Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 1471–1483 | Cite as

An enlarged European Union challenges priority settings in conservation

  • Dan Cogălniceanu
  • Gina-Carmen Cogălniceanu
Original Paper

Abstract

Biodiversity is declining worldwide under increasing human pressure. Since the location of and the threats are unevenly distributed and the resources available for conservation are limited, prioritization is essential to reduce the losses. Most conservation efforts until now proved to be ineffective in stopping the present worldwide decline of threatened species. We focus on the European Union (EU) after the repeated enlargements in the last decade, from 15 to 27 countries, by considering the present conservation priorities that have shifted towards a continental scale approach. The situation in the EU indicates that despite the differences in wealth across countries, there are no significant differences in the number and surface of protected areas between them, so re-evaluating conservation priorities at a continental scale and a reallocation of funds is required. A major limitation in priority settings for conservation is data availability. We recommend including in the decision process data provided by phylogeographic studies. This will prevent the decline of populations and species with evolutionary potential from centres of speciation and climate refugia. Recent EU members from central and eastern Europe still retain high biodiversity with a rather good conservation status. A large number of areas with high evolutionary potential identified by phylogeographic studies are located there and should be considered priorities within the context of global changes, as a proactive approach. We recommend a periodic re-evaluation of the status of species and habitats based on current research results, harmonization between the priority species listed in the conventions, directives and Red Lists at both EU and national levels.

Keywords

Proactive conservation Phylogeography Genetic diversity Glacial refugia European Union Central and Eastern Europe 

Abbreviations

EU

European Union

WE

Western Europe

CEE

Central and Eastern Europe

GDP

Gross Domestic Product

ESU

Evolutionary Significant Units

Notes

Acknowledgements

Ken Dodd, Hartel Tibor, Rozylowich Laurenţiu, Helen Temple, Oliver Tallowin and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on preliminary versions of the manuscript.

