Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, 18:3733 | Cite as

Sound the stressor: how Hoatzins (Opisthocomus hoazin) react to ecotourist conversation

  • Daniel S. Karp
  • Terry L. Root
Original Paper

Abstract

Exposure to ecotourists often disrupts animal behavior, which is known to contribute to heightened mortality rates. In the Amazon, the emblematic, communal nesting Hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin) is frequently pursued by tourists eager for close views. Such encounters may cause heightened stress levels, and egg or nestling predation due to decreased parental attendance to nests and nestlings. The effect of reducing conversational tourist noise near wildlife is poorly understood, but represents one potential mechanism of mitigating the impacts of ecotourists on wildlife. In this study, we approached Hoatzins by canoe, playing recorded tourist conversations at different volumes. Both the distances from which we observed Hoatzins becoming agitated (e.g., clucking, defecation, etc.) and flush (e.g., flight or climbing away) were positively correlated with volume. Within 10 weeks Hoatzins began to habituate to silent approaches. Tourist conversations, however, continued to elicit the same heightened disturbance responses throughout data collection. Therefore, to have the best chance of seeing Hoatzins at a short distance and minimizing potentially negative disturbances, ecotourists should cease all conversation. Although not tested, silence is probably the best strategy when looking for many wildlife species.

Keywords

Ecotourism Noise Hoatzin Bird Conversation Tropical Flight initiation distance 

Abbreviations

AID

Agitation initiation distance

FID

Flight initiation distance

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our gratitude to Rodolfo Dirzo, Bill Durham, and Rainforest Expeditions for their support and guidance throughout the creation and execution of this study. Additionally, this project would not have been possible without the financial support from the Undergraduate Research Programs and the Latin American Studies departments at Stanford University. For assistance with statistical analysis, we would like to thank Dr. Eduardo Mendoza and Dr. Roger Guevara. Finally, we thank Alexander Markham, Matthew Champoux, Cristin Weekley, and Katy McCown for help in data collection.

References

  1. Blumstein DT (2003) Flight-initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance. J Wildl Manage 67:852–857. doi: 10.2307/3802692 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burger J, Gochfeld M (1990) Risk discrimination of direct versus tangential approach by basking Black Iguanas (Ctenosaura similis): variation as a function of human exposure. J Comp Psychol 104:388–394. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.104.4.388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burger J, Gochfeld M (1998) Effects of ecotourists on bird behaviour at Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Florida. Environ Conserv 25:13–21. doi: 10.1017/S0376892998000058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cairns D (1980) Nesting density, habitat structure and human disturbance as factors in Black Guillemot reproduction. Wilson Bull 92:352–361Google Scholar
  5. Dill LM, Houtman R (1989) The influence of distance to refuge on flight initiation distance in the Gray Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis). Can J Zool 67:233–235. doi: 10.1139/z89-033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Domínguez-Bello MG et al (1994) Ecology of the folivorous Hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin) on the Venezuelan plains. Auk 111:643–651Google Scholar
  7. Eckhardt G (2000) The effects of ecotourism on Polar Bear behavior. MS Thesis, University of Central FloridaGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellison LN, Cleary L (1978) Effects of human disturbance on breeding of double-crested cormorants. Auk 95:510–517Google Scholar
  9. Fernández-Juricic E et al (2001) Alert distance as an alternative measure of bird tolerance to human disturbance: implications for park design. Environ Conserv 28:263–269. doi: 10.1017/S0376892901000273 Google Scholar
  10. Fowler G (1999) Behavioral and hormonal responses of Magellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) to tourism and nest site visitation. Biol Conserv 90:143–149. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00026-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geist C et al (2005) Does intruder group size and orientation affect flight initiation distance in birds? Anim Biodivers Conserv 28:69–73Google Scholar
  12. Gillett W et al (1975) Effects of human activity on egg and chick mortality in a Glaucous-winged Gull colony. Cond 77:492–495. doi: 10.2307/1366102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffiths M, Van Schaik CP (1993) The impact of human traffic on the abundance and activity periods of Sumatran rain forest wildlife. Conserv Biol 7:623–626. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07030623.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gutzwiller K et al (1998) Bird tolerance to human intrusion in Wyoming montane forests. Cond 100:519–527. doi: 10.2307/1369718 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hidinger L (1996) Measuring the impacts of ecotourism on animal populations: a case study of Tikal National Park, Guatemala. MA Thesis, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Hunt GL (1972) Influence of food distribution and human disturbance on the reproductive success of Herring Gulls. Ecology 53:1051–1061. doi: 10.2307/1935417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klein ML (1993) Waterbird behavioral responses to human disturbances. Wildl Soc Bull 21:31–39Google Scholar
  18. Klein ML et al (1995) Effects of ecotourism on distribution of waterbirds in a wildlife refuge. Conserv Biol 9:1454–1465. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09061454.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martínez-Abraín A et al (2008) Compromise between seabird enjoyment and disturbance: the role of observed and observers. Environ Conserv 35:104–108. doi: 10.1017/S0376892908004748 Google Scholar
  20. Müllner A (2004) Breeding ecology and related life-history traits of the Hoatzin, Opisthocomus hoazin, in a primary rainforest habitat. Dissertation, Universität WürzburgGoogle Scholar
  21. Müllner A, Linsenmair E (2007) Nesting behavior and breeding success of Hoatzins. J Field Ornithol 78:352–361Google Scholar
  22. Müllner A et al (2004) Exposure to ecotourism reduces survival and affects stress response in Hoatzin chicks (Opisthocomus hoazin). Biol Conserv 118:549–558. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Robert H, Ralph CJ (1975) Effects of human disturbance on the breeding success of gulls. Cond 77:495–499. doi: 10.2307/1366103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Safina C, Burger J (1983) Effects of human disturbance on reproductive success in the Black Skimmer. Cond 85:164–171. doi: 10.2307/1367250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stankowich T, Blumstein D (2005) Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proc R Soc 272:2627–2634. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Strahl SD (1988) The social organization and behavior of the Hoatzin Opisthocomus hoazin in central Venezuela. Ibis 130:483–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1988.tb02714.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ydenberg RC, Dill LM (1986) The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv Study Behav 16:229–249. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60192-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Woods Institute for the EnvironmentStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.OrindaUSA

Personalised recommendations