoGoogle Scholar
  77. Walter H, Mächler W (2006) An old acquaintance from the Guanillon Valley (Prov. de Atacama, Chile) is finally validated. Cact World 24:185–192Google Scholar
  78. Walter HE, Faundez L, Guerrero P, Saldivia P (2013) Copiapoa solaris. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 2 July 2013
  79. Walters C (2004) Principles for preserving germplasm in gene banks. In: Guerrant EO Jr, Havens K, Maunder M (eds) Ex situ plant conservation: supporting species survival in the wild. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 113–138Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isabel Larridon
    • 1
  • Kirsty Shaw
    • 4
  • Mauricio A. Cisternas
    • 3
  • Anna Paizanni Guillén
    • 2
  • Suzanne Sharrock
    • 4
  • Sara Oldfield
    • 4
  • Paul Goetghebeur
    • 1
  • Marie-Stéphanie Samain
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Ghent University Research Group Spermatophytes & Botanical GardenGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Centro Regional del BajíoInstituto de Ecología, A.C.PátzcuaroMexico
  3. 3.Jardín Botánico NacionalViña del MarChile
  4. 4.Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI)RichmondUK

Personalised recommendations