References

  1. Araujo MB, Lobo JM, Moreno JC (2007) The effectiveness of Iberian protected areas in conserving terrestrial biodiversity. Conserv Biol 21:1423–1432. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00827.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Avise JC, Arnold J, Ball RM, Bermingham E, Lamb T, Neigel JE, Reed CA, Saunders NC (1987) Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:489–522Google Scholar
  3. Babik W, Branicki W, Sandera M, Litvinchuk S, Borkin LJ, Irwin T, Rafinski J (2004) Mitochondrial phylogeography of the moor frog, Rana arvalis. Mol Ecol 13:1469–1480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Babik W, Branicki W, Ćrnobrnja-Isailović J, Cogălniceanu D, Sas I, Olgun K, Poyarkov N, Garcia-Paris M, Arntzen JW (2005) Phylogeography of two European newt species—discordance between mtDNA and morphology-based specific and subspecific boundaries. Mol Ecol 14:2475–2491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bănărescu P (1992) Zoogeography of fresh waters, 2 AULA-Verlag. Wiesbaden, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  6. Batáry P, Báldi A, Erdős S (2007) The effects of using different species conservation priority lists on the evaluation of habitat importance within Hungarian grasslands. Bird Conserv Int 17:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baur B, Cremene C, Groza G, Schileyko AA, Baur A, Erhardt A (2007) Intensified grazing affects endemic plant and gastropod diversity in alpine grasslands of the southern Carpathian Mountains (Romania). Biologia (Bratisl) 62:438–445. doi: 102478/s11756-007-0086-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beheregaray LB (2008) Twenty years of phylogeography: the state of the field and the challenges for the southern hemisphere. Mol Ecol 17:3754–3774. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03857.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Biriş IA, Veen P (eds) (2005) Virgin forests in Romania Inventory and strategy for sustainable management and protection of virgin forests in Romania. ICAS and KNNV, pp 61. http://www.veenecology.nl/data/VirginforestRomaniaSummary.PDF
  10. Boşcaiu N, Coldea G, Horeanu C (1994) Lista Roşie a plantelor vasculare dispărute, periclitate, vulnerabile şi rare din flora României [Red List of vascular plants extinct, endangered, vulnerable and rare in the Romanian Flora]. Ocrotirea naturii şi a mediului înconjurător 38:45–56Google Scholar
  11. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL (2006) Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313:58–61. doi: 101126/science1127609 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Butchart SHM, Stattersfield AJ, Baillie J, Bennun LA, Stuart SN, Akçakaya HR, Hilton-Taylor C, Mace GM (2005) Using Red List indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 360:255–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cardillo M, Purvis A, Sechrest W, Gittleman JL, Bielby J, Mace GM (2004) Human population density and extinction risk in the world’s carnivores. PloS Biol 2:909–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cogălniceanu D, Hartel T (2009) Recent taxonomic changes in herpetology - implications for the conservation and systematics of amphibians in Romania. Studii si Cercetari, Biologie, Universitatea din Bacău 17:54–58Google Scholar
  15. Cowell M (2007) Future land use change in a traditionally farmed landscape in eastern Europe (Transylvania, Romania). Transylv Rev Syst Ecol Res 4:199–200Google Scholar
  16. Cremene C, Groza G, Rakosy L, Schileyko AA, Baur A, Erhardt A, Baur B (2005) Alterations of steppe-like grasslands in Eastern Europe: a threat to regional biodiversity hotspots. Conserv Biol 19:1606–1618. doi: 1111/j1523-1739200500084x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Culling MA, Janko K, Boron A, Vasilev VP, Côté IM, Hewitt GM (2006) European colonization by the spined loach (Cobitis taenia) from Ponto-Caspian refugia based on mitochondrial DNA variation. Mol Ecol 15:173–190. doi: 101111/j1365-29X200502790x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. De Iongh HH, Bal D (2007) Harmonization of Red Lists in Europe: some lessons learned in the Netherlands when applying the new IUCN Red List categories and criteria version 3.1. Endanger Species Res 3:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deffontaine W, Libois R, Kotlik P, Sommer R, Nieberding C, Paradis E, Searle JB, Michaux JR (2005) Beyond the Mediterranean peninsulas: evidence of central European glacial refugia for a temperate forest mammal species, the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus). Mol Ecol 14:1727–1739. doi: 101111/j1365-294X200502506x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dihoru G, Dihoru A (1994) Plante rare, periclitate şi endemice în Flora României–Lista Roşie. [Rare, endangered and endemic plants in the Romanian Flora–Red List]. Acta Botanica Horti Bucurestiensis 1993–1994:173–197Google Scholar
  21. Emerson BC, Hewitt GM (2005) Phylogeography. Curr Biol 15:R367–R371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. European Environment Agency (EEA) (2007) Europe’s Environment. The fourth assessment. EEA, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  23. European Environmental Agency (EEA) (2008) National—Common database on designated areas, ver 7.5. http://dataserviceeeaeuropaeu/dataservice/metadetailsasp?id=1047
  24. Frost DR, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain RH, Haas A, Haddad CFB, de Sa RO, Channing A, Wilkinson M, Donnellan SC, Raxworthy CJ, Campbell JA, Blotto BL, Moler P, Drewes RC, Nussbaum RA, Lynch JD, Green DM, Wheeler WC (2006) The amphibian tree of life. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 297:1–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hewitt GM (2000) The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907–913CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hewitt GM (2004) Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the Quaternary. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 359:183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hofman S, Spolsky C, Uzzell T, Cogălniceanu D, Babik W, Szymura JM (2007) Phylogeography of the fire-bellied toads, Bombina: independent Pleistocene histories inferred from mitochondrial genomes. Mol Ecol 16:2301–2316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Isaac NJB, Mallet J, Mace GM (2004) Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroecology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:464–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Isaac NJB, Turvey ST, Collen B, Waterman C, Baillie JEM (2007) Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny. Plos ONE 3:e296. doi: 101371/journalpone0000296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. IUCN (2003) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at regional levels: Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson NC (1995) Biodiversity in the Balance: approaches to setting geographic conservation priorities. Biodiversity support program. Corporate Press, LandoverGoogle Scholar
  32. Keller V, Bollmann K (2004) From Red Lists to species of conservation concern. Conserv Biol 18:1636–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelt DA, Brown JH (2000) Species as units of analysis in ecology and biogeography: are the blind leading the blind? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 9:213–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kidd DM, Ritchie MG (2006) Phylogeographic information systems: putting the geography into phylogeography. J Biogeogr 33:1851–1865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kirschner J, Kaplan Z (2002) Taxonomic monographs in relation to global Red Lists. Taxon 51:155–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Köhler J, Glaw F, Vences M (2008) Trends in rates of amphibian species descriptions. In: Stuart S, Hoffmann M, Chanson J, Cox N, Berridge R, Ramani P, Young B (eds) Threatened amphibians of the world. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, p 18Google Scholar
  37. Köppel C, Jansen F, Burton J, Schnittler M, Hirneisen N (2003) A statistical survey on European Red Lists. In: De Iongh HH, Banki OS, Bergmans W, Van der Werff ten Bosch MJ (eds) The Harmonization of Red Lists of threatened species in Europe proceedings of an international seminar on the harmonization of Red Lists in Europe, Leiden, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden, pp 59–75Google Scholar
  38. Kotlik P, Bogutskaya NG, Ekmekç FG (2004) Circum Black Sea phylogeography of Barbus freshwater fishes: divergence in the Pontic glacial refugium. Mol Ecol 13:87–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuemmerle T, Müller D, Griffiths P, Rusu M (2009) Land use change in southern Romania after the collapse of socialism. Reg Environ Change 9:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lascoux M, Palmé AE, Cheddadi R, Latta RG (2003) Impact of ice ages on the genetic structure of trees and shrubs. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 359:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mace G, Collar NJ, Gaston KJ, Hilton-Taylor C, Akçakaya R, Leader-Williams N, Milner-Gulland EJ, Stuart SN (2008) Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN’s system for classifying threatened species. Conserv Biol 22:1424–1442. doi: 101111/j1523-1739200801044x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Garton EO, Boitani L (2007) Contribution of the Natura 2000 network to biodiversity conservation in Italy. Conserv Biol 21:1433–1444. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00831.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Moritz C (1994) Defining “evolutionary significant units” for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 9:373–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oltean M, Negrean G, Popescu A, Roman N, Dihoru G, Sanda V, Mihăilescu S (1994) Lista Roşie a plantelor superioare din România. [Red List of Higher Plants from Romania]. Studii, Sinteze, Documentaţii de Ecologie Academia Română, Institutul de Biologie. Bucharest 1:1–52Google Scholar
  45. Omernik JM (1987) Ecoregions of the conterminous United States (map supplement). Ann Assoc Am Geogr 77:118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ozinga WA, Römermann C, Bekker RM, Prinzing A, Tamis WLM, Schaminée JHJ, Hennekens SM, Thompson K, Potschlod P, Kleyer M, Bakker JP, van Groenendael JM (2009) Dispersal failure contributes to plant losses in NW Europe. Ecol Lett 12:66–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Palang H, Printsmann A, Konkoly-Gyuró É, Urbanc M, Skowronek E, Woloszyn W (2006) The forgotten rural landscapes of central and eastern Europe. Landscape Ecol 21:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Petit RJ, Aguinagalde I, de Beaulieu JL, Bittkau C, Brewer S, Cheddadi R, Ennos R, Fineschi S, Grivet D, Lascoux M, Mohanty A, Müller-Starck G, Demesure-Musch B, Palmé A, Martín JP, Rendell S, Vendramin GG (2003) Glacial refugia: hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science 300:1563–1565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pullin AS, Báldi A, Can OE, Dieterich M, Kati V, Livoreil B, Lövei G, Mihók B, Nevin O, Selva N, Sousa-Pinto I (2009) Conservation focus in Europe: major conservation policy issues that need to be informed by conservation science. Conserv Biol 23:818–824CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Roekaerts M (2002) The biogeographical regions map of Europe. Basic principles of its creation and overview of its development. European Environment Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  51. Scandura M, Iacolina L, Crestanello B, Pecchioli E, Di Benedetto MF, Russo V, Daboli R, Apollonio M, Bertorelle G (2008) Ancient vs. recent processes as factors shaping the genetic variation of the European wild boar: are the effects of the last glaciation still detectable? Mol Ecol 17:1745–1762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Schmeller DS, Bauch B, Gruber B, Juškaitis R, Budrys E, Babij V, Lanno K, Sammul M, Varga Z, Henle K (2008a) Determination of conservation priorities in regions with multiple political jurisdictions. Biodivers Conserv 17:3623–3630. doi: 101007/s10531-008-9446-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schmeller DS, Gruber B, Bauch B, Lanno K, Budrys E, Babij V, Juškaitis R, Sammul M, Varga Z, Henle K (2008b) Determination of national conservation responsibilities for species conservation in regions with multiple political jurisdictions. Biodivers Conserv 17:3607–3622. doi: 101007/s10531-008-9439-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schmeller DS, Gruber B, Budrys E, Framsted E, Lengyel S, Henle K (2008c) National responsibilities in European species conservation: a methodological review. Conserv Biol 22:593–601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Schmitt T (2007) Molecular biogeography of Europe: Pleistocene cycles and postglacial trends. Front Zool 4:1–13. doi: 101186/1742-9994-4-11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Scott MJ, Davis F, Csuti B, Noss R, Butterfield B, Groves C, Anderson H, Caicco S, D`Erchia F, Edwards TC, Ulliman J, Wright G (1993) Gap analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildl Monogr 123:1–41Google Scholar
  57. Šedivá A, Janko K, Šlechtová V, Kotlik P, Simonovic P, Delic A, Vassilev M (2008) Around or across the Carpathians: colonization model of the Danube basin inferred from genetic diversification of stone loach (Barbatula barbatula) populations. Mol Ecol 17:1277–1292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Sommer R, Benecke N (2004) The recolonisation of Europe by brown bears Ursus arctos Linnaeus, 1758 after the last glacial maximum. Mamm Rev 35:156–164. doi: 101111/j1365-2907200500063x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stoate C, Báldi A, Beja P, Boatman ND, Herzon I, van Doorn A, de Snoo GR, Rakosy L, Ramwell C (2009) Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe—a review. J Environ Manage 91:22–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Sutherland WJ (2000) The conservation handbook: research, management and policy. Blackwell Science Oxford, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sutherland WJ et al (2009) One hundred questions of importance to the conservation of global biological diversity. Conserv Biol 23:557–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Svenning JC, Skov F (2007) Ice age legacies in the geographical distribution of tree species richness in Europe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:234–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Székely P, Plăiaşu R, Tudor M, Cogălniceanu D (2009) The distribution and conservation status of amphibians in Dobrudja (Romania). Turk J Zool 33:147–156Google Scholar
  64. Taberlet P, Fumagalli L, Wust-Saucy A-G, Cosson J-F (1998) Comparative phylogeography and postglacial colonization routes in Europe. Mol Ecol 7:453–464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Vane-Wright RI, Humphries CJ, Williams PH (1991) What to protect—systematics and the agony of choice. Biol Conserv 55:235–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Whiteley AR, Spruell P, Allendorf FW (2006) Can common species provide valuable information for conservation? Mol Ecol 15:2767–2786. doi: 101111/j1365-294X200602972x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Williams PH, Araujo MB (2000) Using probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservation. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1959–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Willis KJ, van Andel TJ (2004) Trees or no trees? The environments of central and eastern Europe during the Last Glaciation. Quat Sci Rev 23:2369–2387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Young J, Richards C, Fischer A, Halada L, Kull T, Kuzniar A, Tartes U, Uzunov Y, Watt A (2007) Conflicts between biodiversity conservation and human activities in the central and eastern European countries. Ambio 36:545–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Natural SciencesUniversity Ovidius ConstanţaConstanţaRomania
  2. 2.Institute of Biology, Department of Plant BiologyRomanian AcademyBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations