Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 1001–1018 | Cite as

Spatial and temporal deforestation dynamics in protected and unprotected dry forests: a case study from Myanmar (Burma)

  • Melissa Songer
  • Myint Aung
  • Briony Senior
  • Ruth DeFries
  • Peter Leimgruber
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Tropical dry forests are more threatened, less protected and especially susceptible to deforestation. However, most deforestation research focuses on tropical rain forests. We analyzed spatial and temporal changes in land cover from 1972 through 2005 at Chatthin Wildlife Sanctuary (CWS), a tropical dry forest in Myanmar (Burma). CWS is one of the largest protected patches of tropical dry forest in Southeast Asia and supports over half the remaining wild population of the endangered Eld’s deer. Between 1973 and 2005, 62% of forest was lost at an annual rate of 1.86% in the area, while forest loss inside CWS was only 16% (0.45% annually). Based on trends found during our study period, dry forests outside CWS would not persist beyond 2019, while forests inside CWS would persist for at least another 100 years. Analysis of temporal deforestation patterns indicates the highest rate of loss occurred between 1992 and 2001. Conversion to agriculture, shifting agriculture, and flooding from a hydro-electric development were the main deforestation drivers. Fragmentation was also severe, halving the area of suitable Eld’s deer habitat between 1973 and 2001, and increasing its isolation. CWS protection efforts were effective in reducing deforestation rates, although deforestation effects extended up to 2 km into the sanctuary. Establishing new protected areas for dry forests and finding ways to mitigate human impacts on existing forests are both needed to protect remaining dry forests and the species they support.

Keywords

Tropical dry forests Biodiversity Change detection Deforestation rates Fragmentation Protected areas Forest dynamics Land use change Remote sensing Landsat ASTER 

Abbreviations

ASTER

Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer

CWS

Chatthin Wildlife Sanctuary

GIS

Geographic Information Systems

GPS

Global Positioning System

ISODATA

Iterative Self-Organizing Data Analysis Techniques

Landsat ETM+

Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper

Landsat MSS

Landsat Multispectral Scanner

Landsat TM

Landsat Thematic Mapper

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of Chatthin Wildlife Sanctuary for their assistance in collection of field data and Dan Kelly and Melanie Delion for assistance in data management in the laboratory. This project was primarily funded by a grant awarded by NASA to the Conservation Non-Governmental Working Group.

References

  1. Allendorf TD, Khaing Khaing Swe, Thida Oo, Ye Htut, Myint Aung, Hayek LA, Leimgruber P, Wemmer C (2006) Community attitudes toward three protected areas in upper Myanmar (Burma). Environ Conserv 33(4):344–352. doi: 10.1017/S0376892906003389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Myint Aung (2007) Policy and practice in Myanmar’s protected area system. J Environ Manage 84(2):188–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.016 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Myint Aung, McShea WJ, Sein Htung, Aung Than, Tin Mya Soe, Monfort S, Wemmer C (2001) Ecology and social organization of a tropical deer (Cervus eldi thamin). J Mammal 82(3):836–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Myint Aung, Khaing Khaing Swe, Thida Oo, Kyaw Kyaw Moe, Leimgruber P, Allendorf T, Duncan C, Wemmer C (2004) The environmental history of Chatthin Wildlife Sanctuary, a protected area in Myanmar (Burma). J Environ Manage 72:205–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.04.013 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks TM, Pimm SL, Collar NJ (1997) Deforestation predicts the number of threatened birds in insular Southeast Asia. Conserv Biol 11(2):382–394. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95493.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Rice RE, da Fonseca GAB (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291(5501):125–127. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5501.125 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E (1995) Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 450 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Bunyavejchewin SC (1982) Canopy structure of the dry dipterocarp forest of Thailand. University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll C, Miquelle DG (2004) Spatial viability analysis of Amur tiger Panthera tigris altaica in the Russian Far East: the role of protected areas and landscape matrix in population persistence. J Appl Ecol 43(6):1056–1068. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01237.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chape S, Harrison J, Spalding M, Lysenko I (2005) Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philos Trans R Soc B 360:442–455. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1592 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeFries RS, Hansen A, Newton AC, Hansen MC (2005) Increasing isolation of protected areas in tropical forests over the past twenty years. Ecol Appl 15(1):19–26. doi: 10.1890/03-5258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eberhardt K (2003) A review of challenges to sustainable development in the uplands of Myanmar. In: Xu J, Mikesell S (eds) Landscapes of diversity: indigenous knowledge, sustainable livelihoods and resource governance in montane mainland Southeast Asia. Proceedings of the III symposium on MMSEA, Lijiang, August 2002. Yunnan Science and Technology, Kunming, pp 101–111Google Scholar
  13. ERDAS Inc (1997) ERDAS tour guide 8.3. ERDAS Inc., AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  14. Ervin J (2003) Rapid assessment of protected area management effectiveness in four countries. Bioscience 53(9):833–841. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0833:RAOPAM]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ewel JJ (1999) Natural systems as models for the design of sustainable systems of land use. Agrofor Syst 45(1–3):1–21. doi: 10.1023/A:1006219721151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foody GM, Cutler MEJ (2003) Tree biodiversity in protected and logged Bornean tropical rain forests and its measurement by satellite remote sensing. J Biogeogr 30(7):1053–1066Google Scholar
  17. Gentry AH (1984) An overview of neotropical phytogeographic patterns with an emphasis on Amazonia. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodman PS (2003) Assessing management effectiveness and setting priorities in protected areas in KwaZulu-Natal. Bioscience 53(9):843–850. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0843:AMEASP]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gurd DB, Nudds TD, Rivard DH (2001) Conservation of mammals in Eastern North American wildlife reserves: how small is too small? Conserv Biol 15(5):1355–1363. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00188.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen AJ, Rotella JJ (2001) Nature reserves and land use: implications of the ‘‘place’’ principle. In: Dale V, Haeuber R (eds) Applying ecological principles to land management. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirsch P (1995) A regional perspective on large dams. As cited in Eberhardt K (2003) A review of challenges to sustainable development in the uplands of Myanmar. In: Xu J, Mikesell S (eds) Landscapes of diversity: indigenous knowledge, sustainable livelihoods and resource governance in montane mainland Southeast Asia. Proceedings of the III symposium on MMSEA, Lijiang, August 2002. Yunnan Science and Technology Press, Kunming, pp 101–111Google Scholar
  22. Hockings M, Stolton S, Dudley N (2004) Management effectiveness: assessing management of protected areas? J Environ Policy Plan 9(2):157–174. doi: 10.1080/1523908042000320731 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Janzen DH (1988) Tropical dry forests: the most endangered major tropical ecosystem. In: Wilson EO, Peters FM (eds) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. Jensen JR, Ramsey EW, Mackey HE, Christensen E, Sharitz R (1987) Inland wetlands change detection using aircraft MSS data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 9:669–682Google Scholar
  25. Koy K, McShea WJ, Leimgruber P, Haack BN, Myint Aung (2005) Percentage canopy cover-using Landsat imagery to delineate habitat for Myanmar’s endangered Eld’s deer (Cervus eldi). Anim Conserv 8(3):289–296. doi: 10.1017/S1367943005002209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurz S (1877) Forest flora of British Burma, vols 1 and 2. Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing, CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
  27. Leimgruber P, Kelly DS, Steininger MK, Brunner J, Mueller T, Songer M (2005) Forest cover change patterns in Myanmar (Burma) 1990–2000. Environ Conserv 32(4):356–364. doi: 10.1017/S0376892905002493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Linkie M, Smith RJ (2004) Mapping and predicting deforestation patterns in the lowlands of Sumatra. Biodivers Conserv 13(10):1809–1818. doi: 10.1023/B:BIOC.0000035867.90891.ea CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu J, Linderman M, Ouyang Z, An L, Yang J, Zheng H (2001) Ecological degradation in protected areas: the case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas. Science 292(5514):98–101. doi: 10.1126/science.1058104 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lynam AJ (1997) Rapid decline of small mammal diversity in monsoon evergreen forest fragments in Thailand. In: Laurance WF, Bierregaard RO (eds) Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management and conservation of fragmented communities. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  31. Maass JM (1995) Conversion of tropical dry forest to pasture and agriculture. In: Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E (eds) Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Mas J-F (2005) Assessing protected area effectiveness using surrounding (buffer) areas environmentally similar to the target area. Environ Monit Assess 105(1–3):69–80. doi: 10.1007/s10661-005-3156-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available via: www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html. Cited 20 Aug 2008
  34. McShea WJ, Leimgruber P, Aung M, Monfort SL, Wemmer C (1999) Range collapse of tropical cervid (Cervus eldi) and the extent of remaining habitat in central Myanmar. Anim Conserv 2(3):173–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.1999.tb00063.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Menzies NK (1995) The changing dynamics of shifting cultivation practices in upland southwest China. As cited in Eberhardt K (2003) A review of challenges to sustainable development in the uplands of Myanmar. In: Xu J, Mikesell S (eds) Landscapes of diversity: indigenous knowledge, sustainable livelihoods and resource governance in montane mainland Southeast Asia. Proceedings of the III Symposium on MMSEA, Lijiang, August 2002. Yunnan Science and Technology Press, Kunming, pp 101–111Google Scholar
  36. Miles L, Newton AC, DeFries RS, Ravilious C, May I, Blyth S et al (2006) A global overview of the conservation status of tropical dry forests. J Biogeogr 33(3):491–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01424.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ministry of Information (2002) Myanmar facts and figures. Ministry of Information, University of Myanmar, YangonGoogle Scholar
  38. Murphy P, Lugo AE (1986) Ecology of tropical dry forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:67–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.000435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Myers N (1984) The primary source: tropical forests and our future. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Newmark WD (1987) A land-bridge island perspective on mammalian extinctions in western North Arnerican parks. Nature 325:430–432. doi: 10.1038/325430a0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Newmark WD (1996) Insularization of Tanzanian parks and the local extinction of large mammals. Conserv Biol 10:1549–1556. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10061549.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parrish JD, Braun DP, Unnasch RS (2003) Are we conserving what we say we are? Measuring ecological integrity within protected areas. Bioscience 53:851–860. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0851:AWCWWS]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pimm SL, Raven P (2000) Extinction by numbers. Nature 403:843–845. doi: 10.1038/35002708 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rao M, Rabinowitz A, Saw Tun Khaing (2002) Status review of the protected-area system in Myanmar, with recommendations for conservation planning. Conserv Biol 16(2):360–368. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00219.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raven PH (1988) Our diminishing tropical forests. In: Wilson EO, Peters FM (eds) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  46. Rutchey K, Vilcheck L (1994) Development of an everglades vegetation map using a SPOT image and the global positioning system. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 60(6):767Google Scholar
  47. Sánchez-Azofeifa GA, Quesada M, Rodriguez JP, Nassar JM, Stoner KE, Castillo A et al (2005) Research priorities for neotropical dry forests. Biotropica 37(4):477–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00066.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Songer M (2006) Tropical dry forests of Southeast Asia. Dissertation, University of MarylandGoogle Scholar
  49. Stamp LD (1925) The vegetation of Burma from an ecological standpoint. Thacker, Spink and Company, CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
  50. Stott P (1990) Stability and stress in the savanna forests of mainland South-East Asia. J Biogeogr 17(4/5):373–383. doi: 10.2307/2845366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Struhsaker TT, Struhsaker PJ, Siex KS (2005) Conserving Africa’s rain forests: problems in protected areas and possible solutions. Biol Conserv 123(1):45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sutton SL, Whitmore TC, Chadwick AC (eds) (1984) Tropical rain forests: ecology and management. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Terborgh J, Lopez L, Tello J, Yu D, Bruni AR (1997) Transitory states in relaxing ecosystems of land bridge islands. In: Laurance WF, Bierregaard RO (eds) Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management and conservation of fragmented communities. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  54. Trigg SN (2006) Utility of landsat 7 satellite data for continued monitoring of forest cover change in protected areas in Southeast Asia. Singap J Trop Geogr 27:49. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00239.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tucker CJ, Grant DM, Dykstra J (2004) NASA’s global orthorectified landsat data set. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 70(3):313–323Google Scholar
  56. Wemmer C, Kress WJ, Zug G (2004) Smithsonian collaborations in Myanmar: a compilation of projects and activities between 1994–2003. Smithsonian Institution, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  57. Zheng D, Wallin DO, Hao Z (1997) Rates and patterns of landscape change between 1972 and 1988 in the Changbai mountain area of China and North Korea. Landscape Ecol 12(4):241–254. doi: 10.1023/A:1007963324520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melissa Songer
    • 1
  • Myint Aung
    • 2
  • Briony Senior
    • 1
  • Ruth DeFries
    • 3
  • Peter Leimgruber
    • 1
  1. 1.Smithsonian Institution, National Zoological Park, Conservation Ecology CenterFront RoyalUSA
  2. 2.SICAS OfficeYangonMyanmar
  3. 3.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental BiologyColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations