Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 7, pp 1933–1961 | Cite as

Secondary forests on anthropogenic soils in Brazilian Amazonia conserve agrobiodiversity

  • André Braga Junqueira
  • Glenn Harvey ShepardJr.
  • Charles R. Clement
Original Paper

Abstract

Throughout Brazilian Amazonia anthropogenic soils that are the product of pre-Columbian settlements are called Terra Preta de Índio (Indian Dark Earths, TPI). These soils are dramatically different from surrounding soils due to long-term human activity, but there is little information about how secondary forest succession is affected by these differences. We tested if community structure (density, richness and basal area), floristic composition and domesticated species’ richness and density were similar between TPI and non-anthropogenic soils (NAS) in 52 25 × 10 m secondary forest plots in different successional stages near three traditional communities along the middle Madeira River, Central Amazonia. We sampled 858 woody individuals on TPI (77 domesticated) and 1095 on NAS (27 domesticated); 550 understory palms on TPI (169 domesticated) and 778 on NAS (123 domesticated). We found 179 species on TPI (10 domesticated), 190 on NAS (8 domesticated), and 74 (25%) in both environments. Although community structure on TPI and NAS was fairly similar, they showed significantly distinctive floristic compositions, both for woody individuals and understory palms. The density and richness of domesticated species was significantly higher on TPI than on NAS for woody individuals, but not for palms. The intimate long-term association of TPI with human activity has lead to the formation of distinct secondary forests and has favored the concentration of domesticated populations of crop species. Hence, secondary forests on anthropogenic soils concentrate agrobiodiversity, offering advantages for in situ conservation of genetic resources, and are unique ecosystems that should be considered in conservation efforts.

Keywords

Community structure Amazonian dark earths Plant domestication Secondary succession Succession management Traditional resource management 

Abbreviations

ANCOVA

Analysis of covariance

EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária)

The Portuguese acronym for the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation)

IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística)

The Portuguese acronym for the Brazilian Institute of geography and statistics

INPA (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia)

The Portuguese acronym for the National Research Institute for Amazonia

IUSS

International Union of Soil Science.

LTSP/INPA (Laboratório Temático de Solos e Plantas)

the Portuguese acronym for the Soil and Plant Thematic Laboratory of INPA

MANOVA

Multivariate analysis of variance

NAS

Non-anthropogenic soils.

NMDS

Non-metric multidimensional scaling

PCA

Principal components analysis

TPI (Terra Preta de Índio)

The Portuguese acronym for Indian black earths, also called Indian dark earths and Amazonian dark earths

References

  1. Aide TM, Zimmermann JK, Herrera L, Rosario M, Serrano M (1995) Forest recovery in abandoned tropical pastures in Puerto Rico. For Ecol Manage 77:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aide TM, Zimmerman JK, Pascarella JB, Rivera L, Marcano-Vega H (2000) Forest regeneration in a chronosequence of tropical abandoned pastures: implications for Restoration Ecology. Rest Ecol 8:328–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrade EB (1983) Relatório de expedição para coleta de germoplasma de caiaué [Elaeis oleifera (H.B.K.) Cortés] na Amazônia brasileira. EMBRAPA/CNPSD, ManausGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrade A (1986) Investigación arqueologica de los antrosoles de Araracuara. Fundación de Investigaciones Nacionales 31:1–103Google Scholar
  5. Balée W, Campbell DG (1990) Evidence for the successional status of liana forest (Xingu River basin, Amazonian Brazil). Biotr 22:36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balée W, Gély A (1989) Managed forest succession in Amazonia: the Ka’apor case. In: Posey DA, Balée W (eds) Resource management in Amazonia: indigenous and folk strategies. Advances in economic botany, vol 7. The New York Botanical Garden, New York, pp 129–158Google Scholar
  7. Barcelos E (1986) Características genético-ecológicas de populações naturais de caiaué [Elaeis oleifera (H.B.K.) Cortés) na Amazônia Brasileira. Dissertation, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia/Fundação Universidade do AmazonasGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernard HR (2002) Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Alta Mira Press, Walnut CreekGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown S (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. FAO forestry paper 134. http://www.fao.org/documents. Cited 2 Jun 2009
  10. Campbell DG, Ford A, Lowell K, Walker J, Lake JK, Ocampo-Raeder C, Townesmith A, Balick M (2006) The Feral forests of the Eastern Petén. In: Balée W, Erickson L (eds) Time and complexity in historical ecology: studies in the neotropical lowlands. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Capers RS, Chazdon RL, Brenes AR, Alvarado BV (2005) Successional dynamics of woody seedling communities in wet tropical secondary forests. J Ecol 93:1071–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castilho CV, Magnusson WE, Araújo RNO, Luizão RCC, Luizão FJ, Lima AP, Higuchi N (2006) Variation in aboveground tree live biomass in a central Amazonian forest: effects of soil and topography. For Ecol Manage 234:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chao A, Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Shen TJ (2005) A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecol Let 8:148–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapin FS, Vitousek PM, Van Cleve K (1986) The nature of nutrient limitation in plant communities. Am Nat 127:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chauvel A, Lucas Y, Boulet R (1987) On the genesis of the soil mantle of the region of Manaus, central Amazonia, Brazil. Experientia 43:234–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chazdon RL (2003) Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 6:51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chazdon RL, Letcher SG, van Breugel M, Martínez-Ramos M, Bongers F, Finegan B (2007) Rates of change in tree communities of secondary Neotropical forests following major disturbances. Phil Trans R Soc B 362:273–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chinea JD (2002) Tropical forest succession on abandoned farms in the Humacao Municipality of eastern Puerto Rico. For Ecol Manage 167:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clement CR (1999) 1492 and the loss of Amazonian crop genetic resources: I. The relation between domestication and human population decline. Econ Bot 53:188–202Google Scholar
  20. Clement CR, McCann JM, Smith NJH (2003) Agrobiodiversity in Amazonia and its relationships with Dark Earths. In: Lehmann D, Kern D, Glaser B, Woods W (eds) Amazonian dark earths: origin, properties, and management. Kluwer Academic Publ, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  21. Clement CR, Klüppel MP, German LA, Almeida SS, Major J, Aragão LEOC, Guix JC, Lleras E, WinklerPrins AMGA, Hecht SB, McCann JM (2009) Diversidade vegetal em solos antrópicos da Amazônia. In: Teixeira WG, Kern DC, Mádari B, Lima HN, Woods W (eds) As Terras Pretas de Índio na Amazônia: sua caracterização e uso deste conhecimento na criação de novas áreas. Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental, ManausGoogle Scholar
  22. de Rouw A (1993) Regeneration by sprouting in slash and burn rice cultivation, Tai rain forest, Cote d’Ivoire. J Trop Ecol 9:387–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Denevan WM (2001) Cultivated landscapes of native Amazonia and the Andes. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Denevan WM, Padoch C (1987) Introduction: the Bora agroforestry project. In: Denevan WM, Padoch C (eds) Swidden fallow agroforestry in the Peruvian Amazon. Advances in economic botany, vol 5. The New York Botanical Garden, New York, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  25. DeWalt SJ, Maliakal SK, Denslow JS (2003) Changes in vegetation structure and composition along a tropical forest chronosequence: implications for wildlife. For Ecol Manage 182:139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dieleman JA, Mortensen DA, Buhler DD, Ferguson RB (2000) Identifying associations among site properties and weed species abundance. II: Hypothesis generation. Weed Sci 48:576–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dufrene M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible assymetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366Google Scholar
  28. Eden MJ, Bray W, Herrera LF, McEwan C (1984) Terra preta soils and their archaeological context in the Caquetá Basin of southeast Colombia. Am Antiquity 49:125–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (1999) Manual de análises químicas de solos, plantas e fertilizantes. Embrapa Solos, Embrapa Informática Agropecuária, Embrapa Comunicação para Transferência de Tecnologia, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  30. Erickson C (2003) Historical ecology and future explorations. In: Lehmann J, Kern D, Glaser B, Woods W (eds) Amazonian dark earths: origin, properties and management. Kluwer Academics Publisher, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  31. Ewel JJ, Berish C, Brown B, Price N, Raich J (1981) Slash and burn impacts on a Costa Rican wet forest site. Ecology 62:816–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fahmy T, Aubry P (2003) XLSTAT, version 7.0. Society Addinsoft, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Falcão NPS, Clement CR, Tsai SM, Cornerford NB (2009) Pedology, fertility and biology of Central Amazonian dark earths. In: Woods W, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Steiner C, Winklerprins A (eds) Terra Preta Nova: a tribute to Wim Sombroek. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  34. Fearnside PM, Guimarães WM (1996) Carbon uptake by secondary forests in Brazilian Amazonia. For Ecol Manage 80:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Feldpausch TR, Riha SJ, Fernandes ECM, Wandelli E (2005) Development of forest structure and leaf area in secondary forests regenerating on abandoned pastures in Central Amazonia. Earth Interact 9:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Finegan B (1996) Pattern and process in Neotropical secondary rain forests: the first 100 years of succession. Trends Ecol Evol 11:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ford A, Nigh R (2009) Origins of the Maya forest garden: Maya resource management. J Ethnobio 29:213–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fraser JA, Clement CR (2008) Dark earths and manioc cultivation in Central Amazonia: a window on pre-Columbian agricultural systems? Bol Mus Para Emílio Goeldi Ciências Humanas 3:175–194Google Scholar
  39. Fraser JA, Cardoso T, Junqueira AB, Falcão NPS, Clement CR (2009) Historical ecology and dark earths in whitewater and blackwater landscapes: comparing the Middle Madeira and Lower Negro Rivers. In: Woods W, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Steiner C, Winklerprins A (eds) Terra Preta Nova: a tribute to Wim Sombroek. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  40. Gehring C, Denich M, Kanashiro M, Vlek PLG (1999) Response of secondary vegetation in Eastern Amazonia to relaxed nutrient availability constraints. Biogeochemistry 45:223–241Google Scholar
  41. Gehring C, Denich M, Vlek PLG (2005) Resilience of secondary forest regrowth after slash-and-burn agriculture in central Amazonia. J Trop Ecol 21:519–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. German LA (2003a) Historical contingencies in the coevolution of environment and livelihood: contributions to the debate on Amazonian black earth. Geoderma 111:307–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. German LA (2003b) Ethnoscientific understandings of Amazonian dark earths. In: Lehmann J, Kern D, Glaser B, Woods W (eds) Amazonian dark earths–origin, properties, and management. Kluwer Academic Publisher, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  44. Glaser B (2007) Prehistorically modified soils of central Amazonia: a model for sustainable agriculture in the twenty-first century. Phil Trans R Soc B 362:187–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (2001) EcoSim: null models software for ecology, Version 7.0. Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear, Jericho. http://garyentsminger.com/ecosim.htm
  47. Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Guariguata MR, Ostertag R (2001) Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics. For Ecol Manage 148:185–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hiraoka M, Yamamoto S, Matsumoto E, Nakamura S, Falesi I, Baena ARC (2003) Contemporary use and management of Amazonian dark earths. In: Lehmann J, Kern D, Glaser B, Woods W (eds) Amazonian Dark Earths: origin, properties, and management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  50. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2001) Mapa de solos do Brasil. http://www.ibge.gov.br. Cited 2 Jun 2009
  51. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2004) Mapa de vegetação do Brasil. http://www.ibge.gov.br. Cited 2 Jun 2009
  52. Irvine D (1989) Succession management and resource distribution in an Amazonian rain forest. In: Posey DA, Balée W (eds) Resource management in Amazonia: indigenous and folk strategies. Advances in economic botany, vol 7. The New York Botanical Garden, New York, pp 223–237Google Scholar
  53. IUSS Working Group WRB (2007) World reference base for soil resources 2006, first update 2007. World soil resources reports 103. FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/ag/AGL/agll/wrb/default.stm. Cited 2 Jun 2009
  54. Kern DC (1996) Geoquímica e pedoquímica em sítios arqueológicos com terra preta na floresta de Caxiuanã (Portel), Pará. PhD Thesis, Universidade Federal do ParáGoogle Scholar
  55. Kern DC, D’Aquino G, Rodrigues TE, Frazão FJL, Sombroek W, Myers TP, Neves EG (2003) Distribution of Amazonian dark earths in the Brazilian Amazon. In: Lehmann J, Kern D, Glaser B, Woods W (eds) Amazonian dark earths–origin, properties, and management. Kluwer Academic Publisher, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  56. Kumar BM, Nair PKR (2004) The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Syst 61:135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Laurance WF, Fearnside PM, Laurance SG, Delamonica P, Lovejoy TE, Rankin-de-Merona JM, Chambers J, Gascon C (1999) Relationship between soils and Amazon forest biomass: a landscape-scale study. For Ecol Manage 118:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lehmann J, Kern D, German L, McCann J, Martins GC, Moreira A (2003a) Soil fertility and production potential. In: Lehmann J, Kern D, Glaser B, Woods W (eds) Amazonian dark earths–origin, properties, and management. Kluwer Academic Publisher, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  59. Lehmann J, Silva JP Jr, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003b) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferrasol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Major J, DiTommaso A, German L, McCann J (2003) Weed population dynamics and management on Amazonian dark earth. In: Lehmann J, Kern D, Glaser B, Woods W (eds) Amazonian dark earths–origin, properties, and management. Kluwer Academic Publisher, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  61. Major J, DiTommaso A, Lehmann J, Falcão NPS (2005) Weed dynamics on Amazonian dark earth and adjacent soils of Brazil. Agr Ecosyst Environ 111:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Maxted N, Kell SP, Ford-Lloyd BV (2008) Crop wild relative and use: establishing the context. In: Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Kell SP, Irinodo JM, Dulloo ME, Turok J (eds) Crop wild relative conservation and use. CABI International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  63. McCann JM (2003) Subsidy from culture: anthropogenic soils and vegetation in Tapajônia, Brazilian Amazonia. Dissertation, University of WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  64. McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD for Windows: multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 4.25. MjM Software, OregonGoogle Scholar
  65. Mesquita RCG, Ickes K, Ganade G, Williamson GB (2001) Alternative successional pathways in the Amazon Basin. J Ecol 89:528–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mittelbach GG, Steiner CF, Scheiner SM, Gross KL, Reynolds HL, Waide RB, Willig MR, Dodson SI, Gough L (2001) What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology 82:2381–2396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Moran EF (1981) Developing the Amazon. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  68. Moran EF, Brondizio ES, Tucker JM, Silva-Forsberg MCS, McCracken S, Falesi I (2000) Effects of soil fertility and land-use on forest succession in Amazonia. For Ecol Manage 139:93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Morcote-Ríos G, Bernal R (2001) Remains of palms (Palmae) at archaeological sites in the new world: a review. Botanical Rev 67:309–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Neves EG, Petersen JB, Bartone RN, da Silva CA (2003) Historical and socio-cultural origins of Amazonian dark earths. In: Lehmann J, Kern D, Glaser B, Woods W (eds) Amazonian dark earths–origin, properties, and management. Kluwer Academic Publisher, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  71. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens HH, Wagner H (2009) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 1.15-4. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
  72. Parker E (1992) Forest islands and Kayapó resource management in Amazonia: a reappraisal of the Apêtê. Am Anthropol 94:406–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pascarella JB, Aide TM, Serrano MI, Zimmerman JK (2000) Land-use history and forest regeneration in the Cayey Mountains, Puerto Rico. Ecosystems 3:217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Paz-Rivera C, Putz FE (2009) Anthropogenic soils and tree distributions in a lowland forest in Bolivia. Biotropica 41:665–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Peña-Claros M (2003) Changes in forest structure and species composition during secondary forest succession in the Bolivian Amazon. Biotropica 35:450–461Google Scholar
  76. Posey DA (1984) A preliminary report on diversified management of tropical forest by the Kayapó Indians of the Brazilian Amazon. In: Prance GT, Kallunki JA (eds) Ethnobotany in the neotropics. Advances in economic botany, vol 1. The New York Botanical Garden, New York, pp 112–126Google Scholar
  77. Posey DA (1992) Reply to Parker. Am Anthropol 94:441–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rapp Py-Daniel LH (2007) Caracterização da área amostrada. In: Rapp Py-Daniel LH, Deus CP, Henriques AL, Pimpão DM, Ribeiro OM (eds) Biodiversidade do médio Madeira: bases científicas para propostas de conservação. INPA, ManausGoogle Scholar
  79. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna. http://www.r-project.org
  80. Silva KE, Pereira KP (2005) Alterações na cobertura vegetal dos municípios do Sul do Amazonas. In: Anais do XII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, Goiânia, 16–21 April 2005Google Scholar
  81. Simões MF, Lopes DF (1987) Pesquisas arqueológicas no baixo/médio rio Madeira (Amazonas). Revista de Arqueologia 4:117–134Google Scholar
  82. Smith NJH (1980) Anthrosols and human carrying capacity in Amazonia. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 70:553–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry–the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 2nd edn. W.H. Freeman & Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  84. Sombroek W, Kern D, Rodrigues TI, Cravo MS, Jarbas TC, Woods W, Glaser B (2002) Terra Preta and Terra Mulata: pre-Columbian Amazon kitchen middens and agricultural fields, their sustainability and their replication. Paper presented at the 17th World congress of soil science, Bangkok, 14–20 August 2002Google Scholar
  85. Sombroek W, Ruivo MDL, Fearnside PM, Glaser B, Lehmann J (2003) Amazonian dark earths as carbon stores and sinks. In: Lehmann J, Kern D, Glaser B, Woods W (eds) Amazonian dark earths–origin, properties, and management. Kluwer Academic Publisher, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  86. Stevens MHH, Carson WP (1999) Plant density determines species richness along an experimental fertility gradient. Ecology 80:455–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stevens MHH, Carson WP (2002) Resource quantity, not resource heterogeneity, maintains plant diversity. Ecol Lett 5:420–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tilman D (1987) Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecol Monogr 57:189–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Uhl C, Clark K, Murphy P (1981) Early plant succession after cutting and burning in the upper Rio Negro region of the Amazon basin. J Ecol 69:631–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Uhl C, Jordan C, Clark K, Clark H, Herrera R (1982) Ecosystem recovery in Amazon caatinga forest after cutting, cutting and burning, and bulldozer clearing treatments. Oikos 38:313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Uhl C, Buschbacher R, Serrao AS (1988) Abandoned pastures in eastern Amazonia: I. Patterns of plant succession. J Ecol 76:663–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Waide RB, Willig MR, Steiner CF, Mittelbach G, Gough L, Dodson SI, Juday GP, Parmenter R (1999) The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:257–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wilkinson L (2002) Systat software, v. 10.2. Systat software, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  94. Woods WI, Denevan WM (2009) Amazonian dark earths: the first century of reports. In: Woods W, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Steiner C, Winklerprins A (eds) Terra Preta Nova: a tribute to Wim Sombroek. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  95. Woods WI, McCann JM (1999) The anthropogenic origin and persistence of Amazonian dark earths. In: The yearbook of the conference of Latin Americanist Geographers, vol 25. Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, pp 7–14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • André Braga Junqueira
    • 1
  • Glenn Harvey ShepardJr.
    • 2
  • Charles R. Clement
    • 1
  1. 1.Coordenação de Pesquisas em Ciências AgronômicasInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da AmazôniaManausBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de AntropologiaMuseu Paraense Emílio GoeldiBelémBrazil

Personalised recommendations