Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 1567–1584

Rapid evaluation of threats to biodiversity: human footprint score and large vertebrate species responses in French Guiana

  • Benoît de Thoisy
  • Cécile Richard-Hansen
  • Bertrand Goguillon
  • Pierre Joubert
  • Jean Obstancias
  • Peter Winterton
  • Sébastien Brosse
Original Paper

Abstract

Although there is an extensive literature demonstrating the impact of human activities on both species extinction risk and local ecological processes, the methodological tools that allow for the visualization and quantification of the intensity of the observed and forthcoming impacts are lacking. Here we propose a Footprint index for French Guiana, (northern Atlantic coast of South America) which sums up the expected and proven disturbances on biodiversity. The index was developed by superimposing geographical and human data, including human population densities, land use, settlements and camps, mining and forest activities, tracks, roads and rivers. The relevance of the index as a general measure of anthropic impact on large terrestrial fauna was estimated by investigating the structure of the large terrestrial vertebrate assemblages, including primates, large frugivorous birds, rodents and ungulates, in relation to the extent of disturbances. The abundance of large terrestrial fauna was assessed using the line-transect sampling method in 34 forest sites facing different disturbance levels, including hunting, logging and fragmentation, and consequently different footprint scores. A Self Organizing Map was used to combine species abundances and disturbance scores. It allowed us to rank species in accordance to their sensitivity towards disturbances, identifying the response of fauna to different concomitant threats. The index provided correct identification of sites with similar threats which proves it is a relevant estimator of human disturbance. In addition, the richness of animal communities and abundances of several seed dispersers and predators were negatively correlated to the index (e.g. large monkeys and frugivorous birds, r2 = 0.49, P < 0.0001 and r2 = 0.48, P < 0.0001, respectively), indicating its reliability in identifying areas where animal communities are disturbed. The index could, therefore, constitute a useful tool to identify areas where ecological processes supported by those species are expected to be disrupted, and where they are already disrupted. Furthermore, the footprint index can deal with lack of field data or with only partially valid information, and so may directly help land managers forecast and, hopefully, mitigate forthcoming impacts resulting from the development of human activities.

Keywords

Vertebrates Threats Management Footprint Self organizing maps Ecological processes 

References

  1. Alhoniemi E, Himberg J, Parankangas J, Vesanto J (2003) SOM Toolbox 2.0. Laboratory of Computer and Information Science. Neural Networks Research Center, Helsinki, Finland. Available at http://www.cis.hut.fi/projects/somtoolbox/
  2. Begazo AJ, Bodmer RE (1998) Use and conservation of Cracidae (Aves, Galliformes) in the Peruvian Amazon. Oryx 32:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bessa-Gomes C, Petrucci-Fonseca F (2003) Using artificial neural networks to assess wolf distribution patterns in Portugal. Anim Conserv 6:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blayo F, Demartines P (1991) Data analysis: How to compare Kohonen neural networks to other techniques? In: Prieto A (ed) Artificial neural networks. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 469–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brosse S, Giraudel JL, Lek S (2001) Utilization of non-supervised neural networks and principal component analyses to study fish assemblages. Ecol Model 146:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brosse S, Grossman GD, Lek S (2007) Fish assemblage patterns in the littoral zone of a European reservoir. Freshwater Biol 52:448–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burgess ND, Balmford A, Cordeiro NJ, Fjeldså J, Küper W, Rahbek C, Sanderson EW, Scharlemann JPW, Sommer JH, Williams PH (2007) Correlations among species distributions, human density and human infrastructure across the high biodiversity tropical mountains of Africa. Biol Conserv 134:164–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carillo E, Wong G, Cuarón AD (2000) Monitoring mammal populations in Costa Rican protected areas under different hunting restrictions. Conserv Biol 14:1580–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chon TS, Park YS, Moon KH, Cha E, Pa Y (1996) Patternizing communities by using an artificial neural network. Ecol Model 90:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CI (Conservation International) (2002) Conservation priorities for the Guyana shield, 2002 Consensus, CI/CBS/UNDP/IUCN/GSIGoogle Scholar
  11. Coppolillo P, Gomez H, Maisels F, Wallace R (2004) Selection criteria for suites of landscapes species as a basis for site-based conservation. Biol Conserv 115:419–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Thoisy B, Renoux F, Julliot C (2005) Hunting in northern French Guiana and its impacts on primate communities. Oryx 39:149–157Google Scholar
  13. de Thoisy B, Brosse S, Dubois MA (2008) Assessment of large-vertebrate species richness and relative abundance in Neotropical forest using line-transect censuses: What is the minimal effort required? Biodiv Conserv 17:2627–2644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Thoisy B, Richard-Hansen C, Peres CA (2009) Impacts of subsistence game hunting on Amazonian primates. In: Garber PA, Estrada A, Bicca-Marques JC, Heyman EW, Strier KB (eds) South American primates: comparative perspectives in the study of behavior, ecology, and conservation. Book Series Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects, vol 15. Springer Press, New York, pp 389–412Google Scholar
  15. Dinerstein E, Loucks C, Wikramanayake E, Ginsberg J, Sanderson E, Seidensticker J, Forrest J, Bryja B, Heydlauff A, Klenzendorf S, Leimgruber P, Mills J, O’Brien TG, Shrestha M, Simons R, Songer M (2007) The fate of wild tigers. Bioscience 57:508–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. FAO (2005) Évaluation des ressources forestières mondiales 2005: Progrès vers la gestion forestière durable. Etude FAO/Forêts n° 147, 321 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Freese CH, Heltne PG, Castro N, Whitesides G (1982) Patterns and determinants of monkey densities in Peru and Bolivia, with notes on distribution. Int J Primatol 3:53–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giraudel JL, Lek S (2001) A comparison of self-organizing map algorithm and some conventional statistical methods for ecological community ordination. Ecol Model 146:329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gond V, Bernard JZ, Brognoli C, Brunaux O, Coppel A, Demenois J, Engel J, Galarraga D, Gaucher P, Guitet S, Ingrassia F, Lelièvre M, Linarès S, Lokonadinpoulle F, Nasi R, Pekel JF, Sabatier D, Thierron V, de Thoisy B, Trébuchon JF, Verger G (2009). In: Philippe J (ed) Ecosystèmes forestiers des Caraïbes. Paris: Karthala. Colloque International et Pluridisciplinaire sur Les Ecosystèmes Forestiers des Caraïbes: entre Ecologie et Developpement (de la Connaissance fondamentale à la Gestion Durable), Trois-Ilets, Martinique, pp 461-481Google Scholar
  20. Groenendijk J (1998) A review of the distribution and conservation status of the giant otter (Pteronura brasiliensis), with special emphasis on the Guayana Shield Region. Netherlands Committee for IUCN, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  21. Hammond DS (2005) Ancient land in a modern world. In: Hammond DS (ed) Tropical forests of the Guiana shield. Cabi Publishing, Cambridge, pp 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hammond DS, Gond V, de Thoisy B, Forget PM, DeDijn B (2007) Causes and consequences of a tropical forest gold rush in the Guiana Shield, South America. Ambio 36:661–670CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Haugaasen T, Peres CA (2005) Mammal assemblage structure in Amazonian flooded and unflooded forests. J Trop Ecol 21:133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hill K, McMillan G, Fariña R (2003) Hunting-related changes in game encounter rates from 1994 to 2001 in the Mbaracayu Reserve, Paraguay. Conserv Biol 17:1312–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johns AD (1985) Differential detectability in primates between primary and selectively logged habitatsand implications for population surveys. Am J Primatol 8:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kareiva P, Watts S, McDonald R, Boucher T (2007) Domesticated nature: shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare. Science 316:1866–1869CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Keller V, Bollmann K (2004) From Red Lists to species of conservation concern. Conserv Biol 18:1636–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kohonen T (2001) Self-organizing maps. Springer series in information sciences 30. Heidelberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  29. Laliberte AS, Ripple W (2004) Range contraction of north American carnivores and ungulates. Bioscience 54:123–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Larsen FW, Bladt J, Rahbek C (2007) Improving the performance of indicator groups for the identification of important areas for species conservation. Conserv Biol 21:731–740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee WS, Kwon YS, Yoo JC, Song MY, Chon TS (2006) Multivariate analysis and self-organizing mapping applied to analysis of nest-site selection in Blacktailed Gulls. Ecol Model 193:602–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lehman SM (2000) Primate community structure in Guyana: a biogeographic analysis. Int J Primatol 21:333–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lek S, Scardi M, Verdonschot PFM, Descy JP, Park YS (2005) Modelling community structure in freshwater ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levin N, Lahav H, Ramon U, Heller A, Nizry G, Tsoar A, Sagi Y (2007) Landscape continuity analysis: a new approach to conservation planning in Israel. Landsc Urban Plann 79:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lopes MA, Ferrari SF (2000) Effects of human colonization on the abundance and diversity of mammals in eastern Brazilian Amazonia. Conserv Biol 14:1658–1665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manne LL, Williams PH (2003) Building indicator groups based on species characteristics can improve conservation planning. Anim Cons 6:291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meffe GK, Carroll R (1997) Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer Ass, Sunderland, 729 ppGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol 16:330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Milner JM, Nilsen EB, Andreassen HP (2007) Demographic side effects of selective hunting in ungulates and carnivores. Conserv Biol 21:36–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Noss RF (1983) A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity. Bioscience 33:700–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nuñez-Iturri G, Howe HF (2007) Bushmeat and the fate of trees with seeds dispersed by large primates in a lowland rainforest in western Amazonia. Biotropica 39:348–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ohl-Schacherer J, Shepard GH, Kaplan H, Peres CA, Levi T, Yu DW (2007) The sustainability of subsistence hunting by Matsigenka Native communities in Manu National Park, Peru. Conserv Biol 21:1174–1185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Orme CDL, Davies RG, Burgess M, Eigenbrod F, Pickup N, Olson VA, Webster AJ, Ding TS, Rasmussen PC, Ridgely RS, Stattersfield AJ, Benett PM, Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Owens IPF (2005) Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threats. Nature 436:1016–1019CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Park YS, Chang J, Lek S, Cao W, Brosse S (2003) Conservation strategies for endemic fish species threatened by the Three Gorges dam. Conserv Biol 17:1748–1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pearman PB, Weber D (2007) Common species determine richness patterns in biodiversity indicator taxa. Biol Conserv 138:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peres CA, Lake IR (2003) Extent of nontimber resource extraction in tropical forest: accessibility to game vertebrates by hunters in the Amazon basin. Conserv Biol 17:521–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peres CA, Palacios E (2007) Basin-wide effects of game harvest on vertebrate population densities in Amazonian forests: implications for animal-mediated seed dispersal. Biotropica 39:304–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peres CA, van Roosmalen M (2002) Patterns of primate frugivory in Amazonia and the Guianan shield: implications to the demography of large-seeded plants in overhunted tropical forests. In: Levey D, Silva W, Galetti M (eds) Seed dispersal and frugivory: ecology, evolution and conservation. CABI International, Oxford, pp 407–423Google Scholar
  49. Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH (1999) The gaps between theory and practices in selecting nature reserves. Conserv Biol 13:484–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Redford KH, Coppolillo P, Sanderson EW, Da Fonseca GAB, Dinerstein E, Groves C, Mace G, Maginnis S, Mittermeier RA, Noss R, Olson D, Robinson JG, Vedder A, Wright M (2003) Mapping the conservation landscape. Conserv Biol 2003:116–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reyjol Y, Fisher P, Lek S, Rosch R, Eckmann R (2005) Studying the spatiotemporal variation of the littoral fish community in a large prealpine lake, using self-organizing mapping. Can J Fish Aquatic Sci 62:2294–2302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Richard-Hansen C, Hansen E (2004) Hunting and wildlife management in French Guiana: current aspects and future prospects. In: People in nature: Wildlife conservation in South and Central America. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 400–410Google Scholar
  54. Russo SE, Portnoy S, Augspurger CK (2006) Incorporating animal behavior into seed dispersal models: implications for seed shadows and an example for a primate-dispersed tree. Ecology 87:3160–3174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, Redford KH, Wannebo V, Woolmer G (2002a) The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience 52:891–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sanderson EW, Redford KH, Chetkiewicz CLB, Medellin RA, Rabinowitz AR, Robinson JG, Taber AB (2002b) Planning to save a species: the jaguar as a model. Conserv Biol 16:58–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sanderson EW, Redford KH, Weber B, Aune K, Baldes D, Berger J, Carter D, Curtin C, Derr J, Dobrott S, Fearn E, Fleener C, Forrest S, Gerlach C, Gates CC, Gross JE, Gogan P, Grassel S, Hilty JA, Jensen M, Kunkel K, Lammers D, List R, Minkowsky K, Olson T, Pague C, Roberston PB, Stephenson B (2008) The ecological future of the North American Bison: conceiving long-term, large-scale conservation of wildlife. Conserv Biol 22:252–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Silva JL, Strahl SD (1991) Human impact on populations of Chachalacas, Guans, and Curassows (Galliformes, Cracidae) in Venezuela. In: Robinson JG, Redford KH (eds) Neotropical wildlife use and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 37–52Google Scholar
  59. Solidoro C, Bandelj V, Barbieri P, Cossarini G, Umani SF (2007) Understanding dynamic of biogeochemical properties in the northern Adriatic Sea by using self-organizing maps and k-means clustering. J Geophys Res 112:C7S90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stoner KE, Vulinec K, Wright SJ, Peres CA (2007) Hunting and plant community dynamics in tropical forests: a synthesis. Biotropica 39:385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taber A, Chalukian SC, Altrichter M, Minkowski K, Lizárraga L, Sanderson E, Rumiz D, Edsel AM, de Angelo, C, Antúnez M, Ayala G, Beck H, Bodmer R, Salvador BB, Cartes JL, de Bustos S, Eaton D, Emmons L, Estrada N, Flamarion de Oliviera L, Fragoso J, Garcia R, Gomez C, Gómez H, Keuroghlian A, Ledesma K, Lizcano D, Lozano C, Montenegro O, Neris N, Noss A, Palacio Vieira JA, Paviolo A, Perovic P, Portillo H, Radachowsky J, Reyna-Hurtado R, Rodriguez Ortiz J, Salas L, Sarmiento Dueñas A, Sarria Perea JA, Schiaffino K, de Thoisy B, Tobler M, Utreras V, Varela D, Wallace R, Zapata Rios G (2008). El Destino de los Arquitectos de los Bosques Neotropicales: Evaluación de la Distribución y el Estado de Conservación de los Pecaríes Labiados y los Tapires de Tierras Bajas. New York, Pigs, Peccaries and Hippos Specialist Group (IUCN/SSC); Tapir Specalist Group (IUCN/SSC); Wildlife Conservation Society; and Wildlife TrustGoogle Scholar
  62. Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Doledec S, Olivier JM (1997) ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Stat Comput 7:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tognelli MF (2005) Assessing the utility of indicator groups for the conservation of South American terrestrial mammals. Biol Conserv 121:409–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Urbani B (2006) A survey of primate populations in Northeastern Venezuelan Guayana. Primate Cons 20:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang J, Dong Y, Xi Y (2008) A comparison of SOFM ordination with DCA and PCA in gradient analysis of plant communities in the midst of Taihang Mountains, China. Ecol Inform 3:367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benoît de Thoisy
    • 1
  • Cécile Richard-Hansen
    • 2
  • Bertrand Goguillon
    • 3
  • Pierre Joubert
    • 4
  • Jean Obstancias
    • 4
  • Peter Winterton
    • 5
  • Sébastien Brosse
    • 6
  1. 1.Association Kwata “Study and Conservation of French Guianan Wildlife”Cayenne cedexFrance
  2. 2.Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune SauvageKourou cedexFrance
  3. 3.WWF France, Bureau GuyaneCayenneFrance
  4. 4.Office National des ForêtsCayenneFrance
  5. 5.UFR LV, Université Paul SabatierToulouse cedex 4France
  6. 6.ECOLAB, U.M.R 5172, C.N.R.S, Université Paul SabatierToulouse cedex 4France

Personalised recommendations