Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 20, Issue 11, pp 2407–2426 | Cite as

A comparative study of two community-based conservation models in Nepal

  • Nabin Baral
  • Marc J. Stern
Original Paper

Abstract

Conservation areas (CAs) and community forests (CFs) are generally considered to be two successful community-based conservation (CBC) models in Nepal. Nepal’s two CAs are administered by a nongovernmental organization (NGO), and all of its CFs are administered by a government agency (GA). The goal of this research is to compare and contrast these two models using quantitative and qualitative data collected through field research in the Annapurna Conservation Area in the summer of 2007 and adjacent CFs in the fall of 2008. The Conservation Area Management Committee (CAMC) and the Community Forest User Committee (CFUC) are the functional decision-making entities at the local level in CAs and CFs, respectively. We conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews with 66 executive members of 10 CAMCs and 67 members of 9 CFUCs. While both models appear to have performed well overall, the CA under the direction of the NGO appears to have fared better with regard to (i) developing trust of local constituencies, (ii) garnering favorable attitudes among villagers, (iii) building capacity of executive members, and (iv) improving standards of living. We suggest that the particular accountabilities associated with NGOs may situate them in a better position to cultivate local governance than state entities on their own.

Keywords

Annapurna Community-based conservation Community forests Management effectiveness Nepal Park governance Protected areas management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Rufford Small Grants Foundation, UK and the Sigma Xi, USA provided the research grant. We would like to thank all the respondents for their time and alacrity. Our special thanks go to the ACAP and DFO office for granting the research permission. We appreciate the help of Som Ale, SR Jnawali, Lizan Maskey, NR Chapagain, Bhim Upadhaya, Laxmi Pun, Raj Kumar Gurung, Manish Pandey, Krishna Gurung, Ram Gurung, SK Neupane, Suresh Thapa, Janardan Bastola and Namrata Baral during the various stages of the research project.

References

  1. Acharya KP (2002) Twenty-four years of community forestry in Nepal. Int Forest Rev 4:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adhikari B (2005) Poverty, property rights and collective actions: understanding the distributive aspects of common property resource management. Environ Dev Econ 10:7–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal A (2001) Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Dev 29:1649–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agrawal A, Ostrom E (2001) Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Polit Soc 29:485–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bajracharya SB, Furley PA, Netwon AC (2005) Effectiveness of community involvement in delivering conservation benefits to the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Environ Conserv 32:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bajracharya SB, Furley PA, Newton AC (2006) Impacts of community-based conservation on local communities in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Biodivers Conserv 15:2765–2786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balint PJ, Mashinya J (2008) CAMPFIRE during Zimbabwe’s national crisis: local impacts and broader implications for community-based wildlife management. Soc Nat Resour 21:783–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baral N (2009) Institutional resilience of community-based conservation to the Maoist insurgency in Nepal. PhD dissertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. Baral N, Heinen JT (2006) The Maoist People’s War and conservation in Nepal. Polit Life Sci 24:2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baral N, Heinen JT (2007a) Decentralization and people’s participation in conservation: a comparative study from the Western Terai of Nepal. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 14:520–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baral N, Heinen JT (2007b) Resources use, conservation attitudes, management intervention and park–people relations in the Western Terai landscape of Nepal. Environ Conserv 34:64–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baral N, Stern MJ (2010) Looking back and looking ahead: local empowerment and governance in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Environ Conserv 37(1):54–63. doi: 10.1017/S0376892909990269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baral N, Stern MJ (2011) Capital stocks and organizational resilience in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Soc Nat Resour 24(10)Google Scholar
  14. Baral N, Stern MJ, Heinen JT (2007) Integrated conservation and development project life cycles in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal: Is development overpowering conservation? Biodivers Conserv 16:2903–2917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Baral N, Stern MJ, Bhattarai R (2008) Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal: implications for sustainable park finance and local development. Ecol Econ 66:218–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Baral N, Stern MJ, Heinen JT (2010) Growth, collapse and reorganization of the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal: an analysis of institutional resilience. Ecol Soc 15(3):10 [online]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art10/ Google Scholar
  17. Bray DB, Duran E, Ramos VH, Mas JF, Velazques A, McNab RB, Barry D, Radachowsky J (2008) Tropical deforestation, community forests, and protected areas in the Maya Forest. Ecol Soc 13(2):56. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss52/art56/ Google Scholar
  18. Davenport MA, Leahy JE, Anderson DH, Jakes PJ (2007) Building trust in natural resource management within local communities: a case study of the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie. Environ Manage 39:353–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Department of Forests (2010) Community forestry. Available via World Wide Web. http://www.dof.gov.np/index.php/division/community-forest-division/community-forestry. Accessed 6 July 2010
  20. Ebrahim A (2003) Accountability in practice: mechanisms for NGOs. World Dev 31:813–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellis EA, Porter-Bolland L (2008) Is community-based forest management more effective than protected areas? A comparison of land use/land cover change in two neighboring study areas of the Central Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. For Ecol Manag 256:1971–1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fortwangler C, Stern MJ (2004) Why history and culture matter—a case study from the Virgin Islands National Park. Policy Matters 13:148–160Google Scholar
  23. Gilmour DA, Fisher RJ (1991) Villagers, forests and foresters: the philosophy, process and practice of Community Forestry in Nepal. Sahayogi Press, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  24. Grumbine RE (1994) What is ecosystem management? Conserv Biol 8:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gurung CP (1995) People and their participation: new approaches to resolving conflicts and promoting cooperation. In: McNeely JA (ed) Expanding partnership in conservation. Island Press, Washington, pp 223–233Google Scholar
  26. Heinen JT, Kattel B (1992) Parks, people, and conservation: a review of management issues in Nepal’s protected areas. Popul Environ 14:49–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hockings M, Stolton S, Dudley N (2000) Evaluating effectiveness: a framework for assessing the management of protected areas. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  28. Infield M, Namara A (2001) Community attitudes and behaviour towards conservation: an assessment of a community conservation programme around Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. Oryx 35:48–60Google Scholar
  29. Jepson P (2005) Governance and accountability of environmental NGOs. Environ Sci Policy 8:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karna BK, Shivakoti GP, Webb EL (2010) Resilience of community forestry under conditions of armed conflict in Nepal. Environ Conserv. doi: 10.1017/S0376892910000263
  31. Khadka D, Nepal SK (2010) Local responses to participatory conservation in Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Environ Manage 45(2):351–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kideghesho JR, Roskaft E, Kaltenborn BP (2007) Factors influencing conservation attitudes of local people in Western Serengeti, Tanzania. Biodivers Conserv 16:2213–2230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lachapelle PR, McCool SF, Patterson ME (2003) Barriers to effective natural resource planning in a “messy” world. Soc Nat Resour 16:473–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee TM, Sodhi NS, Prawiradilaga DM (2009) Determinants of local people’s attitude toward conservation and the consequential effects on illegal resource harvesting in the protected areas of Sulawesi (Indonesia). Environ Conserv 36:157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lepp A, Holland S (2006) A comparison of attitudes toward state-led conservation and community-based conservation in the Village of Bigodi, Uganda. Soc Nat Resour 19:609–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McShane TO, Wells MP (eds) (2004) Getting biodiversity projects to work: towards more effective conservation and development. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Mehta JN, Heinen JT (2001) Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environ Manage 28:165–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mondal AH (2000) Social capital formation: the role of NGO rural development programs in Bangladesh. Policy Sci 33:459–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nagendra H, Gokhale Y (2008) Management regimes, property rights, and forest biodiversity in Nepal and India. Environ Manage 41:719–733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nyaupane GP, Thapa B (2004) Evaluation of ecotourism: a comparative assessment in the Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Nepal. J Ecotourism 3:20–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Pandit BH, Thapa GB (2003) A tragedy of non-timber forest resources in the mountain commons of Nepal. Environ Conserv 30:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pokharel RK, Suvedi M (2007) Indicators for measuring the success of Nepal’s Community Forestry program: a local perspective. Res Hum Ecol 14:68–75Google Scholar
  44. Pollnac RB, Crawford BR, Gorospe MLG (2001) Discovering factors that influence the success of community-based marine protected areas in the Visayas, Philippines. Ocean Coast Manag 44:683–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Redford KH, Sanderson SE (2000) Extracting humans from nature. Conserv Biol 14:1362–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shukla SR, Sinclair AJ (2010) Strategies for self-organization: learning from a village-level community-based conservation Initiative in India. Hum Ecol 38:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simons TL, Peterson TL (2000) Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust. J Appl Psychol 85:102–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Songorwa AN (1999) Community-based wildlife management (CWM) in Tanzania: Are the communities interested? World Dev 27:2061–2079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spiteri A, Nepal SK (2008) Evaluating local benefits from conservation in Nepal’s Annapurna Conservation Area. Environ Manage 42:391–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stern MJ (2008a) Coercion, voluntary compliance and protest: the role of trust and legitimacy in combating local opposition to protected areas. Environ Conserv 35:200–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stern MJ (2008b) The power of trust: toward a theory of local opposition to neighboring protected areas. Soc Nat Resour 21:859–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stern MJ (2010) Payoffs versus process: expanding the paradigm for park/people studies beyond economic rationality. J Sustain For 29:174–201Google Scholar
  53. Stern MJ, Blahna DJ, Cerveny LK, Mortimer MJ (2009) Visions of success and achievement in recreation-related USDA Forest Service NEPA processes. Environ Impact Assess Rev 29(4):220–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stern MJ, Predmore SA, Mortimer MJ, Seesholtz DN (2010) From the office to the field: areas of tension and consensus in the implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act within the US Forest Service. J Environ Manage 91:1350–1356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stevens S (1997) Annapurna Conservation Area: empowerment, conservation, and development in Nepal. In: Stevens S (ed) Conservation through cultural survival: indigenous peoples and protected areas. Island Press, Washington, pp 237–261Google Scholar
  56. Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manage Rev 20:571–610Google Scholar
  57. Taggar S, Ellis R (2007) The role of leaders in shaping formal team norms. Leadership Q 18:105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Teegen H, Doh JP, Vachani S (2004) The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: an international business research agenda. J Int Bus Stud 35:463–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Terborgh J (2000) The fate of tropical forests: a matter of stewardship. Conserv Biol 14:1358–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thoms CA (2008) Community control of resources and the challenge of improving local livelihoods: a critical examination of community forestry in Nepal. Geoforum 39:1452–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wells M, Brandon K, Hannah L (1992) People and parks: linking protected area management with local communities. The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  62. Western D, Wright RM, Strum SC (eds) (1994) Natural connections: perspectives in community-based conservation. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilson JQ (1989) Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Zanetell BA, Knuth BA (2004) Participation rhetoric or community-based management reality? Influences on willingness to participate in a Venezuelan freshwater fishery. World Dev 32:793–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest Resources and Environmental ConservationVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations