Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 1401–1415

Mushroom diversity in sustainable shade tea forest and the effect of fire damage

  • Phongeun Sysouphanthong
  • Sutheera Thongkantha
  • Ruilin Zhao
  • Kasem Soytong
  • Kevin D. Hyde
Original Paper

Abstract

A survey of the biodiversity of wild macrofungi, including edible species yields, was carried out from 1 May to 30 September 2007 at four different forest types (in mainly Miang tea forest). The plots 100 m2, comprised a tea garden with a few planted canopy tree species (37.2% canopy cover), a cultivated sustainable tea forest (80.2% canopy cover), an abandoned sustainable tea forest (89.8% canopy cover), and an abandoned sustainable tea forest that had suffered fire damage (72.9% canopy cover). All visible mushrooms were collected during weekly forays. Macro-characters of the fungi were annotated and photographed by digital camera and the fungi were identified to genera and morphospecies (e.g. Agaricus sp.1, Agaricus sp.2). The fresh weight of wild edible mushrooms produced in the plots was also recorded during this period. The biodiversity of macrofungi in abandoned sustainable tea forest was highest with 115 species in 47 genera, followed by cultivated sustainable tea forest with 85 species in 42 genera and fire damaged abandoned sustainable tea forest with 48 species in 25 genera, while only 19 species belonging to 15 genera were found in the tea garden. Twenty-one species belonging to nine genera with a total of 60.9 kg of edible fungi were collected throughout this study. The fresh weight of edible mushrooms was recorded with the highest fresh weight (25.3 kg) collected from the abandoned sustainable tea forest, followed by 18.2 kg in the cultivated sustainable tea forest, while in the fire damaged sustainable tea forest 16.4 kg were collected and only 1 kg was collected in the tea garden. Abandoned sustainable tea forest contained a greater shade tree biodiversity and higher canopy cover than other plots. This area has a generally higher humidity, a greater ground litter cover, a greater number of microhabitats, a greater number of trees that can form mycorrhizal associations and this probably accounts for the higher diversity of macrofungi and production of edible mushrooms. The fire damaged sustainable tea forest had lower mushroom diversity and edible mushroom production possibly due to the loss of litter and lower tree diversity. The tea garden supported a poor diversity of mushrooms and almost no edible mushrooms. Shade tea forest (Miang tea forest) is a good method to produce tea in a sustainable way as it maintains diversity of mushrooms and other organisms and could be developed as an alternative to shade coffee.

Keywords

Basidiomycetes Burning Diversity Sustainable forestry Thailand 

References

  1. Ambinakudige S, Sathish BN (2009) Comparing tree diversity and composition in coffee farms and sacred forests in the Western Ghats of India. Biodivers Conserv 18:987–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balia A, Kumarb A, Krishnaswamy J (2007) The mammalian communities in coffee plantations around a protected area in the Western Ghats, India. Biol Conserv 139:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boonyanuphap J (2005) Soil nutrient status affected by burning practice and fallow period in lower northern Thailand. 31st congress on science and technology of Thailand at Suranaree University of Technology, 18–20 October 2005Google Scholar
  4. Chotisukharat S (1962) Thiao muang nua lae watthanatham pra pheni khong muang nua (Tour of the north: culture and customs of the north). Odeon, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  5. Gardner S, Sidisunthorn P, Anusarnsunthorn V (2000) A field guide to forest trees of Northern Thailand, CMU Herbarium, Department of Biology. Science Faculty, Chiang Mai University, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  6. Hyde KD (1997) Can we rapidly measure fungal diversity? Mycologist 11:176–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson MD, Sherry TW, Holmes RT, Marra PP (2006) Assessing habitat quality for a migratory songbird wintering in natural and agricultural habitats. Conserv Biol 20:1433–1444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Keen FGB (1972) Upland tenure and land use in North Thailand. Research fellow at the SEATO cultural program 1970–1979Google Scholar
  9. Keen FGB (1978) The fermented tea (Miang) economy of Northern Thailand. In: Kunstadter P, Chapman EC, Sabhasri S (eds) Farmers in the forest. University Press of Hawaii, The East-West Center, pp 255–270Google Scholar
  10. Kerekes J, Desjardin DE (2009) A monograph of the genera Crinipellis and Moniliophthora from Southeast Asia including a molecular phylogeny of the nrITS region. Fungal Divers 37:101–152Google Scholar
  11. Le TH, Nuytinck J, Verbeken A, Lumyong S, Desjardin ED (2007a) Lactarius in Northern Thailand: 1. Lactarius subgenus Piperites. Fungal Divers 24:173–224Google Scholar
  12. Le TH, Nuytinck J, Stubbe D, Verbeken A, Lumyong S, Desjardin ED (2007b) Lactarius in Northern Thailand: 2. Lactarius subgenus Plinthogali. Fungal Divers 27:61–94Google Scholar
  13. Lodge DJ, Ovrebo CL (2008) First records of Hygrophoraceae from Panama including a new species of Camarophyllus and a new veiled species in Hygrocybe section Firmae. Fungal Divers 32:69–80Google Scholar
  14. López-Gómeza AM, Williams-Linera G, Manson RH (2007) Tree species diversity and vegetation structure in shade coffee farms in Veracruz, Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.008
  15. Luoma DL, Eberhart JL, Abbott R, Moore A, Amaranthus MP, Pilz D (2006) Effects of mushroom harvest technique on subsequent American matsutake production. For Ecol Manag 236:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Malajczuk N, Molina R, Trappe JM (1982) Ectomycorrhiza formation in Eucalyptus I. Pure culture synthesis, Host specificity and mycorrhizal compatibility with Pinus radiata. New Phytol 91:467–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Molina R (1979) Pure culture synthesis and host specificity of red alder mycorrhizae. Can J Bot 57:1223–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moore P, Ganz D, Tan LC, Enters T, Durst PB (2002) Communities in flames: proceedings of an international conference on community involvement in fire management In: Makarabhirom P, Ganz D, Onprom S (eds) Community involvement in fire management: cases and recommendations for community-based fire management in Thailand. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific Bangkok, Thailand, pp 10–15Google Scholar
  19. Nouhra ER, Dominguez De Toledo L (1998) The first record of Astraeus hygrometricus from Argentina. Mycologist 12(3):112–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nugen J (1999) In summary of a national seminar on participatory forest fire management, held at RECOFTC, 9–10 February 1999, RECOFTC, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  21. Orchard AE (1996) Fungi of Australia In: Simpson JA (ed) Wood decay fungi, vol 1B. Introduction-fungi in the environment Australian biological resources study, Canberra, pp 95–136Google Scholar
  22. Perlis A, Ball J, Bourke IJ, Holding-Anyonge C, Martin RM, Morell M, Nair CTS, Palmberg-Lerche C, Perlis A, Russo L, Souvannavong O, Vahanen T, Wilkie M, Abdel Nour H, Carneiro C, Durst P, Koné P, Pepke E (2002) Unasylva no. 209, Forest biological diversity In: Nasi R, Dennis R, Meijaard E, Applegate G, Moore P (eds) Forest fire and biological diversity. Int J For Fore Indus 53:2Google Scholar
  23. Phosri C, Watling R, Martin MP, Whalley AJS (2004) The genus Astraeus in Thailand. Mycotaxon 89:453–463Google Scholar
  24. Reichart PA, Phillipsen HP (1996) Betel and Miang vanishing Thai habits. 165 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruksawon P, Flegei TW, Duannphala R (2001) Thai mushrooms and other fungi. National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotehnology, National Science and Technology Development Agency. ISBN 974-229-039-3. 268 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanmee R, Tulloss RE, Lumyong P, Dell B, Lumyong S (2008) Studies on Amanita (Basidiomycetes: Amanitaceae) in Northern Thailand. Fungal Divers 32:97–123Google Scholar
  27. Sasaki A, Kanzaki M, Takeda S, Preechapanya P (2005) Changes in subsistence and socio-economic factors in villages producing Miang (Chewing Tea) in Northern Thailand, Proceedings of the 7th Kyoto university international symposium, pp 197–206Google Scholar
  28. Sathaporn (1999) In summary of a national seminar on participatory forest fire management, held at RECOFTC, 9–10 February 1999. RECOFTC, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  29. Sekercioglu CH, Loarie SR, Oviedo Brenes F, Ehrlich PR, Daly GC (2007) Persistence of forest birds in the Costa Rican agricultural countryside. Conserv Biol 21:482–494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Stubbe D, Nuytinck J, Verbeken A (2008) Lactarius subgenus Plinthogalus of Malaysia. Fungal Divers 32:125–156Google Scholar
  31. Svrček M (1977) A colour guide to familiar mushrooms and fungi. pp 20–21Google Scholar
  32. Trappe JM (1967) Pure culture synthesis of Douglas-Fir mycorrhizae with species of Hebeloma, Suillus, Rhizopogon and Astraeus. Forest Sci 13:121–130Google Scholar
  33. Ukmar E, Battisti C, Luiselli L (2007) Bologna MA (2007) The effects of fire on communities, guilds and species of breeding birds in burnt and control pinewoods in central Italy. Biodivers Conserv 16:3287–3300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wannathes N, Desjardin DE, Lumyong S (2009a) Four new species of Marasmius section Globulares from Northern Thailand. Fungal Divers 36:155–163Google Scholar
  35. Wannathes N, Desjardin DE, Hyde KD, Perry BA, Lumyong S (2009b) A monograph of Marasmius (Basidiomycota) from Northern Thailand based on morphological and molecular (ITS sequences). Fungal Divers 37:209–306Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phongeun Sysouphanthong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sutheera Thongkantha
    • 2
  • Ruilin Zhao
    • 3
  • Kasem Soytong
    • 4
  • Kevin D. Hyde
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Science, Mae Fah Luang UniversityChiang RaiThailand
  2. 2.Mushroom Research CenterChaing MaiThailand
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control in Yunnan Province, Faculty of Biology ConservationSouthwest Forest UniversityBailongshi, KunmingPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Department of Plant Pest Management, Faculty of Agricultural TechnologyKing Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL)BangkokThailand
  5. 5.International Fungal Research and Development Centre, The Research Institute of Insect ResourcesThe Chinese Academy of ForestBailongshi, KunmingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations