Biodiversity and Conservation

, 18:3483

Estimating multiple benefits from vegetation in mediterranean ecosystems

Original Paper


Ecosystems of the Mediterranean region are characterized by a heterogeneous and dynamic landscape mosaic of vegetation formations that provide diverse benefits: agro pastoral products, ecosystem services, and other utilities. Valuation of these benefits in different states of the ecosystem is an important step towards conservation, decision making, and land management. Yet, studies of this kind are scarce, especially cases dealing with more than one benefit. Multiple benefits evaluation is not straightforward; it involves many difficulties and questions which have no agreed solutions, e.g. estimation, common currency, and optimal solution. In this study we present a methodology for the estimation of three benefits in different components of Mediterranean woody vegetation in Israel. Densities of geophyte wildflowers, honey flowers, and fleshy fruits as food for birds were measured within five vegetation components defined by dominant plant functional types, in four sites with different disturbance histories. Each benefit was measured in its own units. The results showed significant differences between vegetation states in values of each benefit. Therefore, it is possible to calculate the contributions of different cover components for these three benefits. Furthermore, this indicates that it is possible to estimate the level of benefits at larger scales as a first approximation, by considering only the composition of the vegetation cover. The values for the three benefits were standardized to illustrate the question of multiple benefits valuation. This method does not lead to an optimization, but can nevertheless provide a useful tool toward conservation and rational management by land managers and policy makers.


Ecosystem services Fleshy fruits Geophytes Honey flowers Management Multiple use Valuation Plant functional types 


  1. Acevedo MF, Urban DL, Shugart HH (1996) Models of forest dynamics based on roles of tree species. Ecol Modell 87:267–284. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(94)00208-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbero M, Bonin G, Loisel R, Quezel P (1990) Changes and disturbances of forest ecosystems caused by human activities in the western part of the Mediterranean Basin. Vegetatio 87:151–173. doi:10.1007/BF00042952 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bestelmeyer BT, Herrick JE, Brown JR, Trujillo DA, Havstad KM (2004) Land management in the American Southwest: a state-and-transition approach to ecosystem complexity. Environ Manag 34:38–51. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0047-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carmel Y, Kadmon R, Nirel R (2001) Spatiotemporal predictive models of Mediterranean vegetation dynamics. Ecol Appl 11:268–280. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0268:SPMOMV]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carson RT, Flores NE, Meade NF (2001) Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environ Resour Econ 19:173–210. doi:10.1023/A:1011128332243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Costanza R, dArge R, deGroot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, ONeill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, vandenBelt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260. doi:10.1038/387253a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Croitoru L, Merlo M (2005) Mediterranean Forest Value. In: Merlo M, Croitoru L (eds) Valuing mediterranean forests tward total economic value. CABI, Cambridge, pp 37–68Google Scholar
  8. Daily GC, Soderqvist T, Aniyar S, Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Ehrlich PR, Folke C, Jansson A, Jansson BO, Kautsky N, Levin S, Lubchenco J, Maler KG, Simpson D, Starrett D, Tilman D, Walker B (2000) Ecology—the value of nature and the nature of value. Science 289:395–396. doi:10.1126/science.289.5478.395 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Diamond PA, Hausman JA (1994) Contingent valuation—is some number better than no number. J Econ Perspect 8:45–64Google Scholar
  10. Farber SC, Costanza R, Wilson MA (2002) Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 41:375–392. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00088-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fleischer A, Tsur Y (2003) Measuring the recreational value of open space. J Agric Econ 54:269–283. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2003.tb00063.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gafni A (2005) Israel. In: Merlo M, Croitoru L (eds) Valuing mediterranean forests toward total economic value. CABI, Cambridge, pp 147–160Google Scholar
  13. Greenberg CH, Levey DJ, Loftis DL (2007) Fruit production in mature and recently regenerated forests of the Appalachians. J Wildl Manag 71:321–335. doi:10.2193/2005-747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hadar L, Noy-Meir I, Perevolotsky A (1999) The effect of shrub clearing and grazing on the composition of a Mediterranean plant community: functional groups versus species. J Veg Sci 10:673–682. doi:10.2307/3237082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henkin Z, Hadar L, Noy-Meir I (2004) Effect of cattle and goat grazing on landscape features and human visual qualities in northern Israel. In: Arianoutsou M, Papanastasis VP (ed) Ecology, conservation and management of Mediterranean Climate Ecosystems. Proceedings 10th MEDECOS Conference, Rhodes, Greece. Milpress, Rotterdam 152Google Scholar
  16. Henkin Z, Hadar L, Noy-Meir I (2007) Human-scale structural heterogeneity induced by grazing in a Mediterranean woodland landscape. Landscape Ecol 22:577–587. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-9042-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herrera CM (1998) Long-term dynamics of Mediterranean frugivorous birds and fleshy fruits: a 12-year study. Ecol Monogr 68:511–538Google Scholar
  18. Herrera CM, Jordano P, Lopezsoria L, Amat JA (1994) Recruitment of a mast-fruiting, bird-dispersed tree—bridging frugivore activity and seedling establishment. Ecol Monogr 64:315–344. doi:10.2307/2937165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hill MO (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holgen P, Mattsson L, Li CZ (2000) Recreation values of boreal forest stand types and landscapes resulting from different silvicultural systems: an economic analysis. J Environ Manag 60:173–180. doi:10.1006/jema.2000.0377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howarth RB, Farber S (2002) Accounting for the value of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 41:421–429. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00091-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huhtala A (2004) What price recreation in Finland? A contingent valuation study of non-market benefits of public outdoor recreation areas. J Leisure Res 36:23–44Google Scholar
  23. Izhaki I (1992) A comparative-analysis of the nutritional quality of mixed and exclusive fruit diets for yellow-vented bulbuls. Condor 94:912–923. doi:10.2307/1369288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Izhaki I (1998) Essential amino acid composition of fleshy fruits versus maintenance requirements of passerine birds. J Chem Ecol 24:1333–1345. doi:10.1023/A:1021274716062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Izhaki I (2002) The role of fruit traits in determining fruit removal in East Mediterranean ecosystems. In: Levey DJ, Silva WR, Galetti M (eds) Disersal and frugivory: ecology evolution and conservation. CAB, UK, pp 161–175Google Scholar
  26. Izhaki I, Walton PB, Safriel UN (1991) Seed shadows generated by frugivorous birds in an eastern mediterranean scrub. J Ecol 79:575–590. doi:10.2307/2260654 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson LE, Pascual U, Hodgkin T (2007) Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121:196–210. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kochli DA, Brang P (2005) Simulating effects of forest management on selected public forest goods and services: a case study. For Ecol Manag 209:57–68. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koniak G, Noy-Meir I (2005) An approach to modelling vegetation dynamics and multiple benefits, in response to land management. In: Modelling, Simulation and optimization. Tonella, G (ed) Proceedings 5th IASTED International Conference, Oranjestad, Aruba pp 471–478Google Scholar
  30. Koniak G, Noy-Meir I (2009) A hierarchical, multi-scale, management-responsive model of Mediterranean vegetation dynamics. Ecol Model 220:1148–1158. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.01.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kremen C (2005) Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol Lett 8:468–479. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00751.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuusipalo J, Kangas J (1994) Managing biodiversity in a forestry environment. Conserv Biol 8:450–460. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08020450.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Landsberg J, Forbes TDA (1997) Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol Evol 12:474–478. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01219-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malanson GP, Westman WE, Yan YL (1992) Realized versus fundamental niche functions in a model of Chaparral response to climatic change. Ecol Modell 64:261–277. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(92)90026-B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martinez-Alier J, Munda G, O’neill J (1998) Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecol Econ 26:277–286. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00120-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Merlo M, Briales ER (2000) Public goods and externalities linked to Mediterranean forests: economic nature and policy. Land use policy 17:197–208. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00017-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Merlo M, Croitoru L (2005) Concepts and methodology: a first attempt towards quantification. In: Merlo M, Croitoru L (eds) Valuing Mediterranean forests toward total economic value. CABI, Cambridge, pp 17–36Google Scholar
  38. Montgomery CA, Pollak RA, Freemark K, White D (1999) Pricing biodiversity. J Environ Econ Manag 38:1–19. doi:10.1006/jeem.1999.1073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moore AD, Noble IR (1990) An individualistic model of vegetation stand dynamics. J Environ Manag 31:61–81. doi:10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80015-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Naveh Z (1978) Model of multipurpose ecosystem management for degraded Mediterranean uplands. Environ Manag 2:31–37. doi:10.1007/BF01866444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Naveh Z (1982) Mediterranean landscape evolution and degradation as multivariate biofunctions—theoretical and practical implications. Landsc Plann 9:125–146. doi:10.1016/0304-3924(82)90003-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Naveh Z, Dan J (1973) The human degradation of Mediterranean landscapes in Israel. In: Di Castri F, Mooney HA (eds) Mediterranean-type ecosystems: origin and structure. Springer, Berlin, pp 373–390Google Scholar
  43. Noy-Meir I, Oron T (2001) Effects of grazing on geophytes in Mediterranean vegetation. J Veg Sci 12:749–760. doi:10.2307/3236862 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Farrell PJ, Donaldson JS, Hoffman MT (2007) The influence of ecosystem goods and services on livestock management practices on the Bokkeveld plateau, South Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 122:312–324. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2007.01.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Neill J (1997) Managing without prices: the monetary valuation of biodiversity. Ambio 26:546–550Google Scholar
  46. Pacala SW, Canham CD, Saponara J, Silander JA, Kobe RK, Ribbens E (1996) Forest models defined by field measurements: estimation, error analysis and dynamics. Ecol Monogr 66:1–43. doi:10.2307/2963479 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pausas JG (1997) Resprouting of Quercus suber in NE Spain after fire. J Veg Sci 8:703–706. doi:10.2307/3237375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pausas JG (1999) Response of plant functional types to changes in the fire regime in Mediterranean ecosystems: a simulation approach. J Veg Sci 10:717–722. doi:10.2307/3237086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pausas JG (2003) The effect of landscape pattern on Mediterranean vegetation dynamics: a modelling approach using functional types. J Veg Sci 14:365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Perevolotsky A (2006) Conserving Mediterranean ecosystems: a challenge for landscape ecology. Isr J Plant Sci 53:203–213. doi:10.1560/DQL0-Q22F-LMD5-97LK CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Perevolotsky A, Seligman NG (1998) Role of grazing in Mediterranean rangeland ecosystems—inversion of a paradigm. Bioscience 48:1007–1017. doi:10.2307/1313457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Perevolotsky A, Ettinger E, Schwartz-Tzachor R, Yonatan R (2002) Management of fuel breaks in the Israeli Mediterranean ecosystem: the case of Ramat-Hanadiv Park. J Mediterr Ecol 3:13–22Google Scholar
  53. Petanidou T, Smets E (1995) The potential of marginal lands for bees and apiculture—nectar secretion in mediterranean shrublands. Apidologie 26:39–52. doi:10.1051/apido:19950106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Possingham HP (2000) Is environmental research a waste of time? Ecol Manage Restor 1:81–82. doi:10.1046/j.1442-8903.2000.00027.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Possingham HP, Andelman SJ, Noon BR, Trombulak S, Pulliam HR (2001) Making smart conservation decisions. In: Soule M, Orians GH (eds) Conservation biology: research priorities for the next decade. Island Press, Washington, Covelo, London, pp 225–244Google Scholar
  56. Potts SG, Petanidou T, Roberts S, O’Toole C, Hulbert A, Willmer P (2006) Plant-pollinator biodiversity and pollination services in a complex Mediterranean landscape. Biol Conserv 129:519–529. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sal AG, Garcia AG (2007) A comprehensive assessment of multifunctional agricultural land-use systems in Spain using a multi-dimensional evaluative model. Agric Ecosyst Environ 120:82–91. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.06.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shugart HH, West DC (1980) Forest succession models. Bioscience 30:308–313. doi:10.2307/1307854 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Slee B, Evans R, Roberts D (2004) Forestry in the rural economy: a new approach to assessing the impact of forestry on rural development. Forestry 77:441–453. doi:10.1093/forestry/77.5.441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Spash CL, Vatn A (2006) Transferring environmental value estimates: Issues and alternatives. Ecol Econ 60:379–388. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Standiford RB, Howitt RE (1993) Multiple use management of California hardwood rangelands. J Range Manag 46:176–182. doi:10.2307/4002277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stirn LZ (1990) Adaptive dynamic model for optimal forest management. For Ecol Manag 31:167–188. doi:10.1016/0378-1127(90)90159-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tecle A, Szidarovszky F, Duckstein L (1995) Conflict analysis in multi-resource forest management with multiple decision-makers. Nat Resour 31:8–17Google Scholar
  64. Urban DL, Bonan GB, Smith TM, Shugart HH (1991) Spatial applications of gap models. For Ecol Manag 42:95–110. doi:10.1016/0378-1127(91)90067-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vatn A, Bromley DW (1994) Choices without prices without apologies. J Environ Econ Manag 26:129–148. doi:10.1006/jeem.1994.1008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vulliamy B, Potts SG, Willmer PG (2006) The effects of cattle grazing on plant-pollinator communities in a fragmented Mediterranean landscape. Oikos 114:529–543. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14004.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Westoby M, Walker B, Noy-Meir I (1989) Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. J Range Manag 42:266–274. doi:10.2307/3899492 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gili Koniak
    • 1
  • Imanuel Noy-Meir
    • 1
  • Avi Perevolotsky
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Plant Sciences, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food, and EnvironmentHebrew University of JerusalemRehovotIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resources, Agricultural Research OrganizationThe Volcani CenterBet DaganIsrael

Personalised recommendations