Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 17, Issue 12, pp 3045–3060 | Cite as

Changes in the distribution area of vascular plants in Flanders (northern Belgium): eutrophication as a major driving force

  • W. Van Landuyt
  • L. Vanhecke
  • I. Hoste
  • F. Hendrickx
  • D. Bauwens
Original Paper"

Abstract

In large parts of Western Europe agricultural intensification after World War II has led to an increased use of fertilisers. The resulting nutrient enrichment (=eutrophication) has a huge impact on the occurrence and distribution of plant species and is one of the main pressures on native plant communities. We used the distribution maps (grid size: 16 km²) of individual plant species, obtained through two consecutive survey projects (1939–1971 and 1972–2004) in Flanders (northern Belgium), to estimate the relative change in their distribution area. The comparison of changes in range size among groups of taxa classified according to habitat preference and Ellenberg indicator values, demonstrated a marked decline in distribution area in species that are characteristic for nutrient-poor habitats. To assess geographic patterns in the change of species assemblages, we calculated the mean Ellenberg N- and R-values for every grid cell during each of both survey periods. Differences between these values were analysed in relation to soil type and estimates of atmospheric nitrogen deposition. The largest shifts in Ellenberg N-values, reflecting a decline of species from nutrient-poor conditions and/or an increase of nitrophilous plants, were observed in areas with nutrient-poor, acid sandy soils and high nitrogen deposition rates. Hence, shifts in species composition were modulated by geographic variation in soil type and levels of nitrogen deposition. As the levels of atmospheric nitrogen deposition are still very high in Flanders, it is likely that species from nutrient-poor habitats such as heathlands, will further decline in the near future.

Keywords

Vascular plants Atlas data Change Nitrogen deposition Eutrophication Ellenberg Belgium 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank David Aplin, Quintin Groom of the National Botanic Garden of Belgium and two anonymous reviewers for commenting on drafts of this paper and David Aplin and Quintin Groom for correction of the English grammar. We also thank all the volunteer botanists who gathered the data on plant distribution in the field.

Supplementary material

10531_2008_9415_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (51 kb)
MOESM1 (PDF 51 kb)

References

  1. Aerts R (1993) Competition between dominant plant species in heathlands. In: Aerts R, Heil GW (eds) Heathlands: patterns and processes in a changing Environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous (2003) Europe’s environment: the third assessment. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  3. Aplin DM (2001) The effects of temporal heterogeneity in nutrient supply on four grassland species. PhD Thesis, University of Sussex, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobbink R, Hornung M, Roelofs JGM (1998) The effects of air-borne nitrogen pollutants on species diversity in natural and semi-natural European vegetation. J Ecol 86:717–738. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.8650717.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chandler CR (1995) Practical considerations in the use of simultaneous inference for multiple tests. Anim Behav 49:524–527. doi:10.1006/anbe.1995.0069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crosby AW (1972) The Columbian exchange. Greenwood, WestportGoogle Scholar
  7. De Blust G (2004) Heide en heidebeheer. In: Hermy M, De Blust G (eds) Natuurbeheer. Davidsfonds, LeuvenGoogle Scholar
  8. Deckers B, Kerselaers E, Gulinck H et al (2005) Long-term spatio-temporal dynamics of a hedgerow network landscape in Flanders, Belgium. Environ Conserv 32:20–29. doi:10.1017/S0376892905001840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Decleer K, Breevaart A, Maes D et al (2005) Terreinverwerving. In: Dumortier M et al (eds) Natuurrapport 2005. Toestand van de natuur in Vlaanderen: cijfers voor het beleid. Mededeling van het Instituut voor Natuurbehoud nr 24, BrusselGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R et al (1991) Zeigerwerte von Planzen in Mitteleuropa. Scr Geobot 18:1–248Google Scholar
  11. Haines-Young R, Barr CJ, Firbank LG et al (2003) Changing landscapes, habitats and vegetation diversity across Great Britain. J Environ Manage 67:267–281. doi:10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00179-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoffmann M, Vanhecke L, Zwaenepoel A (1996) Bolboschoenus maritimus (L.) Palla en Schoenoplectus (Reichb.) Palla in de getijdenzone van Zeeschelde, Rupel, Dijle en Beneden-Nete. Dumortiera 64–65:2–8Google Scholar
  13. Hoste I, Verloove F (2001) De opgang van C4-grassen (Poaceae, Paniceae) in de snel evoluerende onkruidvegetaties in maisakkers tussen Brugge en Gent (Vlaanderen, België). Dumortiera 78:2–11Google Scholar
  14. Lambinon J, Delvosalle L, Duvigneaud J (2004) Nouvelle Flore de la Belgique, du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, du Nord de la France et des régions voisines (Ptéridophytes et Spermatophytes). Jardin botanique national de Belgique, MeiseGoogle Scholar
  15. Leigh GJ (2004) The world’s greatest fix. A history of nitrogen and agriculture. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. McNeill JR (2001) Something new under the Sun. An environmental history of the twentieth-century world. W W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap (2004) Milieubeleidsplan 2003–2007. Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap, BrusselGoogle Scholar
  18. Nixon S, Trent Z, Marcuello C, Lallana C (2003) Europe’s water: an indicator-based assessment. European Environment Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  19. Preston CD, Telfer MG, Arnold HR et al (2002a) The changing flora of the UK. DEFRA, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Preston CD, Telfer MG, Arnold HR, Rothery P (2002b) The changing flora of Britain, 1930–1999. In: Preston CD, Pearman DA, Dines TA (eds) New Atlas of the British & Irish Flora. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Rich TCG, Smith PA (1996) Botanical recording, distribution maps and species frequency. Watsonia 21:155–167Google Scholar
  22. Rich TCG, Woodruff ER (1992) Recording bias in botanical surveys. Watsonia 19:73–95Google Scholar
  23. Rich TCG, Woodruff ER (1996) Changes in the vascular plant floras of England and Scotland between 1930–1960 and 1978–1988: the BSBI Monitoring Scheme. Biol Conserv 75:217–229. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(95)00077-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Richards JF (2003) The unending frontier. An environmental history of the early modern world. University of California Press, Berkely/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Roelofs JGM, Schuurkes JAAR, Smits AJM (1984) Impact of acidification and eutrophication on macrophyte communities in soft waters. 2. Experimental studies. Aquat Bot 18:389–411. doi:10.1016/0304-3770(84)90059-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schuurkes JAAR, Elbers MA, Gudden JJF et al (1987) Effects of simulated ammonium-sulfate and sulfuric-acid rain on acidification, water-quality and flora of small-scale soft-water systems. Aquat Bot 28:199–226. doi:10.1016/0304-3770(87)90001-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Simmons IG (1989) Changing the face of the earth, culture, environment history. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Smart SM, Clarke RT, Van de Poll HM et al (2003) National-scale vegetation change across Britain; an analysis of sample-based surveillance data from the Countryside Surveys of 1990 and 1998. J Environ Manage 67:239–254. doi:10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00177-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smart SM, Bunce RGH, Marrs R et al (2005) Large-scale changes in the abundance of common higher plant species across Britain between 1978, 1990 and 1998 as a consequence of human activity: tests of hypothesised changes in trait representation. Biol Conserv 124:355–371. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smil V (2001) Enriching the earth. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Stevens CJ, Dise NB, Mountford JO, Gowing DJ (2004) Impact of nitrogen deposition on the species richness of grasslands. Science 303:1876–1879. doi:10.1126/science.1094678 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stevens CJ, Dise NB, Gowing DJ, Mountford JO (2006) Loss of forb diversity in relation to nitrogen deposition in the UK: regional trends and potential controls. Glob Change Biol 12:1823–1833. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01217.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stieperaere H, Fransen K (1982) Standaardlijst van de Belgische vaatplanten, met aanduiding van hun zeldzaamheid en socio-oecologische groep. Dumortiera 22:1–41Google Scholar
  34. Tamis WLM, Van’t Zelfde M, Van Der Meijden R et al (2005) Ecological interpretation of changes in the Dutch flora in the 20th century. Biol Conserv 125:211–224. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.03.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Telfer MG, Preston CD, Rothery P (2002) A general method for measuring relative change in range size from biological atlas data. Biol Conserv 107:99–109. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00050-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Turner BL, Clark WC, Kates RW et al (1990) The earth as transformed by human action. Global and regional changes in the biosphere over the past 300 years. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. van den Berg LJL, Tomassen HBM, Roelofs JGM et al (2005) Effects of nitrogen enrichment on coastal dune grassland: a mesocosm study. Environ Pollut 138:77–85. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.02.024 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Gijseghem D, Buysse M, Bellon J et al (2002) Vermesting. In: Van Steertegem M (ed) Milieu- en Natuurrapport Vlaanderen: Thema’s. MIRA-T 2002. Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij en Garant Uitgevers, Antwerpen/ApeldoornGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Gijseghem D, Lauwers L, Sanders A et al (2003) Vermesting. In: Van Steertegem M (ed) Milieu- en Natuurrapport Vlaanderen: Thema’s. MIRA-T 2003. Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij en Lannoo, LeuvenGoogle Scholar
  40. Vanhecke L (1976) Nieuwe gegevens over de verspreiding van enige water- en moerasplanten in de maritieme polders. Dumortiera 5:3–14Google Scholar
  41. Vanhecke L, Charlier G, Verelst L (1981) Landschappen in vlaanderen vroeger en nu: van groene armoede naar grijze overvloed. Nationale Plantentuin van België, MeiseGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Landuyt W, Hoste I, Vanhecke L et al (2006a) Atlas van de Flora van Vlaanderen en het Brussels Gewest. Instituut voor natuur- en bosonderzoek, Nationale Plantentuin van België & Flo.Wer, BrusselGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Landuyt W, Vanhecke L, Hoste I et al (2006b) Verzameling en verwerking van de basisgegevens. In: Van Landuyt W (ed) Atlas van de Flora van Vlaanderen en het Brussels Gewest. Instituut voor Natuurbehoud, Nationale Plantentuin van België & Flo.Wer, BrusselGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Landuyt W, Vanhecke L, Hoste I et al (2006c) Rode Lijst van de vaatplanten van Vlaanderen en het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest. In: Van Landuyt W (ed) Atlas van de Flora van Vlaanderen en het Brussels Gewest. Instituut voor Natuurbehoud, Nationale Plantentuin van België & Flo.Wer, BrusselGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Rompaey E (1943) Cartes floristiques. Bull Soc R Bot Belg 75:48–56Google Scholar
  46. Van Rompaey E, Delvosalle L (1972) Atlas van de Belgische en Luxemburgse Flora Pteridofyten en Spermatofyten. Nationale Plantentuin van België, MeiseGoogle Scholar
  47. Walker KJ, Preston CD (2006) Ecological predictors of extinction risk in the Flora of Lowland England, UK. Biodivers Conserv 15:1913–1942. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-4313-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Van Landuyt
    • 1
  • L. Vanhecke
    • 2
  • I. Hoste
    • 2
  • F. Hendrickx
    • 3
  • D. Bauwens
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO)BrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.National Botanic Garden of BelgiumMeiseBelgium
  3. 3.Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Biology DepartmentGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations