Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 17, Issue 14, pp 3357–3382 | Cite as

Integrating ongoing biodiversity monitoring: potential benefits and methods

  • Pierre-Yves Henry
  • Szabolcs Lengyel
  • Piotr Nowicki
  • Romain Julliard
  • Jean Clobert
  • Tatjana Čelik
  • Bernd Gruber
  • Dirk S. Schmeller
  • Valerija Babij
  • Klaus Henle
Original Paper

Abstract

Halting the loss of biodiversity comes along with the need to quantify biodiversity composition and dynamics at large spatial and temporal scales. Highly standardized, international monitoring networks would be ideal, but they do not exist yet. If we are to assess changes in biodiversity now, combining output available from ongoing monitoring initiatives is the only option. However, integration of biodiversity information across schemes is still very poorly developed. In this paper, we outline practical issues to be considered when planning to combine existing monitoring information. First, we provide an overview of avenues for integration along the four dimensions that characterize a monitoring design: sample size, biological coverage, spatial coverage and temporal coverage. We also emphasize that complementarity in monitoring targets across schemes enables to describe complex processes of biodiversity dynamics, e.g. through relating species traits to the impacts of environmental changes. Second, we review some methods to overcome differences in designs among monitoring schemes, such as site selection, post-stratification and measurement error. Finally, we point out some commonly used statistical methods that are at hand for combining data or parameter estimates. We especially emphasize the possible levels of data integration (raw data, parameter estimates, or effect size estimates), and the largely under-exploited potential of meta-analysis methods and weighted analyses. This contribution aims to bolster the practice and use of integration of ongoing monitoring initiatives for biodiversity assessment.

Keywords

Biodiversity indicator Biodiversity monitoring Biodiversity assessment Conservation Global change Meta-analysis Sampling design Temporal trend 2010 target 

References

  1. Balmford A, Green RE, Jenkins M (2003) Measuring the changing state of nature. Trends Ecol Evol 18:326–330. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00067-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balmford A, Crane P, Dobson AP, Green RE, Mace G (2005a) The 2010 challenge: data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:221–228. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1599 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balmford A, Bennun L, Ten Brink B, Cooper D, Côté IM, Crane P et al (2005b) The Convention on Biological Diversity’s 2010 target. Science 307:212–213. doi:10.1126/science.1106281 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell S, Marzano M, Cent J, Kobierska H, Podjed D, Vandzinskaite D et al (in press) What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity. Biodivers ConservGoogle Scholar
  5. Besbeas P, Freeman SN (2006) Methods for joint inference from panel survey and demographic data. Ecology 87:1138–1145. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1138:MFJIFP]2.0.CO;2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckland ST (2006) Point-transect surveys for songbirds: robust methodologies. Auk 123:345–357. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2006)123[345:PSFSRM]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buckland ST, Magurran AE, Green RE, Fewster RM (2005) Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:243–254. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1589 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butchart SHM, Stattersfield JA, Baillie J, Bennun LA, Stuart SN, Akçakaya HR et al (2005) Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:255–268. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1583 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caughley G, Gunn A (1996) Conservation biology in theory and practice. Blackwell Science, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper HD, Hedges LV (1994) Handbook of research synthesis. Russel Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Côté IM, Gill JA, Gardner TA, Watkinson AR (2005) Measuring coral reef decline through meta-analyses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:385–395. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1591 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Council of the European Communities (1992) EC Habitats Directive. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal of the European Communities, Series L, 206:750. http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/monnat/library. Accessed 14 May 2008
  13. Couvet D, Jiguet F, Julliard R, Levrel H, Teyssèdre A (2008) Enhancing citizen contributions to biodiversity science and public policy. Interdiscip Sci Rev 31:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Danielsen F, Burgess ND, Balmford A (2005) Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodivers Conserv 14:2507–2542. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-8375-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeSante DF, O’Grady DR, Pyle P (1999) Measures of productivity and survival derived from standardized mist-netting are consistent with observed population changes. Bird Study 46:178–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Devictor V, Julliard R, Couvet D, Lee A, Jiguet F (2007a) Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communities. Conserv Biol 21:741–751. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00671.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Devictor V, Godet L, Julliard R, Couvet D, Jiguet F (2007b) Can common species benefit from protected areas? Biol Conserv 139:29–36. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.05.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Devictor V, Julliard R, Clavel J, Jiguet F, Lee A, Couvet D (2008) Functional biotic homogenization of bird communities in disturbed landscapes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:252–261. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00364.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dolédec S, Statzner B, Bournard M (1999) Special traits for future biomonitoring across ecoregions: patterns along a human-impacted river. Freshw Biol 42:737–758. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00509.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donald PF, Sanderson FJ, Burfield IJ, van Bommel FPJ (2006) Further evidence of continent-wide impacts of agricultural intensification on European farmland birds, 1990–2000. Agric Ecosyst Environ 116:189–196. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Donald PF, Sanderson FJ, Burfield IJ, Bierman SM, Gregory RD, Waliczky Z (2007) International conservation policy delivers benefits for birds in Europe. Science 317:810–813. doi:10.1126/science.1146002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dziock F, Henle K, Foeckler F, Follner K, Scholz M (2006) Biological indicator systems in floodplains—a review. Int Rev Hydrobiol 91:271–291. doi:10.1002/iroh.200510885 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elzinga CL, Salzer DW, Willoughby JW, Gibbs JP (2001) Monitoring plant and animal populations: a handbook for field biologists. Blackwell Science, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
  24. EuMon consortium (2006) DaEuMon: a database of animals, plants and habitats monitoring schemes in Europe. http://eumon.ckff.si/. Accessed 14 May 2008
  25. European Environment Agency (2007) Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010: proposal for a first set of indicators to monitor progress in Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://reports.eea.europa.eu. Accessed 14 May 2008
  26. Faith DP, Reid CAM, Hunter J (2004) Integrating phylogenetic diversity, complementarity, and endemism for conservation assessment. Conserv Biol 18:255–261. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00330.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gauthier G, Besbeas P, Lebreton JD, Morgan BJT (2007) Population growth in snow geese: a modeling approach integrating demographic and survey information. Ecology 88:1420–1429. doi:10.1890/06-0953 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Green RE, Balmford A, Crane PR, Mace GM, Reynolds JD, Turner RK (2005) A framework for improved monitoring of biodiversity: responses to the World Summit on Sustainable Development. Conserv Biol 19:56–65. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00289.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gregory RD, van Strien A, Vorisek P, Gmelig Meyling AW, Noble DG, Foppen RPB et al (2005) Developing indicators for European birds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:269–288. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1602 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gurevitch J, Curtis PS, Jones MH (2001) Meta-analysis in ecology. Adv Ecol Res 32:199–247. doi:10.1016/S0065-2504(01)32013-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harvey PH, Pagel M (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2001) The elements of statistical learning. Data mining, inference and prediction. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Hedges LV, Olkin I (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  34. Helmus MR, Bland TJ, Williams CK, Ives AR (2007) Phylogenetic measures of biodiversity. Am Nat 169:E68–E83. doi:10.1086/511334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henle K (2005) Lessons from Europe. In: Lannoo M (ed) Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States species. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  36. Henle K, Schmeller DS (this volume) Biodiversity conservation strategies and monitoring in Europe. Biodivers Conserv (submitted)Google Scholar
  37. Henle K, Alard D, Clitherow J, Cobb P, Firbank L, Kull T et al (2008) Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe—a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 124:60–71. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Henle K, Davies KF, Kleyer M, Margules C, Settele J (2004) Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodivers Conserv 13:207–251. doi:10.1023/B:BIOC.0000004319.91643.9e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Henle K, Dziock F, Foeckler F, Follner K, Husing V, Hettrich A et al (2006) Study design for assessing species environment relationships and developing indicator systems for ecological changes in floodplains—the approach of the RIVA project. Int Rev Hydrobiol 91:292–313. doi:10.1002/iroh.200610886 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Henry P-Y, Jarne P (2007) Marking hard-shelled gastropods: tag loss, impact on life-history traits, and perspectives in biology. Invertebr Biol 126:138–153. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7410.2007.00084.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hochachka WM, Martin K, Doyle F, Krebs CJ (2000) Monitoring vertebrate populations using observational data. Can J Zool 78:521–529. doi:10.1139/cjz-78-4-521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hooten MB, Wikle CK, Dorazio RM, Royle JA (2007) Hierarchical spatiotemporal matrix models for characterizing invasions. Biometrics 63:558–567. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00725.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Houlahan JE, Findlay CS, Meyer AH, Kuzmin SL, Schmidt BR (2001) Global amphibian population declines—reply. Nature 412:500. doi:10.1038/35087661 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hughes JB, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1997) Population diversity: its extent and extinction. Science 278:689–692. doi:10.1126/science.278.5338.689 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jiguet F, Julliard R, Couvet D, Petiau A (2005) Modeling spatial trends in estimated species richness using breeding bird survey data: a valuable tool in biodiversity assessment. Biodivers Conserv 14:3305–3324. doi:10.1007/s10531-004-0448-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Julliard R (2004) Estimating the contribution of survival and recruitment to large scale population dynamics. Anim Biodivers Conserv 27:417–426Google Scholar
  47. Julliard R, Jiguet F, Couvet D (2004a) Common birds facing global changes: what makes a species at risk? Glob Change Biol 10:148–154. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00723.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Julliard R, Jiguet F, Couvet D (2004b) Evidence for the impact of global warming on the long-term population dynamics of common birds. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:S490–S492. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kati V, Devillers P, Dufrêne M, Legakis A, Vokou D, Lebrun P (2004) Testing the value of six taxonomic groups as biodiversity indicators at a local scale. Conserv Biol 18:667–675. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00465.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Krebs CJ, Berteaux D (2006) Problems and pitfalls in relating climate variability to population dynamics. Clim Res 32:143–149. doi:10.3354/cr032143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kull T, Sammul M, Tali K, Lanno K, Henle K (this volume) Necessity and reality of monitoring European vascular plant diversity. Biodivers Conserv (submitted)Google Scholar
  52. Lengyel S, Déri E, Varga Z, Horváth R, Tóthmérész B, Henry P-Y et al (in press, a) Habitat monitoring in Europe: a description of current practices. Biodivers ConservGoogle Scholar
  53. Lengyel S, Kobler A, Kutnar L, Framstad E, Henry P-Y, Babij V et al (in press, b) A review and a framework for the integration of biodiversity monitoring at the habitat level. Biodivers ConservGoogle Scholar
  54. Loh J, Green RE, Ricketts T, Lamoreux J, Jenkins M, Kapos V et al (2005) The Living Planet Index: using species population time series to track trends in biodiversity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:289–295. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1584 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mace GM (2005) A user’s guide to biodiversity indicators. European Academies Science Advisory Council, The Royal Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Sutton N, Kawanishi K, Bailey LL (2005) Improving inferences in population studies of rare species that are detected imperfectly. Ecology 86:1101–1113. doi:10.1890/04-1060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Margurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  58. Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Aha R et al (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Change Biol 12:1969–1976. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01193.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Miller RM, Rodriguez JP, Aniskowicz-Fowler T, Bambaradeniya C, Boles R, Eaton MA et al (2007) National threatened species listing based on IUCN criteria and regional guidelines: current status and future perspectives. Conserv Biol 21:684–696. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00656.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Møller AP, Birkhead TR (1992) A pairwise comparative method as illustrated by copulation frequency in birds. Am Nat 139:644–656. doi:10.1086/285348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Møller AP, Jennions MD (2001) Testing and adjusting for publication bias. Trends Ecol Evol 16:580–586. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02235-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nichols JD, Hines JE (1983) The relationship between harvest and survival rates of mallards: a straightforward approach with partitioned data sets. J Wildl Manage 47:334–348. doi:10.2307/3808506 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nichols JD, Williams BK (2006) Monitoring for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:668–673. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Olsen AR, Sedransk J, Edwards D, Gotway CA, Liggett W, Rathbun S et al (1999) Statistical issues for monitoring ecological and natural resources in the United States. Environ Monit Assess 54:1–45. doi:10.1023/A:1005823911258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Osenberg CW, Sarnelle O, Cooper SD, Holt RD (1999) Resolving ecological questions through meta-analysis: goals, metrics, and models. Ecology 80:1105–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42. doi:10.1038/nature01286 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Parr TW, Ferretti M, Simpson IC, Forsius M, Kovacs-Lang E (2002) Towards a long-term integrated monitoring programme in Europe: network design in theory and practice. Environ Monit Assess 78:253–290. doi:10.1023/A:1019934919140 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pauly D, Watson R (2005) Background and interpretation of the ‘Marine Trophic Index’ as a measure of biodiversity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:415–423. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1597 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pavoine S, Ollier S, Dufour AB (2005) Is the originality of a species measurable? Ecol Lett 8:579–586. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00752.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pereira HM, Cooper HD (2006) Towards the global monitoring of biodiversity change. Trends Ecol Evol 21:123–129. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pettorelli N, Vik JO, Mysterud A, Gaillard JM, Tucker CJ, Stenseth NC (2005) Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends Ecol Evol 20:503–510. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pollock JF (2006) Detecting population declines over large areas with presence-absence, time-to-encounter, and count survey methods. Conserv Biol 20:882–892. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00342.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pons P, Henry P-Y, Gargallo J, Prodon R, Lebreton J-D (2003) Bird survival after fire in Mediterranean shrublands: combining capture-recapture data over several bird species. Popul Ecol 45:187–196. doi:10.1007/s10144-003-0155-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pradel R, Henry P-Y (2007) Potential contributions of capture-recapture to the estimation of population growth rate in restoration projects. Ecoscience 14:432–439. doi:10.2980/1195-6860(2007)14[432:PCOCTT]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Roberts RL, Donald PF, Green RE (2007) Using simple species lists to monitor trends in animal populations: new methods and a comparison with independent data. Anim Conserv 10:332–339. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00117.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rosenstock SS, Anderson DR, Giesen KM, Leukering T, Carter MF (2002) Landbird counting techniques: current practices and an alternative. Auk 119:46–53. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0046:LCTCPA]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roy DB, Rothery P, Brereton T (2007) Reduced-effort schemes for monitoring butterfly populations. J Appl Ecol 44:993–1000. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01340.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schaub M, Gimenez O, Sierro A, Arlettaz R (2007) Use of integrated modeling to enhance estimates of population dynamics obtained from limited data. Conserv Biol 21:945–955. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00743.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schmeller DS, Gruber B, Bauch B, Lanno K, Budrys E, Babij V et al (in press, a) Determination of national conservation responsibilities in regions with multiple political jurisdictions. Biodivers ConservGoogle Scholar
  80. Schmeller DS, Bauch B, Gruber B, Juškaitis R, Budrys E, Babij V et al (in press, b) Determination of conservation priorities in regions with multiple political jurisdictions. Biodivers ConservGoogle Scholar
  81. Schmeller DS, Henry P-Y, Julliard R, Clobert J, Lengyels S, Gruber B, Dziock F, Kull T, Tali K, Bauch B, Kobler A, Déri E, Babij V, Nowicki P, Papastergiadou E, van Swaay CAM, Henle K Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe (submitted) Google Scholar
  82. Statzner B, Bis B, Dolédec S, Usseglio-Polatera P (2001) Perspectives for biomonitoring at large spatial scales: a unified measure for the functional composition of invertebrate communities in European running waters. Basic Appl Ecol 2:73–85. doi:10.1078/1439-1791-00039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stoner C, Caro T, Mduma S, Mlingwa C, Sabuni G, Borner M (2007) Assessment of effectiveness of protection strategies in Tanzania based on a decade of survey data for large herbivores. Conserv Biol 21:635–646. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00705.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Strayer DL (1999) Statistical power of presence-absence data to detect population declines. Conserv Biol 13:1034–1038. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98143.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sutherland WJ, Pullin AS, Dolman PM, Knight TM (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:305–308. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.018 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Teder T, Moora M, Roosaluste E, Zobel K, Partel M, Koljalg U et al (2007) Monitoring of biological diversity: a common-ground approach. Conserv Biol 21:313–317. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00575.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Thomas JA (1995) Why small cold-blooded insects pose different conservation problems to birds in modern landscapes. Ibis 137:S112–S119. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1995.tb08431.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thomas JA (2005) Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:339–357. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1585 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Thomas JA, Telfer MG, Roy DB, Preston CD, Greenwood JJD, Asher J et al (2004) Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303:1879–1881. doi:10.1126/science.1095046 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Van Strien AJ, Plantenga WF, Soldaat LL, Van Swaay CAM, WallisDeVries MF (2008) Bias in phenology assessments based on first appearance data of butterflies. Oecologia 156:227–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. van Swaay CAM, Plate CL, van Strien AJ (2002) Monitoring butterflies in the Netherlands: how to get unbiased indices. Proc Exp Appl Entomol 13:21–27Google Scholar
  92. van Swaay CAM, Nowicki P, Settele J, van Strien AJ (in press) Butterfly Monitoring in Europe—methods, applications and perspectives. Biodivers ConservGoogle Scholar
  93. Yoccoz NG, Nichols JD, Boulinier T (2001) Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 16:446–453. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02205-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Yoccoz NG, Nichols JD, Boulinier T (2003) Monitoring of biological diversity—a response to Danielsen et al. Oryx 37:410. doi:10.1017/S0030605303000747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Webb GJW, Dillon ML, McLean GE, Manolis SC, Ottley B (1990) Monitoring the saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) population in the Northern Territory of Australia. Proc Work Meet IUCN-SSC Crocodile Spec Group 9:329–380Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre-Yves Henry
    • 1
  • Szabolcs Lengyel
    • 2
  • Piotr Nowicki
    • 3
  • Romain Julliard
    • 4
  • Jean Clobert
    • 5
  • Tatjana Čelik
    • 6
  • Bernd Gruber
    • 7
  • Dirk S. Schmeller
    • 5
    • 7
  • Valerija Babij
    • 6
  • Klaus Henle
    • 8
  1. 1.Département Écologie et Gestion de la Biodiversité, UMR 5173 & UMR 7179Muséum National d’Histoire NaturelleParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of EcologyUniversity of DebrecenDebrecenHungary
  3. 3.Institute of Environmental SciencesJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland
  4. 4.Département Écologie et Gestion de la Biodiversité, UMR 7179Muséum National d’Histoire NaturelleParisFrance
  5. 5.Station d’Ecologie Expérimentale du CNRS à MoulisSaint GironsFrance
  6. 6.Jovan Hadži Institute of BiologyScientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Science and ArtsLjubljanaSlovenia
  7. 7.Department of Conservation Biology & Department of Computational Landscape EcologyUFZ – Helmholtz Center for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany
  8. 8.Department of Conservation BiologyUFZ – Helmholtz Center for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations