Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 14, pp 3835–3848 | Cite as

Recovery of indigenous butterfly community following control of invasive alien plants in a tropical island’s wet forests

  • F. B. Vincent FlorensEmail author
  • John R. Mauremootoo
  • Simon V. Fowler
  • Linton Winder
  • Cláudia Baider
Original Paper


Invasive alien species pose one of the highest threats to biodiversity, especially in isolated oceanic islands where high rates of both endemism and extinction risk also usually prevail. Few studies have investigated the impact of invasive alien plants on butterflies in insular ecosystems, despite butterflies representing a key indicator group for terrestrial arthropod diversity. Using the Pollard Technique, we quantified butterfly species richness and abundance in eight wet lowland forest areas invaded by alien plants, principally the strawberry guava (Psidium cattleianum Sabine) on the tropical volcanic island of Mauritius, and compared the results with paired adjacent forest plots that had been weeded of alien plants between 2 and 12 years previously. Butterfly assemblages in weed-infested and weeded forests were distinctly different with higher species richness and much higher butterfly abundance in the latter. At least some of these differences seemed attributable to weed removal effects on forest structure, but understanding the precise mechanisms involved will require further study. The results suggest that alien plant invasion may have contributed to the extinction of certain endemic taxa and can increase the likelihood of butterfly species extinction by reducing population sizes through reduced habitat quality. Such a shift in a forest’s butterfly assemblage is likely to have negative effects on both their indigenous predators and the plants they pollinate. It is argued that in order to maintain butterfly and other arthropod diversity and function in these forests, alien plant control must be maintained and extended beyond the current 1% of surviving forest remnants.


Arthropods Biodiversity hotspot Butterflies Canopy cover Conservation management Exotic invasive plants Forest restoration Mauritius Psidium cattleianum Weed control 



Above sea level


Conservation Management Area


Diameter at breast height


International Union for the Conservation of Nature










Million years



We thank the National Parks and Conservation Service of Mauritius for giving access to study sites and Malika Virah Sawmy, Jean-Claude Sevathian and John Williams for varied assistance. Clare Towner-Mauremootoo helped in the field. Jon Sullivan, Dominique Strasberg, Jean-Yves Meyer, Steven Goodman, Pierre-Michel Forget and two anonymous reviewers provided useful comments to improve this paper. A British Ecological Society’s Overseas Bursary awarded to the first author enabled the survey of plant communities.


  1. Baider C, Florens FBV (2006) Current decline of the ‘Dodo-tree’: a case of broken-down interactions with extinct species or the result of new interactions with alien invaders? In: Peres C, Laurance W (eds) Emerging threats to tropical forests. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Beccaloni GW, Gaston KJ (1995) Predicting the species richness of neotropical forest butterflies: Ithomiinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) as indicators. Biol Conserv 71:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bossart JL, Opuni-Frimpong E, Kuudaar S et al (2006) Richness, abundance, and complementarity of fruit-feeding butterfly species in relict sacred forests and forest reserves of Ghana. Biodivers Conserv 15:333–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brockie RE, Loope LL, Usher MB et al (1988) Biological invasions of island nature reserves. Biol Conserv 44:9–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chittka L, Schurkens S (2001) Successful invasion of a floral market. Nature 411:653CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cleary DFR (2004) Assessing the use of butterflies as indicators of logging in Borneo at three taxonomic levels. J Econ Entomol 97:429–435CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleary DFR, Mooers AO (2006) Burning and logging differentially affect endemic vs widely distributed species in Borneo. Divers Distrib 12:409–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clench HK (1966) Behavioural thermoregulation in butterflies. Ecology 47:1021–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colwell RK (2006) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.
  10. CSO (2008) Mauritius in figures. Central Statistics Office, Ministry of Finance and Economic Empowerment, MauritiusGoogle Scholar
  11. D’Antonio CM, Hughes RF, Mack M et al (1998) The response of native species to removal of invasive exotic grasses in a seasonally dry Hawaiian woodland. J Veg Sci 9:699–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis PMH, Barnes MJC (1991) The butterflies of Mauritius. J Res Lepid 30:145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Boisduval JBAD (1833) Faune entomologique de Madagascar, Bourbon et Maurice. Lépidoptères. Nouvelles Annales du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle (Paris) 2:149–270Google Scholar
  14. Dumbrell AJ, Hill JK (2005) Impacts of selective logging on canopy and ground assemblages of tropical forest butterflies: implications for sampling. Biol Conserv 125:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fabricius JC (1798) Entomologia systematica emendata et aucta. Supplementum. Hafniae: Proft & StorchGoogle Scholar
  16. Florens FBV (2008) Ecologie des forêts tropicales de l’Ile Maurice et impact des espèces introduites envahissantes. Dissertation, Université de la RéunionGoogle Scholar
  17. Florens FBV, Baider C (2007) Relocation of Omphalotropis plicosa (Pfeiffer, 1852), a Mauritius endemic landsnail believed extinct. J Molluscan Stud 73:205–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Florens FBV, Daby D, Jones CG (1998) The impact of controlling alien plants and animals on the snail fauna of forests of Mauritius. J Conchol S2:87–88Google Scholar
  19. Gauch HG (1982) Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Ghazoul J (2004) Alien abduction: disruption of native plant pollinator interactions by invasive species. Biotropica 36:156–164Google Scholar
  21. Griffiths OL, Florens FBV (2006) A field guide to the non-marine molluscs of the Mascarene Islands (Mauritius Rodrigues, Réunion) and the northern dependencies of Mauritius. Bioculture Press, MauritiusGoogle Scholar
  22. Halais P, Davy EJ (1969) Notes on the 1:100,000 agroclimatic map of Mauritius. Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute Occasional paper No. 23. MSIRI, MauritiusGoogle Scholar
  23. Hamer KC, Hill JK, Benedick S et al (2003) Ecology of butterflies in natural and selectively logged forests of northern Borneo: the importance of habitat heterogeneity. J Appl Ecol 40:150–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harvey CA, Medina A, Sanchez DM et al (2006) Patterns of animal diversity in different forms of tree cover in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Appl 16:1986–1999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Heywood VH (1979) The future of island floras. In: Bramwell D (ed) Plants and islands. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirowatari T, Makihara H, Sugiarto (2007) Effects of fires on butterfly assemblages in lowland dipterocarp forest in East Kalimantan. Entomol Sci 10:113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holloway JD, Stork NE (1991) The dimensions of biodiversity: the use of invertebrates as indicators of man’s impact. In: Hawksworth DL (ed) The biodiversity of microorganisms and invertebrates: its role in sustainable agriculture. CABI, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  28. IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List categories and criteria, v 3.1. Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Muller CB (2009) Indirect interactions between invasive and native plants via pollinators. Naturwissenschaften 96(3):339–346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Koh LP (2007) Impacts of land use change on South-east Asian butterflies: a review. J Appl Ecol 44:703–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koh LP, Sodhi NS (2004) Importance of reserves, fragments and parks for butterfly conservation in an urban landscape. Ecol Appl 14:1695–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kremen C (1992) Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecol Appl 2:203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kremen C (1994) Biological inventory using target taxa: a case study of the butterflies of Madagascar. Ecol Appl 4:407–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lawton JH, Bignell DE, Bolton B et al (1998) Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forests. Nature 391:72–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lien VV, Yuan DC (2003) The differences of butterfly (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) communities in habitats with various degrees of disturbance and altitudes in tropical forests of Vietnam. Biodivers Conserv 12:1099–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lorence DH, Sussman RW (1986) Exotic species invasion into Mauritius wet forest remnants. J Trop Ecol 2:147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Manders N (1908) The butterflies of Mauritius and Bourbon. Trans Entomol Soc Lond 4:429–454Google Scholar
  38. Montaggioni L, Nativel P (1988) La Réunion Ile Maurice: Géologie et aperçus biologiques. Guides Géologiques Régionaux, MassonGoogle Scholar
  39. Motala SM, Krell F-T, Mungroo Y et al (2007) The terrestrial arthropods of Mauritius: a neglected conservation target. Biodivers Conserv 16:2867–2881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mungroo Y (1997) Restoration of highly degraded and threatened native forests of Mauritius. In: Mungroo Y, Mauremootoo JR et al (eds) Proceedings of the workshop on Restoration of highly degraded and threatened native forests in Mauritius. Réduit, MauritiusGoogle Scholar
  41. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG et al (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. NBSAP (2006) National biodiversity strategy and action plan for the Republic of Mauritius 2006–2015. National Parks and Conservation Services, MauritiusGoogle Scholar
  43. Padya BM (1989) Weather and climate of Mauritius. MGI, Moka, MauritiusGoogle Scholar
  44. Page W, D’Argent G (1997) A vegetation survey of Mauritius. Mauritian Wildlife Foundation, MauritiusGoogle Scholar
  45. Pollard E (1977) A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv 12:115–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rouillard G, Guého J (1999) Les Plantes et leur histoire à l’île Maurice. MSM Ltd, MauritiusGoogle Scholar
  47. Safford RJ (1997) A survey of the occurrence of native vegetation remnants on Mauritius in 1993. Biol Conserv 80:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Safford RJ, Jones CG (1998) Strategies for land-bird conservation on Mauritius. Conserv Biol 12:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Samways MJ, Taylor S (2004) Impacts of invasive alien plants on red-listed South African dragonflies (Odonata). S Afr J Sci 100:78–80Google Scholar
  50. Samways MJ, Taylor S, Tarboton W (2005) Extinction reprieve following alien removal. Conserv Biol 19:1329–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. WH Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Stork NE, Srivastava DS, Watt AD et al (2003) Butterfly diversity and silvicultural practice in lowland rainforests of Cameroon. Biodivers Conserv 12(3):387–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strahm WA (1993) The conservation and restoration of the flora of Mauritius and Rodrigues. Dissertation, University of ReadingGoogle Scholar
  54. Thomas JA (1983) A quick method for estimating butterfly numbers during surveys. Biol Conserv 27:195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Trimen R (1866) Notes on the butterflies of Mauritius. Trans Entomol Soc Lond 5:329–344Google Scholar
  56. Uehara-Prado M, Brown KS, Freitas AVL (2007) Species richness, composition and abundance of fruit-feeding butterflies in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: comparison between a fragmented and a continuous landscape. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vitousek PM (1986) Biological invasions and ecosystem properties: can species make a difference? In: Mooney HA, Drake JA (eds) Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Vitousek PM, Loope LL, Stone CP (1987) Introduced species in Hawaii: biological effects ad opportunities for ecological research. Trends Ecol Evol 2:224–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walpole MJ, Sheldon IR (1999) Sampling butterflies in tropical rainforest: an evaluation of a transect walk method. Biol Conserv 87:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Williams JR (2007) Butterflies of Mauritius. Bioculture Press, MauritiusGoogle Scholar
  61. Williamson M (1981) Island populations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  62. Wood PA, Samways MJ (1991) Landscape element pattern and continuity of butterfly flight paths in an ecologically landscaped botanical garden, Natal, South Africa. Biol Conserv 58:149–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. B. Vincent Florens
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • John R. Mauremootoo
    • 3
    • 4
  • Simon V. Fowler
    • 5
  • Linton Winder
    • 6
  • Cláudia Baider
    • 7
  1. 1.UMR PVBMT (Peuplements Végétaux et Bioagresseurs en Milieu Tropical)Université de la RéunionSt Denis, La RéunionFrance
  2. 2.Department of BiosciencesUniversity of MauritiusRéduitMauritius
  3. 3.Mauritian Wildlife FoundationLa PreneuseMauritius
  4. 4.BioNET-INTERNATIONAL SecretariatEghamUK
  5. 5.Manaaki Whenua Landcare ResearchLincolnNew Zealand
  6. 6.Research and Knowledge Transfer, Innovation Centre, Rennes DriveUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
  7. 7.Mauritius Herbarium, MSIRIRéduitMauritius

Personalised recommendations