Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 1215–1228 | Cite as

Eat your orchid and have it too: a potentially new conservation formula for Chinese epiphytic medicinal orchids

  • Hong Liu
  • Yi-Bo Luo
  • Joel Heinen
  • Mahadev Bhat
  • Zhong-Jian Liu
Open Access
Original Paper

Abstract

About a quarter of Chinese wild orchid species are used in traditional medicine or as health food supplements. The market demand for some species, such as those in the epiphytic genus Dendrobium, has diminished many wild populations to local extinction or dangerously small numbers. Conservation of these heavily exploited orchids currently relies on a two-pronged approach: establishing nature reserves and encouraging massive commercial cultivation in artificial settings. We argue that these measures are not sufficient to restore or maintain healthy wild populations, and augmentation and reintroduction of these species in natural forests are needed. We argue for an unconventional reintroduction approach, in which populations planted in natural forests are allowed to be sustainably harvested (restoration-friendly cultivation). Because Dendrobium orchids are epiphytic, restoration-friendly cultivation of these species will not be at the expenses of other native plants. In addition, market premiums on wild-collected medicinal plants will generate incentives for farmers who participate in restoration-friendly cultivation to preserve natural forests. With proper policy and oversight, the restoration-friendly cultivation of medicinal Dendrobium orchids will facilitate the conservation of these threatened species, encourage protection of natural forests, and benefit marginalized rural communities. Adding this restoration-friendly cultivation into the current mix of conservation approaches has the potential to turn deeply-entrenched traditional uses of orchids from a conservation challenge to a conservation success.

Keywords

Endangered species Forest conservation Karst region Orchid conservation Traditional Chinese Medicine Economic incentive 

Introduction

With an estimated 25,000 species, the Orchidaceae is among the most diverse flowering plant families known (Dixon et al. 2003). Chinese orchids, estimated to be at least 1,388 species, are important components of China’s botanical diversity and of orchid diversity worldwide, with 491 spp. (35 %) known to be endemic (Chen et al. 2009). Habitat destruction and over collection for horticulture are threats common to wild orchids worldwide (Dixon et al. 2003). Threats from habitat destruction to biodiversity are especially acute in China because of the country’s rapid economic growth and rural development in the past few decades (Liu et al. 2003).

A much less known threat to orchids of China is the 2000-year tradition in ethnobotanical use of orchid species in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM; Chinese Medicinal Material, INC. 1995). About 350 species (25 %) of Chinese orchids are used in TMC, 97 of which are Chinese endemics (Chen and Luo 2003; Liu et al. 2013). Many populations of these species have been exploited to local extirpation (Luo et al. 2003). For example, Dendrobium catenatum, known as 铁皮石斛 (pronounced as Tie Pi Shi Hu) in Chinese, is one of the most popular TCM herbs both in prescribed medicine and as a health food supplement (The State Pharmacopoeia Commission of P. R. China 2010). It is usually consumed directly as tea or mixed in soup. Its popularity started as tonic for traditional vocal artists to protect their voices and its use extended to cancer prevention and cure, as a boost to the immune system, and for other illnesses (The State Pharmacopoeia Commission of P. R. China 2010; Ng et al. 2012).

Wild populations of D. catenatum have declined rapidly due to overexploitation, as China’s human population and purchasing power increased (Ding et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2011; Luo et al. 2013a). Known remaining populations of D. catenatum are small and sparsely distributed (Ding et al. 2008, 2009; Luo et al. 2013b). Several pockets of orchids that were under investigation suffer from extremely low pollinator visitation and fruit set, likely the result of too small a flowering display, with only a small number of open flowers in a given area in any given day during the flowering season (He et al. 2009).

In fact, more than 50 % of the 78 (14 endemic) Chinese species of Dendrobium (Zhu et al. 2009) are used in TCM for varying health purposes (Bao et al. 2001). Modern market demand for wild Dendrobium in China, many of which have showy flowers, is mostly for TCM. On the national scale, trade volume of medicinal Dendrobium spp. reached 600,000 kg fresh weight annually in the 1980s in China, all wild gathered (Bao et al. 2001), which has since declined due to exhaustion of natural populations. This phenomenon is also documented in the limestone regions of Guizhou and Guangxi that constitute the main traditional Dendrobium trading posts of China. In these regions, the trade volumes of several county level markets reached 10,000–40,000 kg each, annually in the 1980s and 1990s (Luo et al. 2013b; Editorial Board of Biodiversity in the Karst Area of Southwest Guangxi 2011). However, no large volume trade has been recorded in any of these markets in the late 2000s, and wild Dendrobium plants available in recent years have largely come from neighboring Vietnam and Laos (Editorial Board of Biodiversity in the Karst Area of Southwest Guangxi 2011). So this insatiable market demand has decimated accessible Dendrobium resources in China, and has started to impact wild populations in neighboring countries (Bao et al. 2001; Editorial Board of Biodiversity in the Karst Area of Southwest Guangxi 2011; Fig. 1a). This is also the case with many high profile medicinal plants and wildlife species (Zhang et al. 2008; Rosen and Smith 2010; Heinen and Shrestha-Acharya 2011; Dongol and Heinen 2012).
Fig. 1

