Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 1513–1522 | Cite as

A Global overview of canids used in traditional medicines

  • Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves
  • Raynner Rilke Duarte Barboza
  • Wedson Medeiros Silva Souto
Review Article

Abstract

Canids are among the mammal species most frequently used in traditional folk medicine around the world. In this context, this paper assesses the global use of canids in traditional folk medicine and their implications. Our review indicated that 19 species of canid are used in traditional medicine worldwide, representing 54.2% of described canid species. Of the species in medicinal use, two are listed as Endangered and three as near threatened on the IUCN Red List. For some species medicinal use represents an additional direct pressure that may have contributed to declines of natural populations. In addition, use of medicinal animals may have indirect impacts on the conservation of other species through the spread of disease. To minimize both harvest impacts and disease spread, guidance on use of medicinal species may be useful. This could include an exploration of the use of alternatives and implementation of sanitary measures.

Keywords

Canidae Traditional medicine Animal conservation 

Introduction

Throughout human history, people have used various materials from nature to cure their illnesses and improve their health. Substances have been derived from flora, fauna, and mineral sources located both in people’s immediate surroundings and in more remote areas (Lev and Amar 2002). Nature has been the source of medicinal agents for thousands of years, and an impressive number of modern drugs have been isolated from natural sources, many based on their use in traditional medicine. In many parts of the world, traditional medicine is the preferred form of health care (WHO 2002–2005), and remains the most available and affordable form of therapy in low income countries. Many animal and plant species are used in traditional medical practices, and therefore discussions on the links between traditional medicine and biodiversity are imperative (Anyinam 1995; Alves and Rosa 2007a).

Wild animals and their products constitute essential ingredients in the preparation of traditional medicine (e.g., Adeola 1992; Gaski and Johnson 1994; Alves et al. 2007a, b; Alves 2008). In fact, various authors pointed out that the phenomenon of zootherapy (the use of animal products in healing) is marked both by a broad geographical distribution and by deep historical origins. In modern societies, zootherapy constitutes an important alternative to many other known therapies practiced worldwide (Alves and Rosa 2005). Currently, examples of animal-derived remedies can be found in many urban, semi-urban, and more remote localities throughout the world (e.g., Sodeinde and Soewu 1999; Almeida and Albuquerque 2002; Pieroni et al. 2002; Apaza et al. 2003; Silva et al. 2004; Alves and Rosa 2005, 2006, 2007a, b, c; Vázquez et al. 2006; Alves and Pereira-Filho 2007; Alves and Rosa 2008a, b; Alves and Santana 2008; Alves 2009). Nevertheless, while the use of floristic resources has been widely researched, utilization of faunistic resources in traditional medicine is less well studied (Alves and Rosa 2005; Dedeke et al. 2006; Alves et al. 2007a, 2009a).

It is well known that the use of some animal species for medicinal purposes is a cause for concern for particular species (e.g., Lee et al. 1998). A large number of mammals are used in traditional folk medicine and many of these are of conservation concern (IUCN 2009). Several carnivores are popular for their supposed medicinal properties, or at least they were in the past (Kruuk 2002). The case of large carnivores threatened by trade for traditional medicine, especially traditional Chinese medicine, is well-known (Lee et al. 1998). Both tigers and most species of bear have suffered population declines associated with the demand for their parts in traditional medicines (Brautigam et al. 1994; Servheen et al. 1999). All of the world’s eight species of bears, except the Giant Panda, have suffered population declines as a result of this Traditional Medicine trade (Knights 1996).

Canidae are among the carnivore families most frequently reported as being used in traditional medical systems around the world (Sillero-Zubiri et al. 2004). The number of canids used in medicine is still unknown. In this context, this work assesses the global use of canids in traditional folk medicine around the world. We provide a review of the literature in order to assess how many and which canid species are used as medicine globally. We identify those that are endangered and discuss the implications of the use of zootherapics for canid conservation and for public health.

Methods

To examine the global use of canids used in traditional medicine, all available references or reports about folk remedies that include canid parts were reviewed. Only taxa that could be identified to species level were included in the database. Scientific names provided in publications were updated according to the ITIS (2008)—Catalogue of Life: 2008 Annual Checklist and Wilson and Reeder (2005). The conservation status of the Canidae species follows IUCN (2009) and information on international trade regulation was extracted from CITES (2008). The sources analyzed were: Ginsberg and Macdonald (1990); Figueiredo (1994); Marques (1995); Costa-Neto (1996); Morales Mávil and Villa Cañedo (1998); Simelane and Kerley (1998); Costa-Neto (1999); Rasmussen (1999); Costa-Neto and Oliveira (2000); El-Kamali (2000); Souto et al. (2000); The Chinese Materia Medica Dictionary (2000); Breuer (2002); CITES (2002); Lev and Amar (2002); Moura (2002); Winter (2002); Lev (2003); Vázquez et al. (2006); Asa and Cossíos (2004); Barbarán (2004); Durbin et al. (2004); Johnsingh and Jhala (2004); Loveridge and Nel (2004); Lucherini et al. (2004); Rodden et al. (2004); Sillero-Zubiri et al. (2004); Woodroffe et al. (2004a, b); Alves and Rosa (2006); Mahawar and Jaroli (2006); Schmidt et al. (2006); Alves and Rosa (2007b, c); Alves et al. (2007a); Khalid et al. (2007); Negi and Palyal (2007); Valle (2007); Alves et al. (2008b,c); Asa et al. (2008); Durbin et al. (2008); Johnsingh and Jhala (2008);Loveridge and Nel (2008); Mahawar and Jaroli (2008); Monroy-Vilchis et al. (2008); Moura and Marques (2008); Rodden et al. (2008); Van and Tap (2008); Alves (2009); Alves et al. (2009b, c), and Ferreira et al. (2009a, b). A database was created containing information on canid species, family names, parts of the animal used and country where use was recorded.

Results

Our review indicated that at least 19 species of canid from 10 genera are used in traditional medicine worldwide (see Table 1). This represents 54% of the extant species of canid. The genus with the largest numbers of medicinal species were: Canis (with five species), followed by Vulpes (4) and Lycalopex (3) (Table 1). Considering that there are 35 known species of canids in the world today, 54.2% are therefore used in traditional folk medicines.
Table 1

Canidae used in the wordwide traditional folk medicine

Species

IUCN Red List

CITES

Country (-ies)

Use(s)

Reference(s)

Canis adustus Sundevall 1847

LC

 

Not mentioned

Epilepsy, to ward off evil spirits

48

Canis aureus Linnaeus 1758

LC

III (only the populations of India)

India, Vietnam

Asthma, arthritis, paralysis

1, 2, 3

Canis latrans Say 1823

LC

 

Mexico

To bring good luck

4, 5, 6

Canis lupus (Linnaeus 1758)

LC

I, II

Brazil, Israel, India, Kingdom of Jordan, Mongolia and Sudan

Chicken pox, mumps, smallpox, asthma, varicella, measles, menstrual cramps, warts

3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 53

Canis mesomelas Schreber 1775

LC

 

Angola, Botswana, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Lesotho, Mozambique, Namibia, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda, Zimbabwe

Asthma

22, 23, 24

Cerdocyon thous (Linnaeus 1766)

LC

II

Brazil

Earache, sore throat, rheumatism, flu, hemorrhoids, disorders after parturition (to accelerate recovery after parturition), bronchitis, cracks in the sole of the feet, back ache, osteoporosis, eczema, arthritis, womb inflammation

10, 11, 12, 21, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54

Chrysocyon brachyurus (Illiger 1815)

NT

II

Brazil, Bolívia

Bronchitis, kidney disease, snake bites, and to bring good luck, epilepsy

21, 30, 31, 32, 33

Cuon alpinus (Pallas 1811)

EN

II

China

Not mentioned

34, 35

Lycalopex culpaeus (Molina 1782)

LC

II

Argentina, Bolívia

susto” (fright)

36

Lycalopex gymnocercus (G. Fischer 1814)

LC

II

Argentina, Bolívia

susto” (fright)

36, 37

Lycalopex sechurae Thomas 1900

NT

 

Peru

Used in traditional magic-religious rituals, bronchial illness, and stomach disorders, amulets, to attract “good spirits” or “positive energies”

38, 39

Lycaon pictus (Temminck 1820)

EN

 

Parts of West, East and Southern Africa, Zimbabwe, Cameroon

It is considered to have medicinal and magical powers for African traditional cultures

17, 40, 41, 42

Nyctereutes procyonoides (Gray 1834)

LC

 

Not mentioned

Not mentioned

17, 43

Otocyon megalotis (Desmarest 1822)

LC

 

South Africa

Not mentioned

44

Speothos venaticus (Lund 1842)

NT

I

Brazil

Not mentioned

12, 45

Vulpes bengalensis (Shaw 1800)

LC

III

India

Not mentioned

32, 46

Vulpes chama (A. Smith 1833)

LC

 

Not mentioned

Not mentioned

17

Vulpes pallida (Cretzschmar 1826)

DD

 

Sudan

Asthma

23

Vulpes vulpes (Linnaeus 1758)

LC

III

Vietnam

Not mentioned

1

Legends: IUCN Red List of threatened species categories—EN endangered, NT near threatened, LC least concern, DD data deficient. CITES Appendices—I, II or III

1. Van and Tap (2008), 2. Negi and Palyal (2007), 3. Mahawar and Jaroli (2008), 4. Monroy-Vilchis et al. (2008), 5. Vázquez et al. (2006), 6. Morales Mávil and Villa Cañedo (1998), 7. Costa-Neto and Oliveira (2000), 8. Costa-Neto (1999), 9. Marques (1995), 10. Alves and Rosa (2006), 11. Alves and Rosa (2007b), 12. Alves et al. (2007a), 13. Moura and Marques (2008), 14. Souto et al. (2000), 15. Lev (2003), 16. Schmidt et al. (2006), 17. CITES (2002), 18. Lev and Amar (2002), 19. El-Kamali (2000), 20. Mahawar and Jaroli (2006), 21. Alves (2009), 22. Loveridge and Nel (2004), 23. Khalid et al. (2007), 24. Loveridge and Nel (2008), 25. Alves and Rosa (2007c), 26. Alves et al. (2008b), 27. Moura (2002), 28. Valle (2007), 29. Alves et al. (2009a), 30. Rodden et al. (2004), 31. Winter (2002), 32. Costa-Neto (1996), 33. Rodden et al. (2008), 34. Durbin et al. (2004), 35. Durbin et al. (2008), 36. Barbarán (2004), 37. Lucherini et al. (2004), 38. Asa and Cossíos (2004), 39. Asa et al. (2008), 40. Woodroffe et al. (2004), 41. Rasmussen (1999), 42. Breuer (2002), 43. The Chinese Materia Medica Dictionary (2000), 44. Simelane and Kerley (1998), 45. Figueiredo (1994), 46. Johnsingh and Jhala (2008), 47. Johnsingh and Jhala (2004), 48. Ginsberg and Macdonald (1990), 49. Ferreira et al. (2009a), 50. Alves et al. (2008c), 51. Ferreira et al. (2009b), 52. Confessor et al. (2009), 53. Alves et al. (2009d), 54. Alves et al. (2009e)

The use of canids in traditional folk medicine is widespread, being recorded in 27 countries, mainly in Latin America, Africa, and Asia. Some species are used in more than once country, although not necessarily for the same disease. Various Canids parts and products are used in the preparation of folk medicines, including heart, fur, fat, eyes, bile, blood, viscera, bone, and meat.

Canids are used to treat approximately 28 conditions: asthma, arthritis, back ache, bronchial illness, bronchitis, chicken pox, cracks in the sole of the feet, disorders after parturition, earache, eczema, epilepsy, flu, hemorrhoids, kidney diseases, measles, menstrual cramps, mumps, osteoporosis, paralysis, small pox, rheumatism, snake bites, sore threat, stomach disorders, varicella, warts, inflammation of the womb and “susto” (fright). Some species were recorded as having magic religious uses, for example to bring good luck and in magic and religious rituals.

The zootherapeutical products of canids are used to prepare clinical remedies as well as to make amulets or charms used in magical/religious diagnoses. For instance, in Brazil body parts of C. brachyurus are believed to bring good luck. In Bolivia, cowboys believe that sitting on the pelt of a maned wolf will protect them from bad luck. Wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) are valued in some areas, not only because their kills provide a source of meat, but also due to the medicinal and magical powers that their various body parts are thought to have.

Discussion

Canid exploitation and trade forms an integral part of human cultural heritage. In some cases, canids have traditionally been viewed as adversaries to be avoided or killed (Kruuk 2002; Johnson 2004; Sillero-Zubiri et al. 2004; Alves et al. 2009a). On the other hand, several canids’ species have been a resource for humans, exploited for subsistence, commercial profit, or hunting for sport (Macdonald and Sillero-Zubiri 2004).

Among the several forms of canid usage by humans, their use in folk practices related to the healing and/or prevention of illnesses has been recorded in different social-cultural contexts throughout the world (e.g., Sillero-Zubiri et al. 2004; Mahawar and Jaroli 2006; Alves and Rosa 2007b, c). Canids have been used in traditional medicines since ancient times. For example, a historical revision of the therapeutic uses of animals described in medieval manuscripts from Azerbaijan, revealed the medicinal use of animals such wolves, foxes, and jackals during the Middle Ages. Various parts (meat, skin, fur, etc.) of these animals were used in the medieval Azerbaijan medicine (Alakbarli 2006). In Brazil, animal species (including canids) were used medicinally in the first half of the eighteenth century (Souza 2008). Lev (2003, 2006) emphasizes that the fox (Vulpes sp.) was used for the treatment of ear diseases in Levant between the tenth and eighteenth century.

Medicinal use of canids is more prominent in countries within Africa, Asia, and South America. This is not surprising given the canid diversity is greater in these areas (Sillero-Zubiri et al. 2004). Domestic commercial sale of canids for medicinal purposes has been documented in a number of countries. In India, for example, Johnsingh and Jhala (2004) noted the localized trade for the skin, tail, teeth, and claws of the Indian fox (Vulpes bengalensis (Shaw 1800)) for medicinal and charm purposes. In Mexico, the Coyote (Canis latrans Say, 1823) is commercialized for medicinal purposes in markets of the city of Chiapas (Vázquez et al. 2006). Durbin et al. (2004) pointed out the need for further research regarding the medicinal use (and commercial exploitation) of Cuon alpinus in China. The commercialization of animals for medicinal purposes is a widespread phenomenon, with significant implications for their conservation and sustainable use (Alves and Rosa 2005).

Of the 19 species of canid recorded in our review, two species are classified as endangered, three species classified as near threatened, and one classified as data deficient in the most recent IUCN Red List. Ten species are included in the CITES Appendices I or II, although the reasons for their inclusion are not necessarily related to medicinal use. The existence of records of the use and commercialization of a species for medicinal purposes does not necessarily imply that specimens of those species are traded internationally.

The medicinal use of canids is not considered a major conservation concern, as for none of those listed as endangered by the IUCN has medicinal use has been highlighted as a major threat to their population. This is contrary to what has been shown for felines and other endangered species historically used in these traditional formulations, such as primates, rhinoceroses, bears, and seahorses (IUCN 2009). Nevertheless, the medicinal use of animals creates an additional threat and must be considered in conjunction with other anthropogenic pressures. Multiple factors have contributed to a significant decline in wild populations of canids in the world.

Canids have survived in many areas where other carnivores have gone extinct. Their resilience is principally due to their relatively high reproductive rate (i.e., large litter sizes and early sexual maturity that compensates for increased human-inflicted mortality rates, and their adaptability to new environments. Canids can often quickly recover from population decreases and range contraction, and rates of re-colonization are often high due to high levels of dispersal (Gittleman 1989).

In addition to the impact of direct loss of species, use and trade in medicinal animal may spread diseases that can affect both people and wildlife (Still 2003; Aguirre 2009). As evidenced in the present review, several organs, bones, and tissues of canids are used in traditional medicine, and transmission of diseases can occur through their medicinal use. Carnivores, in particular domestic cats and dogs, are host to several hundred pathogens (Cleaveland et al. 2001; Samuel et al. 2001) and parasitic infections (Williams and Barker 2001) that may affect humans and/or livestock.

Given the potential for both conservation impacts though harvesting canids and of disease transmission in the preparation of medicinal products from canids, further action is required to ensure that harvesting is sustainable and to develop guidance on public health aspects. Direct impacts on canid populations could be mitigated through education programmes and identification of alternative medicines (see Lee 1999). The therapeutic properties of wild animals and plants and domestic or cultived species overlaps in many cases (Alves et al. 2007a). This aspect opens the possibility of replacing the use of threatened species with less threatened or domestic species in traditional medicine recipes (Alves et al. 2008a, b; Still 2003), thereby minimizing the threat to the ecosystem. Educational programs can be used to promote the use of alternatives, focusing on rural communities where inhabitants use canids in traditional medicine and religious practices. Additionally, measures that do not directly involve modifying the behavior of the local populations should be considered, such as controlling illegal wildlife trade. Implementation of sanitary measures in the use and trade of animal or their parts for medicinal purposes is also necessary.

References

  1. Adeola MO (1992) Importance of wild animals and their parts in the culture, religious festivals, and traditional medicine, of Nigeria. Environ Conserv 19(2):125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguirre AA (2009) Wild canids as sentinels of ecological health: a conservation medicine perspective. Parasit Vectors 2(Suppl 1):S7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alakbarli F (2006) Medical manuscripts of Azerbaijan. Heydar Aliyev Foundation, Baku, AzerbaijanGoogle Scholar
  4. Almeida CFCBR, Albuquerque UP (2002) Uso de plantas e animais medicinais no Estado de Pernambuco (Nordeste do Brasil): Um estudo de caso. Interciencia 27(6):276–284Google Scholar
  5. Alves RRN (2008) Animal-based remedies as complementary medicine in Brazil. Forsch Komplementarmed/Res Complement Med 15:226–227Google Scholar
  6. Alves RRN (2009) Fauna used in popular medicine in Northeast Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 5:1–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Alves RRN, Pereira-Filho GA (2007) Commercialization and use of snakes on North and Northeastern Brazil: implications for conservation and management. Biodivers Conserv 16:969–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alves RRN, Rosa IL (2005) Why study the use of animal products in traditional medicines? J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 1:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Alves RRN, Rosa IL (2006) From cnidarians to mammals: the use of animals as remedies in fishing communities in NE Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol 107:259–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Alves RRN, Rosa IL (2007a) Biodiversity, traditional medicine and public health: where do they meet? J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 3:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Alves RRN, Rosa IL (2007b) Zootherapeutic practices among fishing communities in North and Northeast Brazil: a comparison. J Ethnopharmacol 111(1):82–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Alves RRN, Rosa IL (2007c) Zootherapy goes to town: the use of animal-based remedies in urban areas of NE and N Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol 113:541–555CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Alves RRN, Rosa IL (2008a) Use of tucuxi dolphin Sotalia fluviatilis for medicinal and magic religious purposes in North of Brazil. Hum Ecol 37:443–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Alves RRN, Rosa IL (2008b) Medicinal animals for the treatment of asthma in Brazil. J Altern Complement Med 14:350–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Alves RRN, Santana GG (2008) Use and commercialization of Podocnemis expansa (Schweiger 1812) (Testudines: Podocnemididae) for medicinal purposes in two communities in North of Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 4(3):1–6Google Scholar
  16. Alves RRN, Rosa IL, Santana G (2007a) The role of animal-derived remedies as complementary medicine in Brazil. Bioscience 57(11):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Alves RRN, Pereira-Filho GA, Lima YCC (2007b) Snakes used in ethnomedicine in Northeast Brazil. Environ Dev Sustain 9:455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Alves RRN, Vieira WLS, Santana GG (2008a) Reptiles used in traditional folk medicine: conservation implications. Biodivers Conserv 17(1):2037–2049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Alves RRN, Lima HN, Tavares MC et al (2008b) Animal-based remedies as complementary medicines in Santa Cruz do Capibaribe, Brazil. BMC Complement Altern Med 8:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Alves RRN, Soares TC, Mourão JS (2008c) Uso de animais medicinais na comunidade de Bom Sucesso, Soledade, estado da Paraíba, Brasil. Sitientibus 8(2):142–147Google Scholar
  21. Alves RRN, Mendonça LET, Confessor MVA, Vieira WLS, Lopez LCS (2009a) Hunting strategies used in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 5:1–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Alves RRN, Barboza RRD, Souto WMS (2009b) Endangered felines used in traditional medicines. In: Kuznetsov L, Columbus AM (eds) Endangered species: new research, 1st edn. Nova Science Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Alves RRN, Neto NAL, Brooks SE, Albuquerque UP (2009c) Commercialization of animal-derived remedies as complementary medicine in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol 124:600–608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Alves RRN, Barbosa JAA, Santos SLDX, Souto WMS, Barboza RRD (2009d) Animal-based remedies as complementary medicines in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil. Evidence-Based Complement Altern Med. doi:10.1093/ecam/nep134
  25. Alves RRN, Oliveira MGG, Barboza RRD, Singh R, Lopez LCS (2009e) Medicinal animals as therapeutic alternative in a semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil. Res Complement Med 16:305–312Google Scholar
  26. Anyinam C (1995) Ecology and ethnomedicine: exploring links between current environmental crisis and indigenous medical practices. Soc Sci Med 40:321–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Apaza L, Godoy R, Wilkie D et al (2003) Markets and the use of wild animals for traditional medicine: a case study among the Tsimane’ Amerindians of the Bolivian rain forest. J Ethnobiol 23:47–64Google Scholar
  28. Asa CS, Cossíos ED (2004) Sechuran fox (Pseudalopex sechurae). In: Sillero-Zubire C, Hoffmann M, MacDonald DW (eds) Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs, 1st edn. IUCN Canid Specialist Group, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  29. Asa CS, Cossíos ED, Williams R (2008) Pseudalopex sechurae. In: 2008 IUCN Red List of threatened species. Available via DIALOG. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 17 May 2009
  30. Barbarán FR (2004) Usos mágicos, medicinales y rituales de la fauna en la Puna del Noroeste Argentino y Sur de Bolivia. EMI Contrib Manejo Vida Silv en Latinoamérica 1(1):1–26Google Scholar
  31. Brautigam AJ, Howes T, Hutton H et al (1994) Analysis of the market for tigers, bears and musk deer in the Russian Far East. Traffic Bull 15(1):23–30Google Scholar
  32. Breuer T (2002) Distribution, feeding ecology and conservation of the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus) in Northern Cameroon. WWF-CPO, Yaoundé, CameroonGoogle Scholar
  33. CITES—Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (2002) List of species traded for medicinal purposes. http://www.cites.org/eng/com/AC/17/E17-13-1.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2008
  34. CITES—Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (2008) Appendices I, II and III. http://www.cites.org/eng/resources/species.html. Accessed 2 Jan 2008
  35. Cleaveland S, Laurenson MK, Taylor LH (2001) Diseases of humans and their domestic mammals: pathogen characteristics, host range and the risk of emergence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356:991–999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Confessor MVA, Mendonca LET, Mourao JS, Alves RRN (2009) Animals to heal animals: ethnoveterinary practices in semi-arid region, northeastern Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 5(37):1–9Google Scholar
  37. Costa-Neto EM (1996) Faunistic resources used as medicines by an Afro-brazilian community from Chapada Diamantina National Park, State of Bahia-Brazil. Sitientibus 15:211–219Google Scholar
  38. Costa-Neto EM (1999) Barata é um santo remédio : introdução à zooterapia popular no estado da Bahia. EdUEFS, Feira de Santana, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  39. Costa-Neto EM, Oliveira MV (2000) Cockroach is good for Asthma: zootherapeutic practices in Northeastern Brazil. Hum Ecol Rev 7(2):41–51Google Scholar
  40. Dedeke GA, Soewu DA, Lawal OA et al (2006) Pilot survey of ethnozoological utilisation of vertebrates in Southwestern Nigeria, Indilinga. Afr J Indig Knowl Syst 5(1):87–96Google Scholar
  41. Durbin ALS, Venkataraman S, Hedges W (2004) Cuon alpinus (Pallas, 1811). In: Sillero-Zubire C, Hoffmann M, MacDonald DW et al (eds) Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs: status survey and conservation action plan, 1st edn. IUCN Canid Specialist Group, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  42. Durbin ALS, Hedges S, Duckworth JW et al. (2008) Cuon alpinus. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/5953. Accessed 20 May 2009
  43. El-Kamali HH (2000) Folk medicinal use of some animal products in Central Sudan. J Ethnopharmacol 72(1–2):279–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ferreira FS, Brito SV, Ribeiro SC, Saraiva AAF, Almeida WO, Alves RRN (2009a) Animal-based folk remedies sold in public markets in Crato and Juazeiro do Norte, Ceará, Brazil. BMC Complement Altern Med 9:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ferreira FS, Brito SV, Ribeiro SC, Almeida WO, Alves RRN (2009b) Zootherapeutics utilized by residents of the community Poco Dantas, Crato-CE, Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 5(21):1–10Google Scholar
  46. Figueiredo N (1994) Os ‘bichos’ que curam: os animais e a medicina ‘folk’ em Belém do Pará. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Göeldi 10(1):75–91Google Scholar
  47. Gaski AL, Johnson KA (1994) Prescription for extinction: endangered species and patented oriental medicines in trade. TRAFFIC International, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  48. Ginsberg JR, Macdonald DW, The IUCN/SSC Canid, Wolf Specialist Groups (1990) Foxes, wolves, jackals, and dogs. An action plan for the conservation of canids. IUCN, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  49. Gittleman JL (1989) Carnivore group living: comparative trends. In: Gittleman JL (ed) Carnivore behavior, ecology and evolution, 1st edn. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. ITIS (Integrated Taxonomic Information System) (2008) Catalogue of Life 2008—Annual Checklist. http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/search.php. Accessed 11 Aug 2008
  51. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) (2009) IUCN Red List of threatened species. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 12 June 2009
  52. Johnsingh A, Jhala Y (2004) Vulpes bengalensis (Shaw 1800). In: Sillero-Zubire C, Hoffmann M, MacDonald DW (eds) Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs: status survey and conservation action plan, 1st edn. IUCN Canid Specialist Group, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  53. Johnsingh AJT, Jhala, YV (2008) Vulpes bengalensis. In: 2008 IUCN Red List of threatened species. Available via DIALOG. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/23049. Accessed 21 April 2009
  54. Johnson WE (2004) Evaluating and predicting the impacts of exploitation and trade on canid populations. In: Sillero-Zubire C, Hoffmann M, MacDonald DW (eds) Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs: status survey and conservation action plan, 1st edn. IUCN Canid Specialist Group, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  55. Khalid HS, El-Kamali HH, Atta Elmanan AM (2007) Trade of sudanese natural medicinals and their role in human and wildlife health care. Cropwatch Newsletter 10Google Scholar
  56. Knights P (1996) From forest to pharmacy. The global underground trade in bear parts. The Investigative Network and The Humane Society of the United States, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  57. Kruuk H (2002) Hunter and hunted: relationships between carnivores and people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lee SKH (1999) Trade in traditional medicine using endangered species: an international context. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Australian Symposium on traditional medicine and wildlife conservation, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  59. Lee SKH, Hoover C, Gaski A et al (1998) A world apart? Attitudes toward traditional Chinese medicine and endangered species in Hong Kong and the United States. TRAFFIC East Asia. TRAFFIC North America, WWF, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  60. Lev E (2003) Traditional healing with animals (zootherapy): medieval to present-day Levantine practice. J Ethnopharmacol 86:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lev E (2006) Healing with animals in the Levant from the 10th to the 18th century. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2(11):1–9Google Scholar
  62. Lev E, Amar Z (2002) Ethnopharmacological survey of traditional drugs sold in the Kingdom of Jordan. J Ethnopharmacol 82:131–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Loveridge AJ, Nel JAJ (2004) Black-backed jackal (Canis mesomelas). In: Sillero-Zubire C, Hoffmann M, MacDonald DW (eds) Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs: status survey and conservation action plan, 1st edn. IUCN Canid Specialist Group, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  64. Loveridge AJ, Nel JAJ (2008) Canis mesomelas. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/3755. Accessed 17 May 2009
  65. Lucherini M, Pessino M, Farias AA (2004) Pampas fox Pseudalopex gymnocercus. In: Sillero-Zubire C, Hoffmann M, MacDonald DW (eds) Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs: status survey and conservation action plan, 1st edn. IUCN Canid Specialist Group, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  66. Macdonald DW, Sillero-Zubiri C (2004) Biology and conservation of wild canids. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mahawar MM, Jaroli DP (2006) Animals and their products utilized as medicines by the inhabitants surrounding the Ranthambhore National Park, India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2(46):1–5Google Scholar
  68. Mahawar MM, Jaroli DP (2008) Traditional zootherapeutic studies in India: a review. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 4:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Marques JGW (1995) Pescando pescadores: etnoecologia abrangente no baixo São Francisco Alagoano. NUPAUB/USP, São Paulo, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  70. Monroy-Vilchis O, Cabrera L, Suárez P et al (2008) Uso tradicional de vertebrados silvestres en la Sierra Nanchititla, México. INCI 33(4):308–313Google Scholar
  71. Morales Mávil JE, Villa Cañedo JT (1998) Notas sobre el uso de la fauna silvestre en Catemaco, Veracruz, México. Acta Zool Mex 73:127–143Google Scholar
  72. Moura FBP (2002) Entre o peixe e o dendê: etnoecologia do povo dos Marimbús (Chapada Diamantina-BA). Dissertation, Universidade de São CarlosGoogle Scholar
  73. Moura FBP, Marques JGW (2008) Zooterapia popular na Chapada Diamantina: uma medicina incidental? Ciên Saúde Colet 13:2179–2188Google Scholar
  74. Negi CS, Palyal VS (2007) Traditional uses of animal and animal products in medicine and rituals by the Shoka tribes of district Pithoragarh, Uttaranchal. India Ethno-Med 1(1):47–54Google Scholar
  75. Pieroni A, Giusti ME, Grazzini A (2002) Animal remedies in the folk medicinal practices of the Lucca and Pistoia Provinces, Central Italy. In: Fleurentin J, Pelt JM, Mazars G (eds) Proceedings of the fourth European Colloquium of ethnopharmacology, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  76. Rasmussen GSA (1999) Livestock predation by the painted hunting dog Lycaon pictus in a cattle ranching region of Zimbabwe: a case study. Biol Conserv 88:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rodden M, Rodrigues F, Bestelmeyer S (2004) Maned wolf, Chrysocyon brachyurus. In: Sillero-Zubire C, Hoffmann M, MacDonald DW (eds) Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs: status survey and conservation action plan, 1st edn. IUCN Canid Specialist Group, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  78. Rodden M, Rodrigues F, Bestelmeyer S (2008) Chrysocyon brachyurus. http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/4819. Accessed 17 May 2009
  79. Samuel WM, Pybus MJ, Kocan AA (2001) Parasitic diseases of wild mammals. Manson Publishing Ltd, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schmidt S et al (2006) Rural livelihoods and access to forest resources in Mongolia. FAO/UN, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  81. Servheen C, Herrero S, Peyton B (eds) (1999) Bears: status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Bear and Polar Bear Specialist Groups, World Conservation Union. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  82. Sillero-Zubiri C, Hoffmann M, Macdonald DW (eds) (2004) Canids: foxes, wolves. jackals and dogs. status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  83. Silva MLV, Alves AGC, Almeida AV (2004) A zooterapia no Recife (Pernambuco): uma articulação entre as práticas e a história. Biotemas 17(1):95–116Google Scholar
  84. Simelane TS, Kerley GIH (1998) The conservation implications of the use of indigenous vertebrates by traditional healers in Xhosa communities. S Afr J Wildl Res 28:121–126Google Scholar
  85. Sodeinde OA, Soewu DA (1999) Pilot study of the traditional medicine trade in Nigeria. Traffic Bull 18(1):35–40Google Scholar
  86. Souto FJB, Silva CS, Souza AF (2000) Uma Abordagem Etnoecológica Sobre a Medicina Popular em Andaraí, Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brasil. Paper presented at the 1st Simpósio Estadual de Etnobiologia e Etnoecologia, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Brazil, 22–24 September 1999Google Scholar
  87. Souza RF (2008) Medicina e fauna silvestre em Minas Gerais no século XVIII. Varia Hist 24(39):273–291Google Scholar
  88. Still J (2003) Use of animal products in traditional Chinese medicine: environmental impact and health hazards. Complement Ther Med 11:118–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. The Chinese Materia Medica Dictionary (2000) Jiangsu New Medical College. Shanghai, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  90. Valle YBM (2007) Vaqueiros do Sítio do Meio (Lagoa Grande/PE) and Mamíferos Nativos das Caatingas Pernambucanas: Percepções e Interações. Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  91. Van NDN, Tap N (eds) (2008) An overview of the use of plants and animals in traditional medicine systems in Vietnam. Traffic Southeast Asia, Ha Noi, VietnamGoogle Scholar
  92. Vázquez PE, Méndez RM, Guiascón OGR et al (2006) Uso medicinal de la fauna silvestre en los Altos de Chiapas, México. Interciencia 31(7):491–499Google Scholar
  93. WHO (World Health Organization) (2002–2005) Traditional medicine strategy 2002–2005. Available via DIALOG. http://www.who.int/medicines/library/trm/trm_strat_eng.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2002
  94. Williams ES, Barker IK (2001) Infectious diseases of wild mammals. Manson Publishing Ltd, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wilson DE, Reeder DM (eds) (2005) Mammal species of the World. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USAGoogle Scholar
  96. Winter KA (2002) Subsistence use of terrestrial and aquatic animal resources in the Tierra comunitaria de origen Itonama of Lowland Bolivia. PhD thesis, University of GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
  97. Woodroffe R, Cleaveland S, Courtenay O (2004a) Infectious disease in the management and conservation of wild canids. In: Macdonald DW, Sillero-Zubiri C et al (eds) Biology and conservation of wild canids, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  98. Woodroffe R, McNutt JW, Mills MGL (2004b) African wild dog Lycaon pictus (Temminck, 1820). In: Sillero-Zubire C, Hoffmann M, MacDonald DW (eds) Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs: status survey and conservation action plan, 1st edn. IUCN Canid Specialist Group, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves
    • 1
  • Raynner Rilke Duarte Barboza
    • 2
  • Wedson Medeiros Silva Souto
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de BiologiaUniversidade Estadual da ParaíbaCampina GrandeBrazil
  2. 2.Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Tecnologia AmbientalUniversidade Estadual da ParaíbaCampina GrandeBrazil
  3. 3.Programa Regional de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente (PRODEMA)Universidade Estadual da ParaíbaCampina GrandeBrazil

Personalised recommendations