Testing the accuracy of non-experts in biodiversity monitoring exercises using fern species richness in the Ecuadorian Amazon
- 257 Downloads
Assessing environmental change is often constrained by time, money and expertise. Community-based monitoring schemes attempt to address these limitations by providing local communities with the skills to measure changes in natural resources and contribute locally relevant information for local and regional management decisions. Despite the increasing popularity of community-based monitoring schemes, there is little information about the accuracy of the data they produce. In this study we use visual guides and hands-on training to teach groups of leaders from local communities in the Ecuadorian Amazon to measure the species richness of ferns. We compare their results to data obtained by experienced field biologists and show strong positive correlations in species richness estimates between the results obtained by groups receiving visual guides, groups receiving hands-on training and biologists. Our results show that, even with relatively little training, communities can use simple and cost-effective methodologies to yield data that accurately reflect levels of species richness.
KeywordsCommunity Monitoring Training Biodiversity Ferns Ecuador
Community-based monitoring schemes
We thank all of the participants for their enthusiasm and the residents of Babaoyo who provided us with space and land to deliver the workshops. We also extend our gratitude to Rocío Paz y Mio and the Grupo Sumaco for logistical support. JAO acknowledges the financial support of a Wingate Foundation postgraduate scholarship. We kindly acknowledge the comments from the editor and one anonymous reviewer.
- Danielsen F, Mendoza MM, Alviola P, Balete DS, Enghoff M, Poulsen MK, Jensen AE (2003) Biodiversity monitoring in developing countries: what are we trying to achieve. Oryx 37:407–409Google Scholar
- Danielsen F, Burgess ND, Balmford A, Donald PF, Funder M, Jones JPG, Alviola P, Balete DS, Blomley T, Brashares J, Child B, Enghoff M, Fjedlså J, Holt S, Hübertz H, Jensen AE, Jensen PM, Massao J, Mendoza MM, Ngaga Y, Poulsen MK, Rueda R, Sam M, Skielboe T, stuart-Hill G, Topp-Jørgensen E, Yonten D (2009) Local participation in natural resource monitoring: a characterization of approaches. Conserv Biol 23:31–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Danielsen F, Skutsch M, Burgess ND, Jensen PM, Andrianandrasa H, Karky B, Lewis R, Lovett JC, Massao J, Ngaga Y, Phartiyal P, Poulsen MK, Singh SP, Solis S, Sørensen M, Tewari A, Young R, Zahabu E (2011) At the heart of REDD+: a role for local people in monitoring forests? Conserv Lett 4:158–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gardner TA, Barlow J, Araujo IS, Ávila-Pires TC, Bonaldo AB, Costa JE, Esposito MC, Ferreira LV, Hawes J, Hernandez MIM, Hoogmoed MS, Leite RN, Lo-Man-Hung NF, Malcolm JR, Martins MB, Mestre LAM, Miranda-Santos R, Overal WL, Parry L, Peters Ribeiro, Junior MA, da Silva MNF, da Silva Motta C, Peres CA (2008) The cost-effectiveness of biodiversity surveys in tropical forests. Ecol Lett 11:139–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Navarrete H (2001) Helechos comunes de la Amazonía baja ecuatoriana. Editorial Simbioe, QuitoGoogle Scholar
- Schmeller DS, Henry PY, Julliard R, Gruber B, Clober J, Dziock F, Szabolc L, Nowicki P, Déri E, Budrys E, Kull T, Tali K, Bauch B, Settele J, van Swaay C, Kobler A, Babij V, Papastergiadou E, Henle K (2008) Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe. Conserv Biol 23:307–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar