Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 1785–1803 | Cite as

From fence-and-fine to participatory conservation: mechanisms of transformation in conservation governance at the Gunung Halimun-Salak National Park, Indonesia

  • Hideyuki KuboEmail author
  • Bambang Supriyanto
Original Paper


This paper addresses the transformation of forest bureaucracy, which has occurred in accordance with a national policy shift from “fence-and-fine” to “participatory” conservation, and its impact on resource users at Gunung Halimun-Salak National Park in Indonesia and analyzes causal relationships between this transformation and its outcome. The research suggests that the mode of conservation governance was transformed through the implementation of new ways of communication and interaction, learning processes and perceptional and behavioral changes. The result of this analysis indicates that while the dominant discourse of participatory conservation assumes a primary importance of satisfying local economic needs for conservation, what should be emphasized is the process of trust-building and learning between frontline staff and local resource users without which the durability of a conservation institution is questionable. The analysis also reveals both challenges and limitations of a trust-building approach: while the approach effectively functions to halt forest degradation, it might not lead to the rehabilitation of forest ecosystem.


Fence-and-fine Forest bureaucracy Conservation governance Trust-building Autonomous motivation 



Gunung Halimun-Salak National Park


Integrated Conservation and Development Project


Linear Structural Relations


Root mean square error of approximation


Non-Governmental Organizations


  1. Bonham C, Sacayon E, Tzi E (2008) Protecting imperiled “paper parks”: potential lessons from the Sierra Chinaja, Guatemala. Biodivers Conserv 17:1581–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brechin SR, Wilshusen PR, Fortwangler CL, West PC (2002) Beyond the square wheel: toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process. Soc Nat Resour 15:41–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Budhathoki P (2004) Linking communities with conservation in developing countries: buffer zone management initiatives in Nepal. Oryx 38(3):334–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cernea MM, Schmidt-Soltau K (2006) Poverty risks and national parks: policy issues in conservation and development. World Dev 34(10):1808–1830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Young R (2000) Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. J Soc Issues 56:509–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeCaro D, Stokes M (2008) Social-psychological principles of community-based conservation and conservancy motivation: attaining goals within an autonomy-supportive environment. Conserv Biol 22(6):1443–1451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Departemen Kehutanan (2005) Pengelolaan Kolaboratif: Praturan Menteri Kehutanan No. P.19/Menhut-II/2004. Department Kehutanan, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  8. Departemen Kehutanan (2006) Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Nomor P.56/Menhut-II/2006. Department Kehutanan, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher RJ (2001) Experiences, challenges, and prospects for collaborative management of protected areas: an international perspective. In: Buck L et al (eds) Biological diversity: balancing interests through adaptive collaborative management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gagne M, Deci EL (2005) Self-determination theory and work motivation. J Organ Behav 26:331–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. GHSNPMP-JICA (2007) Gunung Halimun Salak National Park, the misty mountains of Halimun Salak. Gunung Halimun Salak National Park, KabandunganGoogle Scholar
  12. Hirschmann D (1999) Development management versus third world bureaucracies: a brief history of conflicting interests. Dev Change 30:287–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kremen C, Lance K, Raymond I (1998) Interdisciplinary tools for monitoring conservation impacts in Madagascar. Conserv Biol 12:549–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kubo H (2008) Diffusion of policy discourse into rural spheres through co-management of state forestlands: two cases from West Java, Indonesia. Environ Manage 42:80–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Maarleveld M, Dangbegnon C (2002) Social learning: major concepts and issues—lessons from natural resource management in ‘terroirs’ and ‘landelijke gebieden’. In: Leeuwis C, Pyburn R (eds) Wheelbarros full of frons. Koninklijke van Gorcum, Assen, pp 67–84Google Scholar
  16. McShane T, Wells M (eds) (2004) Getting biodiversity projects to work: towards more effective conservation and development. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Nelson G, Prilleltensky I, MacGillivary H (2001) Building value-based partnerships: toward solidarity with oppressed groups. Am J Community Psychol 29:649–677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pandey S (2008) Linking ecodevelopment and biodiversity conservation at the Great Himalayan National Park, India: lessons learned. Biol Conserv 17:1543–1571Google Scholar
  19. Revilla E, Palomares F, Delibes M (2001) Edge-core effects and the effectiveness of traditional reserves in conservation: Eurasian Badgers in Donana national park. Conserv Biol 15(1):148–158Google Scholar
  20. Salafsky N, Wollenberg E (2000) Linking livelihoods and conservation: a conceptual framework and scale for assessing the integration of human needs and biodiversity. World Dev 28:1421–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Salafsky N et al (2001) A systematic test of an enterprise strategy for community-based biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 15(6):1585–1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sayer J et al (2005) Implications for biodiversity conservation of decentralized forest resources management. In: Colfer CJP, Capistrano D et al (eds) The politics of decentralization: forests, power and people. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Schusler TM, Decker DJ, Pfeffer MJ (2003) Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 15:309–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schwartzmann S, Moreira A, Nepstad D (2000) Rethinking tropical conservation: peril in parks. Conserv Biol 14(5):1351–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stern MJ (2008) Coercion, voluntary compliance and protest: the role of trust and legitimacy in combating local opposition to protected areas. Environ Conserv 35(3):200–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Suganda KU (2009) The Ciptagelar Kasepuhan indigenous community, West Java: developing a bargaining position over customary forest. In: Kleden EO, Indradi Y, Chidley L (eds) Forests for the future: indigenous forest management in a changing world. AMAN-DTE, Jakarta, pp 27–62Google Scholar
  27. Sunderland T et al (2008) Conservation and development in tropical forest landscapes: a time to face the trade-offs? Environ Conserv 34(4):276–279Google Scholar
  28. Supriyanto B, Ekariyono W (2007) 5 Strategi Rekonstruksi & Sosial Konservasi Di Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun Salak. GHSNP, KabandunganGoogle Scholar
  29. Thompson J (1995) Participatory approaches in government bureaucracies: facilitating the process of institutional change. World Dev 23(9):1521–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van Steenis CGGJ (1972) Flora Pegunungan Jawa. Puslit Biologi LIPI, BogorGoogle Scholar
  31. Vermeulena S, Sheil D (2007) Partnerships for tropical conservation. Oryx 41:434–440Google Scholar
  32. Viteri C, Chavez C (2007) Legitimacy, local participation, and compliance in the Galapagos Marine Reserve. Ocean Coast Manag 50(3–4):253–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Webler T, Kastenholz H, Renn O (1995) Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective. Environ Impact Assess Rev 15:443–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wells M, Brandon K, Hannah L (1992) People and parks: linking protected area management with local communities. The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  35. Wells M et al (1999) Investing in biodiversity. A review of Indonesia’s integrated conservation and development projects. The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. Wollenberg E, Iwan R, Limberg G, Moeliono M, Rhee S, Sudana M (2004) Muddling towards cooperation: a CIFOR case study of shared learning in Malianu district, Indonesia. Currents 33:20–24Google Scholar
  37. Woodhill J, Roling NG (1998) The second wing of the eagle: the human dimension in learning our way to more sustainable futures. In: Roling NG, Wagemakers MAE (eds) Facilitating sustainable agriculture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 46–71Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Global Link Management, Inc.TokyoJapan
  2. 2.Gunung Halimun Salak National ParkThe Ministry of Forestry, IndonesiaBogorIndonesia

Personalised recommendations