Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 987–1000 | Cite as

Comparing tree diversity and composition in coffee farms and sacred forests in the Western Ghats of India

Original Paper

Abstract

Expansion of coffee cultivation is one of the causes of deforestation and biodiversity loss. However, shade grown coffee has been promoted as a means for preserving biodiversity in the tropics. In this study we compared tree diversity in two types of coffee management regimes with the sacred groves in the Western Ghats of India. We computed species accumulation curves, species diversity indices and evenness indices to compare the different management regimes. Results of diversity indices showed that shade coffee had less diversity compared to sacred groves. Exotic species dominated the tree diversity in lands where the tree harvesting rights are with the growers. Native trees dominated the tree diversity when growers had no ownership rights on trees. A species accumulation curve suggested that the sacred grove had higher species richness compared to other two habitats. Lack of incentive to preserve endemic species as shade trees is forcing growers to plant more exotic species in shade grown coffee plots. If encouraged, shade grown coffee can preserve some biodiversity, but cannot provide all ecological benefits of a natural forest.

Keywords

Biodiversity Coffee India Land tenure Sacred groves Species dominance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Klooster, Dr. R. K. Hegde, Dr. Kushalappa, Tony Stallins, and Shea for helping us in various stages of this study. We would also like to thank all the coffee growers and the villagers in Kodagu for allowing us to do the study in their coffee plots and sacred groves. Finally we would also like to thank anonymous reviewers for all the comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Ambinakudige S (2006) Differential impacts of commodification of agriculture in the Western Ghats of India: an extended environmental entitlement analysis. Florida State University, TallahasseeGoogle Scholar
  2. Benhin J (2006) Agriculture and deforestation in the tropics: a critical theoretical and empirical review. Ambio 35(1):9–16. doi: 10.1639/0044-7447(2006)035[0009:AADITT]2.0.CO;2 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhagwat S (2002) Biodiversity and conservation of a cultural landscape in the Western Ghats of India. Oxford Forestry Institute, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackman A et al (2005) Deforestation and shade coffee in Oaxaca, Mexico: key research findings. Resources for the future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Chandran MDS (1993) Vegetation changes in the evergreen forest tract of Uttara Kannada District of Karnataka State. Department of Botany, Karnataka University, DharwadGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandran MDS et al (1998) Sacred groves of the Western Ghats of India. In: Ramakrishnan PS, Saxena KG, Chandrashekar UM (eds) Conserving the sacred for biodiversity management. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.Pvt Ltd, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  7. Chichilnisky G (1994) North–south trade and the global environment. Am Econ Rev 84:851–874Google Scholar
  8. Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through exploration. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 345:101–118. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0091 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Condit A (1994) A field guide to large forest censuses in the tropics: the Bci 50 ha plot and other large-scale studies. Centre for Tropical Forest Science, PanamaGoogle Scholar
  10. Conservation International (2001) Conservation principles for coffee production. Conservational International, 2007Google Scholar
  11. Dallmeier F, Comiskey JA (eds) (1998) Forest biodiversity in North, Central and South America, and the Caribbean: research and monitoring. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. Daniels RJR et al (1995) Impact of human extraction on tropical humid forests in the Western Ghats in Uttara Kannada, South India. J Appl Ecol 32:866–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehrlich PR (ed) (1988) The loss of biodiversity: causes and consequences. Biodiversity. National Academy Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. Elouard C (2000) Vegetation features in relation to biogeography. In: Ramakrishnan PS, Chandrashekar UM, Elouard C et al (eds) Mountain biodiversity, land use dynamics and traditional knowledge. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, pp 25–42Google Scholar
  15. FRLHT (2000) Kodagu Maps. Foundation for revitalisation of local health traditions, Bangalore Google Scholar
  16. Geist H, Lambin E (2001) What drives tropical deforestation. LUCC International Project Office, University of Lou vain Google Scholar
  17. Gentry AH (1990) Floristic similarities and differences between Southern Central America and Upper and Central Amazonia. In: Gentry AH (ed) Four neotropical rainforests. Yale University Press, New Haven CT, pp 141–157 Google Scholar
  18. Gimaret-Carpentier C et al (1998) Sampling strategies for the assessment of tree species diversity. J Veg Sci 9:161–172. doi: 10.2307/3237115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gorenflo LJ, Brandon K (2003) Agricultural capacity and conservation in high biodiversity forest ecosystems. Conserv Biol 17(6):1844. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00150.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haller G (1910) Revenue settlement of Coorg. Madikeri, Shakthi Printers, MadikeriGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardner J, Rice R (2002) Rethinking green consumerism. Sci Am 286:88–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Iverson L, Prasad A (2002) Potential redistribution of tree species habitat under five climate change scenarios in the eastern US. For Ecol Manage 155:205–222. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00559-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jiménez-Avila E, Martínez VP (1979) Estudios Ecológicos Del Agroecosistema Cafetalero. Ii. Producción De Materia Orgánica En Diferentes Tipos De Estructura. Biotica 4:109–126Google Scholar
  25. Kushalappa CG, Bhagwat S (2001) Sacred groves: biodiversity, threats and conservation. In: Uma Shaanker R, Ganeshaiah KN, Bawa KS (eds) Forest genetic resources: status, threats and conservation strategies. Oxford and IBH publishing Co Pvt Ltd, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  26. Kushalappa CG, Kushalappa KA (1998) Preliminary report: impact assessment of working in the Western Ghats Forests. College of Forestry, University of Agricultural Sciences, Ponnampet, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  27. Lele S (2001) Linking ecology, economics and institutions of forest use in the Western Ghats of Karnataka, India, Institute for Social & Economic Change, Bangalore and Pacific Institute for SIDES, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  28. Magurran A (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing Company, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  29. Menon S, Bawa K (1998) Tropical deforestation: reconciling disparities in estimates for India. Ambio 27(7):576–577Google Scholar
  30. Mittermeier RA et al (2005) Hotspots revisited: Earth's biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. CEMEX—Conservation International, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  31. Moguel P, Toledo V (1999) Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems in Mexico. Conserv Biol 13:11–21. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97153.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. National Audubon Society (2000) Coffee and conservation of migratory birds. NAS 2007Google Scholar
  33. Pascal JP, Ramesh BR (1987). A field key to the trees and lianas of the evergreen forests of the Western Ghats (India). Institut Français de Pondichéry, PondicherryGoogle Scholar
  34. Perfecto I, Snelling R (1995) Biodiversity and the transformation of a tropical agroecosystem: ants in coffee plantations. Ecol Appl 5:1084–1097. doi: 10.2307/2269356 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perfecto I, Vandermeere J (2002) Quality of agroecological matrix in a tropical montane landscape: ants in coffee plantations in Southern Mexico. Conserv Biol 16:174–182. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.99536.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perfecto I et al (1996) Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. Bioscience 46:598–608. doi: 10.2307/1312989 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perfecto I et al (2005) Biodiversity, yield and shade coffee certification. Ecol Econ 54:435–446. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Perfecto I et al (2007) Shaded coffee and the stability of rainforest margins in Latin America. In: Tscharntke T, Leuschner C, Zeller M, Guhudja H, Bidin A (eds) The stability of tropical rainforest margins: linking ecological, economic, and social constraints of land use and conservation. Springer, Environmental Science Series, Heidelberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  39. Philpott SM, Armbrecht I (2006) Tropical agroforests and the ecological role of ants. Ecol Entomol 31:369–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00793.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Philpott S, Dietsch T (2003) Coffee and conservation: a global context and the value of farmer involvement. Conserv Biol 17(6):1844–1846. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00150.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Philpott SM et al (2007) Field testing ecological and economic benefits of coffee certification programs. Conserv Biol 21(4):975–985. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00728.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Philpott SM et al (2008) Biodiversity conservation, yield, and alternative products in coffee agroecosystem in Sumatra, Indonesia. Biodivers Conserv 17(8):1805–1820. doi: 10.1007/s10531-007-9267-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rappole JH et al (2003) Coffee and conservation. Conserv Biol 17:334–336. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01548.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rice RA, Ward JR (1997) Coffee, conservation and commerce N the Western Hemisphere. Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center and Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  45. Sathish BN (2005) Assessment of tree diversity in coffee plantations under different land tenure systems in Virajpet Taluk, Kodagu. College of Forestry, University of Agricultural Sciences, Ponnampet, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  46. Shrinidhi AS, Lele S (2001) Forest tenure regimes in the Western Ghats: a compendium. Bangalore. Inst Soc Econ Change 90:56Google Scholar
  47. Solow AR (1993) A simple test for change in community structure. J Animal Ecol 62:191–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Soto-Pinto L et al (2001) Woody plant diversity and structure of shade-grown-coffee plantations in northern Chiapas, Mexico. Rev Biol Trop 49(3–4):977–987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Utkarsh G et al (1998) On the patterns of tree diversity in the Western Ghats of India. Curr Sci 75:594–603Google Scholar
  50. Verbist B et al (2005) Factors driving land use change: effects on watershed functions in a coffee agroforestry system in Lampung, Sumatra. Agric Syst 85:254–270. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2005.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeosciencesMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA
  2. 2.College of ForestryKodaguIndia

Personalised recommendations