Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 363–383

Do Australian graziers have an offset mindset about their farm trees?

  • Kate Sherren
  • Hwan-Jin Yoon
  • Helena Clayton
  • Jacki Schirmer
Original Paper

Abstract

Worldwide, the footprint of agriculture is higher than that of any other land use, making the local decisions of millions of farmers a global force for achieving the maintenance of ecosystem services. Biodiversity offsets are increasingly used to attempt to reconcile conflicts between production and conservation. Offset policies operate on the principle of habitat substitutability, but little work has considered whether those targeted by such policies perceive nature that way. For instance, do landholders perceive trees of different arrangements, ages or species to be interchangeable? We used a large-scale landholder survey to understand how graziers manage their farm trees, and whether their beliefs are amenable to substitution. Three natural clusters were found, that: (A) liked a tidy farm but did not differentiate trees by species, age or arrangement; (B) strongly supported the need for diversity in tree cover; and, (C) preferred woodlands and connective strips to sparse trees. Those positions were consistent with their beliefs about the costs and benefits of different arrangements of trees, but were largely inconsistent with their declared tree planting and protection activities. Tree management activities were more easily explained by commodity (pro-woodland graziers (C) were most likely to be cropping) or by career stage and what that meant for time and money resources to do conservation work (contrasting A and B). Offset policies and policy incentives encouraging vegetative heterogeneity would motivate at least these first two clusters, helping to sustain a diversity of tree cover and thus ecosystem services on farms.

Keywords

Coarse woody debris Connectivity Heterogeneity Linear strips Remnant trees Scattered trees Spatial arrangement Substitutability Tree planting and protection Woodlands 

Supplementary material

10531_2011_187_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (504 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 505 kb)

References

  1. Asner G, Elmore A, Olander L et al (2004) Grazing systems, ecosystem responses, and global change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 29:261–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Government Environmental Stewardship Program. 2011. Box Gum Grassy Woodland Project, http://nrm.gov.au/stewardship/box-gum/index.html
  3. Bailey JA, Gordon R, Burgon D et al (2008) Energy conservation on Nova Scotia farms: baseline energy data. Energy 33(7):1144–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N et al (2006) Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett 9(10):1146–1156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardsley P, Chaudhri V, Stoneham G et al (2002) New directions in environmental policy. Agenda 9(3):1–12Google Scholar
  6. Bekessy SA, Wintle BA, Lindenmayer DB et al (2010) The biodiversity bank cannot be a lending bank. Conserv Lett 3(3):151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett AF, Kimber SL, and Ryan PA. 2000. Revegetation and Wildlife - A guide to enhancing revegetated habitats for wildlife conservation in rural environments. In: Bushcare National Research and Development Program Research Report. Environment Australia, Canberra Australia and Online: http://www.environment.gov.au/land/publications/pubs/revegwild.pdf
  8. Benson JS, and Redpath PA. 1997. The nature of pre-European native vegetation in south-eastern Australia: a critique of Ryan, D.G., Ryan, J.R. and Starr, B.J. (1995) The Australian Landscape - Observations of Explorers and Early Settlers. Cunninghamia 5(2):285-327Google Scholar
  9. Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18(4):182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bird PR, Bicknell D, Bulman PA et al (1992) The role of shelter in Australia for protecting soils, plants and livestock. Agrofor Syst 20:59–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boakes EH, Mace GM, McGowan PJK et al (2010) Extreme contagion in global habitat clearance. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 277:1081–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brosi BJ, Armsworth PR, Daily GC (2008) Optimal design of agricultural landscapes for pollination services. Conserv Lett 1(1):27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burgin S (2008) BioBanking: an environmental scientist’s view of the role of biodiversity banking offsets in conservation. Biodivers Conserv 17(4):807–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burton RJF (2004) Reconceptualising the ‘behavioural approach’ in agricultural studies: a socio-psychological perspective. J Rural Stud 20:359–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Byron I, Curtis A, MacKay J (2006) Benchmarking community attitudes towards natural resource management in the Lachlan catchment. Australian Government Bureau of Rural Sciences, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  16. Cary JW (1993) The nature of symbolic beliefs and environmental behaviour in a rural setting. Environ Behav 25(5):555–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Curtis A, De Lacy T (1998) Landcare, stewardship and sustainable agriculture in Australia. Environ Values 7:59–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de Groot JIM, Steg L (2008) Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior. Environ Behav 40(3):330–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Department of Sustainability and Environment. 2008. BushTender: Rethinking investment for native vegetation outcomes. The application of auctions for securing private land management agreements. State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment, East Melbourne, VIC, and Online at http://www.dse.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/100209/BushTender_rethinking_investment_web.pdf
  20. Dettman PD, Hamilton SD, Curtis AL (2000) Understanding landholder values and intentions to improve remnant vegetation management in Australia: the Box-Ironbark case study. J Sustainable Agric 16(3):93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2009) Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design methods. John Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  22. Dorrough J, Moxham C (2005) Eucalypt establishment in agricultural landscapes and implications for landscape-scale restoration. Biol Conserv 123(1):55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duncan DH, Dorrough JW (2009) Historical and current land use shape landscape restoration options in the Australian wheat and sheep farming zone. Landsc Urban Plan 91(3):124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dwyer JM, Fensham RJ, Butler DW et al (2009) Carbon for conservation: assessing the potential for win-win investment in an extensive Australian regrowth ecosystem. Agric Ecosyst Environ 134(1–2):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eldridge DJ, Freudenberger D (2005) Ecosystems wicks: woodland trees enhance water infiltration in a fragmented agricultural landscape in eastern Australia. Austral Ecology 30:336–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erb K-H, Gaube V, Krausmann F et al (2007) A comprehensive global 5 min resolution land-use dataset for the year 2000 consistent with national census data. J Land Use Sci 2(3):191–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fischer AP, Bliss JC (2008) Behavioural assumptions of conservation policy: conserving oak habitat on family-forest land in the Willamette Valley, Oregon. Conserv Biol 22(2):275–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD (2006) Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 4:80–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fischer J, Brosi B, Daily GC et al (2008) Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Front Ecol Environ 6(7):380–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fischer J, Stott J, Zerger A et al (2009) Reversing a tree regeneration crisis in an endangered ecoregion. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(25):10386–10391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fischer J, Sherren K, Stott J et al (2010a) Towards landscape-wide conservation outcomes in Australia’s temperate grazing region. Front Ecol Environ 8(2):69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fischer J, Stott J, Law BS (2010b) The disproportionate value of scattered trees. Biol Conserv 143(6):1564–1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fischer J, Zerger A, Gibbons P et al (2010c) Tree decline and the future of farmland biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(45):19597–19602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Foresight. 2011. The future of food and farming – executive summary global food and farming futures. The UK Government Office for Science, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Freudenberger D, Harvey J, Drew A (2004) Predicting the biodiversity benefits of the Saltshaker Project, Boorowa, NSW. Ecol Manag Restor 5(1):5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Frost FM (2000) Value orientations: impact and implications in the extension of complex farming systems. Aust J Exp Agric 40:511–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Frost W (2004) Australia unlimited? Environmental debate in the age of Catastrophe, 1910–1939. Environ Hist 10:285–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gibbons P, Boak M (2002) The value of paddock trees for regional conservation in an agricultural landscape. Ecol Manag Restor 3(3):205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J et al (2008) The future of scattered trees in agricultural landscapes. Conserv Biol 22:1309–1319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gibbons P, Briggs SV, Ayers D et al (2009) An operational method to assess impacts of land clearing on terrestrial biodiversity. Ecol Ind 9:26–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gibbs HK, Ruesch AS, Achard F et al (2010) Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(38):16732–16737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Goldney D, and Watson G. 1995. Marketing and social issues relevant to landholders’ management of native vegetation. In: Price P (ed) R&D on socio-economic aspects of maintaining native vegetation on agricultural land: proceedings of a national workshop and associated papers. Land and water resources research and development corporation, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  44. Greening Australia. 2009. Whole of Paddock Rehabilitation (WOPR): a new approach to regreening the farm. Greening Australia Capital Region, Canberra, ACT and online at http://www.greeningaustralia.org.au/uploads//Our%20Resources%20-%20pdfs/ACT_WOPR09.pdf
  45. Groves RM (2006) Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opin Q 70(5):646–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hodgkins D, Goldney D, Watson G et al (1999) The attitudes of landholders to a range of environmental issues, including the values of remnant bushland in the central western region of New South Wales. In: Hobbs RJ, Yates CJ (eds) Temperate eucalypt woodlands in Australia: biology, conservation, management and restoration. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping NortonGoogle Scholar
  47. House APN, MacLeod ND, Cullen B et al (2008) Integrating production and natural resource management on mixed farms in eastern Australia: the cost of conservation in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127(3–4):153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jurin RR, Fortner RW (2002) Symbolic beliefs as barriers to responsible environmental behaviour. Environ Educ Res 8(4):373–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kirkpatrick JB, Bridle KL, Edwards J et al (2007) Conserving on the run country. In: Kirkpatrick J, Bridle K (eds) People, sheep and nature conservation: the Tasmanian experience. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  50. Lal P, Lim-Applegate H, Scoccimarro MC (2001) The adaptive decision-making process as a tool for integrated natural resource management: focus, attitudes, and approach. Conserv Ecol 5(2):11Google Scholar
  51. Lawrence G, Richards CA, Cheshire L (2004) The environmental enigma: why do producers professing stewardship continue to practice poor natural resource management. J Environ Policy Plan 6(3/4):251–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lumsden LF, Bennett AF (2005) Scattered trees in rural landscapes: foraging habitat for insectivorous bats in south-eastern Australia. Biol Conserv 122:205–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lunt ID, Jones N, Spooner PG et al (2006) Effects of European colonization on indigenous ecosystems: post-settlement changes in tree stand structures in Eucalyptus-Callitris woodlands in central New South Wales, Australia. J Biogeogr 33(6):1102–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Manning AD, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2006) Scattered trees are keystone structures – implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 132:311–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Manning AD, Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB (2009) Scattered trees: a complementary strategy for facilitating adaptive responses to climate change in modified landscapes? J Appl Ecol 46(4):915–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Maron M, Fitzsimons JA (2007) Agricultural intensification and loss of matrix habitat over 23 years in the West Wimmera, south-eastern Australia. Biol Conserv 135(4):587–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Martin WK (2005) Estimates of historical tree densities in the North Lachlan River Catchment, New South Wales, Australia. Geogr Res 43(2):162–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McGuckian N, Rickards L (2009) The social dimensions of mixed farming systems. In: Tow P, Cooper I, Partridge I et al (eds) Rainfed farming systems. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Moore SA, Renton S (2002) Remnant vegetation, landholders’ values and information needs: an exploratory study in the West Australian wheatbelt. Ecol Manage Restor 3(3):179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Munro NT, Fischer J, Wood J et al (2009) Revegetation in agricultural areas: the development of structural complexity and floristic diversity. Ecol Appl 19(5):1197–1210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Norton D (2009) Biodiversity offsets: two New Zealand case studies and an assessment framework. Environ Manage 43(4):698–706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. NSW CMA. 2006. A new approach to native vegetation. NSW Catchment Management Authorities, OnlineGoogle Scholar
  63. Ozolins A, Brack C, Freudenberger D (2001) Abundance and decline of isolated trees in the agricultural landscapes of central New South Wales, Australia. Pacific Conserv Biol 7:195–203Google Scholar
