Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 20, Issue 12, pp 2615–2626 | Cite as

Testing the accuracy of non-experts in biodiversity monitoring exercises using fern species richness in the Ecuadorian Amazon

  • Johan A. OldekopEmail author
  • Anthony J. Bebbington
  • Franka Berdel
  • Nathan K. Truelove
  • Thorsten Wiersberg
  • Richard F. Preziosi
Original Paper


Assessing environmental change is often constrained by time, money and expertise. Community-based monitoring schemes attempt to address these limitations by providing local communities with the skills to measure changes in natural resources and contribute locally relevant information for local and regional management decisions. Despite the increasing popularity of community-based monitoring schemes, there is little information about the accuracy of the data they produce. In this study we use visual guides and hands-on training to teach groups of leaders from local communities in the Ecuadorian Amazon to measure the species richness of ferns. We compare their results to data obtained by experienced field biologists and show strong positive correlations in species richness estimates between the results obtained by groups receiving visual guides, groups receiving hands-on training and biologists. Our results show that, even with relatively little training, communities can use simple and cost-effective methodologies to yield data that accurately reflect levels of species richness.


Community Monitoring Training Biodiversity Ferns Ecuador 



Community-based monitoring schemes



We thank all of the participants for their enthusiasm and the residents of Babaoyo who provided us with space and land to deliver the workshops. We also extend our gratitude to Rocío Paz y Mio and the Grupo Sumaco for logistical support. JAO acknowledges the financial support of a Wingate Foundation postgraduate scholarship. We kindly acknowledge the comments from the editor and one anonymous reviewer.


  1. Andrianandrasana HT, Randriamahefasoa J, Durbin J, Lewis RE, Ratsimbazafy JH (2005) Participatory ecological monitoring of the Alaotra wetlands in Madagascar. Biodivers Conserv 14:2757–2774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker CD, Agreda A, Astudillo E, Costantino M, Torres P (2005) Community-based monitoring of fog capture and biodiversity at Loma Alta, Ecuador enhance social capital and institutional cooperation. Biodivers Conserv 14:2695–2707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Danielsen F, Mendoza MM, Alviola P, Balete DS, Enghoff M, Poulsen MK, Jensen AE (2003) Biodiversity monitoring in developing countries: what are we trying to achieve. Oryx 37:407–409Google Scholar
  4. Danielsen F, Burgess N, Balmford A (2005) Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodivers Conserv 14:2507–2542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Danielsen F, Burgess ND, Balmford A, Donald PF, Funder M, Jones JPG, Alviola P, Balete DS, Blomley T, Brashares J, Child B, Enghoff M, Fjedlså J, Holt S, Hübertz H, Jensen AE, Jensen PM, Massao J, Mendoza MM, Ngaga Y, Poulsen MK, Rueda R, Sam M, Skielboe T, stuart-Hill G, Topp-Jørgensen E, Yonten D (2009) Local participation in natural resource monitoring: a characterization of approaches. Conserv Biol 23:31–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Danielsen F, Burgess ND, Jensen PM, Pirhofer-Walzi K (2010) Environmental monitoring: the scale and speed of implementation varies according to the degree of people’s involvement. J Appl Ecol 47:1166–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danielsen F, Skutsch M, Burgess ND, Jensen PM, Andrianandrasa H, Karky B, Lewis R, Lovett JC, Massao J, Ngaga Y, Phartiyal P, Poulsen MK, Singh SP, Solis S, Sørensen M, Tewari A, Young R, Zahabu E (2011) At the heart of REDD+: a role for local people in monitoring forests? Conserv Lett 4:158–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Derraik JGB, Closs GP, Dickinson KJM, Sirvid P, Barratt BIP, Patrick BH (2002) Arthropod morphospecies versus taxonomic species: a case study of Araneae, Coleoptera and Lepidoptera. Conserv Biol 16:1015–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaidet N, Fritz H, Nyahuma C (2003) A participatory counting methods to monitor populations of large mammals in non-protected areas: a case of bicycle counts in the Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe. Biodivers Conserv 12:1571–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garcia CA, Lescuyer G (2008) Monitoring, indicators and community based management in the tropics: pretexts or red herrings? Biodivers Conserv 17:1303–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gardner TA, Barlow J, Araujo IS, Ávila-Pires TC, Bonaldo AB, Costa JE, Esposito MC, Ferreira LV, Hawes J, Hernandez MIM, Hoogmoed MS, Leite RN, Lo-Man-Hung NF, Malcolm JR, Martins MB, Mestre LAM, Miranda-Santos R, Overal WL, Parry L, Peters Ribeiro, Junior MA, da Silva MNF, da Silva Motta C, Peres CA (2008) The cost-effectiveness of biodiversity surveys in tropical forests. Ecol Lett 11:139–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldstein PZ (1997) How many things are there? A reply to Oliver and Beattie, Beattie and Oliver, Oliver and Beattie, and Oliver and Beattie. Conserv Biol 11:571–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenwood JJD (2007) Citizens, science and bird conservation. J Ornithol 148:S77–S124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hellier A, Newton AC, Ochoa Gaona S (1999) Use of indigenous knowledge for rapidly assessing trends in biodiversity: a case study from Chiapas, Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 8:869–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hopkins GW, Freckleton RP (2002) Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists: implications for conservation. Anim Conserv 5:245–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krell FT (2004) Parataxonomy vs. taxonomy in biodiversity studies—pitfalls and applicability of ‘morphospecies’ sorting. Biodivers Conserv 13:795–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lwanga JS, Balmford A, Badaaz R (1998) Assessing fern diversity: relative species richness and its environmental correlates in Uganda. Biodivers Conserv 7:1378–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mueller JG, Assanou IHB, Guimbo ID, Almedom AM (2010) Evaluating rapid participatory rural appraisal as an assessment of ethnoecological knowledge and local biodiversity patterns. Conserv Biol 24:140–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Navarrete H (2001) Helechos comunes de la Amazonía baja ecuatoriana. Editorial Simbioe, QuitoGoogle Scholar
  20. Noss AJ, Oetting I, Cuéllar RL (2005) Hunter self-monitoring by the Isoseño-Guaraní in the Bolivian Chaco. Biodivers Conserv 14:2679–2693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1993) A possible method for the rapid assessment of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 7:562–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paciencia ML, Prado J (2005) Effects of forest fragmentation on pteridophyte diversity in a tropical rainforest in Brazil. Plant Ecol 180:87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pearson DL (1994) Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversity. Philos Trans Royal Soc B 345:75–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rist J, Milner-Gulland EJ, Cowlishaw G, Rowcliffe M (2010) Hunter reporting of catch per unit effort as a monitoring tool in a bushmeat-harvesting system. Conserv Biol 24:489–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rodríguez JP (2003) Challenges and opportunities for surveying and monitoring tropical biodiversity—a response to Danielsen et al. Oryx 37:411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmeller DS, Henry PY, Julliard R, Gruber B, Clober J, Dziock F, Szabolc L, Nowicki P, Déri E, Budrys E, Kull T, Tali K, Bauch B, Settele J, van Swaay C, Kobler A, Babij V, Papastergiadou E, Henle K (2008) Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe. Conserv Biol 23:307–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sheil D, Lawrence A (2004) Tropical biologists, local people and conservation: new opportunities for collaboration. Trends Ecol Evol 19:634–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Topp-Jørgensen E, Poulsen MK, Lund JF, Massao JF (2005) Community-based monitoring of natural resources and forest quality in Montane forests and Miombo woodlands of Tanzania. Biodivers Conserv 14:2653–2677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Townsend WR, Randall Borman A, Yiyoguaje E, Mendua L (2005) Cofán Indians’ monitoring of freshwater turtles in Zábalo, Ecuador. Biodivers Conserv 14:2743–2755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van Rijsoort J, Jinfeng Z (2005) Participatory resource monitoring as a means for promoting social change in Yunnan, China. Biodivers Conserv 14:2543–2573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilkie P, Sardian A (1999) The limitations of vernacular names in an inventory study, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodivers Conserv 8:1457–1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yoccoz NG, Nichols JD, Boulinier T (2003) Monitoring of biological diversity—a response to Danielsen et al. Oryx 37:410CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johan A. Oldekop
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anthony J. Bebbington
    • 2
    • 3
  • Franka Berdel
    • 4
  • Nathan K. Truelove
    • 1
  • Thorsten Wiersberg
    • 5
  • Richard F. Preziosi
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Life Sciences, The University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Graduate School of Geography, Clark UniversityWorcesterUSA
  3. 3.Institute of Development Policy and Management, The University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  4. 4.Deutscher Entwicklungsdienst (DED)QuitoEcuador
  5. 5.Geographisches InstitutFriedrich-Wilhelms-UniversitätBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations