Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 639–656 | Cite as

Why conservationists should be concerned about natural resource legislation affecting indigenous peoples’ rights: lessons from Peninsular Malaysia

  • Sheema A. Aziz
  • Gopalasamy R. Clements
  • D. M. Rayan
  • Preetha Sankar
Original Paper


For conservation to be effective in forests with indigenous peoples, there needs to be greater recognition of indigenous customary rights, particularly with regards to their use of natural resources. Ideally, legislation regulating the use of natural resources should include provisions for the needs of both indigenous peoples and biodiversity. In reality, however, legislative weaknesses often exist and these can result in negative impacts, either on indigenous peoples’ livelihoods, their surrounding biodiversity, or both. Here, our case study demonstrates why conservationists need to pay greater attention to natural resource legislation affecting indigenous peoples’ rights. Apart from examining relevant laws for ambiguities that may negatively affect biodiversity and livelihoods of indigenous people in Peninsular Malaysia (known as the Orang Asli), we also provide supporting information on actual resource use based on questionnaire surveys. In order to address these ambiguities, we propose possible legislative reconciliation to encourage policy reform. Although there are positive examples of conservationists elsewhere adopting a more inclusive and participatory approach by considering the needs of indigenous peoples, greater recognition must be afforded to land and indigenous rights within natural resource laws for the benefit of indigenous peoples and biodiversity.


Conservation Forest Indigenous peoples Law Malaysia Natural resources 



We are grateful to the Orang Asli of the Belum-Temengor Forest Complex for their hospitality and insights. We thank the Perak State Parks Corporation and the Department of Orang Asli Development for their invaluable assistance. DMR is supported by a WWF-US Kathryn Fuller Science for Nature Fellowship and the Pulau Banding Foundation. GRC is supported by a James Cook University Postgraduate Research Scholarship and University of Malaya Research Grant. WWF-Malaysia’s tiger work in Belum-Temengor has been supported by US Fish and Wildlife Service Assistance—Division of International Conservation Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Fund Award, Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund, Malaysian Wildlife Conservation Fund and WWF-Netherlands. WWF-Malaysia’s protected areas work in Belum-Temengor is wholly funded by generous donations from the Malaysian public. We would also like to thank Shariff Mohamad, Lau Ching Fong, Christopher Wong, Elangkumaran Sagtia Siwan, Hamirul Razak, Umi Rahman and Allim for conducting the interview surveys with the Orang Asli of Belum-Temengor, and Surin Suksuwan, Rejani Kunjappan and Belinda Lip for the internal review of this manuscript.


  1. Ahmad Zafir AW, Azlan M, Lau CF, Sharma DSK, Payne J, Alfred R, Williams AC, Nathan S, Ramono WS, Clements R (2011) Now or never: what will it take to save the Sumatran rhinoceros (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis) from extinction? Oryx 45:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AlJazeeraEnglish (2012) Indigenous Malaysians protest new law. 10 May. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  3. Andaya LY (2011) Leaves of the same tree: trade and ethnicity in the Straits of Melaka. University of Hawaii Press, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  4. Asian Indigenous & Tribal Peoples Network (AITPN) (2008) Malaysia: Extinguishing indigenous peoples rights. AITPN’s contribution for examination of Malaysia’s human rights obligations and commitments under the Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights Council. 8 September. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  5. Aziz SA, Laurance WF, Clements R (2010) Forests reserved for rubber. Front Ecol Environ 8:178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azrina A, Or OC, Kamal SF (2011) Collectors and traders: a study of Orang Asli involvement in the Belum-Temengor complex, Perak. University of Malaya, Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett EL, Nyaoi AJ, Sompud J (2000) Saving Borneo’s bacon: the sustainability of hunting in Sarawak and Sabah. In: Robinson JG, Bennett EL (eds) Hunting for sustainability in tropical forests. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 305–324Google Scholar
  8. Bernama (2010) DOE probes claims land development threaten Orang Asli water source. 4 April. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  9. Bernama (2011) Orang Asli claim ‘Ladang Rakyat’ deprive them of their income. 17 February. Accessed 20 Oct. 2012
  10. Bernama (2012a) Perak government gazettes land for Orang Asli. 18 March. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  11. Bernama (2012b) Orang Asli ordered to vacate land get consent of stay. The Sun. 14 AugustGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhatt H (2012) Suhakam calls for due care in Orang Asli land issues. The Sun Daily. 11 May. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  13. Boo CH, Ang H (2010) How Ketuanan Melayu has dispossessed the Orang Asli. Free Malaysia Today. 2 April. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  14. Borrini-Feyerabend G, Kothari A, Oviedo G (2004) Indigenous and local communities and protected areas: towards equity and enhanced conservation. IUCN, Gland and CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Brechin SR, Wilshusen PR, Fortwangler CL, West PC (2002) Beyond the square wheel: toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process. Soc Nat Resour 15:41–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chelvi ST (2012) Orang asli eviction on hold. The Sun. 27 JuneGoogle Scholar
  17. Chun M (2012) Authorities should not take sides over Orang Asli dispute, Suhakam. The Sun Daily. 4 FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke P, Jupiter SD (2010) Law, custom and community-based natural resource management in Kubulau District (Fiji). Environ Conserv 37:98–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clements R, Rayan MD, Ahmad Zafir AW, Venkataraman A, Alfred R, Payne J, Ambu LN, Sharma DSK (2010) Trio under threat: can we secure the future of rhinos, elephants and tigers in Malaysia? Biodivers Conserv 19:1115–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Datuk Ranita MH (2011) Land in the balance. The Star. 11 MarchGoogle Scholar
  21. Davis SH, Wali A (1994) Indigenous land tenure and tropical forest management in Latin America. AMBIO 23:485–490Google Scholar
  22. Dressler W, Büscher B, Schoon M, Brockington D, Hayes T, Kull CA, McCarthy J, Shrestha K (2010) From hope to crisis and back again? A critical history of the global CBNRM narrative. Environ Conserv 37:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fiallo EA, Jacobson SK (1995) Local communities and protected areas: attitudes of rural residents towards conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. Environ Conserv 22:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Filer C (2011) Interdisciplinary perspectives on historical ecology and environmental policy in Papua New Guinea. Environ Conserv 38:256–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gill SK, Ross WH, Panya O (2009) Moving beyond rhetoric: the need for participatory forest management with the Jakun of South-East Pahang, Malaysia. J Trop For Sci 21:123–138Google Scholar
  26. Hood MS (1993) Man, forest and spirits: images of and survival among forest-dwellers of Malaysia. Southeast Asian Str 30:444–456Google Scholar
  27. Hood S, Bettinger KA (2008) The interaction between indigenous peoples and parks in Malaysia: issues and questions. In: Sodhi NS, Acciaioli A, Erb M, Tan AK-T (eds) Biodiversity and human livelihoods in protected areas: case studies from the Malay Archipelago. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 289–310Google Scholar
  28. Howell CJ, Schwabe KA, Abu Samah AH (2010) Non-timber forest product dependence among the Ja Hut subgroup of Peninsular Malaysia’s Orang Asli. Environ Dev Sustain 12:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson D, Marmulla G (2001) The influence of dams on river fisheries. In: Marmulla G (ed) Dams, Fish and Fisheries: Opportunities, Challenges and Conflict Resolution. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 419. Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, p 1–45Google Scholar
  30. Jamaludin MH (2008) Orang Asli poacher fined. New Straits Times. 19 DecemberGoogle Scholar
  31. Jaringan Orang Asal SeMalaysia (2010a) JOAS statement at the EMRIP 3rd session—Agenda Item 4. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  32. Jaringan Orang Asal SeMalaysia (2010b) JOAS Climate Change focal point comments on Civil Society excluded from interim REDD partnership meeting. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  33. Jaringan Orang Asal SeMalaysia (2010c) JOAS statement on purported forest carbon deal in Sarawak involving indigenous peoples. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  34. Jaringan Orang Asal SeMalaysia (2010) Statement by IIFB to the COP 10. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  35. Kawanishi K, Clements GR, Gumal M, Goldthorpe G, Yasak MN, Sharma DSK. Using BAD for good: how best available data facilitated a precautionary policy change to better protect tiger prey in Peninsular Malaysia. Oryx (in press)Google Scholar
  36. Khalid S (2009) Task force on orang asli land. The Star. 6 MayGoogle Scholar
  37. Koh C (2009) Orang Asli seek rights. The Star. 14 JulyGoogle Scholar
  38. Koshy S (2009) Armed to help the orang asli. The Star. 3 MayGoogle Scholar
  39. Koshy S (2010) Protecting Orang Asli title rights. The Star. 1 DecemberGoogle Scholar
  40. Koshy S (2011a) Delay Act amendment. The Star. 13 MayGoogle Scholar
  41. Koshy S (2011b) Land policy not well-received by Orang Asli. The Star. 24 AugustGoogle Scholar
  42. Koshy S (2011c) Suhakam laments plans to end rights. The Star. 25 AugustGoogle Scholar
  43. Kothari A, Suri S, Singh N (1995) People and protected areas: rethinking conservation in India. Ecologist 25:188–194Google Scholar
  44. Kuek SKK (2012) Peninsula’s first orang asli blockade on ‘land grab’. Malaysiakini. 4 January. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  45. Larson AM (2011) Forest tenure reform in the age of climate change: lessons for REDD+. Glob Environ Change 21:540–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Laurance WF, Kakul T, Keenan RJ, Sayer J, Clements GR, Villegas F, Sodhi NS (2011) Predatory corporations, failing governance and the fate of forests in Papua New Guniea. Conserv Lett 4:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lim TW (2011) Critical review of the forest regulatory framework and its implementation in Malaysia. In: Scheyvens H (ed) Critical review of selected forest-related regulatory initiatives: applying a rights perspective. Institute for global environmental strategies, Kanagawa, pp 51–67Google Scholar
  48. Lim TW, Noorainie AA (2010) Wood for trees: a review of the agarwood (gaharu) trade in Malaysia. TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, Petaling JayaGoogle Scholar
  49. Malaysian Bar Council (2009) Motion proposed by Bar Council on indigenous peoples’ rights, dated 11 February (English translation). Item 7.2 of the Agenda. The 63rd Annual General Meeting of the Malaysian Bar held at the Grand Ballroom, Legend Hotel, Kuala Lumpur—14 March. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  50. Meyers GD, Mugambwa J (1993) The Mabo decision: Australian Aboriginal land rights in transition. Environ Law 23:1203Google Scholar
  51. Nah A (2008) Recognizing indigenous identity in postcolonial Malaysian law: rights and realities for the Orang Asli (aborigines) for Peninsular Malaysia. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde (BKI), 164-2/3 (2008): 212–237. Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en VolkenkundeGoogle Scholar
  52. New Straits Times (NST) (2010) Wildlife protection: Bill’s passage will be triumph for conservation. New Straits Times 20 JulyGoogle Scholar
  53. New Straits Times (NST) (2011) Orang Asli lured into trapping rich pickings. New Straits Times. 30 May. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  54. New Straits Times (NST) (2012) Govt meets Orang Asli demand. 30 March. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  55. Newmark WD, Leonard NL, Sariko HI, Gamassa DM (1993) Conservation attitudes of local people living adjacent to five protected areas in Tanzania. Biol Conserv 63:177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nicholas C (1996) The Orang Asli of Peninsular Malaysia In: Indigenous People of Asia: Many Peoples, One struggle, vol 43. Malay For Rec, p 157–176Google Scholar
  57. Nicholas C (2004) The Orang Asli and the contest for resources: indigenous politics, development and identity in Peninsular Malaysia. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, Copenhagen, Denmark and Center for Orang Asli Concerns (COAC), Subang JayaGoogle Scholar
  58. Nicholas C (2005) Who can protect the forests better? Pitching Orang Asli against professionals in protected area management in Peninsular Malaysia. International Symposium on Eco-Human Interactions in Tropical Forests, Japan Society of Tropical Ecology (JASTE), Kyoto UniversityGoogle Scholar
  59. Nicholas C, Jenita E, The YP (2010) The Orang Asli and the UNDRIP: from Rhetoric to Recognition. Center for Orang Asli Concerns, Subang JayaGoogle Scholar
  60. Olson DM, Dinerstein E (2002) The global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Ann Mo Bot Gard 89:125–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pretty J (2010) Interdisciplinary progress in approaches to address social-ecological and ecocultural systems. Environ Conserv 38:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rao M, Htun S, Zaw T, Myint T (2010) Hunting, livelihoods and declining wildlife in the Hponkanrazi Wildlife Sanctuary, North Myanmar. Environ Manage 46:143–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Richards M (1996) Protected areas, people and incentives in the search for sustainable forest conservation in Honduras. Environ Conserv 23:201–217Google Scholar
  64. Rights and Resources Initiative (RRI) (2012) What rights? A comparative analysis of developing countries’ national legislation on community and indigenous peoples’ forest tenure rights, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  65. Robinson CAJ, Daspit LL, Remis MJ (2011) Multi-faceted approaches to understanding changes in wildlife and livelihoods in a protected area: a conservation case study from the Central African Republic. Environ Conserv 38:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rodríguez-Izquierdo E, Gavin MC, Macedo-Bravo MO (2010) Barriers and triggers to community participation across different stages of conservation management. Environ Conserv 37:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD) (1993) ‘Article 10. Sustainable Use of Components of Biological Diversity’. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  68. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD) (2001) Sustainable management of non-timber forest resources. CBD Technical Series no. 6, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  69. Shaanker UR, Ganeshaiah KN, Krishnan S, Ramya R, Meera C, Aravind NA, Kumar A, Rao D, Vanaraj G, Ramachandra J, Gauthier R, Ghazoul J, Poole N, Reddy BVC (2004) Livelihood gains and ecological costs of non-timber forest product dependence: assessing the roles of dependence, ecological knowledge and market structure in three contrasting human and ecological settings in South India. Environ Conserv 31:242–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shackleton CM, Willis TJ, Brown K, Polunin NVC (2010) Reflecting on the next generation of models for community-based natural resources management. Environ Conserv 37:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Steinmetz R, Chutipong W, Seuaturien N, Chirngsaard E, Khaengkhetkarn M (2010) Population recovery patterns of Southeast Asian ungulates after poaching. Biol Conserv 143:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tan CL (2009) Department: No hunting of sambar and barking deer for two years. The Star. 22 JulyGoogle Scholar
  73. Tan CL (2011) A forest laid bare. The Star 2. 14 JuneGoogle Scholar
  74. The Star (2009) Orang asli to be relocated. 21 August. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  75. The Star (2010a) Selangor to gazette 25 orang asli villages following landmark decision. 27 MayGoogle Scholar
  76. The Star (2010b) Orang Asli view needed in amending Aboriginal Act: Bar Council. 4 DecemberGoogle Scholar
  77. The Star (2011) Orang Asli to take Kelantan government to court. 28 April. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  78. The Star (2012) 13 orang asli held for putting up blockade. 29 JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  79. Theme on Indigenous Peoples, Local Communities, Equity and Protected Areas (TILCEPA) (2008) Recognising and supporting indigenous and community conservation—ideas and experiences from the grassroots. CEESP briefing note 9. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  80. Toh WC (2010) Protect and institutionalize the Native Customary Rights of Indigenous People. Press statement by LLG Cultural Development Centre, 11 May 2010. Accessed 20 Oct 2012
  81. Waylen KA, Fischer A, McGowan PJK, Thirgood SJ, Milner-Gulland EJ (2010) Effect of local cultural context on the success of community-based conservation interventions. Conserv Biol 24:1119–1129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. West P, Brockington D (2006) An anthropological perspective on some unexpected consequences of protected areas. Conserv Biol 20:609–616Google Scholar
  83. Wong JZ, Etoh S, Sujang AB (2009) Towards sustainable community-based fishery resources management: the Tagal system of Sabah, Malaysia. In: Fish for the People 7: 18-23. Southeast Asian Fisheries Development CenterGoogle Scholar
  84. World Wide Fund for Nature-Malaysia (WWF-Malaysia) (2011) Preliminary management plan for Royal Belum State Park (RBSP). Perak, Petaling JayaGoogle Scholar
  85. Yeng AC (2010) WWF: Orang Asli being used. The Star. 10 FebruaryGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheema A. Aziz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gopalasamy R. Clements
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • D. M. Rayan
    • 1
    • 5
  • Preetha Sankar
    • 1
  1. 1.WWF-MalaysiaPetaling JayaMalaysia
  2. 2.Bandar Baru BangiMalaysia
  3. 3.Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science and School of Marine and Tropical BiologyJames Cook UniversityCairnsAustralia
  4. 4.Center for Malaysian Indigenous StudiesUniversity MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  5. 5.Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), University of KentCanterbury, KentUK

Personalised recommendations