Current (A) and desirable (B) conceptual states of Dendrobium cultivation and market status. Note: the thickness of the arrows indicate the magnitude of contribution. At the current state, Contribution to wild population abundance from woodland cultivation is small due to its small scale. In addition, harvest from wild plants and its negative impacts occur mostly outside of China as the Chinese domestic wild populations have been harvested exhaustively. At the desirable state, the scale of woodland cultivation is larger and so is its contribution to market and wild population restoration. As contribution from woodland cultivation to market increases, the market shares from shade house operations may shrink or stay the same, depending on whether the market is already saturated or not. In addition, woodland cultivation, subject to limitation on planting density as a measure to minimize negative impacts on the recipient forests (see text), large industrial shade house production should be maintained to meet the market demand. Finally, woodland cultivation would reduce the pressure on wild populations outside of China only partially since, at least at the moment, it is still cheaper to buy wild collected orchids in Laos, Myanmar, Vietnam etc. compared to artificially propagated plants from seeds

Globally, a few old and new measures have benefited orchid conservation. First of all, the establishment of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), in which all orchid species were listed, alleviates threats to wild orchid populations due to horticultural trade between the orchid-rich developing countries to the orchid-hungry developed countries. In addition, development and perfection of artificial propagation of uniquely minute seeds of orchids has also reduced the demand on wild plants. Furthermore, establishment of protected areas have mitigated impacts of habitat deterioration and loss on ecosystem basis, within which orchids are part of. Finally, species reintroduction (sensu Menges 2008) has, on a few occasions thus far, helped restore orchid populations (Liu et al. 2012; Maschinski and Haskins 2012).

The purpose of this paper is to present the current conservation status of heavily exploited orchids in China, and to illustrate why the current conservation approach is inadequate for these species. Since our primary focus is the conservation of Chinese species that are consumed domestically, we will not discuss the function of CITES in this context. We make our case based on literature, formal and informal discussions with national and provincial officials and staff of nature reserves, and our field observations. We then describe a new cultivation mode, which takes advantage of the epiphytic trait of the medicinal Dendrobium orchids and reintroduces and/or augments them in natural forests (hereafter refer to as restoration-friendly cultivation). Restoration-friendly cultivation is unconventional endangered species reintroduction because it allows for sustainable harvest to address concerns of poaching and livelihood creation in and around nature reserves. We further demonstrate the ecological and conservation benefits of restoration-friendly cultivation of medicinal Dendrobium orchids. More importantly, we demonstrate that this cultivation mode not only enhances ecological value, but also provides much larger economic dividends than the cultivation of introduced Eucalyptus species, a popular cash crop that is incompatible with preservation of native biodiversity. We argue that incorporating restoration-friendly cultivation into the current conservation mix of approaches is probably better suited to the Chinese situation for biological sustainability, habitat conservation, poverty alleviation and meeting complex market demands. We also make specific management recommendations on how to make restoration-friendly cultivation work in practice.

Nature reserves and orchid protection—will establishing nature reserves save endangered orchids?

Establishing protected areas is the most important and proactive strategy for conservation purposes (Heinen 2012). The Chinese government has endorsed this strategy by setting up more than 335 national nature reserves, most within the last two decades (Xu et al. 2009; Zhang 2011). Many more nature reserves were established at the provincial and lower government levels.

Orchids in Chinese reserves

Judging by the species lists from nature reserves, the picture of orchid conservation in China looks quite optimistic. In a survey based on species lists, as 52 % of the Chinese orchid flora and 51 % of all Chinese endemic orchids were represented in at least one of the 543 (21 %) Chinese reserves included in the study (Qin et al. 2012). In the orchid-rich, tropical Hainan Island, all known native orchids of Hainan Island, including all known endemics, can be found in one or more of its protected areas (Song, X.-Q. Hainan University, personal communication; Francisco-Ortega et al. 2010). Similarly, at least 709 of the 760 species of orchids of Yunnan, the most biologically diverse province of China, can be found in nature reserves of various kinds (Xu et al. 2010). Furthermore, China has one of the few national nature reserves in the world, i.e. the Yachang Orchid National Nature Reserve (hereafter refer to as the Yachang Reserve), that adopts orchid conservation as its main goal (Liu et al. 2009; Liu & Luo 2010). Nevertheless, with few exceptions, the population status of these orchids is poorly known (Francisco-Ortega et al. 2010; Xu et al. 2010).

We use the Yachang Reserve as an example throughout this article to illustrate our points as it has the explicit goal of orchid conservation. The Yachang Reserve is also a good representative of the key orchid conservation areas in China because it is located in the subtropical region of the country and is dominated by limestone. This region has the most orchid diversity in China (Cheng et al. 2009) and is considered to be a world orchid hotspot (Dixon et al. 2003).

A case in point, one of the most used orchids in TCM, D. catenatum, was one of the 140 species found in the Yachang Reserve. However, it has no known viable population within the reserve or in adjacent areas due most likely to over collection prior to the establishment of the reserve (Feng et al. 2012; unpublished data). Another case involves Gastrodia eleta (天麻,pronounced as Tian Ma in Chinese), another highly-priced TCM orchid, which is also on the species list of the Yachang Reserve but has no known viable population in the wild (Feng et al. 2012). In fact, it is so rare that when a colleague of ours needed to verify the existence of the species in the Yachang Reserve, he was led to a site with a few plants by a local farmer, only after he agreed to be blind folded so he would not be able to return (Feng, C.-L. Chinese Academy of Forestry, personal communication). These two cases illustrate the dire need for species restoration, via reintroduction and augmentation. Carrying out a conventional species reintroduction or augmentation (sensu Menges 2008) is not easy (Godefroid et al. 2011; Maschinski and Haskins 2012). Doing species restoration with taxa under very high market demand (and therefore high poaching risk) within the Chinese nature reserve system will have added challenges (below).

Managerial issues with chinese nature reserves that hinder conservation

A major obstacle facing Chinese reserves is insufficient funding by the central government (Han 2000; Liu et al. 2003; Zhou and Grumbine 2011), which distracts the nature reserves from its conservation missions (Heinen 2010, 2012). Nature reserves nationwide depend on managerial and local government entrepreneurial behavior for funding for staff support and other activities (Han 2000; Liu et al. 2003; Zhou and Grumbine 2011). This is the case with the Yachang Reserve. There is large-scale commercial orchid cultivation within the Yachang Reserve and D. catenatum is the main species cultivated (Fig. 2). The Yachang Reserve also sports an impressive tissue cultural facility, funded by the State Forestry Administration and the provincial Forestry Bureau, to propagate endangered orchids for restoration purposes (Tiangui Wu, The Yachang Reserve Administration, personal communication). However, the facility is being used primarily for the commercial Dendrobium operation. While large-scale shade house cultivation generates income for the Reserve, this mode of cultivation does not contribute to species restoration directly.
Fig. 2

Large scale commercial artificial cultivation of the medicinal orchid Dendrobium catenatum in a shade house in the buffer zone of the Yachang Orchid National Nature Reserve. Photo credit: Hong Liu

Another obstacle for Chinese reserve management is the complex relationship between nature reserves and local people. China adopted its protected areas system in the most strict sense, i.e. nature reserves allow minimal human interferences (Han 2000; Grumbine and Xu 2011). Yet, in practice, this concept has not worked well given the situation in rural China where large indigenous populations live in and around many Chinese reserves (Harkness 1998; Han 2000; Jim and Xu 2003; Jiang 2005), and the complex physical mix of public, community and privately managed lands within many Chinese nature reserves (Han 2000; personal observations).

The Yachang Reserve is no exception. By Chinese standards, the Yachang Region is remote and sparsely populated (15 persons per km2; Li et al. 2007). But this translates into more than 600 families and nearly 3,000 residents residing within the reserve, and double that amount in immediate adjacent areas. Community and private lands dotted within the reserve. These residents are mostly of the Zhuang and Yao ethnic minority groups. The income level of these residences is around ¥1,000 RMB (~$150) per year, about equal to the Chinese official poverty line (The Comprehensive Scientific Investigation Team of Guangxi Yachang Orchid Nature Reserve 2007). The county where the Yachang Reserve is located, as is the case of many counties in Karst dominated areas of China, is a national poverty county, a designation given by the Chinese central government for its extreme low average income (Zhangliang Chen, People’s Government of Guangxi, personal communications). The limestone landscapes have fostered high levels of biological diversity, especially among orchids and a few other plant groups (Editorial Board of Biodiversity in the Karst Area of Southwest Guangxi 2011), but these landscape features also lead to limited arable land and low income for residents, thus promoting poverty. Ideally, any conservation strategy in this context must also include improving local income by allowing sustainable uses of important biotic resources.

Can massive commercial cultivation help to conserve threatened species?

Medicinal orchids are among the group of species whose wild existence is threatened by consumptive use in China. Encouraging artificial cultivation of plants or farming of animals to meet the market demand and thus reduce wild-collecting pressure, is a national conservation strategy adopted by the Chinese wildlife protection agencies (Staff of the China State Forestry Administration, personal communication). The efficacy of this measure has been under intense debate (Kirkpatrick and Emerton 2009; Conrad and Conrad 2010). Regardless, motivated by market demands in the face of depleted natural resources, mass artificial cultivation of Dendrobium orchids, including that of D. catenatum, using modern in vitro seed germination and tissue culture techniques, was developed recently. This mass production, mostly done in industrial shade houses and currently estimated to be around 500 ha in area with a total market value of ¥250 billion RMB (US $39 billion), seems to have satisfied most of the market demand (Fig. 1A; Liu et al. 2011, 2013).

There are, however, two unsolved issues with this strategy. Firstly, the products of artificial cultivation, in contrast to ornamental orchids, are deemed inferior in quality as medicine and have a much lower market price than wild counterparts, as are the cases with many Asian medicinal plants (Heinen and Shrestha-Acharya 2011). Gastrodia elata, a threatened TCM orchid is a good example; mass artificial cultivation techniques were developed in the 1980s for G. elata (Liu et al. 2010), but collecting from the wild did not stop. Cultivation of medicinal plants under artificial conditions therefore cannot curb wild collecting pressures completely. Secondly, mass shade house operations are not designed for, and do not have a mechanism for, actively assisting wild population recovery (Fig. 1A). From the above discussion, we can clearly identify compelling reasons for alternative conservation strategies for these heavily exploited orchid species in China.

Restoration-friendly cultivation in natural settings: a new potential conservation tool

Because medicinal Dendrobium species are epiphytic and lithophytic (growing on bare rocks), they can be grown on tree trunks (Fig. 3A) or bare rocks (Fig. 3B) within natural forests. An emerging cultivation mode is doing exactly that. We term this restoration-friendly cultivation because the biological traits of Dendrobium spp. are such that individual plants can be harvested non-destructively, i.e. by taking only the older stems that have already flowered and fruited, thereby giving the planted individuals chances to recruit naturally in largely natural forests. Plants can be harvested annually in this manor for up to a decade (Liu et al. 2011).
Fig. 3

Medicinal orchid Dendrobium catenatum were planted on native trees of Castanopsis nigrescens in a natural forest in the private forests within the Danxishan Geopark in Guangdong province (A), and D. aduncum on native trees of C. fabri and Schima superma and D. nobile on rocks of private land within the Malipo nature reserve in southeastern Yunnan province (B), in southern China. Photo credit: Zhong-Jian Liu

The potential ecological benefits of restoration-friendly cultivation

The first and foremost benefit of restoration-friendly cultivation is restoration and sustainable harvest of depleted natural orchid resources. This will facilitate the recovery of wild populations by increasing population sizes directly and by allowing planted orchids to flower and recruit in the wild in due course. Restoration-friendly cultivation also encourages the conservation and restoration of native forests, because the medicinal Dendrobium orchids that are planted on tree trunks or on rocks within natural forests are valued more in the market than those grown in shade houses.

As such, cultivation of epiphytic Dendrobium in natural forests can help alleviate forest conversion pressure brought on by forest tenure reform in China that started in 2008 (Xu 2011).

Forest tenure reform has encouraged privatization of more than 100 million hectares of former collective forests (Xu 2011). While benefiting local economies, privatization also prompted concerns about biodiversity loss, as small landholders tend to cut down forests for immediate profit from timber and replace native forests with exotic trees of higher economic value that harbor little native diversity (Xu 2011). For example, Guangxi Province boasted 60 % forest coverage in 2011 (Guangxi Forestry Bureau Official Website: http://www.gxly.cn:8888/pub/cms/1/3537/3544/86963.html), but a third of this area was planted with non-native trees (Guangxi Forestry Bureau Official Website: http://www.gxly.cn:8888/pub/cms/1/3545/3559/3566/88981.html). In fact, Guangxi grows the majority of the Eucalyptus in China, partially the outcome of forest tenure reform (Guangxi Forestry Bureau Official Website: http://www.gxly.cn:8888/pub/cms/1/3537/3544/69239.html). Restoration-friendly orchid cultivation on privately held lands will provide owners with much greater economic incentives than other non-native forest products would, as indicated by the higher benefit-cost ratio of the restoration-friendly cultivation of D. catenatum (Table 1; Supplemental Table 1). Therefore, private orchid cultivation can be incorporated as part of a biodiversity-friendly management framework while forest tenure reform continues. This will promote conservation of the remaining natural habitats by offering a viable, profitable alternative to natural forest conversion (Table 1).
Table 1

Comparison of initial investment, net present value, and benefit–cost ratio of restoration-friendly woodland cultivation, shade house cultivation of Dendrobium catenatum (tian-pi-shi-hu), and Eucalyptus plantation

Crop

Initial investmenta (¥/mu)

Net present valueb (at the end of 6 years) (¥/mu)

Benefit–cost ratioc

Woodland cultivation of Dendrobium catenatum

22,000

621,461

28.25

Shadehouse cultivation of Dendrobium catenatum

210,560

4,703,050

23.33

Eucalyptus sp. plantation

370

839

3.268

All monetary values are in Chinese Yuan RMB (¥) per mu. Calculations were based on crop rotation of 6-year and market prices of 2012 in Guangdong Province, China. ¥1 = US$0.1628; 1 mu = 0.0667 ha

aSee supplemental Table 1 for more details on yearly economic costs and benefits

bNet present value is difference between the sum of discounted annual net benefits (for 6 years) and the initial investment

cBenefit–cost ratio is the ratio of the sum of discounted annual net benefits (for 6 years) to the initial investment

Incentives to preserve natural forests are especially needed in orchid-rich southwestern China, which is dominated by karst landscapes. Karst mountain ecosystems are inherently fragile because slopes are often steep, soils are scarce and of low fertility, and surface water can be scarce due to porous substrates (Jiang et al. 2008). Once damaged, such as by deforestation, karst ecosystems take a very long time to recover, resulting in rock desertification (Li and He 2002; Li et al. 2004; Su et al. 2006; Jiang et al. 2008; Zhou et al. 2010; Luo et al. 2013a). The limestone-dominated regions in Southwestern China are undergoing rapid changes due to the central government’s, ‘‘Great Western Development’’ plan (Zhou and Grumbine 2011). Under population and development pressures, severe limestone desertification has occurred on more than half the total limestone areas in China (Jiang et al. 2008). Environmental degradation in these regions has made sustainable development and poverty alleviation more difficult. Many Dendrobium species, including D. catenatum, can also be grown, though may not be the optimal condition, on bare limestone rocks, so its cultivation can help to alleviate rock desertification.

Social benefits

Growing, tending and harvesting economic forests are labor intensive. This can be difficult for people in Yachang where a large proportion of young laborers have migrated to coastal regions to seek better incomes. Elders, women and children remain in the villages. Similarly, the industrial scale artificial cultivation operations described above, which demand very large initial investments (Table 1) and somewhat complex management, exclude the participation of villagers with limited education and financial means, other than perhaps being employed as cheap labor.

The proposed restoration-friendly orchid cultivation, with proper training and appropriate small loans, can be adopted by the marginalized populations of older and female rural residents in orchid hotspots because it requires non-intensive labor and smaller initial investments than shade house operations (Table 1). As mentioned above, these medicinal orchids command a high market value and can be harvested non-destructively for up to a decade or more in some species, allowing rural farmers to gain financial independence.

Potential pitfalls and possible ways to overcome them

There are three major potential pitfalls that may prevent the realization of the intended benefits of restoration-friendly cultivation. Firstly, seedlings of inappropriate genetic provenance are used such that species level genetic diversity is reduced or location adaption is lost or broken (Vallee et al. 2004; McKay et al. 2005). As a general guideline we recommend that local sources should be used to preserve and restore possible local adaptations, as has been practiced at several locations where restoration-friendly cultivation has started (unpublished data). This is especially important for species with relatively wide natural distributions, such as D. catenatum, which are found in China and Japan, from the warm temperate region such as Zhejiang province to the subtropical Yunnan, Guizhou, Guangxi and Guangdong provinces. Population genetic studies revealed significant differences among populations across D. catenatum’s distribution range (Ding et al. 2008).

To address this issue, a product certification program can be created and administered by authorities to verify that seedlings and harvested products from restoration-friendly cultivation are of the correct species and genetic provenance (Fig. 4). On the other hand, considering that most existing pockets of populations are small and undergoing climate change, some mixing of populations of various distances should be experimented to increase the evolutionary potential of the restored populations (Frankham 1995; Maschinski et al. 2013).
Fig. 4

Schematic mechanism in implementation of the restoration-friendly cultivation to realize the intended ecological and societal benefits. Arrows point to action recipients or outcomes

Secondly, cultivation activities on existing natural forests may generate unintended impacts on recipient forests. For example, planting Dendrobium orchids may replace and limit natural recruitment of other epiphytic plants such as ferns, Begonia and Gesneria. In addition, periodic thinning of small trees and shrubs were observed in some locations to maintain a certain forest structure for Dendrobium cultivation. Furthermore, dense cultivation could require application of pesticides. To minimize such impacts, restoration-friendly cultivation should only be carried out on natural or semi-natural forests that are already prone to human activities, such as in many community and private forest patches within or close to nature reserves. These forests have been and will be impacted by forest tenure reform. The product certification program mentioned above could also be used to limit the impacts on restoration-friendly cultivation sites by managing planting density, maintaining a certain number of native trees, shrubs and herbs, and limiting pesticide use (Fig. 4). In contrast, in well-protected public forests, only conventional species reintroduction with no harvest agenda should be considered.

Thirdly, small holders, especially marginalized rural populations, may have difficulties purchasing relatively costly seedlings and finding appropriate markets. Chinese nature reserves in principle have obligations to assist local farmers to establish livelihoods that are consistent with natural resources conservation (Zhangliang Chen, Vice Governor of Guangxi, personal communication). Therefore, these nature reserves are in the right position to facilitate the implementation of biodiversity-friendly practices such as restoration-friendly cultivation. In the case of orchid cultivation it will be more practical for nature reserves, or certified private companies working with nature preserves, to acquire the facilities and investment needed to generate appropriate orchid seedlings (Fig. 4). They could also provide training in planting and harvesting techniques. Since botanical gardens have increasing roles and capacities in ex-situ plant conservation in general, they could partner with nature reserves to maintain ex-situ collections for restoration friendly cultivation, and to assist in the seed/plant source certification process (Fig. 4). In addition, the Chinese central government has a large budget for poverty alleviation programs, which can be tapped to provide loans to qualified farmers to participate in restoration-friendly cultivation (Fig. 4), as is the case in southwestern Guizhou province (Xiaoqing Luo, Guizhou Subtropical Crops Research Institute, personal communication). The product certification program can be designed to facilitate these processes.

Conclusion

It is well known that market demands for TCM have led to many high profile conservation problems, such as tiger, rhinoceroses, turtles, etc., poaching throughout Asia and other parts of the world (Lee et al. 1998; Zhang et al. 2008; Tilson and Nyhus 2010; Dongol and Heinen 2012). Many TCMs have no known medicinal properties to support their use, yet despite years of public education campaigns by international NGOs and the Chinese government, demands persist (Lee et al. 1998; Zhang et al. 2008; Tilson and Nyhus 2010; Dongol and Heinen 2012). For medicinal orchids such as Dendrobium, with research demonstrating mechanisms behind claimed medicinal functions (e.g. Ya et al. 2004), market demands will only grow.

Two key biological traits, i.e. being epiphytic (so that its cultivation will not be at the expenses of native trees) and having renewable stem growth (enabling non-destructive, multiple-year harvesting) render Dendrobium orchids ideal for restoration-friendly cultivation. Restoration-friendly cultivation should be implemented at relatively small scales, at selected locations as specified above, and should be managed with a product certification program. It can’t and shouldn’t replace shade house cultivation, which has been the major provider for the market in recent years, and this will continue (Fig. 1). Adding restoration-friendly cultivation to the current mix of conservation offers a scientific solution to the TCM conservation conflict that not only respects, but takes advantage of, deeply-entrenched traditions. Such a new solution to a persisting conservation issue also holds promise for other regions facing similar species conservation issues.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Hon. Zhang-Liang Chen, the Vice Governor of the People’s Government of Guangxi for his unwavering support to biodiversity conservation. Mr. Changlin Feng of the Chinese Academy of Forestry is thanked for his assistance in information gathering during the preparation of this manuscript. We thank the Yachang Reserve Administration, including Directors Tiangui Wu, Shuwei Cai, and Vice Director Zuzhuang Zhao; also Zhenhai Deng, Shiyong Liu, Xinlian Wei, and other staff for their logistic support. This study was supported by grants from the National Key Project of Scientific and Technical Support Programs funded by the Ministry of Science & Technology of China (No. 2012BAC01B05-3 to Yibo Luo), the Guangxi Chairman’s Foundation (09203-04 to Hong Liu, Baoshan Chen and Yibo Luo), the Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund (0905324 to Hong Liu and Yibo Luo), and Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden (to Hong Liu).

Supplementary material

10531_2014_661_MOESM1_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 kb)

References

  1. Bao X-S, Shun Q-S, Chen L-Z (2001) The medicinal plants of Dendrobium (SHI-HU) in China. Fudan University Publisher and Shanghai Medical University Publishing House, Shanghai (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. Chen X-Q, Luo Y–B (2003) Research advances in some plant groups in China: a retrospective and prospective of research in Orchidaceae. Acta Botanica Sinica 45:2–20 (in Chinese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  3. Chen X-Q et al (2009) Orchidaceae. In: Wu Z-Y, Raven P, Hong D-Y (eds) Flora of China, vol 25. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  4. Conrad R, Conrad K (2010) Making sense of the tiger farm debate. Available from www.tiger-economics.com Accessed 2 Sep 2012
  5. Ding G, Zhang D-Z, Ding X-Y, Zhou Q, Zhang W-C, Li X–X (2008) Genetic variation and conservation of the endangered Chinese endemic herb Dendrobium officinale based on SRAP analysis. Plant Syst Evol 276:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ding G, Li X, Ding X-Y, Qian L (2009) Genetic diversity across natural populations of Dendrobium officinale, the endangered medicinal herb endemic to China, revealed by ISSR and RAPD markers. Genetika 45:375–382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dixon KW, Kell SP, Barrett RL, Cribb PJ (eds) (2003) Orchid conservation. Natural History Publications, BorneoGoogle Scholar
  8. Dongol Y, Heinen JT (2012) Pitfalls of CITES implementation in Nepal: a policy gap analysis. Environ Manage 50:181–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Editorial Board of Biodiversity in the Karst Area of Southwest Guangxi (2011) Biodiversity in the Karst area of Southwest Guangxi. Encyclopedia of China Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  10. Feng C-L, Deng Z–H, Cai D–X, Wu T–G, Jia H–Y, Bai L–H, Zhao Z–Z, Yong S (2012) Current status and conservation strategies of wild orchid resources in Guangxi Yachang Forests. Plant Sci J 30:285–292 (in Chinese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  11. Francisco-Ortega J et al (2010) Endemic seed plant species from Hainan Island: a checklist. Bot Rev 76:295–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frankham R (1995) Inbreeding and extinction: a threshold effect. Conserv Biol 9:792–799Google Scholar
  13. Godefroid S et al (2011) How successful are plant species reintroductions? Biol Conserv 144:672–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grumbine RE, Xu J-C (2011) Creating a Conservation with Chinese Characteristics. Biol Conserv 144:1347–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Han N-Y (2000) Research in sustainable management strategies of Chinese nature reserves. J Nat Resour 15:201–207 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Harkness J (1998) Recent trends in forestry and conservation of biodiversity in China. China Quart 156:911–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. He P-R, Song X-Q, Luo Y–B, He M–G (2009) Reproductive biology of Dendrobium officinale (Orchidaceae) in Danxia landform. China J Chin Materia Medica 34:124–127 (in Chinese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  18. Heinen JT (2010) The importance of a social science research agenda in the management of protected natural areas, with selected examples. Bot Rev 76:140–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heinen JT (2012) Global issues and trends in the protection of natural areas. Chapter 1 in: International-trends in protected areas policy and management. In Tech, Rijeka, Croatia, X + 226 pp. Also available from www.intechopen.com/articles/show/title/international-trends-in-protected-areas-policy-and-management
  20. Heinen JT, Shrestha-Acharya R (2011) The non-timber forest products sector in Nepal: emerging policy issues in plant conservation and utilization. J Sustain For 30:543–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiang Z (2005) Lun zhongguo ziran baohuqu de mianji shangxian [On considering an upper limit of China’s nature reserves]. Acta Ecologica Sinica 25:14–21 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Jiang Z-C, Cao J-H, Yang D-S, Luo W-Q (2008) Current status and comprehensive countermeasures of soil erosion for Karst rocky desertification areas in the Southwestern China. Sci Soil Water Conserv 6:37–42 (in Chinese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  23. Jim C, Xu S (2003) Getting out of the woods: quandaries of protected area management in China. Mt Res Dev 23:222–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirkpatrick RC, Emerton L (2009) Killing tigers to save them: fallacies of the farming argument. Conserv Biol 24:655–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee S, Hoover C, Gaski A, Mills J (1998) A world apart? Attitudes toward Traditional Chinese Medicine and endangered species in Hong Kong and the United States. TRAFFIC East Asia, TRAFFIC North America, WWF-US. Available from www.traffic.org/general-reports/traffic_pub_gen3.pdf
  26. Li X-K, He C-X (2002) Comprehensive development of western China and ecological rehabilitation and reconstruction in tropical and subtropical Karst regions. Syst Sci Compr Stud Agric 18:13–16Google Scholar
  27. Li Y-B, Wang S–J, Rong L (2004) Prospect of the study on rock desertification and its restoration in southwest Karst mountains. Chin J Ecol 23:84–86 (in Chinese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  28. Li D-Q et al (2007) Guangxi yachang lankezhiwu zizhiquji baohuqu zhongti guihua [Guangxi Yachang Orchids Natural Reserve Master Plan]. Guangxi Forestry Survey and Design Institute, Nanning (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  29. Liu H, Luo Y-B (2010) Protecting orchids in nature reserves: research and restoration needs. Bot Rev 76:137–139Google Scholar
  30. Liu H, Feng C-L, Chen B-S, Wang Z-S, Xie X-Q et al (2012) Overcoming extreme weather events: successful but variable assisted translocations of wild orchids in southwestern China. Biol Conserv 150:68–75Google Scholar
  31. Liu H, Luo Y-B, Pemberton R, Luo D, Liu S-Y (2009) New hope for Chinese wild orchids. Oryx 43:169Google Scholar
  32. Liu H, Luo Y-B, Liu Z-J (2013) Using guided commercialized cultivation models to promote species conservation and sustainable utilization: an example from the Chinese medicinal orchids. Biodivers Sci 21:132–135 (in Chinese with an English Abstract)Google Scholar
  33. Liu H-X, Luo Y-B, Liu H (2010) Studies of mycorrhizal fungi of Chinese orchids and their role in orchid conservation in China—a review. Bot Rev 76:241–262Google Scholar
  34. Liu J-G, Ouyang Z-Y, Pimm S, Raven P, X-K Wang, Miao H, N-Y Han (2003) Protecting China’s biodiversity. Science 300:1240–1241Google Scholar
  35. Liu Z-J, Zhang Y-T, Wang Y, Huang Q-H, Chen X-Q, Chen L-Q (2011) Recent developments in the study of rapid propagation of Dendrobium catenatum Lindl. With a discussion on its scientific and Chinese names. Plant Sci J 29:763–772 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  36. Luo X-Q, Wu M-K, Shen G, Zhang X-B (2013a) Guizhou Karst areas Dendrobium officinale re-introduction conservation and sustainable utilization. Chin Wild Plant Resour 32(6):47–50 (in Chinese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  37. Luo X-Q, Wu M-K, Zhang X-B, Cha L-S, Ao M-H (2013b) Southwest Guizhou dendrobium resources and persistent drought impact assessment. J South Agr 44:1424–1430 (in Chinese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  38. Luo Y-B, Jia J-S, Wang C-L (2003) A general review of the conservation status of Chinese orchids. Biodivers Sci 11:70–77 (in Chinese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  39. Maschinski J, Haskins KE (eds) (2012) Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: promises and perils. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  40. McKay JK, Christian CE, Harrison S, Rice KJ (2005) How local is local? – a review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restor Ecol 13:432–440Google Scholar
  41. Maschinski J, Wright SJ, Koptur S, Pinto-Torres EC (2013) When is local the best paradigm? Breeding history influences conservation reintroduction survival and population trajectories in times of extreme climate events. Biol Conserv 159:277–284Google Scholar
  42. Menges ES (2008) Restoration demography and genetics of plants: when is a translocation successful? Aust J Bot 56:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maschinski J, Wright SJ, Koptur S, Pinto-Torres EC (2013) When is local the best paradigm? Breeding history influences conservation reintroduction survival and population trajectories in times of extreme climate events. Biol Cons 159:277–284Google Scholar
  44. Ng T-B, Liu J-Y, Wong J-H, Ye X-J, Sze SCW, Tong Y, Zhang K-Y (2012) Review of research on Dendrobium, a prized folk medicine. Appl Microbiol Biotech 93:1795–1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Qin W-H, Jiang M-K, Xu W-G, He Z-H (2012) Assessment of in situ conservation of 1334 native orchids in China. Biodivers Sci 20:177–183Google Scholar
  46. Rosen GE, Smith KF (2010) Summarizing the evidence on the international trade in illegal wildlife. EcoHealth 7:24–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Su W-C, Yan H, Li Q, Guo Y, Chen Z-Q (2006) Woguo xinan kasite shanqu tudi shimuhua chenyin ji fangzi. [Mechanism and prevention of rock desertification in the Karst regions of Southwest China]. Chin J Soil Sci 37:447–451 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  48. The Comprehensive Scientific Investigation Team of Guangxi Yachang Orchid Nature Reserve (2007) The comprehensive investigation report of Guangxi Yachang orchid nature reserve. Guangxi Forestry Inventory & Planning Institute, Nanning (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  49. The State Pharmacopoeia Commission of P. R. China (2010) Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China 2010 (Set of 3, English edition). China Medical Science and Technology Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  50. Tilson R, Nyhus P (eds) (2010) Tigers of the world: the science, politics and conservation of panthera tigris, 2nd edn. Elsevier Inc., AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  51. Vallee L, Hogbin T, Monks L, Makinson B, Matthes M, Rossetto M (2004) Guidelines for the translocation of threatened plants in Australia. Australian Network for Plant Conservation, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  52. Xu J-C (2011) China’s new forests aren’t as green as they seem. Nature 477:371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xu H et al (2009) China’s progress toward the significant reduction of the rate of biodiversity loss. Bioscience 59:843–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xu Z-H, Jiang H, Ye D-P, Liu E-D (2010) The wild orchids in Yunnan. Yunnan Publishing Group Corportation and Yunnan Science & Technology Press, KunmingGoogle Scholar
  55. Ya H, Wang S-C, Wang Z-T, Hu Z-B (2004) Structural analysis of polysaccharides from Dendrobium candidum. Chinese Pham J 39:254–256 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  56. Zhang K (2011) Chinese nature reserves: closed or open? Available from http://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/20110413/00579677683.shtml Accessed on 18 Oct 2012
  57. Zhang L, Hua N, Sun S (2008) Wildlife trade, consumption and conservation awareness in southwest China. Biodivers Conserv 17:1493–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhou D-Q, Grumbine RE (2011) National parks in China: experiments with protecting nature and human livelihoods in Yunnan province, People’s Republic of China (PRC). Biol Conserv 144:1314–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhou L-C, Chen X-M, Li X-L, Yang X-Q, Xia W, Cui C (2010) Variation of physical parameters of soil under different rocky desertification in Karst region, Southwest China. J Earth Sci Environ 32:195–199 (in Chinese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  60. Zhu G-H, Tsi Z-H, Wood J, Wood H-P (2009) 139. Dendrobium. In: Wu Z-Y, Raven P, Hong D-Y (eds) Flora of China, vol 25. Beijing & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, pp 367–397Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hong Liu
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yi-Bo Luo
    • 4
  • Joel Heinen
    • 1
  • Mahadev Bhat
    • 1
  • Zhong-Jian Liu
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Earth and EnvironmentFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresourcesGuangxi UniversityNanningChina
  3. 3.Center for Tropical Plant ConservationFairchild Tropical Botanic GardenCoral GablesUSA
  4. 4.State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of BotanyChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  5. 5.Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Orchid Conservation and UtilizationThe National Orchid Conservation Center of China, and The Orchid Conservation & Research Center of ShenzhenShenzhenChina

Personalised recommendations