Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 9, pp 2685–2698 | Cite as

People, money, and protected areas: the collection of the caterpillar mushroom Ophiocordyceps sinensis in the Baima Xueshan Nature Reserve, Southwest China

  • Caroline S. Weckerle
  • Yongping Yang
  • Franz K. Huber
  • Qiaohong LiEmail author
Original Paper


The caterpillar mushroom Ophiocordyceps sinensis (syn. Cordyceps sinensis) is among the most valuable mushrooms in the world, and plays a major role for the local economies in its distribution area on the Tibetan Plateau and adjacent regions. Large proportions of its habitat fall into protected areas, and best practice of sustainable harvest is under discussion, considering both, O. sinensis as a valuable income source for rural poor and protection of its populations and habitat. This study aims for a detailed analysis of O. sinensis collection in a nature reserve in Southwest China. We found that harvesting is unevenly distributed among households and villages, with households who have access to the resource but lack adequate alternatives for income generation such as rewarding wage labor, fertile agricultural fields or harvest of other high value products being most involved. Although collection is de jure forbidden, authorities of the nature reserve apply adaptive management strategies for sustainable resource use. This includes the allocation of collection areas to communities based on their traditional land use strategies and the control of harvesters from outside, triggering self-policing of the resource by the local people. The strategies applied provide a promising model also for other protected areas where the caterpillar mushroom is collected.


Biodiversity conservation China Commons management Cordyceps sinensis Medicinal mushroom Natural resources Tibet Yunnan 



We thank all the inhabitants and the authorities of BX Nature Reserve for their hospitality, openness and support, making this study possible. Rolf Rutishauser and Nakul Chettri contributed valuable comments on the manuscript. We further are grateful to Michelle Olsgard Stewart, Gao Feng and Yang Kun for their support during fieldwork and Florian Schiestl for help with the statistics. The study was financed by the ICIMOD MAPs traditional knowledge network in Southwest China and the Swiss National Science Foundation (PMPD33-118635).


  1. Arora D (2008) The houses that Matsutake built. Econ Bot 62:278–290Google Scholar
  2. Baima Xueshan, Guojiaji Ziranbaohuqu (2003) Forestry Department of Yunnan Province, Government of Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Bureau of Baima Xueshan Nature Reserve, Forestry Bureau of Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Institute of Forest Inventory and Planning (eds) Baima Xueshan Nature Reserve. Yunnan Minority Press, Kunming. (云南省林业厅、迪庆藏族自治州人民政府、白马雪山国家级自然保护区管理局、迪庆藏族自治州林业局、云南省林业调查规划院编。2003。白马雪山国家级自然保护区。云南民族出版社,昆明。)Google Scholar
  3. Basurto X (2005) How locally designed access and use controls can prevent the tragedy of the commons in a Mexican small-scale fishing community. Soc Nat Resour 18:643–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belcher B, Schreckenberg K (2007) Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: a reality check. Dev Policy Rev 25:355–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkes F, Feeny D, McCay BJ, Acheson JM (1989) The benefits of the commons. Nature 340:91–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brechin SR, West PC, Harmon D, Kutay K (1991) Resident peoples and protected areas: a framework for inquiry. In: West PC, Brechin SR (eds) Resident peoples and national parks. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 5–30Google Scholar
  7. Cannon PF, Hywel-Jones NL, Maczey N, Norbu L, Tshitila, Samdup T, Lhendup P (2009) Steps towards sustainable harvest of Ophiocordyceps sinensis in Bhutan. Biodivers Conserv 18:2263–2281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cocks ML, Bangay L, Shackleton CM, Wiersum KF (2008) ‘Rich man poor man’––inter-household and community factors influencing the use of wild plant resources amongst rural households in South Africa. Int J Sust Dev World 15:198–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Galvin M, Haller T (eds) (2008) People, protected areas and global change: participatory conservation in Latin America, Africa, Asia and perspectives of the Swiss National centre of competence in research (NCCR) North-South, University of Bern, vol 3. Geogra-Bernensia, BernGoogle Scholar
  11. Grüter CC (2009) Determinants of modular societies in snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti) and other Asian colobines. Dissertation, University of Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  12. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holt FL (2005) The catch-22 of conservation: indigenous peoples, biologists, and cultural change. Hum Ecol 33:199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Parajuli DP (2006) A study on ethno-ecology, regeneration pattern, collection techniques and trade of Yartsa gunbu (Cordyceps sinensis): research in Kangchenjunga conversation area and Dolpa region of Nepal for policy recommendation.WWF Nepal Program Baluwatar, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  16. Paterson RRM (2008) Cordyceps—a traditional Chinese medicine and another fungal therapeutic biofactory? Phytochemistry 69:1469–1495CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Robbins P, McSweeney K, Chhangani AK, Rice JL (2009) Conservation as it is: illicit resource use in a wildlife reserve in India. Hum Ecol 37:559–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith EA (2001) On the coevolution of cultural, linguistic, and biological diversity. In: Maffi L (ed) On biocultural diversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 95–117Google Scholar
  19. Varghese A, Ticktin T (2008) Regional variation in non-timber forest product harvest strategies, trade and ecological impacts: the case of black dammar (Canarium strictum Roxb.) use and conservation in the Nilgiri biosphere reserve, India. Ecol Soc 13:11Google Scholar
  20. Weckerle CS, Huber FK, Yang YP, Sun WB (2006) Plant knowledge of the Shuhi in the Hengduan Mountains, Southwest China. Econ Bot 60:3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Winkler D (2008) Yartsa Gunbu (Cordyceps sinensis) and the fungal commodification of Tibet’s rural economy. Econ Bot 62:291–305Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caroline S. Weckerle
    • 1
  • Yongping Yang
    • 2
  • Franz K. Huber
    • 3
  • Qiaohong Li
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Systematic BotanyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Kunming Institute of BotanyChinese Academy of SciencesHeilongtanPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Society, Environment and CultureInstitute for Environmental DecisionsZurichSwitzerland
  4. 4.Centre for Mountain Ecosystem StudiesKunming Institute of BotanyHeilongtanPeople’s Republic of China
  5. 5.World Agroforestry CentreChina ProgramHeilongtanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations