Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 1009–1024

The livelihood impacts of oil palm: smallholders in Indonesia

Original Paper

Abstract

The biodiversity and climate consequences of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) expansion across South East Asia have received considerable attention. The human side of the issue, highlighted with reports of negative livelihood outcomes and rights abuses by oil palm companies, has also led to controversy. Oil palm related conflicts have been widely documented in Indonesia yet uptake by farmers has also been extensive. An assessment of the livelihood impacts of oil palm development, including sources of conflict, is needed to shed light on the apparent contradiction between these reports and the evident enthusiasm of farmers to join the oil palm craze thereby informing future expansion. We assessed the impact of oil palm development on the economic wellbeing of rural farmers in Indonesia. We found that many smallholders have benefited substantially from the higher returns to land and labour afforded by oil palm but district authorities and smallholder cooperatives play key roles in the realisation of benefits. Conflicts between communities and companies have resulted almost entirely from lack of transparency, the absence of free, prior, and informed consent and unequal benefit sharing, and have been exacerbated by the absence of clear land rights. We make specific recommendations to improve the present situation and foster the establishment of smallholder friendly production regimes. Oil palm expansion in Indonesia is set to continue. If environmental standards can be raised and policy interventions targeted at the broader social impacts of land development this expansion may be achieved to the significant benefit of large numbers of rural smallholders.

Keywords

Agriculture Agroforestry Elaeis guineensis Income Land tenure Livelihood Oil palm Rubber Rural development Shifting cultivation 

Abbreviations

CPO

Crude palm oil

FFB

Fresh fruit bunches

NAV

Net added value

NGO

Non governmental organisation

NES

Nucleus estates and smallholder

NTFP

Non timber forest product

RSPO

Roundtable on sustainable palm oil

References

  1. Adnan H, Yentirizal (2007) Blessing or misfortune? locals, transmigrants and collective action. CIFOR Governance brief no. 36. CIFOR, Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous (2007) Kill king corn. Nature 449:637Google Scholar
  3. Armbruster WJ, Coyle WT (2006) Pacific food system outlook 2006–2007: the future role of biofuels. Pacific Economic Cooperation Council, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  4. BAPPEDA, BPS (2006) Produk Domestik Regional Bruto PDRB 2002–2006. Kabupaten BungoGoogle Scholar
  5. Belcher B, Rujehan, Imang N, Achdiawan R (2004) Rattan, rubber or oil palm: cultural and financial considerations for farmers in Kalimantan. Econ Bot 58:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouamrane M (1996) A season of gold—putting a value on harvests from Indonesian agroforests. Agrofor Today 8:8–10Google Scholar
  7. Bungo BPS (2007) Bungo dalam angka 2006. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Bungo, Muara Bungo, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler RA, Laurance W (2009) Is oil palm the next emerging threat to the Amazon. Trop Conserv Sci 2:1–10Google Scholar
  9. Butler RA, Koh LP, Ghazoul J (2009) REDD in the red: palm oil could undermine carbon payment schemes. Conserv Lett 2:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carney D (1999) Approaches to sustainable livelihoods for the rural poor. ODI Poverty Briefing, ODI, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Casson A (2000) The hesitant boom: Indonesia’s oil palm sub-sector in an era of economic crisis and political change. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Chong WK (2008) Oil palm development and land management in Bungo district, Jambi, Indonesia. MSc dissertation, University of Technology and Sciences, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
  13. CIFOR (2000) Kabar dari. Tim pendamping pemetaan desa partisipatif hulu sungai Malinau. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  14. CIFOR (2003) CIFOR helps village win major environmental award p3-4 In CIFOR News 33. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  15. CIFOR (2008) The impacts and opportunities of oil palm in Southeast Asia: What do we know and what do we need to know? Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  16. Colchester M, Ferrari MF (2007) Making FPIC—free, prior and informed consent-work: challenges and prospects for indigenous peoples. Forest Peoples Programme, Moreton-in-Marsh, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Colchester M, Jiwan N (2006) Ghosts on our own land: Indonesian oil palm smallholders and the roundtable on sustainable palm oil. Forest Peoples Programme, and Perkumpulan Sawit Watch, Moreton-in-Marsh, UK, and Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  18. Colchester M, Aik Pang W, Meng Chuo W, Jalong T (2007) Land is life: land rights and oil palm development in Sarawak. Forest Peoples Programme, and Perkumpulan Sawit Watch, Moreton-in-Marsh, UK, and Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  19. Dudley RG, Sheil D, Colfer C (2008) Simulating oil palm expansion requires credible approaches that address real issues. Ecol Soc 13:r1. Available via http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/resp1/. Accessed 15 June 2009
  20. Eye on Aceh (2007) The “Golden” Crop? Palm oil in post-Tsunami Aceh. Aceh: Eye on Aceh. Available via http://www.aceh-eye.org/data_files/english_format/ngo/ngo_eoa/ngo_eoa_2007_09_00.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2009
  21. FAO (2007) FAOSTAT online statistical service. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome. Available via http://faostat.fao.org. Accessed 15 June 2009
  22. Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319:1235–1238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Feintrenie L, Levang P (2009) Sumatra’s rubber agroforests: advent, rise and fall of a sustainable cropping system. Small-Scale For 8:323–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feintrenie L, Chong WK, Levang P (2009) How to influence oil palm development in order to make it benefit local people and prevent uncontrolled deforestation? Abstracts of the XIII World Forestry Congress, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 19–23 October 2009Google Scholar
  25. Fitzherbert EB, Struebig MJ, Morel A, Danielson F, Brühl CA, Donald PF, Phalan B (2008) How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends Ecol Evol 23:538–545CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. FOE (2008) Losing ground the human rights impacts of oil palm plantation expansion in Indonesia. Friends of the Earth, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaiser NM (2009) Perceptions of oil palm cultivation in West Kalimantan—local farmers between development, conservation and indigenous rights discourses. Dissertation, University of Freiburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  28. Index Mundi (2009) Available via http://www.indexmundi.com/commodities. Accessed 15 June 2009
  29. Jacquemard JC (1995) Le palmier à huile. Le technicien d’agriculture tropical. Maisonneuve et Larose, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  30. James WE (2008) Food prices and inflation in developing Asia: Is poverty reduction coming to an end? Asian Development Bank, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  31. Koczberski G, Gibson G, Curry K (2001) Improving productivity of the smallholder oil palm sector in Papua New Guinea: a socio-economic study of the Hoskins and Popondetta schemes. The Australian National UniversityGoogle Scholar
  32. Koh LP, Ghazoul J (2008) Biofuels, biodiversity, and people: understanding the conflicts and finding opportunities. Biol Conserv 141:2450–2460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koh LP, Wilcove DS (2007) Cashing in palm oil for conservation. Nature 448:993–994CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Koh LP, Wilcove DS (2008) Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? Conserv Lett 1:60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koh LP, Wilcove DS (2009) Oil palm: disinformation enables deforestation. Trends Ecol Evol 24:67–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Levang P (2002) Peoples’ dependencies on forest. In forest, science and sustainability: the Bulungan Model Forest. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  37. Levang P, Sheil D, Kanninen M (2008) Le palmier à huile, Dr Jekill pour l’énergie, Mr Hyde pour la biodiversité. Liaison énergie-francophonie Numéro Spécial pp 26–31Google Scholar
  38. McCarthy J, Zen Z (2010) Regulating the oil palm boom: assessing the effectiveness of environmental governance approaches to agro-industrial pollution in Indonesia. Law Policy 32(1):153–179Google Scholar
  39. Ministry of Agriculture of Indonesia (2009) Keynote address at the MAKSI Conference, Bogor, November 24, 2009Google Scholar
  40. Mongabay (2008) Palm oil boycott an unrealistic approach to conserving biodiversity. Available via http://news.mongabay.com/2008/0415-palm_oil_conservation.html. Accessed 15 June 2009
  41. OECD-FAO (2008) Agricultural outlook 2008–2017. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsGoogle Scholar
  42. Orth MG (2009) The Noble Savage Fancies Development. Determinants of community responses to forest conversion plans in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Dissertation, Technical University Dresden, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  43. Pickett J, Anderson D, Bowles D, Bridgwater T, Jarvis P, Mortimer N, Poliakoff M, Woods J (2008) Sustainable biofuels: prospects and challenges. The Royal Society, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  44. Potter L, Lee J (1998) Tree planting in Indonesia: trends, impacts and directions. Occasional paper no. 18. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  45. Profil Daerah (2006) Kabupaten Bungo Tahun 2006. Kabupaten BungoGoogle Scholar
  46. Rahman SH, Ahmed AM, Bauer A, Bhushan I, Carrasco B, Chatterjee S, Dawson RLT, Fawcett B, Hussain A, James WE, Kannan K, Lin T, Mitra S, Olega A, Renfro RZH, Roche FC, Shrestha S, Siddiq A, Srinivasan R, Zahid SN, Zhuang J, Zhukov EG, Alamgir M (2008) Soaring food prices: response to the crisis. Asian Development Bank, Manila, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  47. Rist L, Lee JSH, Koh LP (2009) Biofuels: social benefits. Science 326:1344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Sandker M, Suwarno A, Campbell BM (2007) Will forests remain in the face of oil palm expansion? Simulating change in Malinau, Indonesia. Ecol Soc 12:37. Available via http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art37. Accessed 15 June 2009
  49. Sandker M, Campbell BM, Suwarno A (2008) What are participatory scoping models? Ecol Soc 13:r2. Available via http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/resp2 . Accessed 15 June 2009
  50. SawitWatch (2005) Briefing paper following second meeting of RSPO Criteria Working Group. Available via http://www.forestpeoples.org/documents/prv_sector/oil_palm/rspo_feb05_briefing_eng.shtml. Accessed 15 June 2009
  51. Simeh A, Tengku Ahmad TMA (2001) Regional workshop on commodity export diversification and poverty reduction in South and South-East Asia: the case study on Malaysian palm oil. Available via http://r0.unctad.org/infocomm/Diversification/bangkok/onion.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2009
  52. Susila WR (2004) Contribution of oil palm industry to economic growth and poverty alleviation in Indonesia. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian 23:107–114Google Scholar
  53. Suyanto S (2007) Underlying cause of fire: different form of land tenure conflicts in Sumatra. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 12:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Syafriel A (2009) Crude palm oil increases: Fact or fiction? The Jakarta Post 17th June 2009. Available via http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/06/17/crude-palm-oil-price-increases-fact-or-fiction.html. Accessed 15th June 2009
  55. Therville C, Feintrenie L, Levang P (in press) What do farmers think about forest conversion to plantations? Lessons learnt from Bungo district (Jambi, Indonesia). Forests, trees and livelihoodsGoogle Scholar
  56. USDA‐FAS (2009) Commodity intelligence report. United States Department of Agriculture‐Foreign Agricultural Service (USDA‐FAS), Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  57. Vermeulen S, Goad N (2006) Towards better practice in smallholder palm oil production. Natural Resources Issues Series 5, IIED, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  58. Wakker E (2006) The Kalimantan Border Oil Palm mega-project. Friends of the Earth Netherlands and the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation (SSNC), AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilson (2009) Palm oil boycott will hurt impoverished farmers. Available at http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/08/05/2646364.htm. Accessed 15 June 2009
  60. WRI (2007) EarthTrends: environmental Information. World Resources Institute (WRI), Washington. DC. Available at http://earthtrends.wri.org. Accessed 15 June 2009
  61. WRM (2001) The bitter fruit of oil palm: dispossession and deforestation. World Rainforest Movement, UKGoogle Scholar
  62. Zen Z, Barlow C, Gondowarsito R (2005) Oil palm in Indonesian socio-economic improvement: a review of options. Working paper, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. Available via http://rspas.anu.edu.au/economics/publish/papers/wp2005/wp-econ-2005-11.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2009

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucy Rist
    • 1
  • Laurène Feintrenie
    • 2
    • 3
  • Patrice Levang
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Terrestrial EcosystemsEcosystem Management, ETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Institut de Recherche pour le DéveloppementBoulevard de Dunkerque CS 90009MarseilleFrance
  3. 3.Centre for International Forestry Research, BogorBogorIndonesia

Personalised recommendations