  64. Pannell DJ, Marshall GR, Barr N et al (2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Aust J Exp Agric 46(11):1407–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Porter SR (2004) Overcoming survey research problems: new directions for institutional research. Jossey-Bass, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Pressey RL, Hager TC, Ryan KM et al (2000) Using abiotic data for conservation assessments over extensive regions : quantitative methods applied across New South Wales, Australia. Biol Conserv 96(1):55–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schirmer J (2009) Ethical issues in the use of multiple survey reminders. J Acad Ethics 7(1–2):125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schirmer J, Clayton H, and Sherren K (in review-a). Reversing scattered tree decline on farms: implications of landholder practice and perceptions in the Lachlan catchment, NSW. Australasian J Environ ManageGoogle Scholar
  69. Schirmer J, Dovers S, and Clayton H (in review-b). Informing policy instrument design through an examination of landholder preferences: a case study of scattered tree conservation in Australia. Conserv BiolGoogle Scholar
  70. Seabrook L, McAlpine C, Fensham R (2008) What influences farmers to keep trees? A case study from the Brigalow Belt, Queensland, Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 84(3–4):266–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sherren K, Fischer J, Clayton H et al (2010a) Integration by case, place and process: transdisciplinary research for sustainable grazing in the Lachlan River catchment, Australia. Landsc Ecol 25(8):1219–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sherren K, Fischer J, Price R (2010b) Using photography to elicit grazier values and management practices relating to tree survival and recruitment. Land Use Policy 27(4):1056–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sherren K, Fischer J, Clayton H et al (2011) Lessons from visualising the landscape and habitat implications of tree decline—and its remediation through tree planting—in Australia’s grazing landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 103(2):248–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sherren K, Fischer J, Fazey I (in press) Managing the grazing landscape: Insights for agricultural adaptation from a mid-drought photo-elicitation study in the Australian sheep-wheat belt. Agric Syst. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2011.11.001
  75. Smith FP (2008) Who’s planting what, where and why – and who’s paying? An analysis of farmland revegetation in the central wheatbelt of Western Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 86(1):66–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Spooner PG, Briggs SV (2008) Woodlands on farms in southern New South Wales: a longer-term assessment of vegetation changes after fencing. Ecol Manage Restor 9(1):33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Spooner P, Lunt I, Robinson W (2002) Is fencing enough? The short-term effects of stock exclusion in remnant grassy woodlands in southern NSW. Ecol Manage Restor 3:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. State of the Environment Advisory Council. 2006. Australia: State of the Environment Report 2006. Department of the Environment and Heritage, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  79. Streatfield S, Fifield G, Pickup M (2010) Whole of paddock rehabilitation (WOPR): a practical approach to restoring grassy box woodlands. In: Lindenmayer D, Bennett A, Hobbs R (eds) Temperate woodland conservation and management. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  80. Swift MJ, Izac A-MN, Noordwijk Mv (2004) Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes – are we asking the right questions? Agriculture. Ecosyst Environ 104(1):113–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ten Kate K, Bishop J, and Bayon R. 2004. Biodiversity offsets: views, experience, and the business case. World Conservation Union and Insight Investment, Gland, Switzerland, Cambridge and LondonGoogle Scholar
  82. Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B et al (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292:281–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson P et al (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tonts M, Halpin D, Collins J et al (2003) Rural communities and changing farm business structures: an assessment of the socio-economic impacts. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  85. Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A et al (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8(8):857–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. USDA. 2010. Livestock and poultry: world markets and trade (October 2010). United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, Online: http://www.fas.usda.gov/dlp/circular/2010/livestock_poultryfull101510.pdf
  87. Vanclay F (2004) Social principles for agricultural extension to assist in the promotion of natural resource management. Aust J Exp Agric 44:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Vesk PA, MacNally R (2006) The clock is ticking – revegetation and habitat for birds and arboreal mammals in rural landscapes of southern Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:356–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Walker S, Brower AL, Stephens RTT et al (2009) Why bartering biodiversity fails. Conserv Lett 2(4):149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Walpole SC (1999) Assessment of the economic and ecological impacts of remnant vegetation on pasture productivity. Pacific Conserv Biol 5:28–35Google Scholar
  91. Williams KJH, Cary J (2002) Landscape preferences, ecological quality, and biodiversity protection. Environ Behav 34:257–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wilson SM, Whitham JAH, Bhati UN, et al. (1995) Survey of trees on Australian farms: 1993–1994 ABARE Research report 95.7. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  93. Yiridoe EK, Atari DOA, Gordon R et al (2010) Factors influencing participation in the Nova Scotia environmental farm plan program. Land Use Policy 27(4):1097–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate Sherren
    • 1
    • 3
  • Hwan-Jin Yoon
    • 2
  • Helena Clayton
    • 1
  • Jacki Schirmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Fenner School of Environment and SocietyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Statistical Consulting UnitAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  3. 3.School for Resource and Environmental StudiesDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations