Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 10, pp 2963–2977 | Cite as

Changing conservation strategies in Europe: a framework integrating ecosystem services and dynamics

  • John R. Haslett
  • Pam M. Berry
  • Györgyi Bela
  • Rob H. G. Jongman
  • György Pataki
  • Michael J. Samways
  • Martin Zobel
Original Paper

Abstract

Protecting species and their habitats through the designation and management of protected areas is central to present biodiversity conservation efforts in Europe. Recent awareness of the importance of ecosystem dynamics in changing environments and of human needs for the sustainable provision of ecosystem services expose potential weaknesses in current European conservation management strategies and policy. Here we examine these issues in the light of information gained from reviews, workshops, interviews and discussions undertaken within the RUBICODE project. We present a new conceptual framework that joins conventional biodiversity conservation with new requirements. The framework links cultural and aesthetic values applied in a static environment to the demands of dynamic ecosystems and societal needs within social–ecological systems in a changing Europe. We employ this framework to propose innovative ways in which ecosystem service provision may be used to add value to traditional conservation approaches by supporting and complementing present European biodiversity conservation strategy and policy while remaining within the guidelines of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Keywords

Biodiversity conservation Ecosystem services Habitat management Policy-science interface Protected area networks social–ecological systems 

References

  1. Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He JS, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B (2006) Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett 9:1146–1156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bela G, Pataki G (2008) Web survey template questionnaire. Available from: http://www.essrg.hu/english/survey/rubicode.html. Cited 29 May 2009
  3. Bennet AF (1999) Linkages in the landscape: the role of corridors and connectivity in wildlife conservation. IUCN GlandGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkes F, Folke C (1998) Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Billeter R, Liira J, Bailey D, Bugter R, Arens P, Augenstein I, Aviron S, Baudry J, Bukacek R, Burel F, Cerny M, De Blust G, de Cock R, Diekoetter T, Dietz H, Dirksen J, Dormann C, Durka W, Frenzel M, Hamersky R, Hendrickx F, Herzog F, Klotz S, Koolstra B, Lausch A, Le Coeur D, Maelfait JP, Opdam P, Roubalova M, Schermann A, Schermann N, Schmidt T, Schweiger O, Smulders MJM, Speelmans M, Simova P, Verboom J, van Wingerden WKRE, Zobel M, Edwards PJ (2008) Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study. J Appl Ecol 45:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonnin M, Bruzik A, Delbaere B, Lethier H, Richard D, Rientjes S, van Uden G, Terry A (2007) The pan-European ecological network: taking stock. Nature and Environment No. 146. Council of Europe Publishing, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  7. Cardinale BJ, Srivastava DS, Duffy JE, Wright JP, Downing AL, Sankaran M, Jousseau C (2006) Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443:989–992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Commission of the European Communities (2006) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council for establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending Directive 2004/35/EC. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/soil/index_en.htm. Cited 20 June 2009
  9. Cooney R, Dickson B (eds) (2005) The precautionary principle. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Council of Europe (1996) Pan-European biological and landscape diversity strategy. Nature and Environment No. 74. Council of Europe Press, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  11. Council of Europe (2000a) General guidelines for the development of the Pan-European ecological network. Nature and environment No. 107. Council of Europe Publishing, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  12. Council of Europe (2000b) European Landscape Convention and explanatory report. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  13. Council of Europe (2002) The European Landscape Convention. Naturopa No. 98. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawson TP, Rounsevell MDA, Kluvánková-Oravská T, Chobotová V, Stirling A (2010) Dynamic properties of complex adaptive ecosystems: implications for the sustainability of service provision. Biodivers Conserv (this volume)Google Scholar
  15. De Aranzabal I, Schmitz MF, Aguilera P, Pineda FD (2008) Modelling of landscape changes derived from the dynamics of socio-ecological systems: a case of study in a semiarid Mediterranean landscape. Ecol Indicators 8:672–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DEFRA (2007) Securing a healthy natural environment: an action plan for embedding an ecosystems approach. Department of the Environment Food and Rural Affairs, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Devictor V, Julliard R, Couvet D, Jiguet F (2008) Birds are tracking climate warming, but not fast enough. Proc R Soc B 275:2743–2748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Diaz S, Fargione J, Stuart Chapin F III, Tilman D (2006) Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLOS Biol 4:1300–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diaz S, Lavorel S, De Bello F, Quetier F, Grigulis K, Robson M (2007) Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. PNAS 104:20684–20689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Didham RK, Tylianakis JM, Gremmell NJ, Rand TA, Ewers RM (2007) Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline. Trends Ecol Evol 22:489–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Donald PF, Sanderson FJ, Burfield IJ, Bierman SM, Gregory RD, Waliczky Z (2007) International conservation policy delivers benefits for birds in Europe. Science 317:810–813CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. EASAC (European Academies Science Advisory Council) (2009) Ecosystem services and biodiversity in Europe. EASAC policy report 09. The Royal Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. EEA (1999) Environmental indicators: typology and overview technical report no. 25. European Environment Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  24. Ejrnaes R, Aude E, Nygaard B, Münier B (2002) Prediction of habitat quality using ordination and neural networks. Ecol Appl 12:1180–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. European Commission (1979) Birds Directive. Council Directive 79/409/EEC. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/legislation/birdsdirective/index_en.htm. Cited 22 June 2009
  26. European Commission (1992) Habitats Directive. Council Directive 92/43/EEC. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/legislation/habitatsdirective/index_en.htm. Cited 22 June 2009
  27. European Commission (2008) Marine strategy framework directive. Directive 2008/56/EC. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:164:0019:0040:EN:PDF Cited 22 June 2009
  28. Evans D (2006) The habitats of the European Union Habitats Directive. Biol Environ Proc Royal Irish Acad 106b:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fischlin A, Midgley GF, Price JT, Leemans R, Gopal B, Turley C, Rounsevell MDA, Dube OP, Tarazona J, Velichko AA (2007) Ecosystems, their properties, goods, and services. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP et al (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 211–272Google Scholar
  30. Gitay H, Suárez A, Watson RT, Anisimov O, Chapin FS, Cruz RV, Finlayson M, Hohenstein WG, Insarov G, Kundzewicz Z, Leemans R, Magadza C, Nurse L, Noble I, Price J, Ravindranath NH, Root TL, Scholes B, Villamizar A, Rumei X (2002) Climate change and biodiversity. IPCC Technical Paper V, 77 ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Hannah L, Midgley G, Andelman S, Araújo M, Hughes G, Martinez-Meyer E, Pearson R, Williams P (2007) Protected area needs in a changing climate. Front Ecol Environ 5:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harrington R, Dawson T, Feld CK, Haslett JR, Kluvankova-Oravska T, Kontogianni A, Luck GW, Rounsevell MDA, Samways MJ, Settele J, Zobel M, Harrison PA (2010) Terminology used in the RUBICODE approach to biodiversity conservation. Biodivers Conserv (this volume)Google Scholar
  33. Harrison PA, Vandewalle M. Sykes MT Berry PM, Bugter R, de Bello F, Feld CK, Grandin U, Harrington R, Haslett JR, Jongman RHG, Luck GW, da Silva PM, Moora M, Settele J, Sousa JP, Zobel M (2010) Identifying and prioritising services in European terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Biodivers Conserv (this volume)Google Scholar
  34. Haslett JR (2001) Biodiversity and conservation of Diptera: A fly’s eye view. J Insect Cons 5:71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Haslett JR (2004) Is habitat protection still a relevant conservation tool? Naturopa 101:16–17Google Scholar
  36. Haslett JR (2007) European strategy for the conservation of invertebrates. Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (Bern Convention). Nature and Environment No. 145, Council of Europe Publishing, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  37. Haslett JR, Berry PM, Zobel M (2008) European habitat management strategies for conservation: current regulations and practices with reference to dynamic ecosystems and ecosystem service provision. RUBICODE Report available from www.rubicode.net/rubicode/outputs.html. Cited 20 May 2009
  38. Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (2005) Ecosystem and human well-being. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  39. Hector A, Bagchi R (2007) Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature 448:188–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE, Norton DA, Ojima D, Richardson DM, Sanderson EW, Valladares F, Vila M, Zamora R, Zobel M (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecol Biog 15:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Honnay O, Verheyen K, Butaye J, Jacquemyn H, Bossuyt B, Hermy M (2002) Possible effects of habitat fragmentation and climate change on the range of forest plant species. Ecol Lett 5:525–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jongman RHG, Pungetti GP (2004) Ecological networks, concepts methods and implementation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jongman RHG, Külvik M, Kristiansen I (2004) European ecological networks and greenways. Land Urban Plan 68:305–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jongman RHG, Bouwma IM, van Doorn A (2006) Indicative map of the Pan-European ecological network in Western Europe. Technical Background Document. Alterra Report 1429, 103 ppGoogle Scholar
  45. Jongman RHG, Bela G, Pataki G, Scholten L, Mérı Á, Mertens C (2008) Web report on the effectiveness and appropriateness of existing conservation policies and their integration into other policy sectors. http://www.rubicode.net. Cited 20 May 2009, 122 pp
  46. Lee TM, Jetz W (2008) Future battlegrounds for conservation under global change. Proc Royal Soc B 275:1261–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Luck GW, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (2003) Population diversity and ecosystem services. Trends Ecol Evol 18:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luck GW, Harrington R, Harrison PA, Kremen C, Berry PM, Bugter R, Dawson TP, de Bello F, Díaz S, Feld CK, Haslett JR, Hering D, Kontogianni A, Lavorel S, Rounsevell M, Samways MJ, Sandin L, Settele J, Sykes MT, van den Hove S, Vandewalle M, Zobel M (2009) Quantifying the contribution of organisms to the provision of ecosystem services. Bioscience 59:223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ministry ANF (Ministry of Agriculture Nature and Food Quality, the Netherlands) (2008) Biodiversiteit werkt, voor natuur, voor mensen, voor altijd. Policy Programme Biodiversity 2008–2011, 67 ppGoogle Scholar
  50. Murphy HT, Lovett-Doust J (2004) Context and connectivity in plant metapopulations and landscape mosaics: does the matrix matter? Oikos 105:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Naidoo R, Balmford A, Ferraro PJ, Polasky S, Ricketts TH, Rouget M (2006) Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends Ecol Evol 21:681–687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Papageorgiou K, Vogiatzakis IN (2006) Nature protection in Greece: an appraisal of the factors shaping integrative conservation and policy effectiveness. Environ Sci Pollut 9:476–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pärtel M, Kalamees R, Reier Ü, Tuvi E-L, Roosaluste E, Vellak A, Zobel M (2005) Grouping and prioritization of vascular plant species for conservation: combining natural rarity and management need. Biol Conserv 123:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pärtel M, Helm A, Reitalu T, Liira J, Zobel M (2007) Grassland diversity related to the Late Iron Age human population density. J Ecol 95:574–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Planta Europa (2008) European Strategy for plant conservation (2008–2014): a sustainable future for Europe. Plantlife International, Salisbury, UK and Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  56. Planta Europa, Council of Europe (2002) European plant conservation strategy. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  57. Poschlod P, WallisDeVries MF (2002) The historical and socio-economic perspective of calcareous grasslands—lessons from the distant and recent past. Biol Conserv 104:361–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ridder B (2008) Questioning the ecosystem services argument for biodiversity conservation. Biodivers Conserv 17:781–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rollett A, Haines-Young R, Potschin M, Kumar P (2008) Delivering environmental services through agri-environment programmes: a scoping study. Report to the Land Use Policy Group, Peterborough, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  60. Rolston H III (1994) Conserving natural value. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Rounsevell MDA, Dawson TP, Harrison PA (2010) A conceptual framework to analyse the effects of environmental change on ecosystem services. Biodivers Conserv (this volume)Google Scholar
  62. RUBICODE (2008) Final report of the international workshop on habitat management and conservation policy—strategies for a new dynamic approach focused on ecosystem service provision, Kranjska Gora, April 2008. Available via http://www.rubicode.net/rubicode/RUBICODE_Slovenian_Workshop_Report.pdf. Cited 20 May 2009
  63. Samways MJ, Bazelet CS, Pryke JS (2010) Provision of ecosystem services by large-scale corridors and ecological networks. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-009-9715-2
  64. Shafer CL (1990) Nature reserves. Island theory and conservation practice. Smithsonian Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  65. Siebert R, Tiemann S, Lange A (2008) Identification and analysis of stakeholders for ecological network implementation in Europe—case studies from Germany, United Kingdom, Croatia, Estonia and Switzerland—KEN—knowledge for ecological networks: catalysing stakeholder involvement in the practical implementation of ecological networks. ECNC TilburgGoogle Scholar
  66. Silvertown J, Dodd M, Gowing D, Lawson C, McConway K (2006) Phylogeny and the hierarchical organization of plant diversity. Ecology 87:S39–S49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Srivastava DS, Velland M (2005) Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: is it relevant to conservation? Ann Rev Ecol Syst 36:267–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Standing Committee to the Bern Convention (2000) Abridged report of the 19th meeting (Strasbourg 29 November–3 December 1999). Council of Europe CM, 28 ppGoogle Scholar
  69. Truffer B, Cebon P, Dürrenburger B, Jaeger CC, Rudel R, Rothen S (1998) Innovative social responses in the face of global climate change. In: Cebon P, Dahinden U, Davies D, Imboden DM, Jaeger CC (eds) Views from the Alps: regional perspectives on climate change. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  70. Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vandewalle M, de Bello F, Feld CK, Lavorel S, Martins da Silva P, Moretti M, Sousa JP, Santos P, Sattler T, Sykes MT, Vanbergen AJ (2010) Functional traits as indicators for monitoring biodiversity response to land use changes across ecosystems and taxa. Biodivers Conserv (this volume)Google Scholar
  72. Vollhardt IMG, Tscharntke T, Wackers FL (2007) Diversity of cereal aphid parasitoids in simple and complex landscapes. Agric Ecos Environ 126:289–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vos CC, Verboom J, Opdam PFM, ter Braak CJF (2001) Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. Am Nat 157:24–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wiens JA (1995) Habitat fragmentation—island versus landscape perspectives on bird conservation. Ibis 137:S97–S104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wolfe D (2005) Climate change and the EU Birds Directive. A perspective from The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, UKGoogle Scholar
  77. Zobel M, Pärtel M (2008) What determines the relationship between plant diversity and habitat productivity? Global Ecol Biog 17:679–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • John R. Haslett
    • 1
  • Pam M. Berry
    • 2
  • Györgyi Bela
    • 3
  • Rob H. G. Jongman
    • 4
  • György Pataki
    • 3
  • Michael J. Samways
    • 5
  • Martin Zobel
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Organismal Biology, Division of Zoology and Functional AnatomyUniversity of SalzburgSalzburgAustria
  2. 2.Environmental Change InstituteOxford University Centre for the EnvironmentOxfordUK
  3. 3.Environmental Social Science Research Group (ESSRG), Department of Environmental EconomicsSzent István UniversityGödöllőHungary
  4. 4.Alterra, Wageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, and Centre for Agricultural Biodiversity, Faculty of AgrisciencesUniversity of StellenboschStellenboschSouth Africa
  6. 6.Institute of Ecology and Earth SciencesUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations